To: discostu
That is the purest BS and you know it.
If you don't you are simply intentionally unaware or worse.
No Knocks are for the prevention of destruction of evidence and to remove the opportunity of persons with a predilection for violence to access firearms of destroy that evidence.
The rules for execution are available to you. Read them and be aware that ignorance is a danger to us all.
54 posted on
11/22/2006 8:32:08 AM PST by
Gideon Reader
("The quiet gentleman sitting in the corner sipping Kenya AA and enjoying his Stan Getz CD's".)
To: Gideon Reader
It's not BS and I know it's true.
No knocks are supposedly for the prevention of destruction of evidence, but what's the primery type of enforcement that used no knock? Drug busts. What was the test case that got no knocks approved by the courts? A drug bust. The war on drugs has been used to hack the Bill of Rights to pieces, and attempts to deny it are attempts to deny basic reality
And I notice how you carefully ignored the problem that right now owning too much Sudafed makes someone a drug offender.
123 posted on
11/22/2006 9:40:15 AM PST by
discostu
(we're two of a kind, silence and I)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson