Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: laxin4him
Never really have found in all my reading where evolution is scientifically proven.

You never found where the existence of atoms is scientifically proven, either. That's because science doesn't deal in "proof", it deals with the theories that best fit all the available evidence.

The evolution crowd still can't get around creating something from nothing though.

Neither can the ID crowd, so if you thought you had a point, you're mistaken.

1,087 posted on 12/20/2005 2:31:29 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Ichneumon

"You never found where the existence of atoms is scientifically proven, either. That's because science doesn't deal in "proof", it deals with the theories that best fit all the available evidence."

I thought science dealt with proof and the reason for experiements are to prove a theory.

My point was that neither crowd can prove creation from nothing. You can't prove either way but what I find interesting is that you can't present ID as an alternative theory. Do we discount the many scientists who believe in ID and have evidence to support their theory? Since we are to continue to develop theories for the origin of the universe wouldn't it be right to present ID as another theory?


1,180 posted on 12/20/2005 3:09:09 PM PST by laxin4him (They will know by our love not our picket lines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1087 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson