Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush reaches out to conservatives to quell revolt
Forbes ^ | Feb. 20, 2004 | Adam Entous

Posted on 02/22/2004 8:05:00 PM PST by FairOpinion

WASHINGTON, Feb 20 (Reuters) - The White House has been reaching out to conservative groups to quell a rebellion over government spending and budget deficits, hoping to shore up President George W. Bush's political base in an election year.

Conservative leaders who have taken part in private White House meetings in recent weeks said on Friday officials have promised to all but freeze non-defense spending, and assured them Bush will follow through on his threat to veto major highway legislation if Congress refuses to scale it back.

The price tag on a six-year highway and transportation bill stalled in the House of Representatives is $375 billion while a Senate highway bill calls for spending $318 billion. The White House has proposed a $256 billion measure.

"Bush has been very attentive to the critique from the right," said Stephen Moore, president of the Club for Growth, a politically powerful conservative group -- offering tentative praise where once he talked openly of a brewing rebellion.

But if the White House does not follow through, said Heritage Foundation vice president for government relations, Michael Franc, "all bets are off."

"This is not something you can address with a handshake, a pat on the back and an invitation to the White House. You address it by actions," he added.

The White House is used to being attacked by Democrats, but it came as something of a shock when fellow Republicans broke ranks over growth in government spending, hurting Bush at a time when his job approval numbers were already falling.

Conservatives from the Cato Institute criticized the president for overseeing a nearly 25 percent surge in spending over the last three years -- the fastest pace since the Johnson administration of the mid-1960s.

Others singled out his failure to lay out concrete plans to reduce the federal budget deficit, projected at a record $521 billion this year. Even some of Bush's Republican allies in the House warned of a backlash against his budget priorities.

In what one administration official called a "concerted effort," senior White House officials have been meeting with Republicans in Congress to smooth over their differences.

Joel Kaplan, deputy director of the Office of Management and Budget, has been meeting with conservative groups, an aide said. The effort may be paying off.

"Stung by a lot of the criticism from the right, Bush is going to be steadfast about sticking to his spending targets," said Moore, who warned in January that a rebellion among conservatives was brewing.

Now Moore says, "They clearly are trying to reach out. I think the complaints of conservatives have been heeded."

Heritage analyst Brian Riedl once described the mood of conservatives as "angry."

Now Riedl says, "I think the White House is definitely moving in the right direction," though he added, "There's a lot of work ahead of them."

William Niskanen, the chairman of the libertarian Cato Institute who advised former President Ronald Reagan, said he has personally not seen much of an outreach effort. "We'll have to see" what the White House does, he said.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 601-617 next last
To: k2blader
Based upon your posts, I'm not sure your opinion is worth much in the matter. Have a good day.

Based on your posts, your lobotomy apparently went well.Too bad you could not get an integrity transplant;it's needed desperately.

Cordially,

521 posted on 02/25/2004 3:55:30 PM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 518 | View Replies]

To: gatorbait
Did somebody say wedgie?


522 posted on 02/25/2004 3:57:11 PM PST by EllaMinnow (The best days of America lie ahead GWB 2/23/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies]

To: jammer; BigSkyFreeper
Listen carefully,you and the rest of your LP buddies really do have a warped idea of integrity.Anytime I read one of you gasbags speak of helping the President, I am well reminded of Jim Wright, another tower of integrity, just like you.

BigSky,did this garden ornament have its feelings hurt and hit you,too?

Cordially,

523 posted on 02/25/2004 3:58:26 PM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies]

To: gatorbait



In actuality, you and the rest of the pack are nothing more than opportunists trying to claim you're in the forefront of conservative thought. You claim it but you use DNC talking points.

Which DNC talking points?


524 posted on 02/25/2004 4:02:20 PM PST by Sabertooth (Malcontent for Bush - 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies]

To: gatorbait
Hey, we're laughing at you. Our feelings aren't hurt. Jim Wright, gasbags, garden ornament? All in just 3 sentences and a close.

I listened carefully, so please return the favor: YOU listen carefully.

For the sake of your cause, you should retire and let the people who read White House faxes take over. You really hurt your cause. I voted for Bush once and could be convinced to vote for him again. But it's really sickening to pick a candidate based upon the other guy being worse. And, with the exceptions of 1976 Texas Republican Primary, 1980, 1984 and 2000 (misguided here) general elections, that has been the reason for my 100% Republican voting record since 1968. Your "LP" sneer is pretty lame for that reason alone.

So, tell us why we should vote for Bush. You might win some converts--especially among those without principles or intellect. You might even win some of those of with principles or intellect if you demonstrate some yourself. Or ping someone for help.

525 posted on 02/25/2004 4:47:57 PM PST by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 523 | View Replies]

To: gatorbait
Do you understand the need for reasoned discourse to promote and advance conservative values?

I've seen neither reason nor discourse.
526 posted on 02/25/2004 5:00:14 PM PST by Doohickey ("This is a hard and dirty war, but when it's over, nothing will ever be too difficult again.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 516 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
Do moderates always travel in packs like this, seeking each other's approval and patting one another on the back?
527 posted on 02/25/2004 5:02:47 PM PST by Doohickey ("This is a hard and dirty war, but when it's over, nothing will ever be too difficult again.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 512 | View Replies]

To: jammer
Actually, dimbulb, I have laid it out.You are either too stupid to understand it or choose not too. Enjoy your laugh in the closet with the rest of the gasbag fringers. It amazes me tha tsuicidals like you seem to have such self agrandized views of themselves.Sounds positively Freudian.You seem to have "those "kinds of issues , obviously. In the end, you won't get off your can and vote,might be like doing something useful for society,something fairly novel for you,I'm sure.Have lovely day Homer .

Cordially,

528 posted on 02/25/2004 5:30:46 PM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 525 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
The ones you paraphrase..I do like your "We are just helping the President" You all sound just like Jim Wright, a paragon of integrity and virtue.You understand, of course.

Enjoy running back to LP to compare your notes with the rest of them

Cordially,

529 posted on 02/25/2004 5:33:27 PM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 524 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey
Do you understand the need for reasoned discourse to promote and advance conservative values? I've seen neither reason nor discourse.

Far better than you and the rest of the Jim Wright wannabees, yes.

Enjoy your Cassandra chorus back on LP,there DooDoo.

Cordially,

530 posted on 02/25/2004 5:35:08 PM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 526 | View Replies]

To: gatorbait
You always this congenial, or has the Pamparin not kicked in yet?
531 posted on 02/25/2004 5:37:15 PM PST by Doohickey ("This is a hard and dirty war, but when it's over, nothing will ever be too difficult again.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 530 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey
You always this congenial, or has the Pamparin not kicked in yet?

Are you always a drooling imbecile or does that only happen when you post over at LP? I vote the former.

532 posted on 02/25/2004 5:39:41 PM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 531 | View Replies]

To: gatorbait



The ones you paraphrase.

Identify them.

What DU talking points do I paraphrase?


533 posted on 02/25/2004 5:41:14 PM PST by Sabertooth (Malcontent for Bush - 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 529 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
If you get between a bear and it's cub, that's your quandry.

HEY... that's awfully easy to do in my neighborhood just by parking in your driveway LOL

We average about 3 bears per square mile here... my parents bought a house a few streets away from us, the previous owner of that home did NOT like having a black bear in her kitchen one day ;-)

534 posted on 02/25/2004 5:59:35 PM PST by Tamzee (The Democrat Party...... Kerrying water for Communism since 1971)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies]

Uh-Oh...it is the Smokey Back Room...how many Freepers even know it exists? 10%??? Or more???
535 posted on 02/25/2004 6:00:04 PM PST by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drago
Does a post to a Backroom thread show up on "Latest Posts"??
536 posted on 02/25/2004 6:02:34 PM PST by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 535 | View Replies]

To: Drago
Nope.....it's send there to die/be hidden from view. And that's exactly what the fringers want...for threads to be buried.
537 posted on 02/25/2004 6:06:44 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 536 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Let's try all the NYT and WP , not too mention the LAT articles you have used to bash the President.C,mon, if you have a sh read of intellectual honesty, you have to admit any story from these sources is as good as a script from McAuliffe's office. You've been overjoyed to use them as hammers on President Bush.When he comes out against gay marriage, somehow, he is listening to you,therefore ,your constant carping attacks on him helped him see the light?

You know, sometimes you do post things that are interesting and I can actually enjoy agreeing with.This new thing about how you and the rest of We-hate-Bush clowder about helping the President is very much like the We support the troops but not the War crowd. It does not stand scrutiny. It stand less scrutiny after reading some of the heavy thoughts I've seen posted over at LP. Good God, why don't you all call it Der Sturmer online and be done with it? Same rational thinking and same basic Uber Alles groupthink.

I have nothing to prove to you, frankly.You love to accuse others of being lockstep and groupthink, yet each one of your Kameraden file almost the same posts. I think there's a hell of a lot of transference going on there and it is a warning sign of bipolar syndrome.

Now, you and the rest of the clowder feel free to hack up a few hairballs, moan how offended and hurt you all are and sit on the fringe and convince yourselves that your claim of "helping" the President really flies. You sure can dish it out, but apparently not one of you can take it. Don't you have some illegal aliens to hunt down?

Cordially,

538 posted on 02/25/2004 6:09:43 PM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 533 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey
Do moderates always travel in packs like this, seeking each other's approval and patting one another on the back?

No - I've seen moderates able to defend their position quite well. It's generally the nitwits that travel in packs.

539 posted on 02/25/2004 6:16:13 PM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 527 | View Replies]

To: k2blader
Thanks friend. Hopefully there are many other people that recognize which side remains respectful, and which tosses cheap insults and flames. I suspect it's obvious to all but the most rabid partisans.
540 posted on 02/25/2004 6:18:59 PM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 514 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 601-617 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson