Actually, Wallace arrived at the theory independently of Darwin and at pretty much the same time.
ID IS a scientific theory, and many scientists have said so (even IF it's true that Behe did not).
But they haven't demonstrated yet that it's scientific. Why don't you do it? I've posted the criteria every scientific theory must meet ... more than once ... on this thread ... to you.
Anyone who can come here and in a few posts, convince us that the body contains trillions of cells, ought to be able to make a real science out of a wooden puppet.
Oh, so TWO scientists believed in evo in the 18th century?? Should that convince me?? (eyeroll)
REFUTE, my links below and give me an excerpt with link. This is a challenge. Don't change the subject this time.
Darwin convinced scientists to believe his theory based on antiquated information, at that time, like we only have one cell, when we really have trillions, and when there are new discoveries, evo scientists just change the theories.
PROOF of what Darwin once thought: http://www.biology.arizona.edu/cell_bio/tutorials/cells/cells3.html - shows that they thought there was only one or a few cells
But NOW we know that the human body is made up trillions of cells.
http://websekolah.bharian.com.my/F1Sci/june15.html
Is science EXCITING, though?? Science is ALWAYS learning something new(except for those stuck in the 18th century).
.