Keyword: justices

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Catholic justices challenged to live their faith

    10/12/2009 6:02:48 AM PDT · by NYer · 8 replies · 780+ views
    One News Now ^ | October 11, 2009 | Charles Butts
    A prominent pro-life organization has thrown down the gauntlet before a majority of the U.S. Supreme Court justices. The Supreme Court's fall/winter session is just gettingunder way. The challenge comes from Judie Brown, president of the American Life League (ALL). "Now that we have six people on the Supreme Court out of nine who claim to be Catholic," she notes, "we'd like for them to take the opportunity to address the reality of who it is who lives in the womb from the moment that his or her life begins, and then take action to overrule themselves so that the...
  • "Originalism" is not conservative judicial activism

    06/16/2009 11:02:28 AM PDT · by Graybeard58 · 127+ views
    Renew America ^ | June 16, 2009 | Robert Meyer
    Recent diatribes have appeared in the media criticizing and misrepresenting the rationale of those opposed to the Sotomayor nomination to the Supreme Court. Sotomayor has been lauded ad nauseam for her desire to be empathetic in her adjudication, and many have remarked unceasingly about the impressiveness of her "life experience." Empathy and "life experience" are certainly wonderful virtues. But are they most appropriate for a social worker or for a judge? Our own legal icon, Lady Justice, wears a blindfold and holds balanced scales in her hand. There is no room for favoritism in adjudication, and the idea of judicial...
  • García: The convenient distraction of claiming Cardozo was Hispanic

    05/31/2009 6:43:17 AM PDT · by wolfcreek · 55 replies · 1,720+ views
    Austin American Statesman ^ | 5.31.2009 | Arnold Garcia Jr.
    Adesperate — and ridiculous — claim that Sonia Sotomayor would not be the first Hispanic justice to take the U.S. Supreme Court bench is very revealing. There are actually people claiming with a straight face that Benjamin Cardozo, appointed to the court by Herbert Hoover in 1932, was the first Hispanic justice.
  • OBAMA'S MOST PERILOUS LEGAL PICK (Obama will choose a Muslim)

    04/01/2009 1:37:30 PM PDT · by Paige · 16 replies · 1,003+ views
    New York Post ^ | 03/31/2009 | Meghan Clyne
    JUDGES should interpret the Constitution according to other nations' legal "norms." Sharia law could apply to disputes in US courts. The United States constitutes an "axis of disobedience" along with North Korea and Saddam-era Iraq. Those are the views of the man on track to become one of the US government's top lawyers: Harold Koh. Obama has nominated Koh -- until last week the dean of Yale Law School -- to be the State Department's legal adviser. In that job, Koh would forge a wide range of international agreements on issues from trade to arms control, and help represent our...
  • Justice Department nominees signal ‘Culture of Death’ policies, critic says

    02/02/2009 10:24:25 AM PST · by NYer · 2 replies · 257+ views
    CNA ^ | February 1, 2009
    President Barack Obama / Leonard A. Leo Washington DC, Feb 1, 2009 / 07:55 pm (CNA).- Confirmation hearings for President Barack Obama’s Department of Justice nominees are reportedly proceeding so quickly that Republicans and outside groups are unable to make meaningful criticisms of their intense support for abortion rights and other moral issues. One critic said the nominations portend the most “Culture of Death” justice department in American history.“We are on the brink of having the most Culture of Death, anti-family Justice Department ever,” Leonard Leo, former Co-Chairman of the Republican National Committee Catholic Outreach and Chairman of Students...
  • New U.S. Supreme Court term begins next week

    10/03/2008 10:07:22 PM PDT · by jasonmyos · 2 replies · 350+ views
    WASHINGTON (Legal Newsline)-The U.S. Supreme Court reconvenes next week for a term that will be conducted under the backdrop of November's presidential election. Among cases to be heard by the high court is whether pharmaceutical companies may be sued for patient injuries, if the Federal Communications Commission may restrict foul language on broadcast television, if the Navy can be barred from using sonar off the California coast and whether local officials can be sued for violations that took place on their watch.
  • 5 Supreme Court (Roman Catholic) justices on White House guest list (No Obama or Hillary)

    04/16/2008 11:06:21 AM PDT · by NormsRevenge · 54 replies · 157+ views
    AP on Yahoo ^ | 4/16/08 | AP
    WASHINGTON - All five Roman Catholic justices on the Supreme Court were invited to Wednesday night's splashy White House dinner in honor of Pope Benedict XVI. Republican presidential contender John McCain will be there, too. But Democratic rivals Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama, who had a nationally broadcast debate scheduled Wednesday night, were not invited. About 250 guests were to attend the dinner. Benedict will not be there because he will be attending an evening prayer service with U.S. bishops. The guests include former Los Angeles Dodgers baseball manager Tommy Lasorda, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, House Minority Leader John...
  • Message to Religious Conservatives: Giuliani Would Appoint Solid Supreme Court Justices

    01/23/2008 10:31:44 AM PST · by jdm · 105 replies · 205+ views
    It took Nixon to go to China. It took Bill Clinton, a Democrat, to get control of the federal deficit. (Sorry, conservatives, but it’s true.) And it might take Rudy Giuliani to appoint solid Supreme Court Justices.With Fred Thompson out of the race, judicial conservatives are looking for a candidate. John McCain? Three words: Gang of 14. Mike Huckabee? He’ll never be President. Mitt Romney? Ehhhh . . . he might be OK — but I think he comes across to voters as too slick and unprincipled. And there may be a reason for that.But there’s no reason, in my...
  • Supreme Court justices appear divided over lethal injection case

    01/07/2008 11:25:49 AM PST · by NormsRevenge · 39 replies · 483+ views
    ap on San Diego Union - Tribune ^ | 1/07/08 | Mark Sherman - ap
    WASHINGTON – Supreme Court justices indicated Monday they are deeply divided over a challenge to the way most states execute prisoners by lethal injection, which critics say creates an avoidable risk of excruciating pain. With executions in the United States halted since late September, the court heard arguments in a case from Kentucky that calls into question the mix of three drugs used in most executions. Justice Antonin Scalia was among several conservatives on the court who suggested he would uphold Kentucky's method of execution and allow capital punishment to resume. States have been careful to adopt procedures that do...
  • The Irony of Populism: The Republican Shift and the Inevitability of American Aristocracy

    10/23/2007 10:12:36 AM PDT · by Tolerance Sucks Rocks · 7 replies · 97+ views
    Social Science Research Network ^ | 2006 | Zvi. S. Rosen
    Abstract: "The Irony of Populism: The Republican Shift and the Inevitability of American Aristocracy" analyzes the shift in the role of the Supreme Court following the movement towards a democratic Senate which culminated in the Seventeenth Amendment. The Supreme Court's shift is presented as the inevitable result of the system of mixed government that underlies the constitutional order, which orders American Government into democratic, aristocratic, and monarchical parts. While in the original conception of the constitution the Senate was the aristocratic part, the Senate would become part of the democratic part with the Seventeenth Amendment and prior procedural changes. Into...
  • Analysts Mull Possibility of Supreme Court Vacancy

    06/25/2007 10:47:48 AM PDT · by PR4MRC2007 · 29 replies · 1,362+ views
    CNSNEWS.COM ^ | Evan Moore
    If a U.S. Supreme Court justice steps down in the coming months, the Bush administration may have an easier time filling the seat with a conservative nominee than is generally expected, some political analysts argue. The first full term in which Chief Justice John Roberts, Jr., and Associate Justice Samuel Alito have served together is drawing to a close, and the country is again bracing for the possibility of another justice retiring from the bench. Retirement speculation focuses on Justices John Paul Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, both liberals. Stevens is 87 years old; and although Ginsburg is 13 years...
  • The Next Supreme Court Vacancy

    06/21/2007 5:37:04 AM PDT · by gpapa · 49 replies · 1,531+ views
    National Review ^ | June 21, 2007 | Edward Whelan
    If a Supreme Court vacancy unexpectedly develops this summer, the conventional wisdom is that President Bush will find it extremely difficult or impossible to get a strong proponent of judicial restraint confirmed by the Senate....snip....This conventional wisdom is unsound.
  • CA: Justices uphold Night Stalker convictions, death sentence (now if we had a way to whack 'em)

    05/29/2007 11:02:35 AM PDT · by NormsRevenge · 8 replies · 562+ views
    The Supreme Court refused to review the convictions and death sentence Tuesday for serial killer Richard Ramirez, the so-called Night Stalker who killed 13 people in California in the 1980s. The justices declined without comment to act on Ramirez's appeal. His killing spree terrorized the Los Angeles area in 1984 and 1985. Satanic symbols were left at murder scenes and some victims were forced by the killer to "swear to Satan." Ramirez, convicted in 1989, is not likely to be executed any time soon. He still has another round of federal appeals to pursue and the state's death penalty has...
  • Judging History - Republicans don’t know what they want.

    02/28/2007 11:00:49 PM PST · by gpapa · 10 replies · 533+ views
    National Review ^ | February 28, 2007 | Thomas Sowell
    It is understandable that liberal Democratic presidents, beginning with Franklin D. Roosevelt, loaded the Supreme Court with liberal, Democratic justices. What is far harder to understand is how a whole succession of conservative Republican presidents — Nixon, Ford, Reagan, and Bush 41 — managed to appoint so many liberals to the Supreme Court.
  • Justices defend Florida recount decision ('had no choice but to intervene' in the Florida fiasco)

    01/24/2007 11:26:25 PM PST · by NormsRevenge · 116 replies · 2,447+ views
    AP on Yahoo ^ | 1/24/07 | Mark Sherman - ap
    WASHINGTON - Three of the five Supreme Court justices who handed the presidency to George W. Bush in 2000 say they had no choice but to intervene in the Florida recount. Comments from Justice Anthony Kennedy and retired Justice Sandra Day O'Connor are in a new book that was published this week. Justice Antonin Scalia made his remarks Tuesday at Iona College in New York. Scalia, answering questions after a speech, also said that critics of the 5-4 ruling in Bush v. Gore need to move on six years after the electoral drama of December 2000, when it seemed the...
  • Don’t Despair: Strong justices can still be confirmed ( The Case for Hope )

    11/09/2006 7:46:20 AM PST · by SirLinksalot · 45 replies · 826+ views
    National Review ^ | 11/09/2006 | Edward Whelan
    Don’t Despair Strong justices can still be confirmed. By Edward Whelan The Democrats’ capture of formal control of the Senate is bad news for President Bush’s judicial nominations — especially to the federal courts of appeals — during his final two years in office. But don’t be fooled by Democrats’ bluffing. There’s still plenty of room to get another excellent Supreme Court justice — or even two or three more — confirmed. Skeptical? Consider the last Republican appointee to the Court to be confirmed by a Democrat-controlled Senate — Clarence Thomas in 1991. That Senate had 57 Democrats and only...
  • Four Supreme Court justices attend Red Mass in Washington

    10/03/2006 10:16:49 AM PDT · by NYer · 42 replies · 1,226+ views
    Catholic News Agency ^ | October 2, 2006
    Washington DC, Oct. 02, 2006 (CNA) - Four Supreme Court justices attended the annual Red Mass, which is traditionally held each autumn to mark the beginning of the court’s new term and draws members of the legal community, Presidential Cabinet members, and occasionaly the President himself. Archbishop Donald Wuerl of Washington presided at yesterday’s Mass at the Cathedral of St. Matthew the Apostle, where the Red Mass has been held since 1952. Four of the five Catholic Supreme Court justices — Chief Justice John Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, and Clarence Thomas — attended, reported The Associated Press. Justice Samuel...
  • California justices frown on Internet libel lawsuits

    09/05/2006 9:29:09 PM PDT · by NormsRevenge · 312+ views
    AP on Bakersfield Californian ^ | 9/5/06 | David Kravets - ap
    The California Supreme Court is taking a dim view of libel lawsuits against Web site operators who post inflammatory information from other sources. The justices said during a 60-minute court hearing Tuesday testing the 1996 Communications Decency Act that Congress and other courts have already spoken on the issue. The justices were leaning toward tossing out a lawsuit against a San Diego woman who posted an allegedly libelous e-mail she received on her site's message board. The widely watched case included briefs from some of the Internet's biggest names, including Amazon.com, America Online Inc., eBay Inc., Google Inc., Microsoft Corp....
  • CA: Justices uphold Night Stalker convictions, death sentence (If this was Texan, he'd be long gone)

    08/07/2006 2:01:43 PM PDT · by NormsRevenge · 13 replies · 419+ views
    AP on Bakersfield Californian ^ | 8/7/06 | David Kravets - ap
    The California Supreme Court upheld the convictions and death sentence Monday for serial killer Richard Ramirez whose so-called Night Stalker killing spree terrorized the Los Angeles area in the mid 1980s. Ramirez, 46, was sentenced to death in 1989 for 13 Los Angeles-area murders in 1984 and 1985. Satanic symbols were left at murder scenes and some victims were forced to "swear to Satan" by the killer, who entered homes through unlocked windows and doors. The justices unanimously denied claims that Ramirez was incompetent to stand trial, that the case should have been moved outside Los Angeles, and that all...
  • CA: Justices delve into doctors' religious dilemma

    06/14/2006 9:23:56 PM PDT · by NormsRevenge · 3 replies · 271+ views
    AP on Bakersfield Californian ^ | 6/14/06 | David Kravets - ap
    The California Supreme Court delved into the world of religion Wednesday, agreeing to decide whether doctors can deny treatment to patients who offend their religious beliefs. The justices decided to review the case of two Vista fertility doctors, Christine Brody and Douglas Fenton, who refused to artificially inseminate a lesbian woman. The Christian doctors, however, do not object to treating married patients requiring insemination. "These physicians do not believe that it is necessarily appropriate for a woman to have a baby out of wedlock," the doctors' attorney, Robert Tyler said. "Should a Christian be forced to artificially inseminate an unmarried...
  • USSC: Justices avoid San Diego gay couple's custody battle

    05/22/2006 10:06:40 AM PDT · by NormsRevenge · 13 replies · 788+ views
    WASHINGTON For the second time, the Supreme Court on Monday shied away from getting involved in a child custody fight between a San Diego woman and her former lesbian partner. The birth mother, known as Sharon S., is trying to prevent her former partner from adopting one of the two children the women were raising together. Sharon S. and her partner Annette F. separated after an incident of domestic violence that Sharon blames on Annette. The California Supreme Court rejected the attempt by Sharon to prevent the adoption, which she consented to by signing an adoption petition in August 1999....
  • Breyer Sees More Debate Now Among Justices

    03/07/2006 8:49:38 PM PST · by NormsRevenge · 12 replies · 829+ views
    AP on Yahoo ^ | 3/7/06 | Andrew DeMillo - ap
    LITTLE ROCK, Ark. - Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer said Tuesday the high court has more discussion and debate behind closed doors with its two new members. Breyer, though, said the court "seems to be running very well" under Chief Justice John Roberts, and he doesn't think the extra discussion is a major change. "Perhaps it has to do with younger people," Breyer, 67, told reporters at a news conference before he was to speak at the Clinton Library. President Bush's first nominee to the court, 51-year-old Roberts, was sworn in last fall, becoming the nation's youngest chief justice in...
  • Looking at Justices

    02/27/2006 7:02:18 AM PST · by blitzgig · 8 replies · 405+ views
    2/27/06 | blitzgig
    Just for fun, I am introducing this thread for Freepers who have much interest in the Supreme Court. I thought it would be interesting to take a look at some of the influential justices of the mid-to-late twentieth century, so I have provided a list below naming some of the most prominent justices of that period. I’d love to get reactions from fellow Freepers regarding some of these justices and get an idea of some favorites and least favorites. Obviously, I know very well what harsh words nearly all members will have for the left-wing justices! LOL In an effort...
  • Justices turn away tobacco companies' appeal about ads

    02/21/2006 12:28:39 PM PST · by freepatriot32 · 21 replies · 576+ views
    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court today refused to hear an appeal by two North Carolina-based tobacco companies who claimed California's tough anti-smoking ads smeared their reputations. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., now Winston-Salem, N.C.-based Reynolds American Inc., and Lorillard Tobacco Co. of Greensboro, N.C., had asked the justices to overturn a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision that rejected the companies' claims that their First Amendment rights were violated by California's ad campaign. California uses part of an 87-cent tax on every package of cigarettes to fund health education that includes a campaign to discourage smoking. The ads included a...
  • Unconstitutional justice selection?

    02/15/2006 1:11:09 PM PST · by kathsua · 18 replies · 414+ views
    Dwights Effort ^ | 2/15/06 | Jalexson
    NY Ruling Could Impact Kansas Courts Print E-mail By Jalexson Wednesday, 15 February 2006 By Jalexson HUTCHINSON, KS -- The recent ruling by federal Judge John Gleeson in Lopez Torres v. New York State Board of Elections, could set the stage for a federal court challenge of some Kansas courts. The specific ruling, however, would not be applicable because of differences in the courts of the two states. The New York case involved the selection of judicial candidates for election to lower courts ( called “supreme courts” in New York ). Although voters choose judges, the mechanism for selecting the...
  • FDR's court-packing fiasco (Leahy is either a fool or a liar...or both)

    01/24/2006 9:38:31 AM PST · by doug from upland · 30 replies · 1,173+ views
    enterstageright dot com ^ | K. Daniel Glover
    NOTE: Patrick Leahy referenced "court-packing" in the Judiciary Committee debate today. The scumbag is trying to equate the Constitutional power of the president to appoing judges with the unconstitutional attempt of FDR. The dumbed down Americans among us may fall for it. We won't. ========================================================================= FDR's court-packing fiasco By K. Daniel Glover web posted July 12, 1999 The Supreme Court. The title alone lends an air of distinction to that august legal body and its nine justices who sit in judgment on an entire nation. And indeed, the United States' highest tribunal, more than any other root of America's democratic...
  • Some justices seem to rethink campaign-finance ruling

    01/20/2006 10:50:50 PM PST · by freepatriot32 · 25 replies · 751+ views
    WASHINGTON — It was deja vu all over again at the Supreme Court yesterday, as justices reprised the First Amendment debate over provisions of the federal campaign-finance law that restrict electioneering ads just before an election. In the 2003 litigation over the law that resulted in the ruling McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, the First Amendment lost, with a majority of the Court upholding the restrictions on their face, even though they restrict speech when it arguably matters most. Yesterday, presented with a real-life challenge by a Wisconsin antiabortion group that had to yank its advertisements off the air because...
  • The United States Court of Appeals Composition

    01/16/2006 10:00:52 PM PST · by DuckFan4ever · 5 replies · 310+ views
    Answers.com | 1-16-05 | DuckFan4ever
    Make up of the 13 federal appellate courts. There are currently 15 vacancies on the 11 numbered appellate courts plus the DC Circuit and the Federal Circuit. There are no vacancies on the First, Second, Seventh, Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal circuits. The Ninth has 4 vacancies, the DC circuit has 3, and with Judge Alito's promotion the 3rd circuit has 3. Of the 179 active judge positions, 60 have been appointed by Bill Clinton(33%). GW Bush has appointed 22%(39), Reagan 17%(30), GHW Bush 16%(28), Carter 3%(6), Nixon 0.5%(1). 8%(15) of the seats are vacant, with 3 nominations pending(Saad, Myers, and...
  • W. gets it right

    11/01/2005 7:20:07 AM PST · by thebiggestdog · 174+ views
    www.hotchicken.com ^ | 11-1-05 | www.hotchicken.com
    After a tough couple of weeks, Bush emerged from the failed nomination of Harriet Miers and the legal troubles of Scooter Libby to hit a home run as big as anything we saw by the White Sox. All that I know about Samuel Alito is what I have read and heard in the past several hours, and almost every objective analysis of Alito confirms what most conservatives want-a justice who does not believe that judges should make the laws.
  • Now right demanding Dem memos

    09/15/2005 6:20:03 AM PDT · by wcdukenfield · 60 replies · 3,348+ views
    THE HILL ^ | September 15, 2005 | Alexander Bolton
    Conservative strategists are drafting a letter to Democratic members of the Senate Judiciary Committee demanding the release of hundreds of internal memos detailing contacts between the lawmakers and liberal interest groups opposing John Roberts’ nomination to the Supreme Court. By planning to press Democrats on the sensitive subject, conservatives seem to be pulling a page from the Democrats’ own political playbook. In the weeks leading up to the confirmation hearings, Senate Democrats have repeatedly called on the White House to give them memos Roberts penned while he was deputy solicitor general in President George H.W. Bush’s administration. Sen. Patrick Leahy...
  • Sen. Feinstein Hints at John Roberts Rejection

    08/25/2005 8:56:27 AM PDT · by TBP · 35 replies · 1,114+ views
    NewsMax ^ | Aug. 24, 2005 | Carl Limbacher
    Senator Diane Feinstein today spoke a little about Supreme Court nominees, and what we can expect from the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings. She also let us in on what issues Liberals in the U.S. consider when they think of the rulings that affected them, and which they cherish the most. Feinstein told those gathered to hear her at a meeting of the L.A. County Bar Association that in her opinion the person chosen to replace Sandra Day O'Connor should be "balanced and Fair," and not come from either extreme. She then proceeded to give a history lesson to those gathered,...
  • The Left Creates Confusion about 'Activist Judges' - (Leahy redefines "activism"; Scalia,Thomas)

    07/23/2005 4:53:33 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 41 replies · 974+ views
    HUMAN EVENTS ONLINE.COM ^ | JULY 22, 2005 | THOMAS SOWELL
    Those who want to see judges who will apply the law instead of imposing their own policies face not only political obstruction to the appointment of such judges but also calculated confusion about the very words used in discussing what is at issue. Judges who impose their own preferences, instead of following the law as it is written, have long been known as "judicial activists" while those who carry out the law, instead of rewriting it to suit themselves, have been said to be following the "original intent" of the law. But now a massive effort to muddy the waters...
  • Bush back on his game — for now - Analysts watching to see if the White House gains momentum

    07/20/2005 11:40:47 PM PDT · by Cincinatus' Wife · 17 replies · 469+ views
    Houston Chronicle ^ | JULIE MASON
    WASHINGTON - President Bush's deftly orchestrated Supreme Court announcement muffled a controversy over the leak of a CIA official's identity and put the president back on his political game, analysts said Wednesday. Whether Bush maintains control of the agenda in coming weeks depends largely on events outside of his control, such as the Senate debate over his nominee, John Roberts, and developments in the investigation of the Valerie Plame affair. As he strolled the colonnade outside the Oval Office with his newest nominee on Wednesday, Bush twice described himself as "confident." "I'm confident the senators will come to realize what...
  • Kennedy opposition carries risks for Supreme Court fight

    07/17/2005 11:23:03 AM PDT · by Cincinatus' Wife · 74 replies · 2,298+ views
    Boston Globe ^ | July 17, 2005 | Rick Klein
    Senators Edward M. Kennedy and Christopher Dodd urged the president to nominate a mainstream conservative for the Supreme Court at a news conference earlier this month. (Reuters Photo) WASHINGTON -- Senator Edward M. Kennedy's ringing baritone carried over the nearly empty Senate chamber, sounding a warning on a familiar subject. The liberal lion stood behind his desk in the chamber's last row and promised an aggressive and detailed grilling of whomever President Bush selects for the Supreme Court. .....Cooperation and comity aside, Kennedy has made it clear that he will not hesitate to lead an effort to block a nominee...
  • The "Growth" of a Justice - (Dems want conservatives to "make the wrong judicial picks again")

    07/15/2005 7:29:06 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 1 replies · 313+ views
    HERITAGE.ORG ^ | JULY 14, 2005 | PAUL ROZENZSEIG
    Perhaps Sen. Charles Schumer should have taken the Quiet Car. Here’s what the New York Democrat reportedly was overheard saying the other day on Amtrak: “Even William Rehnquist is more moderate than they expected. The only one that resulted how they predicted [was] Scalia. So most of the time they’ve gotten their picks wrong, and that’s what we want to do to them again.” Whether or not this quote from the Drudge Report is accurate, the sentiment is correct: The litany of conservative disappointments over Supreme Court appointments is a long one. Earl Warren. Harry Blackmun. John Paul Stevens. Anthony...
  • Something nice for a good buddy - (Bush "going too far" for his friend, Alberto Gonzales?)

    07/13/2005 12:48:23 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 15 replies · 608+ views
    INSIGHTMAG.COM ^ | JULY 8, 2005 | WESLEY PRUDEN
    George W. Bush is loyal to his buddies. The gooder the good ol' boy, the better. It's one of the president's most endearing traits. He stood up for Alberto Gonzales on his way to the G-8 summit in Scotland, scolding the "extremists" on the right who are suspicious of the attorney general's credentials as a conservative nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court. "I don't like it when a friend gets criticized," the president told reporters at a stop in Denmark. "I'm loyal to my friends. And all of a sudden this fellow, who is a good public servant and a...
  • A Guide to Liberal Supreme Court-Speak - (yes-s-s! Bush is a great Texas poker player! He'll win!)

    07/12/2005 9:48:27 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 8 replies · 696+ views
    CHRONWATCH.COM ^ | JULY 13, 2005 | LISA FABRIZIO
    Certain seasons or events have historically spawned their own lexicons which are unique to those events and used almost exclusively to describe them. Late in the college football season, some games have what are unfailingly called, “serious bowl implications.” Likewise vice-presidential candidates must possess ''gravitas'' and Super Bowls oddly acquire roman numerals. So. too. does the Supreme Court nomination process require its own terminology, especially when the president is a Republican. Over the next several weeks there are a number of ordinary words and phrases that will be used ad nauseam in reference to whomever President Bush submits to the...
  • Pray for President Bush - Day 1758

    07/11/2005 10:41:13 AM PDT · by Faith · 15 replies · 304+ views
    http://www.prayforgeorgewbush.com ^ | July 11, 2005 | Faith
    I Corinthians 3: 16 Don’t you know that you yourselves are God’s temple and that God’s Spirit lives in you?
  • Vanity - Do You Want Pinged When Our Supreme Court Flyers Are Ready?

    07/06/2005 12:03:24 PM PDT · by grassboots.org · 24 replies · 1,051+ views
    We are prepared to release one or two flyers the day or two after President Bush announces his Supreme Court nominee. If you would like to be added to our ping list for flyer distribution, please let us know. Here is the list of flyers distributed by you and others to 10,000s of homes during 2004. Flyers
  • Pray for President Bush - Day 1748 - July 1, 2005

    07/01/2005 1:29:13 PM PDT · by ohioWfan · 13 replies · 251+ views
    I will be glad and rejoice in You;I will sing praise to Your name, O Most High.My enemies turn back;They stumble and perish before You.For You have upheld my right and my cause;You have sat on Your throne, judging righteously.You have rebuked the nations and destroyed the wicked;You have blotted out their name for ever and ever. Psalm 9: 2-5
  • Supreme Court Liberals to the Little Guy: Drop Dead - (Jurisprudence by tea leaf reading! Superb!)

    06/30/2005 11:58:34 AM PDT · by CHARLITE · 9 replies · 732+ views
    OPINION EDITORIALS.COM ^ | JUNE 25, 2005 | JIM JORDAN
    Five Supreme Court Justices with myriad educational degrees fumbled the simple meaning of the word “public”. Apparently the new meaning of the term “public use” is any use involving people. This is a brazen moving of the goal posts to rig the game in favor of powerful corporations and political interests. The Kelo vs. New London recision (it’s not a decision) is nothing less than a nail in the coffin of government by the people, for the people, and of the people. Here are five reasons why this has happened. BIG GOVERNMENT IS #1: The liberal wing of the Supreme...
  • CA: Justices uphold California domestic partner law

    06/29/2005 3:36:05 PM PDT · by NormsRevenge · 5 replies · 479+ views
    Bakersfield Californian ^ | 6/29/05 | David Kravets - AP
    SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - Gays and lesbians won a major legal victory Wednesday when the California Supreme Court let stand a new law granting registered domestic partners many of the same rights and protections of heterosexual marriage. Without comment, the unanimous justices upheld appellate and trial court rulings that the sweeping measure does not conflict with a voter-approved initiative defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman. Justice Janice Rogers Brown, who leaves Thursday to join the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, did not vote. The domestic partner law, which was signed in...
  • In a 5-4 ruling last week, the justices of the Supreme Court determined...

    06/28/2005 9:26:29 PM PDT · by SonOfTheRepublic · 14 replies · 503+ views
    6-28-2005 | Son Of The Republic
    Supreme court justices give their okie dokie to commercial land developers to sieze their homes and property and turn them into sprawling malls and bus stops.
  • In a 5-4 last week, the Supreme Court Justices of the United States of America...

    06/28/2005 9:22:11 PM PDT · by SonOfTheRepublic · 18 replies · 486+ views
    6-28-2005 | Son Of The Republic
    Supreme Court Justices by a 5-4 ruling gave legal Authorization to commercial land developers, to sieze their property at any time for the good of economic development and the community.
  • CA: Calif justices say Coastal Commission legal

    06/23/2005 12:18:57 PM PDT · by NormsRevenge · 11 replies · 833+ views
    Bakersfield Californian ^ | 6/23/05 | David Kravets - AP
    SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - California's Coastal Commission is not an illegal agency, the state Supreme Court ruled unanimously Thursday, a move that keeps officials from reconsidering four decades of land-use decisions along the 1,100-mile coastline. The justices were reviewing two lower-court rulings that said the 12-member commission was unlawfully formed by the Legislature in 1976. The lower courts ruled that because the agency carries out the will of the Legislature, lawmakers who appoint eight members have too much power over the agency and governor. The Supreme Court, however, ruled that the agency did not breach the so-called separation of powers...
  • Kumbaya or The Battle Hymn of the Republic?

    06/20/2005 7:52:04 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 3 replies · 356+ views
    THE RANT.US ^ | JUNE 20, 2005 | BARBARA ANDERSON
    “He has loosed the fateful lightening of His terrible swift sword. He has sounded forth the trumpet that shall never call retreat.” Those are two lines of “The Battle Hymn of the Republic“. Do they describe the current bunch of Republicans in Congress? As the Democrats continue to be mired in their out-of-power position, they have become more shrill, more audacious, more “in your face”. Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois even compared our service people holding enemy combatants in Guantanamo to Hitler, Pol Pot, etc. He is unrepentant, but this is usual for the leftists. The Democrat Party was at...
  • Calif justices uphold judges' broad sentencing leeway

    06/20/2005 7:04:03 PM PDT · by NormsRevenge · 1 replies · 183+ views
    SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - The California Supreme Court upheld state sentencing guidelines Monday amid challenges judges were unconstitutionally justifying steeper sentences based on elements not considered by the jury. Leaving intact the sentencing guidelines avoided what might have been the resentencing of thousands of prisoners. The decision was the third this year by California's justices interpreting new precedent established by the U.S. Supreme Court involving a hodgepodge of topics including sentencing, executing the mentally retarded and limiting the amount of damages jurors could award to punish business for egregious conduct in civil lawsuits. Ruling 6-1 Monday, the justices said California's...
  • A Look at Likely Supreme Court Candidates

    06/19/2005 8:24:13 PM PDT · by MissouriConservative · 24 replies · 564+ views
    The Washington Post ^ | June 18, 2005 | The Associated Press
    Samuel A. Alito, 55, is a judge on the Philadelphia-based 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. ---------- Emilio Garza, 58, is a judge on the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The former Marine and Texas state judge was considered for a Supreme Court seat by the first President Bush. ---------- J. Michael Luttig, 51, is considered a solid conservative choice for the high court. The Texas native worked in the Justice Department during the first Bush administration. ---------- Michael McConnell, 50, is a judge on the Denver-based 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. ---------- A former Rehnquist...
  • Senators Mentioned As Possible Justices

    06/11/2005 10:17:13 AM PDT · by NormsRevenge · 49 replies · 1,133+ views
    AP on Yahoo ^ | 6/11/05 | Jesse J. Holland - AP
    WASHINGTON - If there is a Supreme Court vacancy this summer, President Bush may look no farther than the Capitol for a member of Congress who can be confirmed quickly. Past presidents have done it, more than two dozen times. While admittedly long shots, GOP Sens. Jon Kyl of Arizona and John Cornyn of Texas are being talked up by some conservatives as possible nominees for the high court. Seen as most likely to step down is Chief Justice William Rehnquist, who at 80 is fighting cancer. Retirement also might be attractive option for Justices Sandra Day O'Connor, 75, and...
  • 'Mainstream'? These folks are in way over their heads

    06/11/2005 2:59:56 AM PDT · by Cincinatus' Wife · 24 replies · 1,669+ views
    Baltimore Sun ^ | June 11, 2005 | Gregory Kane
    IS JANICE Rogers Brown, the California Supreme Court justice who was just confirmed by the U.S. Senate to sit on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, more mainstream than the Congressional Black Caucus? I'm sure the caucus wouldn't agree. It's members opposed Brown's nomination from the start. In 2003, Maryland's own Rep. Elijah Cummings, who was then CBC chairman, said that Brown was one of several of President Bush's nominees "who are out of the mainstream of America." Brown's supporters noted that the last time her name appeared on a California ballot, she received 76...