Posted on 12/07/2006 7:16:54 AM PST by Responsibility2nd
Mary Cheneys pregnancy poses problems not just for her child, but also for all Americans. Her action repudiates traditional values and sets an appalling example for young people at a time when father absence is the most pressing social problem facing the nation. With 37 percent of American children born to fatherless families, Mary Cheney is contributing to a trend that is detrimental to all Americans who will live with the ramifications of millions of children whose anger and frustration at not knowing their father will be felt in the public schools and communities of our nation.
Mary Cheney is among that burgeoning group of adult women over age 20 that are driving the trend of women who dont want a man in the picture, but want to have a baby. These older women are pushing out-of-wedlock birth statistics higher and higher. At a time when teen births and teen abortions are declining dramatically, older women are having more un-wed births and more abortions, including repeat abortions (indicating that they are using abortion as birth control).
Well-educated, professional Mary Cheney is flying in the face of the accumulated wisdom of the top experts who agree that the very best family structure for a childs well-being is a married mom and dad family. Her child will have all the material advantages it will need, but it will still encounter the emotional devastation common to children without fathers.
One Georgia high school principal reported, We have too many young men and women from single-mother families that dont have the role models at home to teach them how to deal with adversity and handle responsibility. Theyve seen their mom work 60 hours a week just to put food on the table; they end up fending for themselves.
When fatherless children get to be teens, the girls tend to start looking for love in all the wrong places and the boys tend to find as their role model the bad-boy celebrities of MTV, NFL and NBA.
As they grow older, fatherless children tend to have trouble dealing with male authority figures. Too often children in single-mother households end up angry at their absent fathers and resentful of the mother who has had to be a father figure, too. Typically, the boys who have a love-hate relationship with their mother end up hating all women. Numerous of them look for vulnerable women where they can act out their anger and be in control.
Mary Cheneys action sets an example that is detrimental for mothers with less financial resources who will start down an irrevocable path into poverty that tends to be generational children in households without a father tend to themselves have unwed births later in life. Experts from both the left and the right cite a disastrous litany of negative outcomes that are predictable when a child grows up in a fatherless family. Such children tend to get involved in drugs, alcohol abuse, and delinquency; they tend to drop out of school and have teen pregnancies. An assistant principal in a Junior High School said that many of the behavioral problems that teachers face in the classroom stem from households without a fathers influence.
Marys pregnancy is an in-your-face action countering the Bush Administrations pro-family, pro-marriage and pro-life policies. She continues to repudiate the work to which her father has devoted his life. Mary has repeatedly said that studies show that children only need a loving home. Her statement is incomplete because the experts agree that for the well-being of children, they desperately need a married father and a mother.
All those people who talk about doing what is best for our children need to get back to the basics: children need a married mom and dad. Children can do without a lot of the trimmings of childhood, but nothing can replace a home where the mother and dad love each other enough to commit for a lifetime and are absolutely crazy about their kids enough to be willing to sacrifice their own needs to see that their children get the very best.
"It's now a real issue that WILL cost the GOP votes--maybe millions of them--if they don't get their act together."
I think the RNC and GOP suits are so larded with homosexuals and their supporters (more supporters) that it's a lost cause. They want to shove it down our throats even if it costs elections.
I hope I am proved wrong.
Perposterous.
You are naive. It's kinda cute.
You probably don't know them as well as I did....
Yes, gay people marching, by default, MUST have nudity and public sex. : rolls eyes :
Do you actually know any gay people?
You also completely ignored my arguement, but that's typical. You can't respond to it logically, better to just ignore it.
Me three, I wonder if Hillary will waltz easily back into the White House.
It happens, and you are incredibly naive to pretend that a gay parade and public debauchery are two separate and coincidental things.
You also completely ignored my arguement, but that's typical.
You have yet to offer anything resembling an argument.
Yes, I do.
...and again, I'll reiterate my position.
I'm not afraid of leftist goons, my government, liberals, Islamo-Nazis. It's liberating....try it sometime.
He's not naive.
Check out Zombietime.com sometime.
I think San Francisco has a law requiring fat ugly nude people must attend gay parades.
Turn the other cheek, yeah, yeah, yeah; some like to cull things to suit their own ends (and no, I am not pointing at you)
As a Christian, I have a moral obligation to defend those who cannot defend themselves. In the world today, the predators wear the cloak of Islam.
My point was that neither of us knows how well we knew the lesbians in our life. And we also know how meaningful anecdotal information is. I still think it's a stretch to assume a lesbian will automatically put her career ahead of her children.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.