[browardchad]

The conclusion is well-supported by your opinion. It's not supported by the level of facts required to generate a federal investigation of a state agency, nor does it rise to the level of evidence in a courtroom.

Unless, of course, you're an advocate of a police state, where folks can generate investigations against anyone they wish, simply based on "suspicions."

[DJ MacWoW]

Unless, of course, you're an advocate of a police state, where folks can generate investigations against anyone they wish, simply based on "suspicions."

So now any country that enforces their laws and Constitution is a police state? LOLOLOL!!!!

[edge919]

Unless, of course, you're an advocate of a police state, where folks can generate investigations against anyone they wish, simply based on "suspicions."

Congress has a reputation for generating investigations, many based on less suspicion than surrounding Obama's forgery.

[lucysmom]

Unless, of course, you're an advocate of a police state, where folks can generate investigations against anyone they wish, simply based on "suspicions."

"Be careful what you pray for; you just may get it."

[butterdezillion]

It is supported by multiple official, double-checked statements from Hawaii officials, Hawaii law, OIP Opinion letters, DOH Administrative rules, and posted birth certificates.

If that’s not solid evidence, then what would you consider solid?

And how do you feel about the fact that the FBI told me three times that they don’t investigate document fraud? Or the ombudsman’s response that they can’t investigate because there are crimes involved?