SCOTUS  ProLife  BangList  Aliens  StatesRights  WOT  HomosexualAgenda  GlobalWarming  Corruption  Taxes  Congress  Elections  Obama  ACORN  TalkRadio  CopyrightList  Rally  WalterReed  TeaParty  TeaPartyExpress  TeaPartyRebellion  MarchOnDC  FreeperConvention  Donate 

Contribute to FR: $10 $20 $50 $100 Or mail checks to: FreeRepublic, LLC, PO Box 9771, Fresno, CA 93794

Keyword: lisamiller

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • ACLU’s Request to Jail Lisa Miller Fails in Virginia Court

    08/25/2009 12:34:06 PM PDT · by Gopher Broke · 14 replies · 1,609+ views
    ACLU’s Request to Jail Lisa Miller Fails in Virginia Court August 25, 2009 www.LC.org Winchester, VA – Earlier today, Liberty Counsel appeared in court to defend Lisa Miller from a complaint filed by the ACLU of Virginia on behalf of Janet Jenkins. The ACLU asked the judge to order Lisa to jail for not delivering her own daughter, Isabella, to Vermont for unsupervised visitation with Janet. The ACLU also requested Lisa to pay attorneys fees and costs. No jail time was ordered and the court rejected the ACLU’s request for money. Although the court ruled that Lisa had violated a...
  • Newsweek trashes the Bible in support of homosexual marriage

    12/08/2008 3:19:42 PM PST · by Rennes Templar · 35 replies · 2,952+ views
    email | Dec. 8, 2008 | Donald E.Wildmon AFA
    Donald E. Wildmon Founder and Chairman American Family Association December 8, 2008 Newsweek magazine has published a lengthy article (http://www.newsweek.com/id/172653) stating that the Bible supports homosexual marriage. The article was written by Lisa Miller, Newsweek religion editor. Miller's article is one of the most biased and distorted pieces concerning homosexual marriage ever published by any major news organization. The article is much too long for this e-mail. Dr. Albert Mohler has offered a response to the Newsweek article. I suggest you read Mohler’s article (http://www.albertmohler.com/blog_read.php?id=2881) and then read Miller's Newsweek article. Mohler made a significant point in his response: "The...
  • Rorschach Exegesis: the Bible as Gay Manifesto (response to Newsweek's cover story)

    12/10/2008 10:36:20 AM PST · by NYer · 22 replies · 955+ views
    Off The Record ^ | December 10, 2008 | Diogenes
    The current Newsweek has an article by Lisa Miller pretending to take seriously the idea that the Bible looks favorably upon homosexual love and is properly used in support rather than rejection of same-sex marriage.  Here's the final paragraph. My friend the priest James Martin says his favorite Scripture relating to the question of homosexuality is Psalm 139, a song that praises the beauty and imperfection in all of us and that glorifies God’s knowledge of our most secret selves: “I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made.” And then he adds that in his heart he believes that...
  • Palin, Jesus and Witches??? (Another Newsweak Hitpiece on Sarah Palin)

    10/29/2008 3:56:07 PM PDT · by St. Louis Conservative · 10 replies · 545+ views
    Newsbusters ^ | October 29, 2008 | Brian Fitzpatrick
    Seven days before America elects a new leadership team, Newsweek is making a last-ditch attempt to portray GOP vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin as a religious nut. In her article "Jesus and Witches," Newsweek Religion Editor Lisa Miller suggests Palin believes in witchcraft, thinks the world is coming to a fiery end in her lifetime, and may have a "special sense of destiny" fueled by her "apocalyptic theology" and Alaskan "Last Frontier identity." Miller even hints Palin may be anti-Semitic. The ominous subhead reads: "Video clips of Sarah Palin attending Alaska church services have raised questions about her views on Christianity...
  • Children in the "Gay Marriage" Crosshairs

    07/05/2008 9:56:26 AM PDT · by wagglebee · 21 replies · 171+ views
    Concerned Women for America ^ | 7/3/08 | J. Matt Barber
    You've probably heard the relativist line that goes something like this: "'Gay marriage' won't hurt anyone. Live and let live, already!" Well, don't buy it for a minute. With its recent 4-3 opinion - which arrogantly presumed to redefine the millennia-old definition of legitimate marriage - the California Supreme Court daftly divined that the framers of the California Constitution intended - all along, I guess - that Patrick Henry really had a constitutional right to "marry" Henry Patrick. In so doing, four black-robed Dr. Frankensteins have loosed that paradoxical abomination tagged same-sex "marriage" on the countryside. "Abomination," you say?...