Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jurors turn focus to Scott Peterson's fishing boat
Court TV ^ | 11/8/04 | Harriet Ryan

Posted on 11/09/2004 5:28:34 AM PST by runningbear

Jurors turn focus to Scott Peterson's fishing boat

REDWOOD CITY, Calif. — Jurors in Scott Peterson's capital murder trial want to see the boat the fertilizer salesman allegedly used to dump his wife's body in the San Francisco Bay, according to two sources close to the case.

The panel wrote a note to Judge Alfred Delucchi Friday requesting an inspection of the 14-foot aluminum Gamefisher Peterson took out on the bay Dec. 24, 2002, the day he reported his wife, Laci, missing.

The sources confirmed to Court TV that the boat will be brought to the courthouse and jurors will see it Monday.

The request to see the boat came as the panel completed a third day of deliberations without reaching a verdict. The six men and six women have weighed evidence for nearly 19 hours. They will spend the weekend sequestered at a hotel, but they are not permitted to discuss the case until they return to the jury room at about 8 a.m. Monday.

Story continues ........


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: avoidingchildsupport; conner; dontubelievemyalibi; ibefishing; laci; lacipeterson; sonkiller; wifekiller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 441-458 next last
To: Canadian Outrage
Oh, but you know we will. And then there's the book, and if she can swing it, a television movie on Lifetime or somewhere. Ug.
341 posted on 11/09/2004 3:13:20 PM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; spectre

GOD ALMIGHTY WHY are these anchors of these shows giving this outcast, ANOTHER BAD JUROR, a constant platform to spew his verbal diarrhea???? All these shows should be boycotted. They are of no real Judicial value PERIOD.


342 posted on 11/09/2004 3:13:33 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (IAll us Western Canuks belong South!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]

To: Spunky

No I believe it was another juror who delayed surgery until after the trial.


343 posted on 11/09/2004 3:14:07 PM PST by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: pies
"Strawberry Shortcake is in."

I am lost. Is Strawberry Shortcake the one some are saying is a bank employee, 30 years old, and 7 tatoos?

344 posted on 11/09/2004 3:14:35 PM PST by Spunky ("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Oh Miz, you Have to be right! He idiolizes Scott.

The Judge should have issued a gag order on Justin like he did this latest one.

sw

345 posted on 11/09/2004 3:15:44 PM PST by spectre (Spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage

btt


346 posted on 11/09/2004 3:16:14 PM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage

I've been wondering what Juror #7 could possibly have been researching?? Falconer just suggested that she was trying to access Court Transcripts on the Internet...


347 posted on 11/09/2004 3:17:27 PM PST by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: spectre

If Falconer shows up with a missing wife, I'd sure want to think they'd look at him real closely.


348 posted on 11/09/2004 3:17:35 PM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
I don't have a clue what the fascination with Falconer is!! I'm glad they tossed this loser off the Jury..

sw

349 posted on 11/09/2004 3:18:06 PM PST by spectre (Spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage

Ridiculous. Unless he's conferring with someone on the jury, this guy adds nothing having been away from the proceedings for months now. Why are they continuing to give him air time? I suspect #7's phone is ringing off the hook so perhaps we'll finally get a Justin reprieve.


350 posted on 11/09/2004 3:18:35 PM PST by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

LOL!


351 posted on 11/09/2004 3:19:25 PM PST by spectre (Spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

I am really stunned that Falconer is in any demand at all. He's a fruitcake. No credibility at all. And yes, you can more than see what his opinion of woman and children is.


352 posted on 11/09/2004 3:20:40 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (IAll us Western Canuks belong South!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz
Falconer just suggested that she was trying to access Court Transcripts on the Internet...

Suggested or knows? I suspect he knows too much for his own good and his big mouth might get another juror dismissed.

353 posted on 11/09/2004 3:20:59 PM PST by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

Obviously this woman doesn't CARE who she hurts!!


354 posted on 11/09/2004 3:22:14 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (IAll us Western Canuks belong South!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: StarFan
Right! And he wasn't even supposed to be talking with the other Juror's about the trial while he was on the Jury.

So how does he know so much? I'll wager the prosecution would like to know the same thing.

sw

355 posted on 11/09/2004 3:23:06 PM PST by spectre (Spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: spectre

How can getting rid of a defense juror be good for the defense?


356 posted on 11/09/2004 3:24:25 PM PST by Howlin (I love the smell of mandate in the morning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: StarFan

The Judge at least gagged this b**ch!!


357 posted on 11/09/2004 3:24:34 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (IAll us Western Canuks belong South!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
"Yesterday Juror #7 looked at the defense table. It appeared to be a sympathetic look and now #7 is gone."

"Beth hung around for a few seconds after jury left the room just now and saw Geragos was all smiles."

Are we saying here that Juror #7 looked at Gagagrosses defense table and (I am not sure what a sympathetic look is) but would it have been more like a disgusted look because of the flimsy defense evidence. If so then did Gagagross go in and complain to the Judge about it?

358 posted on 11/09/2004 3:25:52 PM PST by Spunky ("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: spectre

I wish the Judge would order an investigation into Falconer such as his phone records, computer records etc. SINCE he was removed from the Jury.


359 posted on 11/09/2004 3:25:59 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (IAll us Western Canuks belong South!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

GREAT question ROFLMBO!! Is THAT how spin works??? LOL


360 posted on 11/09/2004 3:26:49 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (IAll us Western Canuks belong South!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 441-458 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson