Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Gideon Reader

It's not BS and I know it's true.

No knocks are supposedly for the prevention of destruction of evidence, but what's the primery type of enforcement that used no knock? Drug busts. What was the test case that got no knocks approved by the courts? A drug bust. The war on drugs has been used to hack the Bill of Rights to pieces, and attempts to deny it are attempts to deny basic reality

And I notice how you carefully ignored the problem that right now owning too much Sudafed makes someone a drug offender.


123 posted on 11/22/2006 9:40:15 AM PST by discostu (we're two of a kind, silence and I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: discostu

Well we've got to do something about runny noses dammit. I find it funny that if we talk 2nd amendment then it's "if you outlaw guns only outlaws will have guns." But when you talk WOD then where's the same reasoning to putting Sudafed behind the counter?? If you outlaw Sudafed, only outlaws will have Sudafed. And as everyone knows, the supply of meth has not dropped one iota since all of these stupid laws have hit the books, it's just made it a pain in the ass for me and everyone else to go get cold medicine. But don't the politicians look good doing "something"???


128 posted on 11/22/2006 9:47:42 AM PST by rednesss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson