#209 -> #4 (me) I made a response to nhm about child abuse and neglect. I posted this comment after reading the article and the first few posts; i.e., nhm's post #4 #214 -> #219 (you) You hammered me for things I never said and for some reason I have yet to understand. #219 -> #210 (me) I made remarks to gracesdad that involved the term ADD which by the way was inappropriate. You were NOT on this thread line. #220 -> #214 (me) I asked for clarification confused about your remarks in #214 #224 -> #220 (you) You inject the term ADD into our thread line and confirmed that your leading accusations were directed at me. #233 -> #224 (me) I'm still confused as to why your bludgeoning me, so I attempt to explain myself and ask you to stop twisting my words. #237 -> #233 (you) Credit to your persistence, you continue on your crusade and state: "You brought up the ADD, & you can't seem to get things correctly." #246 -> #237 (me) Still unsure of where you're coming from, I make the comment fully aware of my ADD remark to someone else: "You injected ADD into our conversion, not me." #259 -> #246 (you) And with the hammer labeled ADD at your side, you've concluded: "Hey there it is for all to see!! You brought it up not me word twister."
Don't try to twist it please. I can post to anything I want to. I happen to agree with much of what you said in fact. This child did not have to die, a grandparent or someone could have taken the child.
However slynx's daughter nor slynx deserved those mean remarks made at her or her daughter. Spin all you want. Its all there for anyone to read. You did it first. I stand by my posts and I happen to be right. If you can't face that then you can't read.