You never found where the existence of atoms is scientifically proven, either. That's because science doesn't deal in "proof", it deals with the theories that best fit all the available evidence.
The evolution crowd still can't get around creating something from nothing though.
Neither can the ID crowd, so if you thought you had a point, you're mistaken.
"You never found where the existence of atoms is scientifically proven, either. That's because science doesn't deal in "proof", it deals with the theories that best fit all the available evidence."
I thought science dealt with proof and the reason for experiements are to prove a theory.
My point was that neither crowd can prove creation from nothing. You can't prove either way but what I find interesting is that you can't present ID as an alternative theory. Do we discount the many scientists who believe in ID and have evidence to support their theory? Since we are to continue to develop theories for the origin of the universe wouldn't it be right to present ID as another theory?