Newly found species fills evolutionary gap between fish and land animals

EurekAlert (AAAS) ^ | 05 April 2006 | Staff

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Evo dictates going across the species line (not creating subspecies).

So where's the proof that this can happen? "

You mean, where's the evidence? The evidence has been provided to you already. Proof is for math and whiskey (and photography).

"And please, no more games."

You're the one playing games.

"Games only make ME look good, and you don't REALLY want to do that, do you? :)"

Your looking good is not something I worry about. :)

[js1138]

Games only make ME look good, and you don't REALLY want to do that, do you? :)

Your cell phone is ringing. You should answer it.

[Sun]

"So, who got the Nobel for that stunning discovery?"

There was more than one scientist, but that's not the point. Focus here: The point is that NOW scientists know there are TRILLIONS of cells. Did you read the link I provided? Can you refute it with another link?

Remember, games make ME look good.

Let me know when you can refute my link with another link.

[js1138]

Looks like the good old days are back.

[Sun]

"Back around 1965, I can remember my High School Biology teacher intoning, "The human body contains hundreds of cells, class! Perhaps over a thousand!"

You CLAIM that I said the above, but I never did. Another poster did.

Next.

[Sun]

YOU are saved by the bell, and I LOVE winning - AGAIN.

[js1138]

You have me convinced.

[Sun]

"You have me convinced."

I just KNEW you would come around.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"There was more than one scientist, but that's not the point. Focus here: The point is that NOW scientists know there are TRILLIONS of cells. Did you read the link I provided? Can you refute it with another link?"

The link you provided did not say there were trillions of different cells. It only said that there were trillions of cells; this was not unknown in Darwin's time.

[Gumlegs]

There was a time when only one man believed in evo - Darwin.

Actually, Wallace arrived at the theory independently of Darwin and at pretty much the same time.

ID IS a scientific theory, and many scientists have said so (even IF it's true that Behe did not).

But they haven't demonstrated yet that it's scientific. Why don't you do it? I've posted the criteria every scientific theory must meet ... more than once ... on this thread ... to you.

[js1138]

Anyone who can come here and in a few posts, convince us that the body contains trillions of cells, ought to be able to make a real science out of a wooden puppet.

[Gumlegs]

My question is why it wasn't posted in breaking news.

[js1138]

When the news breaks, we fix it.

[Gumlegs]

Yeah ... just like my Uncle Guido.

[Sun]

Oh, so TWO scientists believed in evo in the 18th century?? Should that convince me?? (eyeroll)

REFUTE, my links below and give me an excerpt with link. This is a challenge. Don't change the subject this time.

Darwin convinced scientists to believe his theory based on antiquated information, at that time, like we only have one cell, when we really have trillions, and when there are new discoveries, evo scientists just change the theories.

PROOF of what Darwin once thought: http://www.biology.arizona.edu/cell_bio/tutorials/cells/cells3.html - shows that they thought there was only one or a few cells

But NOW we know that the human body is made up trillions of cells.

http://websekolah.bharian.com.my/F1Sci/june15.html

Is science EXCITING, though?? Science is ALWAYS learning something new(except for those stuck in the 18th century).


.

[VadeRetro]

It's like old times, but I still miss the blue.

[PatrickHenry]

Unless I'm given the name of the guy who allegedly discovered this "trillions of cells" stuff, I'm sticking with the tried-and-true one-cell theory. It was good enough for grampa, and it's good enough for me.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Oh, so TWO scientists believed in evo in the 18th century??"

Darwin and Wallace were in the 19th century; also, almost all scientists accepted evolution within 20 years of Darwin publishing the Origin of Species.

"Darwin convinced scientists to believe his theory based on antiquated information, at that time, like we only have one cell,"

No, Darwin knew that we had millions, if not trillions of cells.

"But NOW we know that the human body is made up trillions of cells."

There are not trillions of different types of cells.

[js1138]

You got us dead to rights. Your link

http://www.biology.arizona.edu/cell_bio/tutorials/cells/cells3.html

says right there in black and white that Darwin believed the body was made up of only one cell.

Or certainly not more than "more than one."

[Sun]

"I believe in the one cell theory."

Which is why there was no EUREKA when scientists discovered that there are TRILLIONS of cells, as it refutes Darwinism.