Skip to comments.
DU Tactics at FreeRepublic
FreeRepublic
| 4/3/07
| Reaganesque
Posted on 04/03/2007 7:24:18 PM PDT by Reaganesque
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560, 561-580, 581-600 ... 841-852 next last
To: DCPatriot
Oh, I meant to remind you, given that this forum largely chose Alan Keyes as their presidential candidate in 2000, I’m not terribly concerned that this place represents the real world. Far from it. And lately that’s something to be thankful for.
561
posted on
04/04/2007 11:05:09 AM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons' pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
To: stockstrader
Interesting use of the term brownshirts. If anyone truly has a fear of brownshirtsJulieAnnie should be the LAST PERSON they should ever support!!!....lol
You'd think, wouldn't you.
In addition to his leftwing ideology (Brady Bunch leader, Xlinton assault weapons ban conspirator, NARAL Champion of Choice), Rudi is also the most autocratic Republican candidate since Lincoln himself.
Both Lincoln and FDR were these same kinds of autocratic personalities. And the Constitution suffered badly from both. A forum which defends liberty and reveres the Constitution is not the place for such candidates.
I wouldn't compare Rudi to Hitler or Mussolini. The one he really reminds me of is Goering, right down to the furs, feathered boas, jewelry and the rest. It is quite striking if you've read much about Goering, particularly during the war years when his personality flaws and sexual identity issues were given full rein.
To: Corin Stormhands
Isn’t it wise to know your enemy?
563
posted on
04/04/2007 11:05:57 AM PDT
by
Fierce Allegiance
(One fish, two fish, I want to go catch bluefish.)
To: stockstrader
But the site owner doesn’t endorse or encourage third party talk so be careful or some of the whiny men (ahem, I’m using that term loosely given their delicate sensibilities) will tell on you.
564
posted on
04/04/2007 11:06:24 AM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons' pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
To: George W. Bush
The Constitution suffered because of Lincoln? Huh, the things you learn on Free Republic. /s
565
posted on
04/04/2007 11:07:18 AM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons' pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
To: Fawn
There are 2 types of Conservatives. Financial and Social. And interestingly enough, those of us who are Fiscal Conservatives have been forced to compromise BIG TIME in the past 8 years.
But ask a socio-con to compromise and what happens?
566
posted on
04/04/2007 11:07:42 AM PDT
by
Wormwood
(Future Former Freeper)
To: mkjessup; Jim Robinson; Fierce Allegiance; Peach
Come on guyz.....
The LOL comment was to my posting of Daffy Duck, when Peach lamented about how FR was credited with taking down Dan Rather, but now..couldn't take down Daffy Duck.
Peach in no way is filled with mirth over the seemingly longer Freepathons.
We all wish that graphic would turn yellow tomorrow and go away a day later. ;^)
567
posted on
04/04/2007 11:08:17 AM PDT
by
DCPatriot
("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
To: Fawn
There are 2 types of Conservatives. Financial and Social. I know of few people who are 100% on both. Then there are LOTS MORE THAN TWO!!! geeez...lol
568
posted on
04/04/2007 11:08:22 AM PDT
by
stockstrader
("Where government advances--and it advances relentlessly--freedom is imperiled"-Janice Rogers Brown)
To: Peach
this forum largely chose Alan Keyes as their presidential candidate in 2000 I wasn't a regular participant here in 2000. However, I assume that you are joking. Right?
To: stockstrader
Let's see here, Libertarian candidated got 13 million votes in the 2006 election. THRITEEN MILLION!!Got a link for that?
570
posted on
04/04/2007 11:08:52 AM PDT
by
NeoCaveman
(The Hunt for Fred November)
To: Elyse
The link doesn't come up. And who's the bearded guy in their "symbol" (their equivalent to FR's white star with red on one side and blue on the other, at a diagonal)?
It types "The requested discussion could not be found."
571
posted on
04/04/2007 11:08:59 AM PDT
by
Jedi Master Pikachu
( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
To: My2Cents
Because of my public support here for Rudy Giuliani, I'm surprised I haven't been banned yet.Here we go with the martyr complex nonsense again. NOBODY has been banned from here for being a Rudy fan. Not one person.
So, I'll save the Mods the work of monitoring my posts for some "banning offense," and simply ask that they delete my account at FreeRepublic. I don't want to be associated with this site any longer.
The overall conservatism of this site just went up. I almost hope they leave your account intact just to piss you off.
572
posted on
04/04/2007 11:09:07 AM PDT
by
jmc813
(The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
To: Fawn
There are more than those two types. Like I said will vote for someone that isn’t just perfect, but on the right of Rudy and embraces a better past of conservative ideas.
If we can do that, it would be great.
573
posted on
04/04/2007 11:09:14 AM PDT
by
dforest
(Fighting the new liberal Conservatism. The Left foot in the GOP door.)
To: Fierce Allegiance
You seem to know them in the Biblical sense.
574
posted on
04/04/2007 11:09:18 AM PDT
by
Corin Stormhands
(http://www.virginiaisforrudy.com * http://wardsmythe.com * http://www.rudyblogs.com)
To: Wormwood
That's it in a nutshell, Wormwood.
Social moderates are not welcome here.
575
posted on
04/04/2007 11:09:31 AM PDT
by
DCPatriot
("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
To: NeoCaveman
just google it,,,,,I’ve gotta run now. If you can’t find it, I’ll find it.
576
posted on
04/04/2007 11:10:33 AM PDT
by
stockstrader
("Where government advances--and it advances relentlessly--freedom is imperiled"-Janice Rogers Brown)
To: EveningStar; Peach
I wasn't a regular participant here in 2000. However, I assume that you are joking. Right? No. She's not joking.
577
posted on
04/04/2007 11:10:39 AM PDT
by
Corin Stormhands
(http://www.virginiaisforrudy.com * http://wardsmythe.com * http://www.rudyblogs.com)
To: DCPatriot
Social moderates are not welcome here.That's been spelled out fairly plainly to me for some time now.
578
posted on
04/04/2007 11:11:19 AM PDT
by
Wormwood
(Future Former Freeper)
To: DCPatriot
Pure tripe. The record is out there, and your lame attempt to cover over it isn’t playing well.
579
posted on
04/04/2007 11:11:22 AM PDT
by
Fierce Allegiance
(One fish, two fish, I want to go catch bluefish.)
To: Peach
The point is that Rudy's support on FR is VERY LOW and the vast majority of FReepers understand that Rudy is VERY LIBERAL. So, it should not come as a huge surprise to Rudyites here that he is being criticized.
Havent you noticed how most of the nastiest posters who pretend to be perfect conservatives dont ever support candidates who have actually announced or could actually win?
The fact that Fred Thompson hasn't announced doesn't mean he's not running.
As far as Hunter goes, I admit it is a long shot; however, his poll numbers are about where Clinton's were in 91 and Carter's were in 75.
580
posted on
04/04/2007 11:11:35 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560, 561-580, 581-600 ... 841-852 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson