To: bray
No actually I found evidence that the evidence was fake.
Which evidence do you consider fake? Why do you consider this evidence fake? When did you have the chance to inspect any fossil evidence? And do you know if any particular individual is reponsible for these forgeries?
542 posted on
07/27/2006 10:14:41 PM PDT by
Boxen
(THE SPICE MUST FLOW)
To: Boxen
" Which evidence do you consider fake?"
Piltcown man, Lucy, Spotted moth, Kennewick man, etc.
547 posted on
07/27/2006 10:17:11 PM PDT by
RobRoy
(Islam is more dangerous to the world now that Naziism was in 1937.)
To: Boxen
The internet is a great thing for the Truth, but not so good for Darwiniacs. All the kings men and all the kings horses couldn't pur Evolution together again.
You would think with the millions of scientists trying to find a real missing link it would be found if it existed.
Pray for W and Our Troops
Shalom Israel
564 posted on
07/27/2006 10:32:58 PM PDT by
bray
(Jeb '08, just to watch their Heads Explode!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson