Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Free Republic Purge: Conservative Web Site Bans Giuliani Supporters
NY Observer ^ | Published: May 24, 2007 | by Rebecca Sinderbrand

Posted on 05/26/2007 1:49:34 PM PDT by Eurotwit

A few weeks ago – in between Hillary Clinton’s official entry into the presidential race and the first Republican primary debate of the cycle – the fiery online conservative forum Free Republic marked a decade in operation as one of the premier online forums for right-wing political discussion.

It also experienced one of the biggest internal battles to rock the site since the 2000 election of George W. Bush -- a tumultuous campaign year that nearly tore the site apart, as its founder and chief administrator first cleansed commenting ranks of Bush supporters, then, later, rallied to his support.

At the heart of the latest controversy: the fight over the conservative bona fides of Rudy Giuliani.

Over the past few weeks, chaos has reigned in the “Freeper” community as members sympathetic to the former mayor's candidacy claim to have suffered banishment from the site. They were victimized, they say, by a wave of purges designed to weed out any remaining support for the Giuliani campaign on the popular conservative web forum. Another significant chunk of commenters have migrated away from the controversial site over the action, according to a number of former site members and conservative bloggers who have been tracking the situation.

In a plaintive post on the blog “Sweetness & Light,” exiled commenter Steve Gilbert, who says he does not support the former mayor’s campaign, blasted the site’s new “anti-Giuliani, anti-abortion jihad.” Since George W. Bush was elected president, he wrote, “there haven’t been any large scale [Free Republic] purges to speak of – until now.”

The fight began one month ago, when site founder Jim Robinson posted an anti-Giuliani manifesto titled: “Giuliani as the GOP presidential nominee would be a dagger in the heart of the conservative movement.” Then the virtual ax started to swing. Longtime posters to the freewheeling discussion threads, used to serious no-holds-barred web etiquette, were still stunned by the intensity of the anti-Rudy activity; conservative blogs buzzed with the development.

“Jim Robinson has been going on a tear demonizing Rudy Giuliani, because Rudy (agreeing with the vast majority of Americans), is personally opposed to abortions on a moral level…” complained a user on the GOPUSA Web site. “Anyone who posts any support for Giuliani at the site, if it's at all forceful, will be banned.”

(“Normally, we don't allow complaints about other conservative forums,” chided the moderator, but “…because it is being discussed all over the Internet, I'll make an exception.”)

Just a few months ago, Rudy Giuliani placed second in an early Free Republic straw poll; now, his support on the site has been virtually eliminated. “After the ‘April Purge,’ I don't think there are any Rudybots left around here,” noted Free Republic commenter “upchuck” in one recent post. “And if there are, they're not posting pro-Rudy stuff :).”

The forums weren’t the only venue for the Free Republic’s new antagonism toward Mr. Giuliani, which coincided with a wave of comments expressing similar sentiments from other corners of the conservative movement. A few days after Mr. Giuliani’s equivocal Roe v. Wade comments at the Republican presidential debate on May 3, a new “STOP RUDY NOW News & Information Thread” was featured on the site, and a newly-created stand-alone category debuted via a link from the homepage: “The Giuliani Truth File.” (So far this campaign season, Mr. Giuliani is the only candidate – Republican or Democratic – to be singled out for that level of scrutiny from the Free Republic.)

Why Rudy? Why now? Some conservative bloggers and former commenters contacted for their view of the continuing controversy say they believe that site founder Jim Robinson holds ideologically middling Republicans like Mr. Giuliani responsible for the GOP’s congressional loss and current woes. (They asked that their names be kept out of this story for fear of antagonizing the famously frisky site regulars.)

Others claim that the former mayor’s top-tier status is spurring frantic site administrators into action. Finally, one popular theory holds that the Free Republic is secretly hoping for another Clinton presidency that would send its Alexa ratings soaring back to levels it hasn’t experienced since its halcyon days of the Clinton impeachment, when a since-soured relationship with blog pioneer Matt Drudge and overwhelming anti-Clinton sentiment in Republican ranks helped make Free Republic one of the hottest Web sites in the nation. It hasn't recovered that luster since the Bush administration took over.

“It’s not a conspiracy theory, it’s an observation,” said one blogger, who describes himself as a half-hearted Mitt Romney supporter. “They’ve still got a brand name that means something, but they’re not what they were in terms of real-world impact. A Hillary presidency would get them there.”

Robinson himself could not be reached for comment, but his original post laid out his case against Mr. Giuliani – a graphics-heavy presentation of some of the former mayor’s most damning moderate quotes in mainstream media venues, along with a color-coded report card tracking his less-than-doctrinaire positions on abortion, immigration, gays and guns.

Robinson, it should be noted, famously blasted George W. Bush’s presidential candidacy back in 2000, before a dramatic late-campaign about-face that saw him emerge as one of the GOP ticket’s biggest supporters. But whether or not Free Republic experiences a similar election-year shift this cycle, the site’s current campaign is spreading a dangerous primary-season meme of Rudy Giuliani as big-city liberal – and turning one of the most influential web forums in conservatism into an exclusive gathering place for those who share that view.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bugzapper; byebyerinos; freepicide; goodriddance; popcorntime; rinowhine; springcleaning; wambulance; whiners
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 1,421-1,422 next last
To: Eurotwit
Any publicity for the site is good publicity. :-)


461 posted on 05/27/2007 6:48:35 AM PDT by cgbg (A cigar a day keeps the liberals away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elfman2
The only poster I followed who was recently banned was pukindog.

He had some interesting posts about the lovelorn astronaut where he defended the male astronaut (and spoke as though he knew him). Pukindog was a Romney supporter, so I guess that dosen't clearly fit into the template of this article.
462 posted on 05/27/2007 6:52:32 AM PDT by cgbg (A cigar a day keeps the liberals away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: loreldan

Well we’ve got our eye on you so WATCH IT! :-)


463 posted on 05/27/2007 6:54:43 AM PDT by Valin (History takes time. It is not an instant thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit
I don't know if anyone else commented on this

A few weeks ago – in between Hillary Clinton’s official entry into the presidential race and the first Republican primary debate of the cycle – the fiery online conservative forum Free Republic marked a decade in operation as one of the premier online forums for right-wing political discussion.

HORRAY FOR US!

464 posted on 05/27/2007 6:56:34 AM PDT by Valin (History takes time. It is not an instant thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam; Eurotwit
Regarding the definition of Yankee, I always found this one amusing:

To foreigners, a Yankee is an American.
To Americans, a Yankee is a Northerner.
To Northerners, a Yankee is an Easterner.
To Easterners, a Yankee is a New Englander.
To New Englanders, a Yankee is a Vermonter.
And in Vermont, a Yankee is somebody who eats pie for breakfast.

465 posted on 05/27/2007 6:59:38 AM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies]

To: Valin

BTTT...


466 posted on 05/27/2007 7:00:15 AM PDT by LowOiL (Paul wrote, "Let love be without hypocrisy. Abhor what is evil" (Rom. 12:9))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit

Testing! Testing! I am a Giuliani supporter. 10-9-8.....


467 posted on 05/27/2007 7:03:47 AM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
Of those three, the only one I ever crossed swords with was Howlin. And my many "discussions" with her convinced me that she was, in fact, a liberal pretending to be a conservative. I've come to recognize the MO over the years--they always support the president--even when he's dead wrong on something--but never the key conservative issues. Especially on social issues, they're always on the wrong side and use the exact same terminology to attack social conservatives as the left does.

You and I are on the same page on this. I tired of her trolling thread after thread. After her role in the so-called "Rathergate" affair, I feared that she had achieved "untouchable" status around here and would never go away. I am pleased to have been wrong.

But I suspect that she'll be back somehow. I'll keep an eye out for someone throwing the "dimbulb" insult around and notify management immediately. :)

APf

468 posted on 05/27/2007 7:04:47 AM PDT by APFel (Regnum Nostrum Crescit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]

To: Nam Vet

Glad you had a great reunion. Thanks again for your service. I saw the thread once but don’t know where it is. Maybe someone else has it handy. I don’t even know whom we lost.


469 posted on 05/27/2007 7:16:21 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

He had his flaws but he stood up for what he believed.

I kinda suspect that one reason he left is that he saw the writing on the wall as far as Thompson was concerned.

Pukin claimed up and down that he would never enter the race. I suspect he’s a guy who doesn’t like to be proven wrong. :)


470 posted on 05/27/2007 7:17:58 AM PDT by JRochelle (Just say no to the slick crazy bully.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

Reagan signed that bill because he thought the borders would be secure. In fact his recently published diaries attest to that.

If the borders would have been secured then, amnesty would have been worth it.


471 posted on 05/27/2007 7:22:04 AM PDT by JRochelle (Just say no to the slick crazy bully.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies]

To: durasell
Are you getting saucy with me Bernaise?
472 posted on 05/27/2007 7:22:56 AM PDT by investigateworld ( Abortion stops a beating heart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

I suspect he’s a guy who doesn’t like to be proven wrong. :)

As opposed too....? :-)


473 posted on 05/27/2007 7:26:12 AM PDT by Valin (History takes time. It is not an instant thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 470 | View Replies]

To: sarasmom; EternalVigilance

Howlin was the meanest freeper I ever came across. I knew to stay away from her. If you went to her comments during the last month, most of her posts were just plain mean, always directed at another freeper, like EV. :)


474 posted on 05/27/2007 7:26:33 AM PDT by JRochelle (Just say no to the slick crazy bully.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies]

To: elfman2
I reduction in posters (I don't think it could be classified as a purge) there was. Rudibots misrepresenting/defending him got zotted. I didn't know about it until today I did a little searching on Rudi threads and found some posters warned and warned again.

Some of it was sneaky stuff like Jim giving out warnings and posters continuing to defend him while addressing it to other members (Like Jim can't read)

Some may have gotten the boot a little early but they obviously pissed him off and I can't blame him.

This site is for conservatives and by all measures Rudi isn't one of them, IMO defending Rudi is up there with supporting Hillery.

Good riddance, let's move on and get behind the conservatives, principals are all we have and I'm not willing to sacrifice them by backing a RINO especially in the primaries.

In closing I have only one thing left to say, Run Fred Run!!!

475 posted on 05/27/2007 7:26:40 AM PDT by #1CTYankee (That's right, I have no proof. So what of it??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: spectre
” I’m going to read in between Rudy’s lines, to see if he actually verbally supports and commits to stay the course in Iraq till we win.”

Rooty has no intention of fighting the terrorists beyond the way Clinton did!

He is just another NE liberal puke that thinks its a police matter.

This is a very long article but at the end spells out Rooty’s real plan...

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/013/482uqcqf.asp?pg=1

476 posted on 05/27/2007 7:29:39 AM PDT by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super Walmart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: theymakemesick

Yes he does. Bacon being banned is good reason for revolution.


477 posted on 05/27/2007 7:30:03 AM PDT by nativist (Weigh into them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: restornu

No they were good people who were being decieved into thinking that Rudy was the only way to beat Hillary.

Fear of Hillary is what did most of these people in.


478 posted on 05/27/2007 7:32:17 AM PDT by JRochelle (Just say no to the slick crazy bully.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 429 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
..was just joking anyway, doug

But your name did come to mind when I thought about making a film about "The Thread" : - )

479 posted on 05/27/2007 7:35:05 AM PDT by WalterSkinner ( ..when there is any conflict between God and Caesar -- guess who loses?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 469 | View Replies]

To: Coldwater Creek

Will he come back as pukin dog or under a new name?


480 posted on 05/27/2007 7:35:07 AM PDT by JRochelle (Just say no to the slick crazy bully.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 1,421-1,422 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson