Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $15,231
18%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 18%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: justices

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Justices turn away tobacco companies' appeal about ads

    02/21/2006 12:28:39 PM PST · by freepatriot32 · 21 replies · 601+ views
    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court today refused to hear an appeal by two North Carolina-based tobacco companies who claimed California's tough anti-smoking ads smeared their reputations. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., now Winston-Salem, N.C.-based Reynolds American Inc., and Lorillard Tobacco Co. of Greensboro, N.C., had asked the justices to overturn a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision that rejected the companies' claims that their First Amendment rights were violated by California's ad campaign. California uses part of an 87-cent tax on every package of cigarettes to fund health education that includes a campaign to discourage smoking. The ads included a...
  • Unconstitutional justice selection?

    02/15/2006 1:11:09 PM PST · by kathsua · 18 replies · 451+ views
    Dwights Effort ^ | 2/15/06 | Jalexson
    NY Ruling Could Impact Kansas Courts Print E-mail By Jalexson Wednesday, 15 February 2006 By Jalexson HUTCHINSON, KS -- The recent ruling by federal Judge John Gleeson in Lopez Torres v. New York State Board of Elections, could set the stage for a federal court challenge of some Kansas courts. The specific ruling, however, would not be applicable because of differences in the courts of the two states. The New York case involved the selection of judicial candidates for election to lower courts ( called “supreme courts” in New York ). Although voters choose judges, the mechanism for selecting the...
  • FDR's court-packing fiasco (Leahy is either a fool or a liar...or both)

    01/24/2006 9:38:31 AM PST · by doug from upland · 30 replies · 1,203+ views
    enterstageright dot com ^ | K. Daniel Glover
    NOTE: Patrick Leahy referenced "court-packing" in the Judiciary Committee debate today. The scumbag is trying to equate the Constitutional power of the president to appoing judges with the unconstitutional attempt of FDR. The dumbed down Americans among us may fall for it. We won't. ========================================================================= FDR's court-packing fiasco By K. Daniel Glover web posted July 12, 1999 The Supreme Court. The title alone lends an air of distinction to that august legal body and its nine justices who sit in judgment on an entire nation. And indeed, the United States' highest tribunal, more than any other root of America's democratic...
  • Some justices seem to rethink campaign-finance ruling

    01/20/2006 10:50:50 PM PST · by freepatriot32 · 25 replies · 768+ views
    WASHINGTON — It was deja vu all over again at the Supreme Court yesterday, as justices reprised the First Amendment debate over provisions of the federal campaign-finance law that restrict electioneering ads just before an election. In the 2003 litigation over the law that resulted in the ruling McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, the First Amendment lost, with a majority of the Court upholding the restrictions on their face, even though they restrict speech when it arguably matters most. Yesterday, presented with a real-life challenge by a Wisconsin antiabortion group that had to yank its advertisements off the air because...
  • The United States Court of Appeals Composition

    01/16/2006 10:00:52 PM PST · by DuckFan4ever · 5 replies · 337+ views
    Answers.com | 1-16-05 | DuckFan4ever
    Make up of the 13 federal appellate courts. There are currently 15 vacancies on the 11 numbered appellate courts plus the DC Circuit and the Federal Circuit. There are no vacancies on the First, Second, Seventh, Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal circuits. The Ninth has 4 vacancies, the DC circuit has 3, and with Judge Alito's promotion the 3rd circuit has 3. Of the 179 active judge positions, 60 have been appointed by Bill Clinton(33%). GW Bush has appointed 22%(39), Reagan 17%(30), GHW Bush 16%(28), Carter 3%(6), Nixon 0.5%(1). 8%(15) of the seats are vacant, with 3 nominations pending(Saad, Myers, and...
  • W. gets it right

    11/01/2005 7:20:07 AM PST · by thebiggestdog · 201+ views
    www.hotchicken.com ^ | 11-1-05 | www.hotchicken.com
    After a tough couple of weeks, Bush emerged from the failed nomination of Harriet Miers and the legal troubles of Scooter Libby to hit a home run as big as anything we saw by the White Sox. All that I know about Samuel Alito is what I have read and heard in the past several hours, and almost every objective analysis of Alito confirms what most conservatives want-a justice who does not believe that judges should make the laws.
  • Now right demanding Dem memos

    09/15/2005 6:20:03 AM PDT · by wcdukenfield · 60 replies · 3,369+ views
    THE HILL ^ | September 15, 2005 | Alexander Bolton
    Conservative strategists are drafting a letter to Democratic members of the Senate Judiciary Committee demanding the release of hundreds of internal memos detailing contacts between the lawmakers and liberal interest groups opposing John Roberts’ nomination to the Supreme Court. By planning to press Democrats on the sensitive subject, conservatives seem to be pulling a page from the Democrats’ own political playbook. In the weeks leading up to the confirmation hearings, Senate Democrats have repeatedly called on the White House to give them memos Roberts penned while he was deputy solicitor general in President George H.W. Bush’s administration. Sen. Patrick Leahy...
  • Sen. Feinstein Hints at John Roberts Rejection

    08/25/2005 8:56:27 AM PDT · by TBP · 35 replies · 1,138+ views
    NewsMax ^ | Aug. 24, 2005 | Carl Limbacher
    Senator Diane Feinstein today spoke a little about Supreme Court nominees, and what we can expect from the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings. She also let us in on what issues Liberals in the U.S. consider when they think of the rulings that affected them, and which they cherish the most. Feinstein told those gathered to hear her at a meeting of the L.A. County Bar Association that in her opinion the person chosen to replace Sandra Day O'Connor should be "balanced and Fair," and not come from either extreme. She then proceeded to give a history lesson to those gathered,...
  • The Left Creates Confusion about 'Activist Judges' - (Leahy redefines "activism"; Scalia,Thomas)

    07/23/2005 4:53:33 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 41 replies · 990+ views
    HUMAN EVENTS ONLINE.COM ^ | JULY 22, 2005 | THOMAS SOWELL
    Those who want to see judges who will apply the law instead of imposing their own policies face not only political obstruction to the appointment of such judges but also calculated confusion about the very words used in discussing what is at issue. Judges who impose their own preferences, instead of following the law as it is written, have long been known as "judicial activists" while those who carry out the law, instead of rewriting it to suit themselves, have been said to be following the "original intent" of the law. But now a massive effort to muddy the waters...
  • Bush back on his game — for now - Analysts watching to see if the White House gains momentum

    07/20/2005 11:40:47 PM PDT · by Cincinatus' Wife · 17 replies · 497+ views
    Houston Chronicle ^ | JULIE MASON
    WASHINGTON - President Bush's deftly orchestrated Supreme Court announcement muffled a controversy over the leak of a CIA official's identity and put the president back on his political game, analysts said Wednesday. Whether Bush maintains control of the agenda in coming weeks depends largely on events outside of his control, such as the Senate debate over his nominee, John Roberts, and developments in the investigation of the Valerie Plame affair. As he strolled the colonnade outside the Oval Office with his newest nominee on Wednesday, Bush twice described himself as "confident." "I'm confident the senators will come to realize what...
  • Kennedy opposition carries risks for Supreme Court fight

    07/17/2005 11:23:03 AM PDT · by Cincinatus' Wife · 74 replies · 2,312+ views
    Boston Globe ^ | July 17, 2005 | Rick Klein
    Senators Edward M. Kennedy and Christopher Dodd urged the president to nominate a mainstream conservative for the Supreme Court at a news conference earlier this month. (Reuters Photo) WASHINGTON -- Senator Edward M. Kennedy's ringing baritone carried over the nearly empty Senate chamber, sounding a warning on a familiar subject. The liberal lion stood behind his desk in the chamber's last row and promised an aggressive and detailed grilling of whomever President Bush selects for the Supreme Court. .....Cooperation and comity aside, Kennedy has made it clear that he will not hesitate to lead an effort to block a nominee...
  • The "Growth" of a Justice - (Dems want conservatives to "make the wrong judicial picks again")

    07/15/2005 7:29:06 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 1 replies · 341+ views
    HERITAGE.ORG ^ | JULY 14, 2005 | PAUL ROZENZSEIG
    Perhaps Sen. Charles Schumer should have taken the Quiet Car. Here’s what the New York Democrat reportedly was overheard saying the other day on Amtrak: “Even William Rehnquist is more moderate than they expected. The only one that resulted how they predicted [was] Scalia. So most of the time they’ve gotten their picks wrong, and that’s what we want to do to them again.” Whether or not this quote from the Drudge Report is accurate, the sentiment is correct: The litany of conservative disappointments over Supreme Court appointments is a long one. Earl Warren. Harry Blackmun. John Paul Stevens. Anthony...
  • Something nice for a good buddy - (Bush "going too far" for his friend, Alberto Gonzales?)

    07/13/2005 12:48:23 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 15 replies · 646+ views
    INSIGHTMAG.COM ^ | JULY 8, 2005 | WESLEY PRUDEN
    George W. Bush is loyal to his buddies. The gooder the good ol' boy, the better. It's one of the president's most endearing traits. He stood up for Alberto Gonzales on his way to the G-8 summit in Scotland, scolding the "extremists" on the right who are suspicious of the attorney general's credentials as a conservative nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court. "I don't like it when a friend gets criticized," the president told reporters at a stop in Denmark. "I'm loyal to my friends. And all of a sudden this fellow, who is a good public servant and a...
  • A Guide to Liberal Supreme Court-Speak - (yes-s-s! Bush is a great Texas poker player! He'll win!)

    07/12/2005 9:48:27 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 8 replies · 741+ views
    CHRONWATCH.COM ^ | JULY 13, 2005 | LISA FABRIZIO
    Certain seasons or events have historically spawned their own lexicons which are unique to those events and used almost exclusively to describe them. Late in the college football season, some games have what are unfailingly called, “serious bowl implications.” Likewise vice-presidential candidates must possess ''gravitas'' and Super Bowls oddly acquire roman numerals. So. too. does the Supreme Court nomination process require its own terminology, especially when the president is a Republican. Over the next several weeks there are a number of ordinary words and phrases that will be used ad nauseam in reference to whomever President Bush submits to the...
  • Pray for President Bush - Day 1758

    07/11/2005 10:41:13 AM PDT · by Faith · 15 replies · 347+ views
    http://www.prayforgeorgewbush.com ^ | July 11, 2005 | Faith
    I Corinthians 3: 16 Don’t you know that you yourselves are God’s temple and that God’s Spirit lives in you?
  • Vanity - Do You Want Pinged When Our Supreme Court Flyers Are Ready?

    07/06/2005 12:03:24 PM PDT · by grassboots.org · 24 replies · 1,090+ views
    We are prepared to release one or two flyers the day or two after President Bush announces his Supreme Court nominee. If you would like to be added to our ping list for flyer distribution, please let us know. Here is the list of flyers distributed by you and others to 10,000s of homes during 2004. Flyers
  • Pray for President Bush - Day 1748 - July 1, 2005

    07/01/2005 1:29:13 PM PDT · by ohioWfan · 13 replies · 278+ views
    I will be glad and rejoice in You;I will sing praise to Your name, O Most High.My enemies turn back;They stumble and perish before You.For You have upheld my right and my cause;You have sat on Your throne, judging righteously.You have rebuked the nations and destroyed the wicked;You have blotted out their name for ever and ever. Psalm 9: 2-5
  • Supreme Court Liberals to the Little Guy: Drop Dead - (Jurisprudence by tea leaf reading! Superb!)

    06/30/2005 11:58:34 AM PDT · by CHARLITE · 9 replies · 771+ views
    OPINION EDITORIALS.COM ^ | JUNE 25, 2005 | JIM JORDAN
    Five Supreme Court Justices with myriad educational degrees fumbled the simple meaning of the word “public”. Apparently the new meaning of the term “public use” is any use involving people. This is a brazen moving of the goal posts to rig the game in favor of powerful corporations and political interests. The Kelo vs. New London recision (it’s not a decision) is nothing less than a nail in the coffin of government by the people, for the people, and of the people. Here are five reasons why this has happened. BIG GOVERNMENT IS #1: The liberal wing of the Supreme...
  • CA: Justices uphold California domestic partner law

    06/29/2005 3:36:05 PM PDT · by NormsRevenge · 5 replies · 522+ views
    Bakersfield Californian ^ | 6/29/05 | David Kravets - AP
    SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - Gays and lesbians won a major legal victory Wednesday when the California Supreme Court let stand a new law granting registered domestic partners many of the same rights and protections of heterosexual marriage. Without comment, the unanimous justices upheld appellate and trial court rulings that the sweeping measure does not conflict with a voter-approved initiative defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman. Justice Janice Rogers Brown, who leaves Thursday to join the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, did not vote. The domestic partner law, which was signed in...
  • In a 5-4 ruling last week, the justices of the Supreme Court determined...

    06/28/2005 9:26:29 PM PDT · by SonOfTheRepublic · 14 replies · 551+ views
    6-28-2005 | Son Of The Republic
    Supreme court justices give their okie dokie to commercial land developers to sieze their homes and property and turn them into sprawling malls and bus stops.