[NoGrayZone]

"I really don’t understand,if one candidate was ineligible and clearly fraudulent why no new election."

I think ALL of us are just grasping at straws here. There is nothing in the Constitution, that I know of anyway, that states what we the people should do in the case of a fraudulent election.

It does cover what should happen if POTUS can no longer "perform" as POTUS, but nothing about a usurper.

[rodguy911]

Thanks much,looks like a comment that was made about the Surpemes deciding may be the case.

[Windflier]

There is nothing in the Constitution, that I know of anyway, that states what we the people should do in the case of a fraudulent election.

As well as I can determine in consulting my desk top copy of the Constitution, Amendment XX, Section 3 may provide an answer to that question:

"...if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified;..."