Posted on 05/22/2006 8:14:10 AM PDT by RightWingAtheist
A high school science teacher vowed yesterday to continue telling his Inuit students about Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, despite complaints from parents in the northern Quebec community of Salluit.
Science teacher Alexandre April was given a written reprimand last month by his principal at Ikusik High School for discussing evolution in class.
Parents in the village 1,860 kilometres north of Montreal complained their children had been told they came from apes.
"I am a biologist. ... This is what I'm passionate about," said April, who teaches Grades 7 and 8. "It interests the students. It gets them asking questions.
"They laugh and they call me 'ape,' but I don't mind. If I stopped, they would lose out."
April, who is leaving the town when his contract runs out at the end of the school year, said the principal first told teachers last fall not to talk about evolution.
Debate over the teaching of evolution in Salluit - a village of 1,150 located along the northern coast of Quebec, between Ungava and Hudson bays - is pitting an increasingly religious Inuit population against a Quebec education system that's becoming more and more secular.
Although April, 32, won't be punished, his reprimand has outraged Quebec's scientific community.
"What he's doing is right and it's best for the kids," said Brian Alters, director of the Evolution Education Research Centre at McGill University. "Science should not be de-emphasized for non-science."
Over the years, controversy over the teaching of evolution has erupted in Pennsylvania, along with U.S. states in the so-called Bible Belt. In November, the Kansas State Board of Education approved science standards that cast doubt on evolution.
But with heightened religious fervour among the Inuit and Cree in northern communities, some observers suggest Canada might have its own Bible North.
Molly Tayara, a member of the Salluit school's volunteer education committee, said she'd tell her four school-age children to walk out of a lesson on Darwin.
"The minister (of education) may have come from apes, but we're Inuit and we've always been human," she told The Gazette in a phone interview.
"Most of us rely on God's word. ... God made Adam and Eve and they weren't animals."
Legally, Inuit schools in Quebec's north must teach evolution, as it's part of the provincial curriculum. After April's story came out this week in the magazine Quebec Science, Education Department officials immediately called the school to ensure the curriculum was followed.
Topics like reproduction and diversity of species are part of Science and Technology, a course for Grades 7 and 8. Darwin's work, based on the premise that humans and other animals have evolved over time, is further covered in Grade 11 biology - an elective course.
"We want the curriculum to be applied. We're just saying the theory of evolution could be taught more delicately to students," said Gaston Pelletier, director of educational services for the Kativik School Board, which serves northern Quebec's 14 Inuit communities. "We have to respect their view."
Hey, I'm all for evolution. I was just trying to get a laugh. :)
I took it wrong. That kind of "argument" is about all we get from the overwhelming majority of the cre-ID-ers, so I was fooled.
My apologies.
From O brother where art thou, the movie:
"Well Ah ain't come descended from no monkeys"!
You have the original New Testament? ... could you send me that in softcopy? I would be very interested in that.
We cannot conceive of, yet you're able to talk about. Interesting
*Perhaps*? How about *absolutely!* Science is determined and performed by very error prone human beings. It is not some independent field that men stumbled onto that is outside of human experience. It is not all that objective because what it is, is determined by men.
You: *Perhaps*? How about *absolutely!*
That's fine. Every field of thought is subject to human error -- but nothing has proven more useful, and more successful, in mitigating that error than the methods of science. Even the claims of absolute authority for one's religious opinions does not do as much to eliminate error. Witness the thousands of competing doctrinal opinions among Christians, all based on only once source of authority -- one "piece of evidence."
One piece of evidence is all that's needed if it's true. The Bible is not invalidated just because it's *one*. As a matter of fact, until it was all collected and put together in one, easy to reference source, it wasn't just one piece of literature. It's one now for convenience but has many authors from many time periods.
I said nothing about invalidation. I said that the methods of science have been far more effective at overcoming human error than have arguments among Christians who all believe in that "one" source. My point was that, even working with only "one" source -- a source that just about all conservative Christians agree on -- there are still thousands of unresolved problems. If they problems are not due to the "source" -- they must be due to human error.
I am somewhat knowledgeable in the area of Christian hermeneutics. Those principles have been developed for this very purpose -- to help people more accurately interpret scripture. They are pretty good tools -- but still, there are thousands of unresolved problems. That is all I was pointing out.
Fool's gold -- iron pyrite, often found in proximity to real gold. And there -- a parking lot full of employed persons, earning their gold-equivalent.
Simple biology. In masquerade. Call Charles Lydell.
Fool's gold -- iron pyrite, often found in proximity to real gold. And there -- a parking lot full of employed persons, earning their gold-equivalent.
Simple biology. In masquerade. Call Charles Lydell.
Sorry, you seem to be speaking in tongues or something tonight.
What is it you are really trying to say? I don't have the energy for a scavenger hunt.
I think I can translate that gibberish for you:
The pellet with the poison is in the vessel with the pestle. The chalice from the palace has the brew that is true.
Or something like that.
Lurking...
Well said, metmom. To the persistent claims of superiority and near infallibility of science and the believers in science as the highest human pursuit, I'll just have to answer with an old observation: "the fish don't know they're wet!"
In response to this, Heinlein said it best:
What are the facts? Again and again and again - what are the facts? Shun wishful thinking, ignore divine revelation, forget what 'the stars foretell,' avoid opinion, care not what the neighbors think, never mind the unguessable 'verdict of history' - what are the facts, and to how many decimal places? You pilot always into an unknown future; facts are your only clue. Get the facts!Robert A. Heinlein, Time Enough for Love, 1973
Facts are the fossil and geologic record. You find a fossil, it's buried in dirt, radioactive dating can be done using known half-lifes of isotopes, presumng we know how much of the original material there was in the sample, but it's the interpretation of all that, that is a different matter. That's what the main disagreement appears to be over.
Buried in dirt=encased in rock=fossilized=whatever form they're in
Poor choice of words there. Benadryl taking effect. snore...
Ahh you are right.....so, then what amobe or monkey do you look like? Just curious. I'm sure one of your ancestors was either a crawly thing or jumped from tree to tree. Maybe, just maybe with your intelligence IQ, one of your hairy ancestors invented fire.....hmmmmm :))) lolol
So, if I say that you or your favorite kid looks like a monkey I assume you wouldn't be insulted...right? :)))) wink.
uh, nat me unhinged, you's became unhinged from da beginning swet pea. It muzt mean dat I musta hit a nerve in yor tineey tiny brain....:)) I wrote so that you could understand it.....naw hisn't dat better for ya....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.