Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Intelligent Design case decided - Dover, Pennsylvania, School Board loses [Fox News Alert]
Fox News | 12/20/05

Posted on 12/20/2005 7:54:38 AM PST by snarks_when_bored

Fox News alert a few minutes ago says the Dover School Board lost their bid to have Intelligent Design introduced into high school biology classes. The federal judge ruled that their case was based on the premise that Darwin's Theory of Evolution was incompatible with religion, and that this premise is false.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: biology; creation; crevolist; dover; education; evolution; intelligentdesign; keywordpolice; ruling; scienceeducation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640641-660661-680 ... 3,381-3,391 next last
To: mlc9852

"And a very Merry Christmas to you and your family!"

And to yours. I'm hosting Christmas dinner for 9 this year. My 8 year old nephew will be saying grace, in English, Norwegian, and German, to honor his heritage.

I always enjoy Christmas, thanks.


641 posted on 12/20/2005 11:42:59 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 629 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor

Thank you.


642 posted on 12/20/2005 11:43:39 AM PST by unlearner (You will never come to know that which you do not know until you first know that you do not know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 630 | View Replies]

To: Shadowfax
Don't be absurd. The difference between the two is obvious. Micro-evolution (or adaptation) are changes within species. Macro-evolution is change that results in one species begetting another, more complex species. The former is an accepted scientific principle. It meets all the standards of the scientific method. The latter does not. It is completely unproven. It cannot be observed or reproduced. It also is not predictive in nature. Macro-evolution, which is at the heart of evolutionary thinking, is a total violation of the scientific method.

If evolutionary scientists see no difference between the two, you have pointed out why a) creation scientists are more rigorous in their thinking and b) why evolutionary scientists don't realize that the "theory" they are championing is total crap.

I am guessing you really meant to set the arbitrary bar a bit higher than that, as the evolution of new species has been observed. Of course, things like that pesky Archeopteryx that they keep discovering more fossils of have to be an annoyance to the idea that there is no evidence of higher transitions, but I'm confident in your ability to ignore trivial stuff like that.

Oh, but could you please explain why whales and boas have vestigial hips and legs, if they are not remnants of what you would call 'macro' evolution?

643 posted on 12/20/2005 11:43:41 AM PST by Antonello (Oh my God, don't shoot the banana!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

This tread should come with a warning label to protect the innocent and unsuspecting.


644 posted on 12/20/2005 11:43:58 AM PST by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shadowfax
Already addressed in a previous post. When you have a fish that evolves into something that is not a fish and more complex than a fish, call me. Otherwise, you're no different than that street preacher standing on the corner with the sign that says, "The End is Near."

Define "not a fish".

Define "more complex than a fish".

I note that you've given up on the "no observed speciation" lie, and now you've moved on to a different creationist canard.

Hmmm, what previously made observations does your street-preacher's sign confirm? What successful predictions have been made using it? What hypothetical observations would falsify it? If you have sensible answers to those questions then you can rate the preacher's sign as a theory. Until then it is just a baseless assertion, unlike scientific theories such as the theory of evolution.

645 posted on 12/20/2005 11:44:06 AM PST by Thatcherite (More abrasive blackguard than SeaLion or ModernMan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras

"No right, no wrong, no good, no bad. Just what happens and what happens because of it. Actions and consequences. Sad."

That would be sad. I'm sure glad I don't feel that way.


646 posted on 12/20/2005 11:44:35 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 635 | View Replies]

To: Physicist

Are there any animals evolving today?

I have come to largely accept evolution since the evidence is too overwhelming, but I just do not understand this point.

I don't buy punc. eqilibrium, so what else could account for why we don't seem to have evolution in progress (evolution from one species to another, not adaptation).


647 posted on 12/20/2005 11:44:40 AM PST by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: gman992
What I do have a problem is with some unelected prick telling us what we can and cannot teach!!

It is easy. Science in science class. Religion in religion class, or in church.

648 posted on 12/20/2005 11:45:02 AM PST by Thatcherite (More abrasive blackguard than SeaLion or ModernMan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 637 | View Replies]

To: gman992

"What I do have a problem is with some unelected prick telling us what we can and cannot teach!!
"

Yeah! Shame on George W. Bush for appointing this activist judge, eh?


649 posted on 12/20/2005 11:45:20 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 637 | View Replies]

To: Antonello
Oh, but could you please explain why whales and boas have vestigial hips and legs, if they are not remnants of what you would call 'macro' evolution?

If they didn't have hips, their pants would fall down, as everyone knows whales and boas don't wear belts!

650 posted on 12/20/2005 11:45:27 AM PST by bobhoskins (?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 643 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

LOL. I'm ignoring Christmas this year. Just don't want to deal with the stress, which takes away from the meaning. Sounds like you all will have a wonderful time. We'll probably order a pizza and watch football - lol. Have fun. And your nephew sounds very smart. I'm sure he gets it from your side!


651 posted on 12/20/2005 11:45:57 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 641 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
You know what Jesus looked like? If he suddenly appeared on a street somewhere and you passed him later, you'd recognize him?

Certainly not. I wouldn't recognize him no matter what. Some of his own disciples didn't recognize him.

I suspect that he could be walking anywhere on this planet and not a person would recognize him.

Actually, he does walk among us. He is the living God, not a dead prophet. That is what true Christians believe. (just for your edification)

But all will recognise him instantly at the time of judgement. Every knee shall bend and every head shall bow.

652 posted on 12/20/2005 11:46:05 AM PST by Protagoras (Many people teach their children that Jesus is story character but Santa Claus is real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 600 | View Replies]

To: Antonello

"Oh, but could you please explain why whales and boas have vestigial hips and legs, if they are not remnants of what you would call 'macro' evolution?"

I know! I know! God was distracted by a cell phone call when he designed those two. I mean...you can't expect him to pay 100% attention all the time.


653 posted on 12/20/2005 11:46:52 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 643 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

Augustine's exegesis was predicated on Origen's, which is why I rank Origen higher. Despite the posthumous controversy, Origen set out the bedrock of later Christian doctrine. His writings were integral to a host of 4th and 5th century theologians, including Jerome, Basil, Gregory of Nyssa, Ambrose, Augustine, Eusebius, and Gregory Nazianzen.


654 posted on 12/20/2005 11:47:13 AM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 638 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
Are there any animals evolving today?

Yes, all species are involving all the time. Individual animals don't evolve, species do.

Here is an example of speciation happening right now.

655 posted on 12/20/2005 11:47:57 AM PST by Thatcherite (More abrasive blackguard than SeaLion or ModernMan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 647 | View Replies]

To: highball
I disgree. Long before the current body of test data had reached its current volume, each of those other theories, were still considered a theory. Just because you may not agree with the amount of, or the extent of, the test data and rational given for ID, does not make that data any less relevant than what was present in the ealry stages of the other theories.

If you disagree (and it sounds like you do), fine. I have no qualms with that. The entire arguement about what should or should not be taught in public schools is, as far as I am concerned, outweighed by the very arguement as to whether our "public" schools in their current form should even be opperating and coersing the public largess.

People should be able to spend their hard earned monies on an education that meets with their personal beliefs as long as the basic math, reading and writing skills are met. I believe a charter or private school that wants to teach ID should be allowed to, and that parents should have the vouchers/freedom to spend their money in that manner if they so choose.

656 posted on 12/20/2005 11:49:50 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras

"Every knee shall bend and every head shall bow."

That'd be cool! My right knee has been messed up since I blew out the ACL skiing back in 1973. And my neck doesn't bend very well since I had three vertebrae fused together.


657 posted on 12/20/2005 11:49:52 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 652 | View Replies]

To: Anti-MSM
I place my faith in a perfect God, not imperfect scientists.

...he said, posting on the internet through a computer...

658 posted on 12/20/2005 11:50:11 AM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 639 | View Replies]

To: narby
..the entive Catholic Church..


‘Entive’ does not appear to be a word. What adjective were you attempting to apply to the Catholic Church?
659 posted on 12/20/2005 11:50:19 AM PST by redtetrahedron (John 6:51-57)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Paradox

"No, it is not. Many religious people think that Evolution was the means by which God created Man"

The Bible is not compatable with evolution. It says there was no death prior to the fall, hence there could be no natural selection or evolution to produce mankind. The fall was also the reason for needing a Savior, and the fall is what Christ came to redeem us from, so evolution denies the very foundation of Christianity. Yes, there are churches that pick and choose from the Bible to come up with a theology that will be more popular that that, but that doesn't change the facts of how evolution and the Bible conflict.


660 posted on 12/20/2005 11:52:09 AM PST by Grig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640641-660661-680 ... 3,381-3,391 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson