Ann Coulter weighs in on Darwinism

uncommondescent.com ^ | William Dembski

[Tribune7]

I’m happy to report that I was in constant correspondence with Ann regarding her chapters on Darwinism — indeed, I take all responsibility for any errors in those chapters. :-)

[Tribune7]

For your lists :-)

[Tribune7]

Your list too.

[mlc9852]

Again I agree with Ann.

[PatrickHenry]

Archive

[wallcrawlr]

Interesting stuff from Ann:

. . . Though liberalism rejects the idea of God and reviles people of faith, it bears all the attributes of a religion itself. In Godless: The Church of Liberalism, Ann Coulter throws open the doors of the Church of Liberalism, showing us:

**Its sacraments (abortion)
**Its holy writ (Roe v. Wade)
**Its martyrs (from Soviet spy Alger Hiss to cop-killer Mumia Abu Jamal)
**Its clergy (public school teachers)
**Its churches (government schools, where prayer is prohibited but condoms are free)
**Its doctrine of infallibility (as manifest in the “absolute moral authority” of such spokesmen as Cindy Sheehan and Max Cleland)
**And its cosmology (in which mankind is an inconsequential accident)
Then, of course, there’s the liberal creation myth: Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution.

^{Revelation 4:11}Intelligent Design
Constantly searching for objectivity in the evolution debate...
See my profile for info

[atlaw]

Oh my. This is embarrassing.

[RunningWolf]

Well thats what people have been saying. I really doubt if Ann really cares what a few anonymous freepers have to say about her either.

W.

[PatrickHenry]

Oh my. This is embarrassing.

Yeah. Well, conservatives aren't necessarily science literate. Opinions vary all over the place:

Limbaugh on the Dover Ruling. Rush is no evolutionist, but he sees the fraud of ID.
Charles Krauthammer: Phony Theory, False Conflict. "... so anachronistic and retrograde as to be a national embarrassment.."
Cal Thomas: INTELLIGENT DESIGN: Teaching children the truth. "... sham attempt to take through the back door what proponents have no chance of getting through the front door."
George F. Will: Grand Old Spenders. "... religion, in the guise of 'intelligent design' theory ..."

[Kenny Bunkport]

It's one thing for the Darwinists to doubt the creator, now they're opposed by Ann Coulter!

[Manic_Episode]

First Rush, now Ann.

Darwinism = DU liberalism.

Schadenfreude.

[Kenny Bunkport]

More evidence that the Darwinist philosophy (because it's more of a philosophy than it is a science), is contrary to a conservative worldview.

[wallcrawlr]

Some Freepers certainly do have their DU supporters/admirers.

No doubt about that.

[Kenny Bunkport]

Interesting that you lead off your links with a quote from Rush Limbaugh. I thought you guys only appealed to "science."

[Blzbba]

"I really doubt if Ann really cares what a few anonymous freepers have to say about her either."


Nor does science really care about the uninformed opinions of a blonde anorexic!

100 years from now, evolution will still be accepted as the best explanation, whereas Ann Coulter will be relegated to the dustbin of history.

[wallcrawlr]

[svcw]

Well, conservatives aren't necessarily science literate...

Interesting statement .. as a conservative and a (gasp) religious one at that ... its hard to type this note out as I am floating around the room ... because I do not get gravity.

A little sarcastic I know, but I am baffled by the fact that there are those who believe that religious conservatives are "science illiterate".

[Sam Cree]

So, does Ann say that only the Left believes in evolution, or believes it a credible theory?

[RunningWolf]

Despite what you have been mislead to believe, a few anonymous freepers are not the voice of science.

W.