"You never found where the existence of atoms is scientifically proven, either. That's because science doesn't deal in "proof", it deals with the theories that best fit all the available evidence."
I thought science dealt with proof and the reason for experiements are to prove a theory.
My point was that neither crowd can prove creation from nothing. You can't prove either way but what I find interesting is that you can't present ID as an alternative theory. Do we discount the many scientists who believe in ID and have evidence to support their theory? Since we are to continue to develop theories for the origin of the universe wouldn't it be right to present ID as another theory?
Oh, no, they're so sure that they're right, they become incredibly and comically arrogant and serpent-tongued,spiteful and rude towards anyone who disagrees with them.
Well we've found the core of your misunderstanding. Perhaps if you knew what science was you could make better arguements. Just a thought.