2008 Q4 FReepathon. Target: $80,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $23,852
29%  
Woo hoo!! The first 29% is in!! Thank you all very much!!

Keyword: decision

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Decision Points to How Barack Obama Would Fund Abortions

    10/06/2008 1:58:20 PM PDT · by julieee · 4 replies · 119+ views
    LifeNews.com ^ | October 6, 2008 | Steven Ertelt
    Washington, DC -- Last week, the Bush administration used a national law prohibiting American taxpayer funding of international groups that promote forced abortions to de-fund UK-based Marie Stopes International. The decision to points to how the policy could change if Barack Obama becomes president. In April 2005, Obama supported an amendment to nullify the Mexico City Policy, which prevents forcing taxpayers to fund performing or promoting abortions in other nations.
  • A "Decision Card" For Today's New Churches

    09/13/2008 8:40:38 AM PDT · by Gamecock · 9 replies · 11+ views
    Extreme Theology ^ | August 26, 2007 | Chris Rosebrough
    Clicking on a 'decision' will take you to a page about that 'decision'.
  • Support Terrorists? Yes We Can! (Snappy Take on Israel/Obama/Supremes)

    06/17/2008 2:36:45 PM PDT · by Dave123 · 4+ views
    israelnationalnews.com ^ | 6/15/2008 | Jack Engelhard
    Support Terrorists? Yes We Can! (Snappy Take on Israel/Obama/Supremes) by Jack Engelhard The meter is running on our survival. From the beginning, Barack Obama has mesmerized the multitudes with his chant, "Yes we can!" His worshipful millions dutifully provide the hallelujah chorus - "YES WE CAN!" Therefore, can we say that Obama supports the Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling which grants Gitmo terrorist detainees the same Constitutional rights as American citizens? YES WE CAN! This is what he said in consent: "This is an important step toward re-establishing our credibility as a nation committed to the rule of law." (Since when...
  • Boumediene v. Bush: US Supreme Court Tapes “Kick Me’ Sign on America’s Back

    06/17/2008 9:26:04 AM PDT · by mondoreb · 14 replies · 1+ views
    DBKP ^ | June 17, 2008 | Mondoreb
    The Supreme Court's Boumediene v. Bush used the U.S. Constitution to find extraordinary rights for the very same people trying to destroy that Constitution. In doing so, the five liberal members of the U.S. Supreme Court taped a "KICK ME!" signs to their own backs. But unlike other Kick Me Liberals, in the Supreme Court's case, they've also taped that sign onto the backs of 300 million of their countrymen. A few examples of Kick Me Liberals. United States Supreme Court Incredibly, these five Justices [the Court's liberal bloc of Justices John Paul Stevens, David Souter, Ruth Ginsburg and Stephen...
  • A Supreme Error

    06/13/2008 4:26:54 PM PDT · by Josh Painter · 43 replies · 7+ views
    Townhall.com ^ | June 13, 2008 | Fred Thompson
    In reading the majority opinion I am struck by the utter waste that is involved here... all those years... studying how adherence to legal precedent is the bedrock of the rule of law, when it turns out, all they really needed was a Pew poll, a subscription to the New York Times, and the latest edition of “How to Make War for Dummies.” It is truly stunning that this court has seen fit to arrogate unto itself a role in the most important issue facing any country, self-defense, in a case in which Congress has in fact repeatedly acted. This...
  • Adiós, Guantánamo

    06/12/2008 4:16:23 PM PDT · by vietvet67 · 55 replies · 1+ views
    The Wall Street Journal ^ | June 12, 2008 | JAMES TARANTO
    "The Nation will live to regret what the Court had done today," Justice Antonin Scalia writes at the end of his dissent in Boumediene v. Bush, the case in which a bare majority of the Supreme Court, for the first time ever, extended rights under the U.S. constitution to enemy combatants who have never set foot on U.S. soil. It's worth noting that the nation has lived to regret things the court has done in earlier wars. In Schenck v. U.S. (1919), the court upheld the conviction of a Socialist Party leader for distributing an anticonscription flier during World War...
  • Did the California Supreme Court make the correct decision on Homosexual Marriage?

    05/18/2008 2:03:06 PM PDT · by TheEaglehasLanded · 42 replies · 2+ views
    LA Times Online Poll ^ | May 18, 2008 | the eagle has landed
    The poll is in the middle of the left hand column in the story that it was a tough decision for Ron George.
  • Decision Point Approaches in Kosovo, NATO Chief Says

    10/10/2007 5:04:38 PM PDT · by SandRat · 20 replies · 228+ views
    WASHINGTON, Oct. 10, 2007 – With elections nearing and the question of independence uncertain, the next few months will be a “telling time” for people in the breakaway Serbian province of Kosovo, NATO’s top military officer said at a Pentagon news conference today. Army Gen. Bantz J. Craddock, NATO’s supreme allied commander for Europe and commander of U.S. European Command, conducts a news conference at the Pentagon, Oct. 10, 2007. Photo by Petty Officer 2nd Class Molly A. Burgess, USN  (Click photo for screen-resolution image);high-resolution image available. Army Gen. Bantz J. Craddock, NATO’s supreme allied commander for Europe, said the...
  • Bush Announces Decision to Support Petraeus Recommendations

    09/13/2007 9:49:01 PM PDT · by SandRat · 1 replies · 127+ views
    WASHINGTON, Sept. 13, 2007 – President Bush said tonight that he accepts Army Gen. David H. Petraeus’ recommendations on the U.S. strategy in Iraq and reduced troop levels. Bush said in a White House address that the strategy implemented eight months ago, which included a 30,000-troop surge, has enabled coalition troops and Iraqi security forces to make progress against al Qaeda and other extremists. He cited turnarounds in Baghdad, where violence is down, and in Anbar province, a region previously considered lost to terrorists. While acknowledging that the challenge in Iraq remains “formidable,” Bush said that testimony to Congress...
  • The Decision (Ann Romney)

    06/19/2007 8:24:35 AM PDT · by Reaganesque · 58 replies · 999+ views
    Romney for President 2008 ^ | 06/16/07 | Ann Romney
    This video was put together by Ann Romney. It was shot around Christmas time in 2006 and documents the family meeting that the Romney's had where Mitt asked them how they felt about him running for President. As campaign videos go, this one is quite remarkable. View the video here.
  • Abortion Ruling Is All About Alito

    04/18/2007 5:51:40 PM PDT · by LdSentinal · 54 replies · 1,457+ views
    The Washington Post ^ | 4/18/07 | Andrew Cohen
    This is why presidential elections matter even if and when you don't particularly like one candidate or the other. The re-election of George W. Bush in 2004 begat the nomination to the United States Supreme Court of Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr. and Justice Alito's ascenion to the High Court last year begat today a landmark abortion ruling that anti-abortion advocates have pushed to get for years. You can spin this any other way you want but in the end it comes down to a simple matter of personnel. Justice Alito was willing and able to go in the law...
  • Retraining Iraq Police Brigade is Right Decision, General Says

    10/06/2006 5:18:45 PM PDT · by SandRat · 4 replies · 178+ views
    American Forces Press Service ^ | Sgt. Sara Wood, USA
    WASHINGTON, Oct. 6, 2006 – The decision to pull an Iraqi police brigade off the streets for intensive retraining is part of the Iraqi government’s overall reform plan and will improve the professionalism and confidence within the national police, the U.S. general in charge of training Iraqi police said today. The Iraqi Ministry of Interior announced Oct. 3 that the 8th Brigade, 2nd National Police, was being recalled to go through intensive training in anti-militia and anti-sectarian violence operations, due to poor performance and possible complicity with sectarian violence. “I really believe that the decision to withdraw the 8th Brigade...
  • America's Iraq Decision

    09/01/2006 8:23:36 AM PDT · by MosesKnows · 7 replies · 182+ views
    9/1/2006 | MosesKnows
    America's Obligation I believe America has an obligation to answer this question as a nation. "Does America want to win or lose in Iraq". It is just that simple.
  • And Subjective Justice For All

    08/19/2006 2:21:09 PM PDT · by jennivinson · 307+ views
    1440 KEYS AM ^ | August 19, 2006 | Jenni Vinson Trejo
    And Subjective Justice For All By Jenni Vinson Trejo August 19, 2006 William S. Mosher lived in Harris County in Houston, Texas. Mosher was a prominent Houston businessman and philanthropist who had been a long-time active and supporter of a local Christian charity, the Star of Hope Mission, that provided food and shelter to indigents. William Mosher died in 1948. In 1953 the president of the Star of Hope Mission approached the Harris County Commissioners Court and secured permission to erect a memorial to Mosher on the Courthouse property. Morris testified that Star of Hope selected a location in front...
  • CA: State education board stripped of funding over textbook decision

    07/12/2006 7:13:26 PM PDT · by NormsRevenge · 11 replies · 442+ views
    ap on Riverside Press Enterprise ^ | 7/12/06 | Juliet Williams - ap
    SACRAMENTO Caught in a political dustup over English-learning students and their own philosophical divide, members of the state Board of Education decided Wednesday to put their trust in the state's top political leaders to restore funding after the body was stripped of its entire operating budget. The loss of the board's $1.6 million annual staff budget came as political retaliation for its split vote in April not to allow alternative textbooks for English-learner students. The board rejected pleas from bilingual education advocates to allow schools to use different textbooks for students learning English. That vote angered the Democratic Latino Caucus,...
  • Pelosi Statement on Judge's Decision on FBI Raid of Congressional Office (William Jefferson, D-La.)

    07/10/2006 10:46:33 PM PDT · by NormsRevenge · 21 replies · 1,177+ views
    U.S. Newswire on Yahoo ^ | 7/10/06 | Nancy Pelosi
    WASHINGTON, July 10 /U.S. Newswire/ -- House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi released the following statement today on Judge Thomas F. Hogan's ruling upholding his approval of the search warrant of Representative William Jefferson (news, bio, voting record)'s congressional office: "No one is above the law and no Members of the House can use a congressional office to conceal evidence of criminal wrongdoing or to shield them from prosecution. "This particular search could have been conducted in a manner that fully protected the ability of the prosecutors to obtain the evidence needed to do their job while preserving constitutional principles. "The...
  • Rumsfeld: Don't Draw Conclusions From Decision on Deployment

    05/12/2006 4:55:56 PM PDT · by SandRat · 5 replies · 170+ views
    WASHINGTON, May 11, 2006 – The decision to delay deployment of one Army brigade from Germany to Iraq does not mean officials have decided to draw down troops in Iraq, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said yesterday. Concluding that putting an Army brigade's deployment to Iraq on hold makes a statement about Iraq's stability or a troop drawdown ahead is like "taking one tulip and deciding it's spring," the secretary said on a radio talk show. It's premature to draw sweeping conclusions from the decision to keep the 2nd Brigade, 1st Infantry Division, in Schweinfurt, Germany, until further notice, Rumsfeld...
  • Deal takes sheep off grazing allotment

    03/17/2006 8:22:02 PM PST · by george76 · 32 replies · 623+ views
    Billings Gazette ^ | March 17, 2006 | MIKE STARK
    Sheep don't mix well with grizzly bears and wolves. Now they won't mix at all on more than 70,000 acres in the Absaroka-Beartooth wilderness. A 74,000-acre sheep grazing allotment south of Big Timber in the Gallatin National Forest has been permanently closed and the ranchers who used it for generations have been paid to move their sheep elsewhere... The agreement is the eighth -- and second-largest -- in the greater Yellowstone ecosystem in recent years that has led to the retirement of about 300,000 acres from grazing. The latest involves the Ash Mountain and Iron Mountain allotments used for generations...
  • U.S. panel says voters don't have to prove citizenship (Decision counter to state's Prop. 200)

    03/11/2006 10:56:57 AM PST · by SandRat · 26 replies · 767+ views
    Arizona Daily Star ^ | C.J. Karamargin
    PHOENIX ¡ª State election officials are scrambling to interpret a ruling that Arizonans do not need to show proof of citizenship when they register to vote with a federal registration form. Issued Monday by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, the ruling amounts to a potential loophole in Proposition 200, the voter-approved initiative that made Arizona the first state in the nation to require proof of citizenship for voter registration. The ruling says "Arizona may not refuse to register individuals to vote in a federal election for failing to provide supplemental proof of citizenship," as required under Prop. 200. In a...
  • Brit Hume: Bush Will Reverse Ports Decision

    02/19/2006 10:30:27 AM PST · by LibWhacker · 284 replies · 4,847+ views
    NewsMax ^ | 2/19/06 | Carl Limbacher
    The Bush administration will reverse its decision to allow a Dubai company based in the United Arab Emirates to gain control over several key U.S. ports, the Fox News Channel's Brit Hume predicted on Sunday. "I don't think the administration will be able to sustain this," Hume told "Fox News Sunday." "I think it will have to reverse itself in some way or create some entity that stands between the company and the management of the ports." "I just don't think [the decision] can stand," he added. "It doesn't sound good to let some Arab shieks to be in charge...
  • Online Poll: Decision: Bomb Iran Now?

    02/16/2006 11:35:05 AM PST · by hamboy · 20 replies · 686+ views
    NewsMax Media, Inc. ^ | Feb. 16, 2006 | NewsMax Media, Inc.
    Dear NewsMax Reader: NewsMax.com, one of America's leading online news services, is conducting an urgent national online poll. Should the U.S. bomb Iran and stop its nuclear weapons program? We need to know your opinion in this online poll. Just Go Here Now to vote. NewsMax will provide the results of this poll to major media. Additionally, NewsMax's results will be shared with every major radio talk show host in America. NewsMax reports have been cited by national major media, including Fox News, CNN and MSNBC. Don't miss this opportunity to let your voice be heard! Vote today! Go...
  • Eminent domain abuse - it could happen to you

    01/21/2006 6:12:26 AM PST · by seanmerc · 17 replies · 777+ views
    January 20, 2006 | Jerry Falwell
    Date: January 20, 2006 From: Jerry Falwell EMINENT DOMAIN KNOCKING ON CHURCH’S DOOR I learned this week that a small Baptist church in Oklahoma is at risk of losing its place of worship because it sits on a site where city leaders want to build a shopping plaza. This eminent domain business is getting serious. Since the U.S. Supreme Court’s Kelo ruling last year, we are facing a brand new ballgame in terms of private property and what that term really means. For the Rev. Roosevelt Gildon, pastor of the Centennial Baptist Church in Sand Springs, Okla., eminent domain is...
  • 1982 Court Decision Approved Unwarranted Wiretaps

    12/20/2005 6:33:36 PM PST · by TheDotte · 48 replies · 1,061+ views
    District Court Judge Freeman accepted Jabara’s arguments in a precedent-setting opinion, holding that the FBI and NSA violated Jabara’s Fourth Amendment rights. The judge first found that Jabara had a well-based expectation of privacy when he made his overseas telephone calls. Next, the court found that because the FBI evidence failed to tie Jabara or domestic organizations he was affiliated with to a foreign agent or to collaboration with a foreign power, the FBI should have sought a warrant before asking the NSA to “seize” his telephone calls. Finally, the court held that the NSA...should have sought a warrant before...
  • Williams Waits on Gov.'s Clemency Decision (Tookie Update! Gov says NO to clemency)

    12/12/2005 12:13:42 PM PST · by NormsRevenge · 54 replies · 1,600+ views
    AP on Yahoo ^ | 12/12/05 | David Kravets - ap
    SAN FRANCISCO - A federal appeals court has rejected a stay of execution for Crips co-founder Stanley Tookie Williams, who is scheduled to die after midnight. The court's decision comes a day after the California Supreme Court refused to grant a stay of execution for the convicted killer meaning the former gang leader who became an outspoken critic of gang violence will be executed early Tuesday unless the governor grants clemency. Williams' supporters also made another pitch directly to the governor Sunday to spare his life, telling Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in a letter that they had a new witness who...
  • Freep Governor Schwarzennegger 1-916-445-2841, Will he be "Girly Man" or the "Terminator" w/ Tookie

    12/12/2005 5:34:42 AM PST · by TheEaglehasLanded · 17 replies · 434+ views
    vanity | December 12, 2005 | the eagle has landed
    When the 9th Circus says it's ok to go ahead with the execution, a bunch that has opposed most capital punishment it seems like an easy call. 26 years of appeals, 4 murders directly and thousands more indirectly by starting the Crypts gang. If writing childrens books gets you off death row I can see a bunch of new authors coming out.
  • Decision on oil-for-food official delayed (Stephanides)

    11/14/2005 9:29:37 PM PST · by NormsRevenge · 4 replies · 371+ views
    AP on Yahoo ^ | 11/13/05 | Nick Wadhams - ap
    UNITED NATIONS - The United Nations put off a decision on how to respond to a ruling by an appeals body that vindicated the lone employee fired over the Iraq oil-for-food scandal, despite promises that it would come to a conclusion on Monday. The move gave Joseph Stephanides the right to a copy of the ruling, made 30 days ago, which said he was wrongly fired and should be reinstated, paid two years of back pay as compensation and given a written apology. A copy was obtained last week by The Associated Press but it has not been made public....
  • Western states sue feds over decision to open pristine forests

    08/31/2005 9:20:01 AM PDT · by NormsRevenge · 30 replies · 732+ views
    ap on Monterey Herald ^ | 8/31/05 | Terence Chea - ap
    SAN FRANCISCO - California, New Mexico and Oregon sued the Bush administration over the government's decision to allow road building, logging and other commercial ventures on more than 90,000 square miles of the nation's remaining pristine forests. In the lawsuit filed Tuesday, attorneys general for the three states challenged the U.S. Forest Service's repeal of the Clinton administration's "roadless rule" that banned development on 58.5 million acres of national forest land, mostly in western states. "The Bush administration is putting at risk some of the last, most pristine portions of America's national forests," California Attorney General Bill Lockyer said. "Road...
  • Waiting for Another Hiroshima

    08/18/2005 5:38:03 PM PDT · by forty_years · 10 replies · 827+ views
    War to Mobilize Democracy, LLC ^ | August 18, 2005 | Andrew Jaffee
    August 6th marked the 60th anniversary of America’s use of an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. While some still argue that President Truman’s decision to use the A-bomb was “controversial,” they are afflicted with the scourge of our time, the loss of a sense of moral proportion and certainty. Unfortunately, those with relativistic morals will lead us to see the day when nuclear weapons are used again – this time to end once and for all the barbaric savagery of Islamism. Green Left Weekly (GLW) calls the U.S. putting a swift end to WWII – using atomic...
  • CA: Environmental group sues over California logging decision

    08/09/2005 7:09:38 PM PDT · by NormsRevenge · 5 replies · 245+ views
    AP on Bakersfield Californian ^ | 8/9/05 | Don Thompson - AP
    SACRAMENTO (AP) - An environmental group is suing California wildlife regulators, alleging officials broke the law by giving a North Coast timber company the right to damage the habitats of two endangered species. Pacific Lumber Co. gained permission under the 1999 Headwaters deal for certain logging activities that environmentalists said would harm populations of coho salmon and marbled murrelets, a seabird that nests in old growth redwoods. A Humboldt County Superior Court judge revoked the permits in 2003, saying they violated the California Endangered Species Act. In February, the state Department of Fish and Game cleared the way for the...
  • Anticipatory self-defense - (International law is not a suicide pact! First strike on Iran?)

    07/25/2005 9:03:15 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 13 replies · 546+ views
    WASHINGTON TIMES.COM ^ | JULY 25, 2005 | LOUIS RENE BERES
    International law is not a suicide pact. Fashioned to ensure the survival of states in a world still lacking global government, these binding rules emphasize the right of national self-defense. This right may be exercised not only after an attack has already been suffered, but also in advance, if the defensive first strike can meet certain essential conditions. Consider Iran. President Bush has assuredly authorized the Pentagon to prepare plans for the pre-emptive destruction of that country's developing nuclear installations. Leaving aside the difficult tactical side of such an operation, a prior question arises: Would this particular pre-emption be permissible...
  • Bush's choice was pure genius - (interesting argument re: consequences if Roe were overturned!)

    07/21/2005 8:41:55 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 30 replies · 902+ views
    JEWISH WORLD REVIEW.COM ^ | JULY 21, 2005 | FROMA HARROP
    The Republicans' ideal Supreme Court nominee is someone who might overturn Roe v. Wade, but won't. That makes President Bush's choice of John G. Roberts pure genius. If defenders of abortion rights condemn the pick, so much the better. Social conservatives will think they won. And when a court ruling later proves they haven't, Republican leaders can comfort them. So far, all is according to plan. Roe v. Wade is the 1973 Supreme Court decision enshrining a federal right to abortion. If Roe went down, two bad things would happen to Republicans. One is that it would arouse America's pro-choice...
  • Laura Bush pressured to resign over Guantanamo Bay scandal - President withholds decision

    07/16/2005 2:53:25 PM PDT · by Libloather · 30 replies · 704+ views
    7/16/05
    Laura Bush pressured to resign over Guantanamo Bay scandal - President withholds decision POSTED: 2:35 pm PDT July 16, 2005 (AP Photo/Haraz Ghanbari) WASHINGTON -- Former presidential candidate John Kerry said Saturday "Laura Bush ought to be fired." Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., a possible 2008 presidential contender, nodded in agreement when the two appeared together on Capitol Hill. Also Saturday, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid said the matter of leaking a recipe from her cookbook "rises above politics and is about our national security." Leading White House critic Representative John Conyers added, “All we know is that it was...
  • Bill Cosby's Judicial Good Fortune - (timing of multiple sex charges found to be suspicious!)

    07/12/2005 1:27:45 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 24 replies · 1,225+ views
    NEWSMAX.COM ^ | JULY 12, 2005 | JAMES HIRSEN
    Bill Cosby has drawn a good judge in Philadelphia. Last March, in a civil lawsuit, Andrea Constand alleged that Cosby had drugged and groped her at his home. Constand's suit also claimed that she had been contacted by 12 women who were willing to come forward and allege that Cosby sexually assaulted them in a similar manner. Attorneys retained by nine of the women had tried to keep the names of their clients a secret for a host of reasons, one of which was fear of a deteriorating bipolar condition brought on by intense media scrutiny. U.S. District Judge Eduardo...
  • 4th Circuit reinstates juvenile nudist camp's free-speech lawsuit-(is this NUTS?...or what?!)

    07/06/2005 5:02:31 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 102 replies · 5,295+ views
    FIRST AMENDMENT CENTER.ORG ^ | JULY 6, 2005 | A/P
    RICHMOND, Va. — A federal appeals court yesterday reinstated a lawsuit challenging a Virginia law requiring parental supervision at a summer camp for juvenile nudists. A three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the American Association for Nude Recreation-Eastern Region could pursue its claim that the law violates its free-speech rights by crimping its ability to spread its social nudism philosophy. The organization claims it had to cancel a summer camp last summer in southeast Virginia because only 11 of the 35 youths who signed up would have been able to bring a parent as...
  • Supreme Court Liberals to the Little Guy: Drop Dead - (Jurisprudence by tea leaf reading! Superb!)

    06/30/2005 11:58:34 AM PDT · by CHARLITE · 9 replies · 659+ views
    OPINION EDITORIALS.COM ^ | JUNE 25, 2005 | JIM JORDAN
    Five Supreme Court Justices with myriad educational degrees fumbled the simple meaning of the word “public”. Apparently the new meaning of the term “public use” is any use involving people. This is a brazen moving of the goal posts to rig the game in favor of powerful corporations and political interests. The Kelo vs. New London recision (it’s not a decision) is nothing less than a nail in the coffin of government by the people, for the people, and of the people. Here are five reasons why this has happened. BIG GOVERNMENT IS #1: The liberal wing of the Supreme...
  • When Justices become dictators - (astute commentary by brilliant young Ben Shapiro)

    06/29/2005 1:43:08 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 8 replies · 717+ views
    TOWNHALL.COM ^ | JUNE 29, 2005 | BEN SHAPIRO
    This week, the Supreme Court of the United States once again proved that it is a feckless, dictatorial and altogether ridiculous body. Its latest spate of decisions reveals legislative usurpation, disingenuous deference and silly inconsistency. But, of course, what else should we expect from the court that tells us our Constitution protects pornography but not political advertising, sodomy but not the Ten Commandments, and mentally disabled murderers but not private property? For those disinterested enough not to gasp in horror at each new judicial outrage, it is fascinating to watch as the Supreme Court gradually turns the Constitution on its...
  • The government can now take your home and sell it to a private developer-(CFIF.ORG ACTION ALERT!)

    06/29/2005 11:19:57 AM PDT · by CHARLITE · 5 replies · 435+ views
    NEWSMAX.COM ^ | JUNE 29, 2005 | Staff Writers
    "The government can now take your home and sell it to a private developer." Those are the words of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor in her dissent from the draconian Supreme Court ruling in the case of Kelo v The City of New London.. The Kelo decision is an outright repudiation of the most basic American principle -- constitutional protection for life, liberty and property. But we are not about to take this assault on our God-given liberties lying down!When we heard of this decision on Thursday, we immediately went to work. And Senator John Cornyn has already answered the call.Just...
  • Property Rights, Eminent Domain, and the Making of a Citizen Politician - (terrific story!)

    06/28/2005 10:31:37 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 18 replies · 1,021+ views
    CHRONWATCH.COM ^ | JUNE 29, 2005 | VINCENT FIORE
    Over the weekend, a good friend of mine left a message on my answering machine, which at first I didn’t recognize, because his voice was so shaken with rage and desperation. But after a brief moment, I realized that it was my buddy, Danny, from the firehouse. At first I didn’t recognize him because Danny is as calm and collected a man as I have had the privilege of knowing. To hear the agitation in his voice was something that I could not associate with him. Living on the south shore of New York’s Long Island, Danny was naturally drawn...
  • Hairsplitting at the Court - (what a relief! Sage George Will on historical religion/state concepts)

    06/27/2005 11:59:51 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 18 replies · 665+ views
    TOWNHALL.COM ^ | JUNE 28, 2005 | GEORGE WILL
    <p>WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court on Monday rendered two more hairsplitting, migraine-inducing decisions about when religious displays on public property do and do not violate the First Amendment protection against ``establishment'' of religion. In a case from Texas, where a Ten Commandments monument stands outside the state Capitol, the court, splintered six ways from Sunday, said: We find no constitutional violation. The second case came from Kentucky, where the Commandments displayed in several courthouses are surrounded by historical symbols and documents -- e.g., copies of the Mayflower Compact, the Declaration of Independence, the Star Spangled Banner -- to comply with the ``reindeer rule,'' more about which anon. On Monday the court recoiled from Kentucky's displays, saying, they are unconstitutionally motivated by a ``predominately religious purpose.'' Not enough reindeer?</p>
  • Holy Moses - (SCOTUS 10 Commandments decisions; imagine our Founders knowing THIS!)

    06/27/2005 9:03:42 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 11 replies · 606+ views
    AMERICAN SPECTATOR.ORG ^ | JUNE 28, 2005 | GEORGE NEUMAYR, Executive Editor
    Perhaps nothing illustrates this era of judicial lawlessness better than the Supreme Court's ruling yesterday that the Ten Commandments, unless they are somehow aesthetically muted and secularized, be chiseled off courthouses across the country. Lawless judges cannot abide the sight of fixed laws adorning courts. Imagine if the representatives of the states at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 had a chance to review David Souter's secularized understanding of the First Amendment before deciding whether or not to ratify the Constitution. Would any of the states have ratified it? Would they have agreed to a constitution that gave federal judges the...
  • Supreme Court Decision- Castle Rock vs Gonzales

    06/27/2005 7:19:43 PM PDT · by sactodan · 7 replies · 1,028+ views
    Sacto Dan Blog ^ | June 27, 2005 | Sacto Dan
    The United States Supreme Court today ruled in the case TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK, COLORADO v. GONZALES. This case is about a woman who had a restraining order against her estranged husband. ...when its police officers, acting pursuant to official policy or custom, failed to respond to her repeated reports over several hours that her estranged husband had taken their three children in violation of her restraining order against him. Ultimately, the husband murdered the children.The court ruled in favor of the Town of Castle Rock. Here is a brief excerpt of the decision which can be viewed in its...
  • Ding...Ding...Ding! Another Bell Rings: This time, not for Liberty ...(SCOTUS taking our freedoms!)

    06/27/2005 3:18:03 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 36 replies · 701+ views
    TORONTO FREE PRESS.COM ^ | JUNE 27, 2005 | JB WILLIAMSQ
    That little bell that just went off in your head this week is a warning you had better heed… When eminent domain becomes absolute dominion, as it just has, not a single citizen is safe from the insatiable greed of its government. Once used as only a tool of last resort, to make room for a highway connecting cities, or a military installation needed to defend our borders, the law of eminent domain now places your home well in reach for purposes of simple commercial and economic development. According to the recent 5-4 Supreme Court ruling, your government now has...
  • Condemnation for Corporations - (Detroit attorney reviews Kelo v. New London SCOTUS decision)

    06/27/2005 2:46:48 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 19 replies · 810+ views
    INFOSHOP.ORG ^ | JUNE 26, 2005 | GEORGE CORSETTI, ESQ.
    Conservatives called it the most important case in the Supreme Court this year. It was the latest skirmish in a war that pitted liberals against conservatives who desperately fought to limit government control over private property. This case, Kelo v City of New London Connecticut, would decide whether local governments could seize private property and give it to another private party under an expanded view of eminent domain. And when the 5 to 4 decision was announced on Thursday it was a victory for the Supreme Court's liberal wing. And the conservatives Justices were livid. But conservatives weren't the only...
  • When Leninists rule the nation - (SCOTUS decision bodes ill for American liberties)

    06/25/2005 6:19:52 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 73 replies · 1,318+ views
    WORLD NET DAILY.COM ^ | JUNE 25, 2005 | RUDY TAKALA
    In a recent Supreme Court decision, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote, "If the peasants sow the fields poorly, they should be helped – and this particularly applies to the poor peasants – by means of collective cultivation of the large estates. There is no other way of helping the poor peasants." Therefore, "the landed estates must be confiscated immediately." Actually, that was Vladimir Lenin writing in an issue of the Communist publication Pravda on June 2, 1917. I've compiled a small list of quotes for use in this article, but at times it can be hard to remember who used...
  • Supreme Court Begins Dismantling Bill of Rights - (destruction, nullification of 5th amendment)

    06/24/2005 9:19:29 AM PDT · by CHARLITE · 27 replies · 1,710+ views
    MENS NEWS DAILY.COM ^ | JUNE 24, 2005 | SHER ZIEVE
    June 23, 2005 saw the end of Amendment V to the US Constitution. Although this profound occurrence has been mentioned by our mainstream press, I have been shocked that it hasn’t been more vigorously reported and pursued. This decision undermines the very fabric of the United States of America. These are not “dramatic for the sake of drama” statements. This is what has actually occurred. The Amendment V clause to which I am referring is: “…nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” Five individuals have decided that “public” now means “private”. Thursday’s 5-4 SCOTUS ruling,...
  • Blogs Face Possible FEC Regulation - (financial & political disclosures may be required)

    06/03/2005 3:02:15 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 7 replies · 496+ views
    FOX NEWS.COM ^ | JUNE 3, 2005 | Kelley Beaucar Vlahos
    WASHINGTON — The Federal Election Commission is considering whether to require political bloggers to disclose whether they are receiving funds from a political campaign, the latest step in a larger debate over whether political activity on the Internet should be regulated by the government. Friday is the deadline set for the FEC to receive public comments on a number of proposed regulations dealing with Internet activities. The commission will hold hearings on June 28-29 in Washington, D.C., before deciding on final action. One of those new rules, the disclosure requirement, has many bloggers bristling, accusing the government of unfairly targeting...
  • Democrats Nuke Party Beliefs To Stop Women - (glaring policy contradictions in obstruct tactics)

    05/19/2005 9:22:53 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 13 replies · 739+ views
    Opinion Journal.com ^ | May 20, 2005 | Daniel Henninger
    Surveying the Senate's nuclear-missile silos, Court TV's Fred Graham said that of course the Republican majority had the power to change the filibuster rule, and the Democrats would have to lump it: "What are they going to do," he asked, "appeal to the Supreme Court?" They didn't much enjoy their last visit to the high court after the 2000 election. But the nightmare lingers on. The death-struggle in the Senate over the Bush judges is best understood as a re-fighting of the post-2000 Florida election challenge. Democratic logic, premised on the famous 5-4 Bush v. Gore decision, runs like this:...
  • Your Blog Will Be Investigated Soon - (implications of future government intrustion into internet)

    05/09/2005 10:17:15 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 14 replies · 617+ views
    AMERICAN SPECTATOR.ORG ^ | MAY 10, 2005 | JOHN SAMPLES
    Insta Pundit University of Tennessee School of Law Knoxville, TN February 10, 2009 Dear Mr. Pundit, I am writing to inform you that the Federal Election Commission has voted unanimously to support my recommendation that there is "reason to believe" that you have violated federal election law. Pursuant to that finding, the Commission has opened an investigation of these violations. I hereby direct you to provide sworn written answers to the following questions related to your violation of federal election law. 1. Did you on or before August 30, 2008, state on your "blog" that "If elected, Hillary Clinton will...
  • D-Hour for Iran rapidly approaches: Corsi

    04/28/2005 3:12:25 PM PDT · by F14 Pilot · 44 replies · 1,132+ views
    worldnetdaily.com ^ | Jermoe Corsi
    The "Decision-Hour" for Iran is rapidly approaching. The Financial Times announced yesterday in a front-page article that the Pentagon has notified Congress of the pending sale to Israel of 100 "bunker-buster" bombs that could be used to attack Iran's secret underground nuclear facilities, such as their uranium-enrichment farm at Natanz. Congress has only 30 days to object. If the liberal Democrats decide to pass on raising a fuss, Lockheed Martin will proceed to deliver the 5,000-pound GBU-28 bombs to the Israeli Defense Force, marking the first time Lockheed Martin has ever sold a "bunker-buster" to a foreign nation. No matter...
  • Final Porn Decision

    04/24/2005 10:14:12 AM PDT · by GeekDejure · 16 replies · 678+ views
    Aftenposten Multimedia A/S, Oslo, Norway ^ | 22 Apr 2005 | Jonathan Tisdall
    Norway's Supreme Court supported decisions refusing Conoco Phillips the right to fire two workers who surfed the Internet for pornographic images on company time. The two workers on the Ekofisk field lost their jobs after being caught peeping at porn on the job in the summer of 2002. The pair took their case to court and won at both the municipal and appeals level, NRK (Norwegian Broadcasting) reports. Conoco Phillips appealed the decisions to the Supreme Court in order to have a clarification of what employees can do on company time and what employers can do to enforce violations of...