Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newly found species fills evolutionary gap between fish and land animals
EurekAlert (AAAS) ^ | 05 April 2006 | Staff

Posted on 04/05/2006 10:32:31 AM PDT by PatrickHenry

Paleontologists have discovered fossils of a species that provides the missing evolutionary link between fish and the first animals that walked out of water onto land about 375 million years ago. The newly found species, Tiktaalik roseae, has a skull, a neck, ribs and parts of the limbs that are similar to four-legged animals known as tetrapods, as well as fish-like features such as a primitive jaw, fins and scales.

These fossils, found on Ellesmere Island in Arctic Canada, are the most compelling examples yet of an animal that was at the cusp of the fish-tetrapod transition. The new find is described in two related research articles highlighted on the cover of the April 6, 2006, issue of Nature.

"Tiktaalik blurs the boundary between fish and land-living animal both in terms of its anatomy and its way of life," said Neil Shubin, professor and chairman of organismal biology at the University of Chicago and co-leader of the project.

Tiktaalik was a predator with sharp teeth, a crocodile-like head and a flattened body. The well-preserved skeletal material from several specimens, ranging from 4 to 9 feet long, enabled the researchers to study the mosaic pattern of evolutionary change in different parts of the skeleton as fish evolved into land animals.

The high quality of the fossils also allowed the team to examine the joint surfaces on many of the fin bones, concluding that the shoulder, elbow and wrist joints were capable of supporting the body-like limbed animals.

"Human comprehension of the history of life on Earth is taking a major leap forward," said H. Richard Lane, director of sedimentary geology and paleobiology at the National Science Foundation. "These exciting discoveries are providing fossil 'Rosetta Stones' for a deeper understanding of this evolutionary milestone--fish to land-roaming tetrapods."

One of the most important aspects of this discovery is the illumination of the fin-to-limb transition. In a second paper in the journal, the scientists describe in depth how the pectoral fin of the fish serves as the origin of the tetrapod limb.

Embedded in the fin of Tiktaalik are bones that compare to the upper arm, forearm and primitive parts of the hand of land-living animals.

"Most of the major joints of the fin are functional in this fish," Shubin said. "The shoulder, elbow and even parts of the wrist are already there and working in ways similar to the earliest land-living animals."

At the time that Tiktaalik lived, what is now the Canadian Arctic region was part of a landmass that straddled the equator. It had a subtropical climate, much like the Amazon basin today. The species lived in the small streams of this delta system. According to Shubin, the ecological setting in which these animals evolved provided an environment conducive to the transition to life on land.

"We knew that the rocks on Ellesmere Island offered a glimpse into the right time period and the right ancient environments to provide the potential for finding fossils documenting this important evolutionary transition," said Ted Daeschler of the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia, a co-leader of the project. "Finding the fossils within this remote, rugged terrain, however, required a lot of time and effort."

The nature of the deposits where the fossils were found and the skeletal structure of Tiktaalik suggests the animal lived in shallow water and perhaps even out of the water for short periods.

"The skeleton of Tiktaalik indicates that it could support its body under the force of gravity whether in very shallow water or on land," said Farish Jenkins, professor of organismic and evolutionary biology at Harvard University and co-author of the papers. "This represents a critical early phase in the evolution of all limbed animals, including humans--albeit a very ancient step."

The new fossils were collected during four summers of exploration in Canada's Nunavut Territory, 600 miles from the North Pole, by paleontologists from the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia, the University of Chicago and Harvard University. Although the team has amassed a diverse assemblage of fossil fish, Shubin said, the discovery of these transitional fossils in 2004 was a vindication of their persistence.

The scientists asked the Nunavut people to propose a formal scientific name for the new species. The Elders Council of Nunavut, the Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit, suggested "Tiktaalik" (tic-TAH-lick)--the word in the Inuktikuk language for "a large, shallow water fish."

The scientists worked through the Department of Culture, Language, Elders and Youth in Nunavut to collaborate with the local Inuit communities. All fossils are the property of the people of Nunavut and will be returned to Canada after they are studied.

###

The team depended on the maps of the Geological Survey of Canada. The researchers received permits from the Department of Culture, Language, Elders and Youth of the Government of Nunavut, and logistical support in the form of helicopters and bush planes from Polar Continental Shelf Project of Natural Resources Canada. The National Science Foundation and the National Geographic Society, along with an anonymous donor, also helped fund the project.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: 375millionyears; coelacanth; crevolist; lungfish; tiktaalik; transitional
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 1,501-1,512 next last
To: muawiyah
After 500+ posts, don't think of my last post as a hijacking.

It's a mighty puny thread that can be highjacked with WORDS!

(We ALL know you have to have a metaphorical boxknife!)

661 posted on 04/06/2006 6:30:51 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 623 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

"goat-headers"

What's a goat-header?


662 posted on 04/06/2006 6:31:17 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 658 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman
No, just one ID somewhere doing one thing does the trick in knocking down your use of Occam.

He doesn't have to create the Universe ~ just one new lifeform is sufficient, and it doesn't even have to be all that different ~

663 posted on 04/06/2006 6:32:52 AM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 654 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
You simply cannot substitute the word "evolution" with the word "change" without distorting the argument.

Silly!

This is EXACTLY how "Evolution" works!

A little 'change'...
A little 'mutation'....

BaddaBoom baddaBING....

and you gotchaself a NEW creation: old things are gone - all has become new.

664 posted on 04/06/2006 6:33:31 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman
Then you are a Gnostic. The rest of us aren't, although most Moslems tend toward that sort of belief ~ Sharia Law certainly assumes there can actually be one fixed, immutable law.

Fascists with their fuhrer principle, and the Commies with Democratic Centrism, also believe in an objective reality which they can create and which everybody will believe even if they have to kill off the nonbelievers.

I think you should reassess your understanding of the place of "objective reality" in a universe where religious folks, of all stripes, accept change, revelations, miraculous occurrences, and so forth ~ all inexplicble at the time, but maybe explainable ultimately, and still useful in assisting in comprehending our existence for the time being.

Such mysticism allow them to accept the change that is constantly occurring.

665 posted on 04/06/2006 6:36:52 AM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 655 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
"No, just one ID somewhere doing one thing does the trick in knocking down your use of Occam."

Nonsense. Nobody is saying that an intelligent designer doesn't exist (man). That in NO way is evidence that Man is the intelligent designer of the universe. There is simply no evidence for a designer of the universe, or of life as we see it on Earth, that isn't easier explained with natural means.

"He doesn't have to create the Universe ~ just one new lifeform is sufficient, and it doesn't even have to be all that different ~"

Nope, that's poppycock.

666 posted on 04/06/2006 6:37:16 AM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 663 | View Replies]

To: metmom
then why all the insults and derision towards those who are skeptical and don't accept it 100%?

For the same reason we snicker at flat earthers. The phrase "less than 100%" includes "99.999%".

667 posted on 04/06/2006 6:37:27 AM PDT by js1138 (~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 582 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

An evolved goat-heRder!

(Or...
for those with dirty minds....)


668 posted on 04/06/2006 6:39:23 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 662 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Those aren't pics - they're drawings.


669 posted on 04/06/2006 6:39:50 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 639 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Elsie, we no longer use "gradualism" in our arguments. The DNA thing is out of the bag ~ use it.

On the other hand, we do know there are bounds to species ~ they are not just our imagination.

670 posted on 04/06/2006 6:40:36 AM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 664 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

You think goat-herders wrote the Bible?


671 posted on 04/06/2006 6:40:51 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 668 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman
 
666!
 
Revelation 13:11-18
 11.  Then I saw another beast, coming out of the earth. He had two horns like a lamb, but he spoke like a dragon.
 12.  He exercised all the authority of the first beast on his behalf, and made the earth and its inhabitants worship the first beast, whose fatal wound had been healed.
 13.  And he performed great and miraculous signs, even causing fire to come down from heaven to earth in full view of men.
 14.  Because of the signs he was given power to do on behalf of the first beast, he deceived the inhabitants of the earth. He ordered them to set up an image in honor of the beast who was wounded by the sword and yet lived.
 15.  He was given power to give breath to the image of the first beast, so that it could speak and cause all who refused to worship the image to be killed.
 16.  He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead,
 17.  so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name.
 18.  This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man's number. His number is 666.
 
 
 
 

672 posted on 04/06/2006 6:41:41 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 666 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman
For all anyone can know the entire Universe is just in my mind.

However, the debate was not about the entire Universe, just ID as that applies to biological systems.

673 posted on 04/06/2006 6:42:05 AM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 666 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
"Then you are a Gnostic."

Gnostics are not the only people who accept the existence of objective reality. You said they say we can know things 100% certain; I said we can't. Your conclusion does not follow from your premises.

"The rest of us aren't, although most Moslems tend toward that sort of belief ~ Sharia Law certainly assumes there can actually be one fixed, immutable law."

Ah, the subtle *You're really an islamo-facsist* bit. Sorry. You are digging yourself into a deep hole with your logical fallacies.

"Fascists with their fuhrer principle, and the Commies with Democratic Centrism, also believe in an objective reality which they can create and which everybody will believe even if they have to kill off the nonbelievers."

No, they believe in a subjective reality, where whatever they say or wish is true. You have it completely backwards. Thanks for invoking Godwin's law though.

"I think you should reassess your understanding of the place of "objective reality" in a universe where religious folks, of all stripes, accept change, revelations, miraculous occurrences, and so forth ~ all inexplicble at the time, but maybe explainable ultimately, and still useful in assisting in comprehending our existence for the time being."

Why should I have to yield to the subjective whims of others?

"Such mysticism allow them to accept the change that is constantly occurring."

It allows them to reject change. YEC's are a great example.

Again, post-modernist relativism isn't my bag.
674 posted on 04/06/2006 6:43:10 AM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 665 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
More complex "processing" perhaps, with new programs (contained where) ~ yes, that is the mystery ~ what really makes the difference between a man and a fruit fly ~ certainly not millions of genes!

Not much difference between species in the cellular machinery.

675 posted on 04/06/2006 6:43:30 AM PDT by js1138 (~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 620 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

Many times the phrase has been used by E's to try and denigrate the intelligence of the OT writers.


676 posted on 04/06/2006 6:43:30 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 671 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852; Elsie

I thought the Hebrews were sheep herders who lived out on the plains. Goat herders live in the mountains ~ that would be the Medes.


677 posted on 04/06/2006 6:43:43 AM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 671 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Addendum: not ALL E's; just some of them.


678 posted on 04/06/2006 6:44:47 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 676 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
"For all anyone can know the entire Universe is just in my mind."


Or that you are a space alien, and that Thetans fill my body. Sorry, you're babbling now.
679 posted on 04/06/2006 6:44:52 AM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 673 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

680 posted on 04/06/2006 6:46:05 AM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 672 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 1,501-1,512 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson