Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newly found species fills evolutionary gap between fish and land animals
EurekAlert (AAAS) ^ | 05 April 2006 | Staff

Posted on 04/05/2006 10:32:31 AM PDT by PatrickHenry

Paleontologists have discovered fossils of a species that provides the missing evolutionary link between fish and the first animals that walked out of water onto land about 375 million years ago. The newly found species, Tiktaalik roseae, has a skull, a neck, ribs and parts of the limbs that are similar to four-legged animals known as tetrapods, as well as fish-like features such as a primitive jaw, fins and scales.

These fossils, found on Ellesmere Island in Arctic Canada, are the most compelling examples yet of an animal that was at the cusp of the fish-tetrapod transition. The new find is described in two related research articles highlighted on the cover of the April 6, 2006, issue of Nature.

"Tiktaalik blurs the boundary between fish and land-living animal both in terms of its anatomy and its way of life," said Neil Shubin, professor and chairman of organismal biology at the University of Chicago and co-leader of the project.

Tiktaalik was a predator with sharp teeth, a crocodile-like head and a flattened body. The well-preserved skeletal material from several specimens, ranging from 4 to 9 feet long, enabled the researchers to study the mosaic pattern of evolutionary change in different parts of the skeleton as fish evolved into land animals.

The high quality of the fossils also allowed the team to examine the joint surfaces on many of the fin bones, concluding that the shoulder, elbow and wrist joints were capable of supporting the body-like limbed animals.

"Human comprehension of the history of life on Earth is taking a major leap forward," said H. Richard Lane, director of sedimentary geology and paleobiology at the National Science Foundation. "These exciting discoveries are providing fossil 'Rosetta Stones' for a deeper understanding of this evolutionary milestone--fish to land-roaming tetrapods."

One of the most important aspects of this discovery is the illumination of the fin-to-limb transition. In a second paper in the journal, the scientists describe in depth how the pectoral fin of the fish serves as the origin of the tetrapod limb.

Embedded in the fin of Tiktaalik are bones that compare to the upper arm, forearm and primitive parts of the hand of land-living animals.

"Most of the major joints of the fin are functional in this fish," Shubin said. "The shoulder, elbow and even parts of the wrist are already there and working in ways similar to the earliest land-living animals."

At the time that Tiktaalik lived, what is now the Canadian Arctic region was part of a landmass that straddled the equator. It had a subtropical climate, much like the Amazon basin today. The species lived in the small streams of this delta system. According to Shubin, the ecological setting in which these animals evolved provided an environment conducive to the transition to life on land.

"We knew that the rocks on Ellesmere Island offered a glimpse into the right time period and the right ancient environments to provide the potential for finding fossils documenting this important evolutionary transition," said Ted Daeschler of the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia, a co-leader of the project. "Finding the fossils within this remote, rugged terrain, however, required a lot of time and effort."

The nature of the deposits where the fossils were found and the skeletal structure of Tiktaalik suggests the animal lived in shallow water and perhaps even out of the water for short periods.

"The skeleton of Tiktaalik indicates that it could support its body under the force of gravity whether in very shallow water or on land," said Farish Jenkins, professor of organismic and evolutionary biology at Harvard University and co-author of the papers. "This represents a critical early phase in the evolution of all limbed animals, including humans--albeit a very ancient step."

The new fossils were collected during four summers of exploration in Canada's Nunavut Territory, 600 miles from the North Pole, by paleontologists from the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia, the University of Chicago and Harvard University. Although the team has amassed a diverse assemblage of fossil fish, Shubin said, the discovery of these transitional fossils in 2004 was a vindication of their persistence.

The scientists asked the Nunavut people to propose a formal scientific name for the new species. The Elders Council of Nunavut, the Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit, suggested "Tiktaalik" (tic-TAH-lick)--the word in the Inuktikuk language for "a large, shallow water fish."

The scientists worked through the Department of Culture, Language, Elders and Youth in Nunavut to collaborate with the local Inuit communities. All fossils are the property of the people of Nunavut and will be returned to Canada after they are studied.

###

The team depended on the maps of the Geological Survey of Canada. The researchers received permits from the Department of Culture, Language, Elders and Youth of the Government of Nunavut, and logistical support in the form of helicopters and bush planes from Polar Continental Shelf Project of Natural Resources Canada. The National Science Foundation and the National Geographic Society, along with an anonymous donor, also helped fund the project.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: 375millionyears; coelacanth; crevolist; lungfish; tiktaalik; transitional
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,341-1,3601,361-1,3801,381-1,400 ... 1,501-1,512 next last
To: Sun
"Evo dictates going across the species line (not creating subspecies).

So where's the proof that this can happen? "

You mean, where's the evidence? The evidence has been provided to you already. Proof is for math and whiskey (and photography).

"And please, no more games."

You're the one playing games.

"Games only make ME look good, and you don't REALLY want to do that, do you? :)"

Your looking good is not something I worry about. :)
1,361 posted on 04/10/2006 5:20:42 PM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1358 | View Replies]

To: Sun
Games only make ME look good, and you don't REALLY want to do that, do you? :)

Your cell phone is ringing. You should answer it.

1,362 posted on 04/10/2006 5:24:04 PM PDT by js1138 (~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1358 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro

"So, who got the Nobel for that stunning discovery?"

There was more than one scientist, but that's not the point. Focus here: The point is that NOW scientists know there are TRILLIONS of cells. Did you read the link I provided? Can you refute it with another link?

Remember, games make ME look good.

Let me know when you can refute my link with another link.


1,363 posted on 04/10/2006 5:25:21 PM PDT by Sun (Hillary Clinton is pro-ILLEGAL immigration. Don't let her fool you. She has a D- /F immigr. rating.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1348 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro

Looks like the good old days are back.


1,364 posted on 04/10/2006 5:26:41 PM PDT by js1138 (~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1363 | View Replies]

To: Thatcherite

"Back around 1965, I can remember my High School Biology teacher intoning, "The human body contains hundreds of cells, class! Perhaps over a thousand!"

You CLAIM that I said the above, but I never did. Another poster did.

Next.


1,365 posted on 04/10/2006 5:28:09 PM PDT by Sun (Hillary Clinton is pro-ILLEGAL immigration. Don't let her fool you. She has a D- /F immigr. rating.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1355 | View Replies]

To: js1138

YOU are saved by the bell, and I LOVE winning - AGAIN.


1,366 posted on 04/10/2006 5:29:07 PM PDT by Sun (Hillary Clinton is pro-ILLEGAL immigration. Don't let her fool you. She has a D- /F immigr. rating.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1362 | View Replies]

To: Sun

You have me convinced.


1,367 posted on 04/10/2006 5:29:54 PM PDT by js1138 (~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1366 | View Replies]

To: js1138

"You have me convinced."

I just KNEW you would come around.


1,368 posted on 04/10/2006 5:31:02 PM PDT by Sun (Hillary Clinton is pro-ILLEGAL immigration. Don't let her fool you. She has a D- /F immigr. rating.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1367 | View Replies]

To: Sun
"There was more than one scientist, but that's not the point. Focus here: The point is that NOW scientists know there are TRILLIONS of cells. Did you read the link I provided? Can you refute it with another link?"

The link you provided did not say there were trillions of different cells. It only said that there were trillions of cells; this was not unknown in Darwin's time.

1,369 posted on 04/10/2006 5:34:06 PM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1363 | View Replies]

To: Sun
There was a time when only one man believed in evo - Darwin.

Actually, Wallace arrived at the theory independently of Darwin and at pretty much the same time.

ID IS a scientific theory, and many scientists have said so (even IF it's true that Behe did not).

But they haven't demonstrated yet that it's scientific. Why don't you do it? I've posted the criteria every scientific theory must meet ... more than once ... on this thread ... to you.

1,370 posted on 04/10/2006 5:35:16 PM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1360 | View Replies]

To: Gumlegs

Anyone who can come here and in a few posts, convince us that the body contains trillions of cells, ought to be able to make a real science out of a wooden puppet.


1,371 posted on 04/10/2006 5:37:40 PM PDT by js1138 (~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1370 | View Replies]

To: js1138

My question is why it wasn't posted in breaking news.


1,372 posted on 04/10/2006 5:43:31 PM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1371 | View Replies]

To: Gumlegs

When the news breaks, we fix it.


1,373 posted on 04/10/2006 5:44:14 PM PDT by js1138 (~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1372 | View Replies]

To: js1138

Yeah ... just like my Uncle Guido.


1,374 posted on 04/10/2006 5:45:32 PM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1373 | View Replies]

To: All; Gumlegs

Oh, so TWO scientists believed in evo in the 18th century?? Should that convince me?? (eyeroll)

REFUTE, my links below and give me an excerpt with link. This is a challenge. Don't change the subject this time.

Darwin convinced scientists to believe his theory based on antiquated information, at that time, like we only have one cell, when we really have trillions, and when there are new discoveries, evo scientists just change the theories.

PROOF of what Darwin once thought: http://www.biology.arizona.edu/cell_bio/tutorials/cells/cells3.html - shows that they thought there was only one or a few cells

But NOW we know that the human body is made up trillions of cells.

http://websekolah.bharian.com.my/F1Sci/june15.html

Is science EXCITING, though?? Science is ALWAYS learning something new(except for those stuck in the 18th century).


.


1,375 posted on 04/10/2006 5:47:41 PM PDT by Sun (Honest wins every debate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1370 | View Replies]

To: js1138
It's like old times, but I still miss the blue.
1,376 posted on 04/10/2006 5:49:29 PM PDT by VadeRetro (I have the updated "Your brain on creationism" on my homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1364 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Unless I'm given the name of the guy who allegedly discovered this "trillions of cells" stuff, I'm sticking with the tried-and-true one-cell theory. It was good enough for grampa, and it's good enough for me.
1,377 posted on 04/10/2006 5:50:35 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Yo momma's so fat she's got a Schwarzschild radius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1364 | View Replies]

To: Sun
"Oh, so TWO scientists believed in evo in the 18th century??"

Darwin and Wallace were in the 19th century; also, almost all scientists accepted evolution within 20 years of Darwin publishing the Origin of Species.

"Darwin convinced scientists to believe his theory based on antiquated information, at that time, like we only have one cell,"

No, Darwin knew that we had millions, if not trillions of cells.

"But NOW we know that the human body is made up trillions of cells."

There are not trillions of different types of cells.
1,378 posted on 04/10/2006 5:51:58 PM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1375 | View Replies]

To: Sun

You got us dead to rights. Your link

http://www.biology.arizona.edu/cell_bio/tutorials/cells/cells3.html

says right there in black and white that Darwin believed the body was made up of only one cell.

Or certainly not more than "more than one."


1,379 posted on 04/10/2006 5:52:11 PM PDT by js1138 (~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1375 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

"I believe in the one cell theory."

Which is why there was no EUREKA when scientists discovered that there are TRILLIONS of cells, as it refutes Darwinism.


1,380 posted on 04/10/2006 5:52:11 PM PDT by Sun (Logic wins every debate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1350 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,341-1,3601,361-1,3801,381-1,400 ... 1,501-1,512 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson