Free Republic 3rd Quarter Fundraising Target: $88,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $76,673
87%  
Woo hoo!! And now over 87%!! Less than $11.5k to go!! Let's git 'er done!! Thank you all very much!!

Posts by RaceBannon

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Howie Carr: Obama’s renaming of Mount McKinley an outrage

    09/01/2015 2:38:27 AM PDT · 12 of 19
    RaceBannon to Brad from Tennessee

    I am not so offended at this, experienced hikers all it DENALI and always have, almost none call it Mt McKinley
    However, Obama is not a hiker. Obama did this because it sticks a finger in the eye of all ‘folks’ as he calls them...

  • WALMART EMPLOYEE WITH HIS TROUSERS HANGING TOO LOW

    08/31/2015 6:28:21 AM PDT · 110 of 116
    RaceBannon to libertarian27

    Yes, 5 years ago

  • Beautiful Christian music link for new traditional God honoring music

    08/31/2015 3:11:21 AM PDT · 42 of 42
    RaceBannon to imardmd1

    They have a page
    Google Unto the chief musician
    They have lyric sheets and some music sheets, too

  • WALMART EMPLOYEE WITH HIS TROUSERS HANGING TOO LOW

    08/30/2015 6:18:12 PM PDT · 76 of 116
    RaceBannon to Lazamataz
  • WALMART EMPLOYEE WITH HIS TROUSERS HANGING TOO LOW

    08/30/2015 5:53:43 PM PDT · 63 of 116
    RaceBannon to Molon Labbie; exit82

    Nah, she’s young
    and holding up much better than I...(sigh)...

  • WALMART EMPLOYEE WITH HIS TROUSERS HANGING TOO LOW

    08/30/2015 5:52:12 PM PDT · 58 of 116
    RaceBannon to Rodamala

    Capslockoid... I like that

  • WALMART EMPLOYEE WITH HIS TROUSERS HANGING TOO LOW

    08/30/2015 5:50:42 PM PDT · 53 of 116
    RaceBannon to humblegunner

    ya know, I used to think you were being a friendly chops buster, but now, ...

  • WALMART EMPLOYEE WITH HIS TROUSERS HANGING TOO LOW

    08/30/2015 5:43:34 PM PDT · 45 of 116
    RaceBannon to Lazamataz; humblegunner

    he he
    OH, YOU WANNA ARGUE?
    I GOT MY CAPS LOCK ON!!

  • WALMART EMPLOYEE WITH HIS TROUSERS HANGING TOO LOW

    08/30/2015 5:40:01 PM PDT · 39 of 116
    RaceBannon to Bullish

    no, I didnt pay for the food, I left it at the customer service area and told them I wouldn’t eat it or pay for it. She understood

  • WALMART EMPLOYEE WITH HIS TROUSERS HANGING TOO LOW

    08/30/2015 5:23:12 PM PDT · 9 of 116
    RaceBannon to exit82

    it just flummoxes me
    they think this makes them look cool?
    buying pants too small for their waist but long enough to drag on the ground?

    If they had fathers, I hope they would spank the tar out of them

  • Beautiful Christian music link for new traditional God honoring music

    08/30/2015 5:21:49 PM PDT · 34 of 42
    RaceBannon to z taxman

    then you should love this, because this is not CCM

  • Beautiful Christian music link for new traditional God honoring music

    08/30/2015 5:19:21 PM PDT · 33 of 42
    RaceBannon to MayflowerMadam

    several of the BBN execs go to church with me :)

  • WALMART EMPLOYEE WITH HIS TROUSERS HANGING TOO LOW

    08/30/2015 5:15:34 PM PDT · 1 of 116
    RaceBannon
  • What More Evidence Does the President Need that the VA Must Be Reformed?

    08/30/2015 2:32:07 PM PDT · 21 of 26
    RaceBannon to george76

    you need a disability rating to get mileage reimbursement

  • Beautiful Christian music link for new traditional God honoring music

    08/30/2015 2:24:12 PM PDT · 2 of 42
    RaceBannon to RaceBannon; The Ignorant Fisherman
  • Beautiful Christian music link for new traditional God honoring music

    08/30/2015 2:23:51 PM PDT · 1 of 42
    RaceBannon
    https://soundcloud.com/theignorantfishermen
  • What More Evidence Does the President Need that the VA Must Be Reformed?

    08/30/2015 10:22:55 AM PDT · 10 of 26
    RaceBannon to george76

    I am waiting almost 3 months for an ultrasound of my liver/gall bladder, I am showing signs of a potential cancer, my appt is due in 3 weeks

    and they wont move up the appt when the symptoms got worse 3 weeks ago

    Criminal.

  • Uh oh Donald Trump admits to reporter his shocking plans for the word "Christmas"

    08/29/2015 7:34:59 PM PDT · 34 of 57
    RaceBannon to boycott

    Ted Cruz has been saying these things all along

    Trump has just been more crass about it

  • Donald Trump Is An “Authoritarian” and Is “Dangerous”, says Ron Paul

    08/25/2015 4:07:10 PM PDT · 66 of 113
    RaceBannon to z taxman

    ronulans are loser anarchists, too

  • Chinese shares drop in dramatic free-fall(-8.4%)

    08/24/2015 3:17:18 AM PDT · 108 of 141
    RaceBannon to Tolerance Sucks Rocks

    this is the time to buy
    I just wish I had to capital to do so

  • Ten Things You Didn’t Know Were Racist

    08/22/2015 3:56:46 PM PDT · 102 of 125
    RaceBannon to Ruy Dias de Bivar

    boy, we’re going way back

    but yeah, I remember them! :)

    I am only 56!

  • Ten Things You Didn’t Know Were Racist

    08/22/2015 10:59:30 AM PDT · 62 of 125
    RaceBannon to MarvinStinson

    it’s bush’s fault, and I am a racist

  • Ten Things You Didn’t Know Were Racist

    08/22/2015 10:20:47 AM PDT · 15 of 125
    RaceBannon to MarvinStinson

    this one is real, too
    in Boot Camp, one recruit from Harlem accused me of being racist because I dont like black licorice

    It didnt matter to him that I didnt like the taste, all that mattered was I didn’t like the black ones

    true story

  • How It Really Went Down in the First Class to Graduate Female Rangers

    08/22/2015 4:18:18 AM PDT · 90 of 155
    RaceBannon to T-Bird45

    it isnt about whether they can

    it is about whether they should

  • BREAKING: Secret Obama Letters Found by 2 GOP Senators, Send Obama Admin Into Panic Mode

    08/21/2015 9:36:29 AM PDT · 83 of 93
    RaceBannon to dontreadthis

    Bump

  • The Big List Of 33 Things That Are Going To Happen In September 2015

    08/21/2015 9:35:14 AM PDT · 4 of 62
    RaceBannon to Roman_War_Criminal

    Bump

  • The immigrant invasion no candidate is talking about [No, it's not Latinos]

    08/20/2015 3:48:01 PM PDT · 17 of 18
    RaceBannon to justiceseeker93

    Andrew McCarthy on the Muslim Brotherhood and huma Abadin and hillary
    1:30 minutes
    http://youtu.be/AjY9xKd0EGU

  • 5 Lessons From the Hacking of an Adultery Website

    08/20/2015 8:11:23 AM PDT · 5 of 22
    RaceBannon to Kaslin

    Amen!

  • WPOP Hartford Makes Long Awaited Talk Flip (Carr, Levin etc)

    08/19/2015 4:05:15 PM PDT · 37 of 37
    RaceBannon to nutmeg

    about time they came back
    they were the station that premiered Limbaugh before tic got him

  • 'Ridiculous': FBI warns of next big terror attack (against Muslims by U.S. “militia extremists")

    08/19/2015 2:09:16 AM PDT · 18 of 35
    RaceBannon to Pollster1

    Post of the day!!!!!

  • Arminian or Calvinist?

    08/14/2015 7:27:12 PM PDT · 10 of 41
    RaceBannon to kindred

    THE SAVIOUR OF ALL MEN
    (1 Timothy 4:10)

    “For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe” (1 Timothy 4:10).

    There are those who teach that God has provided salvation only for those who are His elect. They would also teach a limited atonement, that Christ died on the cross only for the sins of God’s elect [those who will believe on Christ and be saved]. Such false teaching is answered by the verse cited above. This verse teaches that there is a sense in which God is the Saviour of all men and there is a special sense (”especially”) in which God is the Saviour of those who believe. Timothy should have had no problem understanding this because Paul had already written in this same epistle that there is a sense in which God is the Saviour of all. He is the Saviour of all men because He desires all men to be saved (1 Tim. 2:3-4) and because Christ died for all men (1 Tim. 2:6). Paul also made it clear that there is a special sense in which He is the Saviour of those who come to God through Christ and who believe and know the truth (1 Tim. 2:4; 4:3).

    Extreme Calvinists have a problem with this verse because the expression “all men” must here be understood as referring to all humanity without exception. The verse teaches that out of that large class of people referred to as “all men” there is a smaller class of people referred to as “those who believe.” It is therefore obvious that the “all men” describes a group of people that includes more than just those who believe (more than “the elect”). He is the Saviour of all men. He is “especially” the Saviour of believers (in a special sense that is not true those who are not believers).

    The expression “all men” is also found in 1 Timothy 2:4. Extreme Calvinists tells us that in this verse the “all men” means “all sorts of persons” (see Jay Adams’ translation). They say that it refers to all men without distinction but not all men without exception. Thus in 1 Timothy 2:4 they understand the “all men” to refer, not to all humanity, but to “the elect” which would include elect Jews and Gentiles, elect men and women, elect slaves and freemen, etc. In other words, according to their theology, God does not desire to save all men without exception, but God desires to save only His elect who belong to all kinds of classes of people (God’s elect are among the rich, the poor, the Jews, the Gentiles, etc.). This is forcing the text to fit one’s theology. We simply must let the verse say what it says: “God will have (desires) all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth.” Indeed, God proved His desire for their salvation by sending Christ to die for them (1 Tim. 2:6)!

    The extreme Calvinist must find a way to get around the clear statement of 1 Timothy 4:10. Jay Adams has tried to do this in a unique way in his translation: “who is the Saviour of all sorts of men, that is, of those who believe.” The problem with this is that the word “especially” cannot be translated “that is.” Adams is desperately trying to force the verse to fit his theology, even at the cost of abandoning sound principles of translation and ignoring the obvious meaning of words.

    How then do extreme Calvinists explain this verse? They usually argue that the term “Saviour” is used in a temporal and not an eternal sense, meaning that God is the Preserver of all men or the Deliverer of all men, especially of those who believe. This runs contrary to all the standard translations (NASB,NIV,RSV,ASV,NEB, etc.) which render the word “Saviour” and not “Preserver.” Also their view raises this problem: Does God really preserve believers in a temporal, physical way more than He does unbelievers? Often God lets the wicked prosper and the righteous suffer in this life. Christ promised His followers persecution, tribulation and even death at the hands of unbelievers. The truth is that they who believe are likely to undergo great difficulty in this world. Believers must suffer through natural disasters (floods, tornados, fire, etc.) just as unbelievers. It is true that there is spiritual help and comfort for believers even in the midst of their trials, but in what sense are believers preserved physically and temporally in a very special sense that is not true of unbelievers? Often unbelievers seem to be well-preserved in this life, whereas believers are made as the filth of the world, and are the offscouring of all things (1 Cor. 4:13).

    It is true that sometimes the verb “save” is used in different ways, and it does not always mean salvation from sin. 1 Timothy 2:15 speaks of the Christian woman being saved from satanic deception (compare 1 Tim. 5:14-15). Also 1 Timothy 4:16 is likewise speaking of being saved from Satanic deception (compare 4:1), but this is not a good parallel to the verse under discussion because obviously Satanic deception is not the issue in 1 Timothy 4:10.

    It is helpful to ask this: How does Paul use the expression “God our Saviour”? The term “Saviour” is applied to God in several other places beside 1 Timothy 4:10. See Luke 1:47; 1 Timothy 1:1; 2:3; Titus 1:3; 2:10; 3:4; and Jude 25. Will anyone venture to say that in these seven texts the meaning is “God the Preserver,” referring to temporal and not to eternal benefits?

    The last place Paul used this term is very significant. It is found in 1 Timothy 2:3 (and see also 2:4 where “all men” is used). God is the Saviour of all men in the sense that He desires all men to be saved and Christ died for all (1 Tim. 2:4,6). The verse clearly refers to eternal salvation. The ASV understands 1 Timothy 4:10 in this way because in the marginal reference it gives these two verses: 1 Timothy 2:4 and John 4:42.

    Is it a problem to say that God is the Saviour of all men? Only to the extreme Calvinists who say that the Saviour’s work on the cross had nothing to do with those who are not elect. The Bible speaks of God being “the Saviour of the world” (John 4:42; 1 John 4:14) and yet it is obvious that the world will not all be saved. The vast majority of those who make up “world” will perish because of their unbelief and rejection of God’s Saviour (John 3:16-18). And yet we must ask, how can the world reject Him as Saviour if He is not in some sense the world’s Saviour? How can a person reject the gospel if Christ did not die for him (compare 1 Cor. 15:1-4)? What is the good news that he is rejecting? The extreme Calvinist has no good news for anyone but the elect. You cannot reject something that is not genuinely offered to you. If there is no gospel offered to the “non-elect,” then how can they reject the gospel?

    Why did Paul strive so diligently and why was he willing to suffer reproach as he labored in the gospel? Paul knew that he had a message for all men—a message of hope, a message of good news, a message of reconciliation. He also knew that as this message went forth it would be gladly received by some. There would be those who would believe and be actually saved. Note the similar motivation expressed by Paul in 2 Timothy 2:10. Paul was willing to endure all things for the sake of the elect, so that they might obtain the salvation that is found in Christ (not just so that they might have temporal and physical deliverance). Paul knew that God was using his gospel preaching (as he proclaimed the good news of Christ and His death on the cross to all men) as a means by which God would bring the elect to faith in Christ. Without preaching there can be no faith (Rom. 10:14-17). Paul was willing to suffer and labour and pray toward this end.

    “His will is that all men should be saved, and He has made full and sufficient provision for the salvation of all, so that, as far as salvation stands in Him, He is the Saviour of all men...if God be thus willing for all to be saved, how much more shall He save them that put their trust in Him” (Alford). “While God is potentially Saviour of all, He is actually Saviour of the believers. So Jesus is termed `Saviour of the World’ (John 4:42)” (A.T.Robertson). “He has a general good-will to the eternal salvation of all men thus far that He is not willing that any should perish...He desires not the death of sinners; He is thus the Saviour of all men” (Matthew Henry).

    Those who take this verse at face value cannot be in danger of teaching universalism. If God were to actually save all men, then how would believers be saved in a special sense? The very fact that the verse says that there is a special sense in which believers are saved implies that there is a sense in which unbelievers are not saved. Unbelievers are not actually saved, even though God the Saviour has desired their salvation and provided for it in the death of His Son. May we joyfully carry the gospel to all men, telling them that there is a Saviour for them who has died for them! May we urge them to receive this One who came to be their Saviour. “I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people. For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord” (Luke 2:10-12).

    George Zeller (revised March 2000; October 2003)

    http://www.middletownbiblechurch.org/reformed/saviour.htm

    http://www.middletownbiblechurch.org/reformed/reformed.htm

  • Arminian or Calvinist?

    08/14/2015 7:25:42 PM PDT · 8 of 41
    RaceBannon

    FOR WHOM DID CHRIST DIE?
    A Defense of Unlimited Atonement

    For Whom Did Christ Die?

    Introduction

    Saved by grace alone
    This is all my plea:
    Jesus died for all mankind,
    And Jesus died for me.

    From the Hymn Grace! ‘tis a Charming Sound
    Words by P. Doddridge

    * * * * * * *

    “Lord, I believe were sinners more
    Than sands upon the ocean shore,
    Thou hast for all a ransom paid,
    For all a full atonement made.”

    4th Stanza of JESUS THY BLOOD AND RIGHTEOUSNESS
    by Nikolaus L. von Zinzendorf, 1739

    * * * * * * *

    Then let us all with one accord
    Sing praises to our heavenly Lord,
    That hath made heaven and earth of naught,
    And with His blood mankind hath bought!

    4th stanza of The First Noel, Old English Carol

    For Whom Did Christ Die? Introduction

    “What saith the Scriptures?” (Romans 4:3)

    “For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour; Who will have [desires] all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time” (1 Timothy 2:3-6)
    “But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death, crowned with glory and honour; that he by the grace of God should taste death for every man” (Hebrews 2:9).

    “And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world” (1 John 2:2).

    The Bible Declares that...

    He died for ALL (1 Tim. 2:6).
    He died for ALL MEN (Rom. 5:18; 1 Tim. 4:10).
    He died for US ALL, for ALL OF US (Isa. 53:6).
    He died for the UNGODLY (Rom. 5:6).
    He died for CHRIST-DENIERS (2 Peter 2:1).
    He died for SINNERS (Rom. 5:8).
    He died for EVERY MAN (Heb. 2:9).
    He died for MANY (Matthew 20:28).
    He died for the WORLD (John 6:33,51; John 1:29 and John 3:16).
    He died for the WHOLE WORLD (1 John 2:2).
    He died for the WHOLE NATION of Israel (John 11:50-51).
    He died for the CHURCH (Eph. 5:25).
    He died for His SHEEP (John 10:11).
    He died for ME (Gal. 2:20).
    The Scriptures teach that the sacrifice of the Lamb of God involved the sin of the world (John 1:29) and that the Saviour’s work of redemption (1 Tim. 2:6; 2 Pet. 2:1), reconciliation (2 Cor. 5:19), and propitiation (1 John 2:2) was accomplished on behalf of all mankind (1 Timothy 4:10a). However, the cross-work of Christ is efficient, effectual and beneficial only for those who believe (1 Tim. 4:10b; John 3:16). To say it another way, Christ died a substitutionary death and made a payment for sins which was SUFFICIENT for all men, EFFICIENT only for the elect. A payment was made and provided for all, but only those who believe on Christ receive the benefits of this payment.

    Definition Of Terms

    It might help to begin by defining some of the terms which will be used in this paper:

    The atonement: For our purposes here we are using this term to refer to the cross-work of Christ in general, with special emphasis upon Christ’s substitutionary death for our sins.

    Unlimited atonement (general atonement, universal atonement): This is the doctrine which says that Christ died for the sins of all men, for all mankind, for every person, for the whole world. However, individuals do not benefit from the death of Christ in a saving way until they come to Christ and believe on Him. God’s gift has been purchased, offered and extended to all (1 John 5:11), but must be personally received by faith (1 John 5:12; John 1:12).

    Limited atonement (definite atonement, particular atonement, limited redemption): This is the doctrine which says that Christ died only for the elect. He did not die for those who will eventually be in hell (such as Judas or Pharaoh). This is the third point of 5-point Calvinism, the letter “L” in the term TULIP.

    The Elect: We use this term to refer to the saved of all ages. The term includes any or all of those who will eventually be in heaven and counted among the redeemed (compare Col. 3:12).

    The Non-elect: We use this term to refer to those who will eventually perish in hell. It refers to those who persist in their unbelief and reject Christ even to the day they die. They are in hell, not because God elected them to damnation, but because “they received not the love of the truth that they might be saved” (see 2 Thess. 2:10-13). Those who go to heaven have only God to thank; those who go to hell have only themselves to blame.

    Extreme Calvinism (Hyper-Calvinism, 5-point Calvinism): In this paper this term is simply another way of referring to those who believe in a limited atonement, that Christ died only for the elect.

    Note: We recognize that no one likes to refer to themselves as “hyper” or “extreme.” Most consider themselves to be quite balanced. When a five-point Calvinist uses the term “hyper-Calvinist” he is referring to an even more extreme group of Calvinists who, for example, may not believe it is necessary to preach the gospel to sinners. They reason that those whom God has chosen will come to faith in Christ whether the gospel is preached or not. William Carey met such an extremist when he proposed his missionary work. His name was Mr. Ryland Sr., and he rebuked Carey with these words: “Young man, sit down! You are an enthusiast. When God pleases to converse with heathen He’ll do it without consulting you or me.” On the other side were strong Calvinists such as James Morison and Richard Baxter, but because they held firmly to an unlimited atonement and universal redemption, they were labeled as “low Calvinists.”

    http://www.middletownbiblechurch.org/doctrine/4whom01.htm

  • Arminian or Calvinist?

    08/14/2015 7:24:45 PM PDT · 7 of 41
    RaceBannon

    The Dangers of
    REFORMED THEOLOGY

    Conclusion

    In spite of its many strong points, Reformed Theology errs in some very crucial areas. Its extreme Calvinism forces it to have a gospel only for the elect. Its deadly legalism permeates its entire teaching on the Christian life and sanctification. Its teaching on regeneration and saving faith takes away from the sinner’s personal, God-given responsibility to believe the gospel. Its emphasis on Lordship salvation complicates and corrupts the gospel message by requiring the sinner to perform additional acts of surrender and obedience in order to be saved. This detracts from the simple gospel of the grace of God which Paul preached and defended with his life.

    The Reformed theory of “vicarious law-keeping” is a distortion of the doctrine of justification, and the teaching that Christ bore our sins prior to the cross is a serious misunderstanding of what took place on Calvary’s tree. Putting believers under the law of Moses as a rule of life puts the focus upon Mt. Sinai rather than Mt. Calvary, and incalculable harm is caused whenever the cross is not central in the Christian life.

    In addition to these problems, Reformed Theology has abandoned the literal, normal interpretation of the Scriptures when it comes to prophecy in general and the millennial reign of Christ in particular. Many Reformed men have embraced preterism, a system of prophetic interpretation which has destroyed the prophetic significance of hundreds of passages in the Word of God, thus robbing the Church of its “blessed hope” and robbing Israel of its promised kingdom. When the Church loses its evangelistic zeal due to extreme Calvinism and when the Church ceases to look for the Lord’s coming due to preterist influences, then a sad spiritual condition will inevitably result.

    With an open Bible and with a poor and contrite heart and with an attitude of trembling before the written Word of God, may we continue in those things which are fitting for sound doctrine!

    Questions or correspondence are welcomed and may be sent to:

    George Zeller
    The Middletown Bible Church
    349 East Street
    Middletown, CT 06457

  • Arminian or Calvinist?

    08/14/2015 7:24:03 PM PDT · 6 of 41
    RaceBannon

    Reformed Theology and Regeneration

    This paper is by David Dunlap, Bible & Life Ministries, Inc. (3116 Gulfwind Drive, Land O’Lakes, FL 34639. It is taken from a larger work entitled Limiting Omnipotence—The Consequences of Calvinism—A Study of Crucial Issues in Reformed and Dispensational Theology. This paper is reproduced with the author’s permission.

    In 1883 on the island of Krakatao, in the Straits of Sunda, a volcano erupted, splitting mountains from top to bottom and scattering rock, landscape, and debris into the sea. Nothing was left of the island but a lifeless mass 100 feet deep of lava and volcanic ash. Observers estimated that 36,000 people lost their lives, thereby making this one of the deadliest eruptions in history. Scientists declared positively that no animal or vegetable life would be able to survive. Nevertheless, over the next three years, flowers and ferns began to sprout out of the dark soil. Seeds had been carried there by the wind and the sea. By 1897, many portions of the ground were covered with vegetation. Soon the entire island was covered with plant growth, and an array of birds, animals, and insects populated the island. This account vividly illustrates what takes place spiritually when the life of God completely transforms the sin-darkened souls of men through faith in Christ. The name the Bible gives for this experience is regeneration or “quickening” (KJV).

    The term “new birth” never occurs in the Bible; the noun “regeneration” occurs only twice in the Bible (Titus 3:5, Mt. 19:28). The Greek word translated “regeneration” is “palingenesia”, which, when broken down into its component parts, means “born-again” (“palin”= again; “genesia”= birth). While the term new birth never occurs, related words occur many times, such as “new creation”, “born again”, and “new man”.

    What is regeneration? Regeneration is the one-time experience of receiving new life in Christ, when the work of a new creation is begun, and the process of sanctification is set in motion. The regenerate man is no longer the man he once was. By virtue of the work of the Holy Spirit, the new life (created after the image of God) has come into the souls of men. This new nature has its own desires, affections, and interests—they are all spiritual, rooted in Christ, and God-centered. “That which is born of the Spirit is spirit”; the new nature is spiritual, for it shares the nature of the One who imparts it. The believer is made “a partaker of the divine nature...” (2 Peter 1:4). However, the old nature remains within the believer, struggling with the new.

    The Reformed View of Regeneration

    Students of Holy Scripture offer differing views on the divine order in regard to the new birth. This debate is not merely an academic exercise, but one which has far-reaching consequences. Clear biblical thinking in this area greatly helps the serious Christian. Current Reformed theology teaches that regeneration, or new birth, must precede faith. It maintains that since unregenerate man is dead and unable to respond to the gospel, he must first be “born again” so that he can receive the gift of faith. This regenerative work of God will only take place in the lives of the elect as God irresistibly draws them. This all must take place in this order; otherwise biblical salvation, it is maintained, is no longer of God in His grace, but rather of man through self-effort. Calvinist professor Dr. R. C. Sproul sets forth this position when he writes:

    In regeneration, God changes our hearts. He gives us a new disposition, a new inclination. He plants a desire for Christ in our hearts. We can never trust Christ for our salvation unless we first desire Him. This is why we said earlier that regeneration precedes faith. [R. C. Sproul, Chosen by God, (Wheaton, IL: Tyndale Publishers, 1986), p. 118]

    In a similar vein, concerning regeneration Reformed psychologist Jay Adams writes:

    Only God can bring life to dead souls to enable them to believe. He does this when and where and how He pleases by His Spirit, who regenerates, or gives life leading to faith...As a reformed Christian, the writer believes that counselors must not tell any unsaved counselee that Christ died for him, for they cannot say that. No man knows except Christ Himself who are His elect for whom He died. [Jay Adams, Competent To Counsel, (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1970), p. 70]

    On the other hand, non-calvinists teach that new birth occurs after an unregenerate man exercises faith in Christ. The unregenerate man, after he is drawn by the convicting work of the Holy Spirit, enlightened by the power of the Word of God, gripped by grace, and prodded through prayer, is then enabled by God to exercise faith in the finished work of Christ. Although unregenerate man is dead in trespasses and sin and at enmity with God, this does not mean that he is unable to express faith. God’s sovereign design does, however, lay emphasis upon the infinite power of the convicting work of the Holy Spirit, the grace of God, the will of God, and the Word of God. Without this work of God, no man would ever be saved.

    Regeneration and Infant Salvation

    Calvinism also teaches that infants, when yet unborn, are regenerated, even though they have no knowledge of Christ; and that, upon birth, infant baptism is to be practiced as a sign that the child is regenerate. John Calvin believed that all the children of believers were spiritually regenerated in the womb. To complete the salvation process Calvin also suggested that God granted a unique, supernatural faith to these infants in the womb. This would certainly add a new twist to the term “child-like faith.” But how is this all possible? John Calvin writes:

    But how, they ask, are infants regenerated, when not possessing a knowledge of either good or evil? We answer, that the work of God, though beyond the reach of our capacity, is not therefore null. Infants who are to be saved (and that some are saved at this age is certain) must, without question, be regenerated by the Lord. ...Many He certainly has called and endued with true knowledge of Himself, by internal means, by the illumination of the Spirit, without the intervention of preaching. [John Calvin, Institutes of Christian Religion, Vol.11, (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmanns, 1962), p. 541,542]

    The issue of the salvation of the children of the elect soon occupied the minds of many leading Calvinists. How could one know if the children of the elect would eventually come to Christ, or might some never come to trust Him as Savior? Calvinists reasoned: if only the elect are regenerated and only the regenerated can be saved, is there any way of knowing if children are elect? John Calvin, comforted the hearts of many by stating that God had already made provision for that need. He suggested that all the children of the elect will be saved. Calvin writes:

    Our children, before they are born, God declares that He adopts for His own when He promises He will be a God to us, and to our seed after us. In this promise their salvation is included. [John Calvin, Institutes of Christian Religion, Vol.11; (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmanns, 1962), p.525]

    What are the spiritual consequences of such speculation? First of all, if this is true, we need not concern ourselves with the spiritual condition of our children and our grandchildren. Why? Because if we are elect, our children are also elect, which means their children are also elect, and so on, until our family line comes to an end. While a Calvinist may find comfort in this view, he needs to flip the coin to see what lies on the other side. If it follows that a “Calvinist” child is elect and will be saved because of his parents’ election, would it not also be true that if that child never believes in Jesus Christ, this proves that the parents were never elect? If a parent proves not to be elect, it would mean that his father could not be elect either. The Calvinist “election domino” must logically fall in both directions. Furthermore, Scripture stresses that children are not saved because the parents were elect but because children themselves possessed faith in Jesus Christ unto salvation (Acts 16:31-32,2 Tim. 3:14-15).

    The Reformed View and the Scriptures

    Many have noted that the Reformed view of regeneration is in stark contrast to Scripture. The Bible clearly establishes that the blessings of salvation, the indwelling Holy Spirit in the life of a believer, eternal life, and regeneration never precede faith, but are always the result of faith.

    • Ephesians 1:13 states, “In whom also after that you believed, you were sealed with that Holy Spirit of promise.” At the time of belief, as a result of faith, the believer receives the sealing of the Holy Spirit.

    • John 3:16 “...that whosoever believes on Him should not perish but have everlasting life”. Again the same truth is emphasized—belief precedes salvation.

    • Acts 16:31 “Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved—you and your house.” The order of salvation is clear; belief is first and then salvation follows. Faith is a condition of salvation.

    • Romans 5:1 “Therefore, since we have been justified through faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ”. Regeneration is not a condition for receiving justification. But notice it is faith first, followed by justification. This is the pattern we have throughout the Bible in virtually every verse which is connected to this subject.

    The godly Bible teacher Samuel Ridout, setting forth the great importance of faith prior to new life, writes:

    Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible seed, by the Word of God, which liveth and abideth forever” (I Peter 1:23). New birth is by the word of God. That it is a sovereign act of God, by His Spirit, none can question. But this verse forbids us from separating, as has sometimes been done, new birth from faith in the gospel. It has been taught that new birth precedes faith; here we are told that the Word of God is the instrument in new birth. “Faith cometh by hearing and hearing by the word of God”; “the word which by the gospel is preached.” Thus while we can distinguish between faith and new birth, we cannot separate them. John 3:3 and 3:16 must ever go together. There is no such anomaly possible as a man born again, but who has not yet believed the gospel. [Samuel Ridout, Numerical Bible, Vol.6, (NY : Loizeaux Bro., 1903), p. 148-149]

    Similarly, Dr. John Walvoord, former president of Dallas Theological Seminary, sets forth the necessity of faith before eternal life or regeneration is received:

    Eternal life is not possessed until faith in Christ is exercised. Eternal life is not to be confused with efficacious grace, or that bestowal of grace which is antecedent to faith. Eternal life is to be identified with regeneration and is received in the new birth. It is resultant rather than causative of salvation, but is related to conversion or the manifestation of the new life in Christ. [Everett F. Harrison, editor, Wycliffe Dictionary of Theology, (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1999), p. 195]

    Very often, Reformed writers will use Ezekiel 36:26 to garner support for the view that regeneration precedes faith. This verse reads, “I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit in you; I will remove from you your heart of stone and give you a heart of flesh.” However, it appears from a careful contextual study of this passage and related verses, that the Calvinist view is not supported. Firstly, we find that this passage is not addressing individual believers and the manner in which they are to be saved, but rather, the prophetic “house of Israel” (v.17). The thrust of the prophet’s argument is what God in His grace will do to restore Israel to her land in a future day. Regeneration of the individual unbeliever is not the context, but rather, the nation of Israel. Secondly, in an earlier passage Ezekiel writes, “Cast away all your transgressions ...and make yourself a new heart and a new spirit”( 18:31). Here, the responsibility is placed in the hands of man for a new heart and a new spirit. The gift of a new heart signifies the new birth of the nation of Israel through the new covenant, by the renewal of the Holy Spirit. However, Ezekiel also conditions the reception of the new heart upon repentance (18:31). Those who use this passage to support the view that regeneration of the unsaved precedes faith appear to be guilty of stretching Scripture to fit a particular theological view.

    The Reformed View and Logic of C. H. Spurgeon

    Many have seen great difficulty with the Reformed view of regeneration. One of the most obvious shortcomings is that if a man has been regenerated, what need does he have then for faith? For he is saved already, albeit without the biblical prerequisite— faith. If regeneration precedes faith, then faith is unnecessary, for the one regenerated is saved already. Even some respected Calvinists have pointed out this apparent theological contradiction. Calvinist C. H. Spurgeon, in his famous sermon “The Warrant of Faith”, argues this point with his characteristic style:

    If I am to preach faith in Christ to a man who is regenerated, then the man, being regenerated, is saved already, and it is an unnecessary and ridiculous thing for me to preach Christ to him, and bid him to believe in order to be saved when he is saved already, being regenerate. Am! only to preach faith to those who have it? Absurd, indeed! Is not this waiting till the man is cured and then bringing him the medicine? This is preaching Christ to the righteous and not to sinners. [C. H. Spurgeon, Sermon: Warrant of Faith, (Pasadena,TX: Pilgrim Publications, 1978), p.3]

    Spurgeon, with great insight, points to three weaknesses in this traditional Reformed position. Firstly, regeneration prior to faith will be a great barrier to preaching the true soul-saving gospel. He says, “...it is an unnecessary and ridiculous thing for me to preach Christ.” For if someone is regenerated already, why must the gospel be preached? Hereby, the great themes of the gospel message such as sin, judgment, love, and grace are rendered unnecessary. Secondly, it eliminates the reality of the spiritual battle in winning souls for Christ. Spurgeon says, “...and bid him to believe in order to be saved when he is saved already...Am I only to preach faith to those who have it?” Where is the spiritual battle, prevailing prayer, and power of the Holy Spirit in evangelism? For they are saved already. There is no earnest wrestling with souls for the cause of the gospel. Thirdly, it makes the preacher wait at bay with the gospel. Spurgeon writes, “Is not this waiting till the man is cured and then bringing him the medicine?” Are preachers to wait with the spiritual cure, the gospel, until a lost soul is regenerated and then, when he is saved, bring him the gospel? This view takes the urgency and the “Now” out of gospel preaching. Scriptures are clear, “Now is the accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation.”(2 Cor. 6:2). According to the “prince of preachers” this view of regeneration is a hindrance to one who brings good news and a contradiction of the general tenor of Scripture.

    Regeneration and the Preaching of the Gospel

    This leads us to consider the consequences of the Reformed view of regeneration upon gospel preaching. We must admit that some great Reformed gospel preachers were used of God to bring many to Christ, including Whitfield and Spurgeon. But this was in spite of the inconsistency between their theological position and the message they so effectively proclaimed. Anyone reading Spurgeon’s sermons, for example, will discover that while he frequently uses the word “elect”, he did not do so in such a way that sinners could not be included if they so desired. However Reformed theologians have produced a system that is as unorthodox as it is inconsistent. Unfortunately, this theology has been a great hindrance to the unfettered proclamation of the gospel. Eighteenth century Calvinistic theologian Dr. John Gill, illustrates the withering effect of Calvinist theology on the preaching of the gospel. During the tenure of Dr. Gill at a Reformed church, this congregation, which at one time numbered 1, 200, dwindled down to a mere shadow of its original size. C. H. Spurgeon, though a Calvinist himself, pointed to Calvinism as the reason for the marked decline:

    During the pastorate of my venerated predecessor, Dr. Gill, this Church, instead of increasing, gradually decreased...the system of theology with which many identify his (Gill’s) name has chilled many churches to their very soul, for it has led them to omit the free invitations of the gospel, and to deny that it is the duty of sinners to believe in Jesus. [Iain Murray, Spurgeon vs. Hyper-Calvinism: The Battle for Gospel Preaching, (Calisle, PA: Banner of Truth, 1995), p. 120]

    To the Calvinist, the preaching of the gospel is an exercise in futility if a person has not been regenerated. According to the Calvinist, the first thing that the unbeliever must get is regeneration. But regeneration is given sovereignly and irresistibly by God alone. There is nothing an unsaved man can do to produce regeneration; furthermore, there is nothing he would want to do since he is dead, without even the slightest desire for spiritual things. We now discover one of the great inconsistencies in Calvinism: the work of the unbeliever as a “living-dead man.” Calvinism states that total depravity means the complete inability to desire, understand, think, or learn about God and His salvation. However, on the other hand, Calvinism insists on the depraved man seeking, learning about, and praying to God for his regeneration. Notice the explanation of Calvinist writer, W. G. T. Shedd, in Dogmatic Theology, as he writes:

    The Calvinist maintains that faith is wholly from God, being one of the effects of regeneration. [W. G. T. Shedd, Dogmatic Theology, Vol.11, (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, n.d.), p. 472,512-514]

    In another place Shedd explains that since an unbeliever is unregenerated, there are certain steps necessary before he can be saved:

    One, read and hear the divine Word . . . Two, give serious application of the mind, and examination of truth in order to understand and feel its force . . . Three, pray for the gift of the Holy Spirit both as a convicting and regenerating Spirit . . . prayer for regenerating grace is a duty and a privilege for the unregenerate man. [W. G. T. Shedd, Dogmatic Theology, Vol.11, (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, n.d.), p. 472,512-514]

    The popular Calvinist writer A. W. Pink also insists that the unbeliever must plead with God for his regeneration before he can be saved. He writes,

    . . . his first duty is to set his ‘seal that God is true’ . . . His second duty is to cry unto God for enabling power—to ask God in mercy to over come his enmity, and draw him to Christ; to bestow on him the gifts of faith and repentance. [A. W. Pink, The Sovereignty of God, (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1992), p.160]

    Is this the New Testament message of salvation? Is the evangelist to exhort the lost to pray for the gift of the Holy Spirit? Is there a New Testament example of anyone ever charging one who is lost to pray for regeneration? I suggest there is no such example. Is the unbeliever to pray for the gift of regeneration or to believe on Christ? The high price of salvation has been paid in full by our Lord, and He invites the sinner to believe on Him and receive eternal life. Does a criminal need to plead and beg for his prison release, while the warden stands before him with the signed pardon in his outstretched hand? It is not a time for a prisoner to beg and to seek, but a time to receive. In like manner, the work of the cross is complete, the ultimate price has been paid by Christ for every man, the gospel offer goes to all, now the sinner must receive it by faith. This strange new gospel turns the salvation of God into something to be sought, instead of something that is to be received. Is our gospel message “believe and thou shalt be saved” or pray and seek and ask for regeneration? The New Testament is clear: the work of salvation is finished by the once-for-all sacrifice of Christ; the unsaved need not pray for regeneration, but believe on the Lord Jesus Christ “and thou shalt be saved”.

    Regeneration and Relationship to Christ

    Calvinism teaches that God first regenerates the elect, and then at a later point in time, this leads to faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. In the Reformed view of regeneration, our new life in Christ is separated from a new relationship with Christ. Calvinism teaches that a baby is regenerated in the womb, and a person can be regenerated for years before he is saved. However, when the Holy Spirit does His work of regeneration in our lives, at the same time He relates us to a Person, and the gift of eternal life unites us to the person of the Lord Jesus Christ. John writes, “This is life eternal, that they might know Thee, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom Thou hast sent” (John 17:3). It is certainly a strange “regeneration”, to be alive by the Spirit of God, but not know Christ by faith. Lewis Sperry Chafer, founder of Dallas Theological Seminary, in his Systematic Theology explains the link between regeneration and relationship:

    The important fact, never to be forgotten in the doctrine of regeneration, is that the believer in Christ has received eternal life. This fact must be kept free from all confusion of thought arising from the concept of regeneration which makes it merely an antecedent of salvation, or a preliminary quickening to enable the soul to believe. It is rather the very heart of salvation. [L S. Chafer, Systematic Theology, Vol. VI, (Dallas, TX: Dallas Seminary Press, 1948), p. 117]

    The Word of God teaches that a man receives life by receiving Jesus Christ as Savior. That is why our Lord said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life...” (John 14:6). He did not say, “I have the way, the truth, and the life”, as though the indwelling Christ was simply a force or power or merely an agent who gives eternal life. Our Lord, before raising Lazarus from the dead, says, “I am the resurrection, and the life.. .“(John 11:25); not “I have life to impart.” This brings home to us the fact that if we are to have life, we must have Jesus Christ. Since Jesus Christ is the life, the Spirit must bring us into a living, vital union with Him. New birth or regeneration can never be divorced from a living relationship with Christ. John the apostle writes, “He that has the Son has life; and he that has not the Son of God has not life” (1 John 5:12). In the epistles of the apostle Paul, we find that he uses the carefully chosen and deeply meaningful term “in Christ” to explain this truth. Paul states, “if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature (creation)...” (2 Cor. 5:17). Paul never imagined regeneration to precede faith in Christ, which in turn would precede the relationship of Christ in us, the “hope of glory”. The New Testament doctrine is clear: the Holy Spirit of God produces new birth, which gives us new life, and that new life is the Lord Jesus Christ Himself.

    The work of regeneration is conditioned upon faith. Faith must precede new birth. It is God alone who imparts this new life in Christ. This new life in Christ provides a new nature or disposition, by which we now have a relationship with God. The spiritual order of God’s work of regeneration may have been best summarized by Sir Robert Anderson when he wrote:

    It is by the Word that the sinner is born again to God. As Scripture declares, ‘We are born again by the word of God”— living and eternally abiding word of God.” And to bar all error, it is added: “And this is the word by which the gospel is preached unto you “— preached, as the Apostle has already said, “with the Holy Ghost sent down from heaven.” Not the Spirit without the Word, nor the Word without the Spirit, but the Word preached in the power of the Spirit. God is never arbitrary; but He is always sovereign. Men preach; the Spirit breathes; and dry bones live. Thus sinners are born again to God. [Sir Robert Anderson, Redemption Truths, (Kilmarnock, GB: Ritchie, 1940), p. 152]

    http://www.middletownbiblechurch.org/reformed/ddregen.htm

  • Bombshell: State Department Official Reveals Details of Alleged Document Review (Flashback 9-15-14)

    08/14/2015 5:23:52 AM PDT · 16 of 27
    RaceBannon to Brad from Tennessee

    Bump

  • Obama's Betrayals: Willfully Supporting Al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood

    08/12/2015 3:37:13 AM PDT · 9 of 10
    RaceBannon to Brad from Tennessee

    To: Mr. Holder and the DOJ
    The following is just for you if you wish to charge me with posting material offensive to half breeds and moslem faithful pedophile worshippers.

    From Audacity of Hope: by Barak Hussein Obama

    “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”

    Koran 8:12 “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them. This is because they acted adversely to Allah and his messenger”

    Koran 9:5 “When the sacred months are past, kill those who join other gods wherever you find them, seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them with every kind of ambush…..”

    Koran 9:29-30 “Fight those who do not believe in Allah…. The Jews say Ezra is the son of God, and the Christians say Christ is the son of God…. Allah’s curse be on them….”

    Koran 9:3 “Announce painful punishment on those who disbelieve..”

    Koran 8:55 “Surely the vilest of animals in Allah’s sight are those who disbelieve…”

    Koran 8:39 “And fight with them until there is no more persecution and religion should be only for Allah”

    Koran 9:29 “Fight those who do not believe in Allah… nor follow the religion of truth…out of those who have been given the book (Christians and Jews) until they pay the tax in acknowledgement of superiority and are in a state of subjugation”

    Koran 9:123 “O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness; and know that Allah is with those who guard (against evil)”

    Koran 5:49-51 “O you who believe Take not the Jews and Christians as your friends… and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, surely he is one of them..”

    Koran 5:33-34 “The punishment of those who pit themselves against Allah and His Messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement, except those who repent before you have them in your power..” .

    A Short Course on Shariah & the Muslim Brotherhood

    1. What Is Shariah?
    http://shariahthethreat.org/a-short-course-1-what-is-shariah/

    2. How Does Shariah Define Jihad?
    http://shariahthethreat.org/a-short-course-1-what-is-shariah/a-short-course-2-how-does-shariah-define-jihad/

    3. ‘Civilization Jihad’ – the Muslim Brotherhood’s Potent Weapon
    http://shariahthethreat.org/a-short-course-1-what-is-shariah/a-short-course-3-civilization-jihad/

    4. True Lies – the Paradox of Debating Shariah
    http://shariahthethreat.org/a-short-course-1-what-is-shariah/a-short-course-4-debating-shariah/

    5. Taqiyya – A Concept of Deceit that Security Professionals Must Know
    http://shariahthethreat.org/a-short-course-1-what-is-shariah/a-short-course-5-taqiyya/

    6. Slander – How it is Used and Abused Under Shariah
    http://shariahthethreat.org/a-short-course-1-what-is-shariah/a-short-course-6-slander/

    7. How Shariah ‘Blasphemy’ Laws are Being Imposed On Us
    http://shariahthethreat.org/a-short-course-1-what-is-shariah/a-short-course-7-blasphemy/

    8. What is the Muslim Brotherhood and How Does it Operate?
    http://shariahthethreat.org/a-short-course-1-what-is-shariah/a-short-course-8-what-is-the-muslim-brotherhood-and-how-does-it-operate/

    9. Genesis of the Muslim Brotherhood
    http://shariahthethreat.org/a-short-course-1-what-is-shariah/a-short-course-9-genesis-of-the-muslim-brotherhood/

    10. Movement of the Muslim Brotherhood into the West
    http://shariahthethreat.org/a-short-course-1-what-is-shariah/a-short-course-10-movement-of-the-muslim-brotherhood-into-the-west/

    11. The Muslim Brotherhood’s Westward Infiltration
    http://shariahthethreat.org/a-short-course-1-what-is-shariah/a-short-course-11-the-muslim-brotherhood%e2%80%99s-westward-infiltration/

    12. The Muslim Brotherhood in America
    http://shariahthethreat.org/a-short-course-1-what-is-shariah/a-short-course-12-the-muslim-brotherhood-in-america/

    13. The Holy Land Trial: On the Trail of the Muslim Brotherhood
    http://shariahthethreat.org/a-short-course-1-what-is-shariah/a-short-course-13-the-holy-land-trial-on-the-trail-of-the-muslim-brotherhood/

    14. The Muslim Brotherhood’s ‘Strategic Plan’
    http://shariahthethreat.org/a-short-course-1-what-is-shariah/a-short-course-14-the-muslim-brotherhood%e2%80%99s-strategic-plan/

    15. Penetration of the US Government: A Case Study
    http://shariahthethreat.org/a-short-course-1-what-is-shariah/a-short-course-15-penetration-of-the-us-government-a-case-study/

    16. Mapping the Muslim Brotherhood in America
    http://shariahthethreat.org/a-short-course-1-what-is-shariah/a-short-course-16-mapping-the-muslim-brotherhood-in-america/

    17. Who’s Who in the American Muslim Brotherhood .
    http://shariahthethreat.org/a-short-course-1-what-is-shariah/a-short-course-17-who%e2%80%99s-who-in-the-american-muslim-brotherhood-msa-isna/

    “American Muslim Taskforce” (AMT). This is how the AMT describes itself:

    AMT is an umbrella organization that includes American Muslim Alliance (AMA), American Muslims for Palestine (AMP), Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), Muslim Alliance in North America (MANA), Muslim American Society-Freedom (MAS-F), Muslim Legal Fund of America (MLFA), Muslim Ummah of North America (MUNA), National Association of Imams (NAIF) and United Muslims of America (UMA).

    Meanwhile, the Koran says this, dhimmi:
    “Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them.” Koran 2:191
    “Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood.” Koran 9:123
    “When opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you catch them.” Koran 9:5
    “Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable.” Koran 3:85
    “The Jews and the Christians are perverts; fight them.”... Koran 9:30
    “Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam” Koran 5:33
    “Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water; melt their skin and bellies.” Koran 22:19
    “Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Qur’an.” Koran 8:12

    In 1968, Bobby Kennedy was shot and killed by a Muslim male.
    In 1972 at the Munich Olympics, terrorists attacked the Israeli athlete’s dorms. In all, eleven Israeli athletes were massacred by Muslim male terrorists.
    In 1972 Pan Am 747 was hijacked and eventually diverted to Cairo where a fuse was lit on final approach and it was blown up shortly after landing by Muslim males.
    In 1973 Pan Am 707 was destroyed in Rome , with 33 people killed, when it was attacked with grenades by Muslim males.
    In 1979, the US embassy in Iran was taken over by Muslim males
    In the 1980’s a number of Americans were kidnapped and murdered in Lebanon by Muslim males.
    In 1983, the US Marine barracks in Beirut was blown up, killing 241 Americans, and it was done by Muslim males.
    In 1985, the cruise ship Achille Lauro was hijacked and a 70 year old American passenger was murdered and thrown overboard in his wheelchair by Muslim males.
    In 1985, TWA flight 847 was hijacked at Athens, and a US Navy diver trying to rescue passengers was murdered by Muslim males.
    In 1988, Pan Am Flight 103 was bombed over Scotland, killing 259 on board and 11 on the ground. This act of terror was planned and carried out by Muslim males.
    In 1993, the World Trade Center was bombed for the first time, killing 6 and injuring over 1,000...by Muslim males.
    In 1998, the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed by Muslim males.
    In 2011, on 911, four airliners were hijacked; two were used as weapons to crash into and take down the World Trade Centers Towers. Another was used to attack and crash into the Pentagon. The third was in the process of being re-claimed by the passengers when the terrorists flew it into the ground. Thousands of people were killed that day, all of them by Muslim males.
    In 2002-2012, the United States fights a war in Afghanistan against Muslim males.
    In 2002, reporter Daniel Pearl was kidnapped and beheaded by...yes, Muslim males.
    In July, 2002 a shooting at LAX international Airport killed two people and injured five others. It was committed by a Muslim Male, Hesham Mohamed Hadayet.
    In October 2002, beltway snipers killed 17 and wounded five. The shooters? Yes, more Muslim males, John Mohammed and Malik Malvo
    In 2003-2009, the US fights a war in Iraq to topple a tyrannical regime and defeat a fundamentalist Islamic/Al Quida insurgency, made up of Muslim males.
    In March, 2003, on the eve of battle for Iraq, a grenade attack was conducted on the US HQ killing two officers and wounding 14 others. A Muslim male, Sgt. Hasan Akbar, conducted the attack.
    In March, 2006, a rampaging SUV at Chapel Hill, NC, on the Univ. Campus injured nine. Miraculously no one was killed. Who did it? Mohammed Taheri-azar, a muslim male
    In August, 2006, in San Francisco, another SUV rampage kills one and injures nineteen. The perp? A musilm male named Omid Azeez Popal.
    In February, 2007, a shooter kills four and wounds five at the Trolley Square Mall in Salt Lake City. The shooter? Sulejman Talovic, another Muslim male.
    In October, 2007, an attack on Homestead Air Force Base in Florida was stopped at the front gate by military police. The would be terrorist was Tahmeed Ahmad, another Muslim male.
    In November, 2008, Jewish students on the University of Berkley campus were singled out for killing by a Muslim male, Husam Zakharia, who beat two students to death with his fists.
    In June 2009, a military recruiting station in Little Rock, AR was attacked by a shooter with an assault rifle. One solider was killed an another injured by Abdulhakim Muhammad, a Muslim male.
    On November 5, 2009, a U.S. Army officer went on a shooting rampage against other soldiers, killing 29 and wounding 13. Major Nidal Hasan, a Muslim male, who was under investigation for his own ties to Al Quida operatives, conducted the attack shouting, “Allah Akbar!”.

    Here is something educated and uneducated Americans should consider, the Muslim Brotherhood’s ahead of schedule agenda discovered in 1991:

    Islamic invasion of America: The 20 Point Plan

    This sums up the Muslim Brotherfood project in America quite succinctly. On November 7, 2001 international law enforcement authorities and Western intelligence agencies discovered a twenty-year old document revealing a top-secret plan developed by the oldest Islamist organization with one of the most extensive terror networks in the world to launch a program of “cultural invasion” and eventual conquest of the West that virtually mirrors the tactics used by Islamists for more than two decades.

    Since that time information about this document, known in counterterrorism circles as “The Project”, and discussion regarding its content has been limited to the top-secret world of Western intelligence communities. Only through the work of an intrepid Swiss journalist, Sylvain Besson of Le Temps, and his book published in October 2005 in France, La conquête de l’Occident: Le projet secret des Islamistes (The Conquest of the West: The Islamists’ Secret Project), has information regarding The Project finally been made public. One Western official cited by Besson has described The Project as “a totalitarian ideology of infiltration which represents, in the end, the greatest danger for European societies.”

    [...]

    Included in the documents seized during the raid of Nada’s Swiss villa was a 14-page plan written in Arabic and dated December 1, 1982, which outlines a 12-point strategy to “establish an Islamic government on earth” – identified as The Project. According to testimony given to Swiss authorities by Nada, the unsigned document was prepared by “Islamic researchers” associated with the Muslim Brotherhood.

    If you want to read more of the Muslim Brotherhood project go here.

    U.S. Arab-American author outlines secret 20-year strategy to undermine countryWND
    A refugee from the Muslim Middle East thinks he has discovered Islam’s 20-point plan for conquering the United States by 2020

    Anis Shorrosh, author of ‘’Islam Revealed’’ and ‘’The True Furqan,’’ is a Christian Arab-American who emigrated from Arab-controlled Jerusalem in January 1967.

    ‘’The following is my analysis of Islamic invasion of America, the agenda of Islamists and visible methods to take over America by the year 2020,’’ Shorrosh says. ‘’Will Americans continue to sleep through this invasion as they did when we were attacked on 9/11?’’

    1. Terminate America’s freedom of speech by replacing it with statewide and nationwide hate-crime bills.

    2. Wage a war of words using black leaders like Louis Farrakhan, Rev. Jesse Jackson and other visible religious personalities who promote Islam as the religion of African-Americans while insisting Christianity is for whites only. What they fail to tell African-Americans is that it was Arab Muslims who captured them and sold them as slaves. In fact, the Arabic word for black and slave is the same, ‘’Abed.’’

    3. Engage the American public in dialogues, discussions, debates in colleges, universities, public libraries, radio, TV, churches and mosques on the virtues of Islam. Proclaim how it is historically another religion like Judaism and Christianity with the same monotheistic faith.

    4. Nominate Muslim sympathizers to political office to bring about favorable legislation toward Islam and support potential sympathizers by block voting.

    5. Take control of as much of Hollywood, the press, TV, radio and the Internet as possible by buying the related corportations or a controlling stock.(This is already happening with Major media stations.)

    6. Yield to the fear of the imminent shut-off of the lifeblood of America – black gold. America’s economy depends on oil and 41 percent of it comes from the Middle East.

    7. Yell ‘’foul, out-of-context, personal interpretation, hate crime, Zionist, un- American, inaccurate interpretation of the Quran’’ anytime Islam is criticized or the Quran is analyzed in the public arena.

    8. Encourage Muslims to penetrate the White House, specifically with Islamists who can articulate a marvelous and peaceful picture of Islam. Acquire government positions and get membership in local school boards. Train Muslims a medical doctors to dominate the medical field, research and pharmaceutical l companies (Ever notice how numerous Muslim doctors in America are, when their countries need them more desperately than America?) Take over the computer industry. Establish Middle Eastern restaurants throughout the U.S. to connect planners of Islamization in a discreet way.

    9. Accelerate Islamic demographic growth via:

    * Massive immigration (100,000 annually since 1961).

    * Use no birth control whatsoever – every baby of Muslim parents is automatically a Muslim and cannot choose another religion later.

    * Muslim men must marry American women and Islamize them (10,000 annually). Then divorce them and remarry every five years – since one can’t legally marry four at one time. This is a legal solution in America.

    * Convert angry, alienated black inmates and turn them into militants (so far 2,000 released inmates have joined al-Qaida worldwide). Only a few ‘’sleeper cells’’ have been captured in Afghanistan and on American soil.

    10. Reading, writing, arithmetic and research through the American educational system, mosques and student centers (now 1,500) should be sprinkled with dislike of Jews, evangelical Christians and democracy. There are currently 300 exclusively Muslim schools in the U.S. which teach loyalty to the Quran, not the U.S. Constitution. In January of 2002, Saudi Arabia’s Embassy in Washington mailed 4,500 packets of the Quran and videos promoting Islam to America’s high schools – free of charge. Saudi Arabia would not allow the U.S. to reciprocate.

    11. Provide very sizeable monetary Muslim grants to colleges and universities in America to establish ‘’Centers for Islamic studies’’ with Muslim directors to promote Islam in higher-education institutions.

    12. Let the entire world know through propaganda, speeches, seminars, local and national media that terrorists have hijacked Islam, when in truth, Islam hijacked the terrorists.

    13. Appeal to the historically compassionate and sensitive Americans for sympathy and tolerance towards Muslims in America who are portrayed as mainly immigrants from oppressed countries.

    14. Nullify America’s sense of security by manipulating the intelligence community with misinformation. Periodically terrorize Americans with reports of impending attacks on bridges, tunnels, water supplies, airports, apartment buildings and malls.

    15. Form riots and demonstrations in the prison system demanding Islamic Sharia as the way of life, not America’s justice system.

    16. Open numerous charities throughout the U.S., but use the funds to support Islamic terrorism with American dollars.

    17. Raise interest in Islam on America’s campuses by insisting freshman take at least one course on Islam.

    18. Unify the numerous Muslim lobbies in Washington, mosques, Islamic student centers, educational organizations, magazines and papers by Internet and an annual convention to coordinate plans, propagate the faith and engender news in the media.

    19. Send intimidating messages and messengers to the outspoken individuals who are critical of Islam and seek to eliminate them by hook or crook.

    20. Applaud Muslims as loyal citizens of the U.S. by spotlighting their voting record as the highest percentage of all minority and ethic groups in America.

    AND, unnoticed like Bin Laden’s declaration of war on the US in 1996, the MB has declared war on the US in the last few weeks...Rubin’s article on the matter: B H OBAMA He’s a Muslim. What makes you think he’s concerned about Christians?

    Obama is a Muslim wanabe or Wahabe

    Is Barack Obama Really A Saudi / Muslim “Plant” in the White House?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Jhx_2TqffE

    “One of the prettiest sounds on earth” is the Muslim call to prayer at sunset.
    Barack Hussein Obama as quoted by Nicholas D. Kristof in the New York Times - March 6, 2007

    • The FIRST thing Obama did as a newly elected Illinois State Senator was to attempt to declare a Muslim holiday. Obama sponsored Bill SR0110 in the 90th General Assembly to declare November 1, 1997 to be Islamic Community Center Day. It did not pass.
    http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/legisnet90/summary/900SR0110.html

    http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/legisnet90/srgroups/sr/900SR0110LV.html

    • His biological father was a Muslim.
    http://www.bing.com/reference/semhtml/?title=Barack_Obama%2C_Sr.&src=abop&qpvt=barack+obama+seniot&q=barack+obama+senior&fwd=1

    • Because his biological father was a Muslim the Islam world thinks he is a Muslim.
    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/behind-the-numbers/2010/08/obama_is_a_muslim_18_24_or.html?hpid=topnews http://www.indonesiamatters.com/2952/barry-soetoro/

    • His stepfather was a Muslim.
    http://www.indonesiamatters.com/2952/barry-soetoro/

    • As a child Barry was enrolled in school as a Muslim in Jakarta Indonesia. An Indonesian Madrasa.
    Obama didn’t just study at a Muslim school, he was enrolled in mugaji classes (where devout Muslims learn the Koran in Arabic).
    http://laotze.blogspot.com/2008/01/obama-and-inconvenient-truth.html

    • Barack Hussein Obama’s first and middle names are Arabic Muslim names.
    Barack was the name for Mohammad’s horse. Husein, enough said.
    http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700246419/Barack-Muhammads-horse.html

    http://sanooaung.wordpress.com/2009/01/22/will-be-obama-with-us-muslims-as-the-meaning-of-his-name-in-persian-language/

    • Obama recited the opening lines of the Muslim call to prayer, which includes a vow of fidelity to Islam, in flawless Arabic on a radio program. - Nikolos Kristoff, NYTs, 3-06-07 (***this one is a gottcha moment***)
    http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.3413/pub_detail.asp

    http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/11679

    • On that same program he said he thinks the call to prayer is “one of the prettiest sounds on earth.”
    http://jewagainstobama.wordpress.com/2008/03/03/obama-muslim-call-to-prayer-one-of-the-prettiest-sounds-on-earth/ http://caosblog.com/archives/7373

    • Obama belonged to Rev. Wright’s (a former Muslim) church for twenty years. Many congregants are Muslims.
    http://infidelsarecool.com/2008/04/07/jeremiah-wright-former-muslim/

    http://infidelsarecool.com/2008/03/20/rev-wright-got-his-masters-degree-in-islam-in-west-africa/
    http://endtimes.yuku.com/forum/viewtopic/id/289

    • Obama’s said that the U.S. is “one of the largest Muslim countries in the world.”
    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/tobyharnden/9959057/Barack_Hussein_Obama_US_one_of_the_largest_Muslim_countries_in_the_world/
    http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/06/obama_america_one_of_the_large_1.asp

    • Obama holds Muslim celebrations in the WH but canceled the National Day of Prayer.
    http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1724544/obama_cancels_national_day_of_prayer.html?cat=9 http://www.exposeobama.com/

    • President Obama’s religious adviser, Eboo Patel, once deemed the United States “the ideal place for the renewal of Islam.”
    http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2010/06/-obama-tells-egyptian-foreign-minister-i-am-a-muslim-stealth-coup-on-the-white-house.html

    • Obama does not give gifts on Christmas.
    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0708/12035.html

    • Obama doesn’t celebrate his birthday.
    http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/04/a-tough-birthday-for-obama/

    • Obama falsely attributes Muslim participation in the founding of America.
    http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.7041/pub_detail.asp

    • Obama required that the cross be covered when he gave a speech at Notre Dame.
    http://blog.acton.org/archives/9843-notre-dame-georgetown-and-president-obama.html

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/05/11/opinion/main5006203.shtml

    http://dougpowers.com/2009/04/17/obamas-jesus-coverup/

    • Christian symbol covered up during Obama’s Georgetown speech
    http://myfaithspace.ning.com/profiles/blogs/obama-covers-christ-and-cross

    http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=46667

    • Obama’s first major speech in office was a “Muslim outreach” speech in Cairo Egypt.
    http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-by-the-President-at-Cairo-University-6-04-09/

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8083171.stm

    • “The American President told me in confidence that he is a Muslim,” said Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit on Nile TV.
    http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2010/06/12/bombshell-egyptian-foreign-minister-ahmed-aboul-gheit-says-on-egyptian-tv-%e2%80%9cthe-american-president-told-me-in-confidence-that-he-is-still-a-muslim-%e2%80%9d/

    http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=166905

    • Obama gave strong support to the Cordoba House community center and mosque to be built at the Ground Zero site of Sep. 11, 2001 at a dinner celebrating the day’s end of the first day of Ramadan at the WH.
    http://www.aolnews.com/surge-desk/article/president-obama-supports-ground-zero-mosque/19593492?ncid=webmail

    • Obama tasked NASA with a mission of “Muslim outreach.”
    http://technology.newsplurk.com/2010/07/nasa-and-islam.html

    • Obama referred to his faith as “my Muslim faith” gaffe in an interview with George Stephanopolous.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQqIpdBOg6I

    Pushes Islamic freedom of religion but not Jewish or Christian freedoms. Several weeks ago he told Israel NOT to build settlements in East Jerusalem. But OK to build that Mosque at Ground Zero.
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/7514285/Israel-spits-in-Obamas-eye-by-announcing-new-settlements-in-east-Jerusalem.html
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/mar/24/barack-obama-israel-settlement-plan

    Be wary, wary aware ....and wary, wary afraid...get prepared for more creeping sharia...more than what is coming out of the White House today. Islam is a warrior’s code, not a religion.

    Islam Explained in Layman’s Terms

    Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat.

    Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of life.

    Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components. The religious component is a beard for all of the other components.

    Islamization begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their religious privileges.

    When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the other components tend to creep in as well.

    Here’s how it works:

    As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in:

    United States — Muslim 1.8%
    Australia — Muslim 1.5%
    Canada — Muslim 1.9%
    China — Muslim 1.8%
    Italy — Muslim 1.5%
    Norway — Muslim 1.8%
    At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs. This is happening in:

    Denmark — Muslim 2%
    Germany — Muslim 5.2%
    United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
    Spain — Muslim 4%
    Thailand — Muslim 4.6%
    From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:

    France — Muslim 8%
    Philippines — Muslim 5%
    Sweden — Muslim 5%
    Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
    The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
    Trinidad & Tobago — Muslim 5.8%
    At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

    When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris , we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam, with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections in:

    Guyana — Muslim 10%
    India — Muslim 13.4%
    Israel — Muslim 16%
    Kenya — Muslim 10%
    Russia — Muslim 15%
    After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues, such as in:

    Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%
    At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:

    Bosnia — Muslim 40%
    Chad — Muslim 53.1%
    Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%
    From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels, such as in:

    Albania — Muslim 70%
    Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
    Qatar — Muslim 77..5%
    Sudan — Muslim 70%
    After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and in some ways is on-going in:

    Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
    Egypt — Muslim 90%
    Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
    Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
    Iran — Muslim 98%
    Iraq — Muslim 97%
    Jordan — Muslim 92%
    Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
    Pakistan — Muslim 97%
    Palestine — Muslim 99%
    Syria — Muslim 90%
    Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
    Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
    United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%
    100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace. Here there’s supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in:

    Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
    Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
    Somalia — Muslim 100%
    Yemen — Muslim 100%
    Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states the most radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons.

    It is important to understand that in some countries, with well under 100% Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by Sharia Law. The national police do not even enter these ghettos. There are no national courts, nor schools, nor non-Muslim religious facilities. In such situations, Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. The children attend madrasses. They learn only the Koran. To even associate with an infidel is a crime punishable with death. Therefore, in some areas of certain nations, Muslim Imams and extremists exercise more power than the national average would indicate.

    Today’s 1.5 billion Muslims make up 22% of the world’s population. But their birth rates dwarf the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, and all other believers. Muslims will exceed 50% of the world’s population by the end of this century.

    Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat.

    Well, boys and girls, today we are letting the fox guard the henhouse. The wolves will be herding the sheep!

    Obama appointed two devout Muslims to Homeland Security posts. Doesn’t this make you feel safer already? Arif Alikhan as Assistant Secretary for Policy Development and Kareem Shora as ADC National Executive Director.
    NOTE: Has anyone ever heard a new government official being identified as a devout Catholic, a devout Jew or a devout Protestant...? Just wondering.

    Devout Muslims being appointed to critical Homeland Security positions? Doesn’t this make you feel safer already??

    Was it not “Devout Muslims” who flew planes into U.S. buildings 8 years ago?

    Was it not a Devout Muslim who killed 13 at Fort Hood?

    “American Muslim Taskforce” (AMT). This is how the AMT describes itself:

    AMT is an umbrella organization that includes American Muslim Alliance (AMA), American Muslims for Palestine (AMP), Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), Muslim Alliance in North America (MANA), Muslim American Society-Freedom (MAS-F), Muslim Legal Fund of America (MLFA), Muslim Ummah of North America (MUNA), National Association of Imams (NAIF) and United Muslims of America (UMA).

    Meanwhile, the Koran says this, dhimmi:
    “Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them.” Koran 2:191
    “Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood.” Koran 9:123
    “When opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you catch them.” Koran 9:5
    “Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable.” Koran 3:85
    “The Jews and the Christians are perverts; fight them.”... Koran 9:30
    “Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam” Koran 5:33
    “Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water; melt their skin and bellies.” Koran 22:19
    “Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Qur’an.” Koran 8:12

    In 1968, Bobby Kennedy was shot and killed by a Muslim male.
    In 1972 at the Munich Olympics, terrorists attacked the Israeli athlete’s dorms. In all, eleven Israeli athletes were massacred by Muslim male terrorists.
    In 1972 Pan Am 747 was hijacked and eventually diverted to Cairo where a fuse was lit on final approach and it was blown up shortly after landing by Muslim males.
    In 1973 Pan Am 707 was destroyed in Rome , with 33 people killed, when it was attacked with grenades by Muslim males.
    In 1979, the US embassy in Iran was taken over by Muslim males
    In the 1980’s a number of Americans were kidnapped and murdered in Lebanon by Muslim males.
    In 1983, the US Marine barracks in Beirut was blown up, killing 241 Americans, and it was done by Muslim males.
    In 1985, the cruise ship Achille Lauro was hijacked and a 70 year old American passenger was murdered and thrown overboard in his wheelchair by Muslim males.
    In 1985, TWA flight 847 was hijacked at Athens, and a US Navy diver trying to rescue passengers was murdered by Muslim males.
    In 1988, Pan Am Flight 103 was bombed over Scotland, killing 259 on board and 11 on the ground. This act of terror was planned and carried out by Muslim males.
    In 1993, the World Trade Center was bombed for the first time, killing 6 and injuring over 1,000...by Muslim males.
    In 1998, the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed by Muslim males.
    In 2011, on 911, four airliners were hijacked; two were used as weapons to crash into and take down the World Trade Centers Towers. Another was used to attack and crash into the Pentagon. The third was in the process of being re-claimed by the passengers when the terrorists flew it into the ground. Thousands of people were killed that day, all of them by Muslim males.
    In 2002-2012, the United States fights a war in Afghanistan against Muslim males.
    In 2002, reporter Daniel Pearl was kidnapped and beheaded by...yes, Muslim males.
    In July, 2002 a shooting at LAX international Airport killed two people and injured five others. It was committed by a Muslim Male, Hesham Mohamed Hadayet.
    In October 2002, beltway snipers killed 17 and wounded five. The shooters? Yes, more Muslim males, John Mohammed and Malik Malvo
    In 2003-2009, the US fights a war in Iraq to topple a tyrannical regime and defeat a fundamentalist Islamic/Al Quida insurgency, made up of Muslim males.
    In March, 2003, on the eve of battle for Iraq, a grenade attack was conducted on the US HQ killing two officers and wounding 14 others. A Muslim male, Sgt. Hasan Akbar, conducted the attack.
    In March, 2006, a rampaging SUV at Chapel Hill, NC, on the Univ. Campus injured nine. Miraculously no one was killed. Who did it? Mohammed Taheri-azar, a muslim male
    In August, 2006, in San Francisco, another SUV rampage kills one and injures nineteen. The perp? A musilm male named Omid Azeez Popal.
    In February, 2007, a shooter kills four and wounds five at the Trolley Square Mall in Salt Lake City. The shooter? Sulejman Talovic, another Muslim male.
    In October, 2007, an attack on Homestead Air Force Base in Florida was stopped at the front gate by military police. The would be terrorist was Tahmeed Ahmad, another Muslim male.
    In November, 2008, Jewish students on the University of Berkley campus were singled out for killing by a Muslim male, Husam Zakharia, who beat two students to death with his fists.
    In June 2009, a military recruiting station in Little Rock, AR was attacked by a shooter with an assault rifle. One solider was killed an another injured by Abdulhakim Muhammad, a Muslim male.
    On November 5, 2009, a U.S. Army officer went on a shooting rampage against other soldiers, killing 29 and wounding 13. Major Nidal Hasan, a Muslim male, who was under investigation for his own ties to Al Quida operatives, conducted the attack shouting, “Allah Akbar!”

  • Obama Signed Off on Iran’s Right to Nuclear Program in Secret 2011 Talks

  • Obamanization

    08/10/2015 6:56:35 PM PDT · 6 of 7
    RaceBannon to kindred

    For the UNknowing, the UNaware and the wary,

    When the founding fathers thought of America, their little baby, the last thing they wanted was an invasive force to stifle, smother it, and then overwhelm it and kill it.

    Most people do not recognize that what happens in a mosque is sedition. Pure and simple. Islam is not just a “religion”, it is a cult. Larger than that though, it is a political system, it is it’s own government, a economic system (which includes funding new mosque construction), its judicial...all wrapped up in the word sharia. This is inclusive of its military (jihadis) all rolled into one with one intent ...and that is to rule wherever they take root. It is a invasive, systemic infection looking to take over the host once it has quantum.

    This is not just a “religion”, but something that cloaks itself in those terms so it should not be given the same treatment contemplated under the first amendment. The Korans Sharia rules are to consume whatever government there is wherever it goes.
    Islam is political, and it’s goal is to supplant and replace. Globally.

    When the founding fathers thought of America, their little baby, the last thing they wanted was an invasive force to stifle, smother it, and then overwhelm it and kill it.

    The sooner America learns this , the better. Some know and many do not, but it is a threat to everything America knows.

    Obama? Obama and Company? Should be tried for treason in this issue for promoting the establishment of a foreign government on our soils. He is doing nothing to protect America as per his oath. Also, as a Muslim, he knows this, he know far better, he knows sharia, but is looking to deceive America.
    For all interested...Wanna learn more?
    On Sharia
    http://thehayride.com/2010/08/louisiana-at-leading-edge-in-fight-against-shariah/#more-5392

    On sharia global finance
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7iHxl90CD0&feature=related

    On sharia global Economy and huge financial fraud!!!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qbb5s8hALVE&feature=related

    this,
    Three things about Islam
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ib9rofXQl6w&feature=player_embedded

    and a little Bill Whittle
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qg_iDPRud_c

    Maybe we should talk about the birth of Pakistan?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IstZSgniH8

    How can anyone suggest Obama maybe a Muslim... most unfounded statement ever!

    For the unaware and unknowing.... and the wary

    We all have different dreams, and perceptions about America and what it should become. A special thank you to Cruise _Missile for summarizing his observations!

    Obama is a Muslim wanabe or Wahabe

    • The FIRST thing Obama did as a newly elected Illinois State Senator was to attempt to declare a Muslim holiday. Obama sponsored Bill SR0110 in the 90th General Assembly to declare November 1, 1997 to be Islamic Community Center Day. It did not pass.
    http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/legisnet90/summary/900SR0110.html
    http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/legisnet90/srgroups/sr/900SR0110LV.html

    • His biological father was a Muslim.
    http://www.bing.com/reference/semhtml/?title=Barack_Obama%2C_Sr.&src=abop&qpvt=barack+obama+seniot&q=barack+obama+senior&fwd=1

    • Because his biological father was a Muslim the Islam world thinks he is a Muslim.
    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/behind-the-numbers/2010/08/obama_is_a_muslim_18_24_or.html?hpid=topnews
    http://www.indonesiamatters.com/2952/barry-soetoro/

    • His stepfather was a Muslim.
    http://www.indonesiamatters.com/2952/barry-soetoro/

    • As a child Barry was enrolled in school as a Muslim in Jakarta Indonesia. An Indonesian Madrasa.
    • Barack Hussein Obama’s first and middle names are Arabic Muslim names.
    Barack was the name for Mohammad’s horse. Husein, enough said.
    http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700246419/Barack-Muhammads-horse.html
    http://sanooaung.wordpress.com/2009/01/22/will-be-obama-with-us-muslims-as-the-meaning-of-his-name-in-persian-language/

    • Obama recited the opening lines of the Muslim call to prayer, which includes a vow of fidelity to Islam, in flawless Arabic on a radio program. - Nikolos Kristoff, NYTs, 3-06-07 (***this one is a gottcha moment***)
    http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.3413/pub_detail.asp
    http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/11679

    • On that same program he said he thinks the call to prayer is “one of the prettiest sounds on earth.”
    http://jewagainstobama.wordpress.com/2008/03/03/obama-muslim-call-to-prayer-one-of-the-prettiest-sounds-on-earth/
    http://caosblog.com/archives/7373

    • Obama belonged to Rev. Wright’s (a former Muslim) church for twenty years. Many congregants are Muslims.
    http://infidelsarecool.com/2008/04/07/jeremiah-wright-former-muslim/
    http://infidelsarecool.com/2008/03/20/rev-wright-got-his-masters-degree-in-islam-in-west-africa/
    http://endtimes.yuku.com/forum/viewtopic/id/289

    • Obama’s said that the U.S. is “one of the largest Muslim countries in the world.”
    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/tobyharnden/9959057/Barack_Hussein_Obama_US_one_of_the_largest_Muslim_countries_in_the_world/
    http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/06/obama_america_one_of_the_large_1.asp

    • Obama holds Muslim celebrations in the WH but canceled the National Day of Prayer.
    http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1724544/obama_cancels_national_day_of_prayer.html?cat=9
    http://www.exposeobama.com/

    • President Obama’s religious adviser, Eboo Patel, once deemed the United States “the ideal place for the renewal of Islam.”

    http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2010/06/-obama-tells-egyptian-foreign-minister-i-am-a-muslim-stealth-coup-on-the-white-house.html

    • Obama does not give gifts on Christmas.

    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0708/12035.html

    • Obama doesn’t celebrate his birthday.

    http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/04/a-tough-birthday-for-obama/

    • Obama falsely attributes Muslim participation in the founding of America.
    http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.7041/pub_detail.asp

    • Obama required that the cross be covered when he gave a speech at Notre Dame.
    http://blog.acton.org/archives/9843-notre-dame-georgetown-and-president-obama.html
    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/05/11/opinion/main5006203.shtml
    http://dougpowers.com/2009/04/17/obamas-jesus-coverup/

    • Christian symbol covered up during Obama’s Georgetown speech
    http://myfaithspace.ning.com/profiles/blogs/obama-covers-christ-and-cross
    http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=46667

    • Obama’s first major speech in office was a “Muslim outreach” speech in Cairo Egypt.
    http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-by-the-President-at-Cairo-University-6-04-09/
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8083171.stm

    • “The American President told me in confidence that he is a Muslim,” said Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit on Nile TV.
    http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2010/06/12/bombshell-egyptian-foreign-minister-ahmed-aboul-gheit-says-on-egyptian-tv-%e2%80%9cthe-american-president-told-me-in-confidence-that-he-is-still-a-muslim-%e2%80%9d/
    http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=166905

    • Obama gave strong support to the Cordoba House community center and mosque to be built at the Ground Zero site of Sep. 11, 2001 at a dinner celebrating the day’s end of the first day of Ramadan at the WH.
    http://www.aolnews.com/surge-desk/article/president-obama-supports-ground-zero-mosque/19593492?ncid=webmail

    • Obama tasked NASA with a mission of “Muslim outreach.”
    http://technology.newsplurk.com/2010/07/nasa-and-islam.html

    • Obama referred to his faith as “my Muslim faith” gaffe in an interview with George Stephanopolous.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQqIpdBOg6I

    • Pushes Islamic freedom of religion but not Jewish or Christian freedoms. Several weeks ago he told Israel NOT to build settlements in East Jerusalem. But OK to build that Mosque at Ground Zero.
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/7514285/Israel-spits-in-Obamas-eye-by-announcing-new-settlements-in-east-Jerusalem.html
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/mar/24/barack-obama-israel-settlement-plan

    Be wary, wary aware ....and wary, wary afraid...get prepared for more creeping sharia...more than what is coming out of the White House today

  • Obamanization

    08/10/2015 6:56:04 PM PDT · 5 of 7
    RaceBannon to kindred

    “The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the presidency. It will be easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails us. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president.”

    Communism and Obama

    The now obvious takeover of the American economy by a Socialist entity is complete. With the majority of the United States Senate voting in favor of a government takeover of our health care system sounds the death knell for American Capitalism and American freedom, and most specifically: American Health Care.

    With the new Government Health Care hostile takeover, Americans will lose the ability to choose their own specific options for a plan that fits their budget, and instead will be told by the government what is acceptable for health care coverage by any insurance policy.
    http://money.cnn.com/2009/07/24/news/economy/health_care_reform_obama.fortune/index.htm

    If your employer is providing this policy through shared payments through your company’s payroll, your employer will be fined if that policy or plan does not match the government mandates as defined by the new government control. Your employer will be fined thousands of dollars for each employee who is not covered under the plan that your employer voluntarily introduced in the first place for your benefit. This is regardless of whether you are happy with your present coverage or not, the government will determine what is appropriate for you and will demand that you pay the higher fees and premiums necessary to fund the new policy.

    Due to this cost increase to existing policies with a fine per employee for each infraction, companies will find it cheaper to eliminate their health care plans entirely and refer their employees to seek out their own personal policy or inform them of a government sponsored health care insurance policy. The individual company that does this will still face the fines for not providing health care for their employees, but that total amount of the fines is smaller than the actual costs of paying the employer benefits amount added to the imposed fines for policies that the government decides is lacking in government approved health care coverage.

    If you choose to not have insurance due to your budget or belief that you will not need catastrophic health care for personal reasons, you will be in violation of the law and will be facing a government mandated arrest and several thousand dollars worth of fines to force you to pay for government health care.

    If you have an expensive coverage plan already, one where you already have full coverage and can well afford the payments, you will be facing a tax because the new government takeover of healthcare has declared your health care plan to be excessive and they will impose a tax upon your policy and plan and premiums.

    In any government run health care system, there is rationing of health care, an intentional rationing of who gets care and when and is independent of the severity of your health condition. While in some cases, a more severe case or condition may expedite health care, the original waiting period to be diagnosed for your condition will be increased to an unhealthy length of time as evidenced in Canada and England.

    In this new government controlled health care system, the existing Medicare and Medicaid programs will see a $500 Billion decrease in funding, forcing Medicare and Medicaid to cut costs wherever possible to meet budgets. No one is stupid enough to think that this will not result in fewer services to the infirm and the elderly. Handicapped persons who rely upon Medicare and Medicaid will see their benefits reduced to ensure the financial budget is not overstressed. The elderly will face reduced health care to the point where lifesaving health care will be refused unless someone from the government authorizes your personal health care based upon a government defined definition of what diseases or conditions will be treated based on the present Medicare and Medicaid budget.

    In this new government mandated takeover of our health care system, there is what has been termed “Death Panels.” Under the new government takeover of health care, women’s health is severely compromised by the new government refusal to allow coverage for mammograms for women under the age of 50. Men themselves have internal issues that require intrusive procedures such as sygmoid-oscopys which can detect early stages of cancer and this is surely next on their list to restrict an age limit as to when there is health care coverage for such procedures. In a town hall meeting where he face a friendly question from a woman named Jane Sturm, Obama was asked if Mrs. Sturm’s mother would be allowed to receive a pacemaker at age 100 like her mother already did, and Obama ended his obtuse answer by telling her that some people are just going to have to take a pain killer:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJYvaLS-xOw

    This health care bill is the icing on the socialist cake. They will make you pay for it but you won’t get to eat it. I wrote this opinion below in February of 2009. Add in to your thoughts when you read it, that on December 24, 2009, at 0712 E.S.T., our nation became Socialist when they had their 51st vote for Health Care.

    May God Have Mercy on America.

    Subject: Points to ponder about our new President: Somber reading

    As Marines, we did NOT swear an oath to the President in the first sentence, we swore it to the Constitution. Our founding fathers made clear distinctions between the 3 powers of government: Executive, Legislative, and Judicial.
    http://usmilitary.about.com/od/joiningthemilitary/a/oathofenlist.htm
    http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_sepp.html

    While the President leads, he has the Congress to enact laws and the Court to make sure the law is upheld. For ANY of those three to go AGAINST the Constitution, that is treason itself.

    Bush’s enactment of the Patriot Act was to save our country, while Clinton’s spying on her domestic enemies by acquiring over 1800 FBI files on private American citizens was treasonous, illegal, and laughed away as a silly mistake, just like Democrats not paying taxes and becoming Treasury Secretary. To be so bold and blatant against the laws of the country, and to have a political party defend these criminalities is treason in itself.
    http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/01/14/hillary/
    http://www.judicialwatch.org/1197.shtml

    Our founding fathers gave us the SECOND AMENDMENT for just that reason, that if our government ever became so tyrannical, we the people would have the power to overthrow it if need be, by force, by arms, with guns.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

    http://www.nolanchart.com/article6064.html

    The greatest problem here is the absolute hypocrisy of democrats when it comes to politicians upholding the law. Example: Scooter Libby did NOT reveal Valerie Plame’s name to the media, Democrat Richard Armitage did and the special counsel knew that on the 3rd day of the trial from Robert Novak, yet the Special Counsel pushed and pushed until he found Libby make a mis-statement so he could hang someone in the Bush administration for something.
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/13/AR2006091301572.html

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwJCUZHZjV8

    That is a complete political abuse of power. When we compare the crimes of the Clinton administration against Bush, Bush is a boy scout, yet Bush never prosecuted Clinton for sending missile technology to China in exchange for campaign donations, never prosecuted Clinton for allowing Iran to arm the KLA in Serbia against UN resolutions while the rest of the world was stunned, never prosecuted Clinton for allowing the war against Serbia in the first place since it was the Serbs fighting against MUSLIMS who were slaughtering Serbs that started the whole thing over there.
    http://de-construct.net/e-zine/?p=402

    http://de-construct.net/

    The list goes on.

    It is the Democrats who had over a dozen personnel who were known Soviet Spies in the Roosevelt Administration, proven by the Venona papers;
    http://www.conservapedia.com/List_of_Americans_in_the_Venona_papers

    The democrats who defended Julius and Ethel Rosenberg for decades after their execution only to have their other spy friend and conspirator, Morton Sobell, admit on his death bed 3 months ago that they actually did it;
    http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-radosh17-2008sep17,0,864776.story

    And not just nuclear secrets, too, but according to the article cited: “Not only did they try their best to give the Soviets top atomic secrets from the Manhattan Project, they succeeded in handing over top military data on sonar and on radar that was used by the Russians to shoot down American planes in the Korean and Vietnam wars.” Books have been written about the democrat’s complicity with Soviet policies and plans by men such as John Stormer,
    http://www.amazon.com/None-Dare-Call-Treason-Stormer/dp/0899667252

    FDR’s reckless economics and corruption detailed by John Flynn
    http://books.google.com/books?id=CVqTXJjmtmUC&printsec=frontcover&dq=the+roosevelt+myth&hl=en&ei=IqlxTcD8JsqutwfQkMmGDw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false

    This dalliance with Communism is also Obama’s favorite topic apparently.

    The democrat platform is almost identical to the Communist Party Goals:
    http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpusa-and-obama-platforms-are-identical

    The democrats want to take over your 401K...ITS YOUR MONEY:
    http://online.wsj.com:80/article/SB122662401729126813.html

    Obama supporters flew the Soviet Flag in DC when protesting:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYwSGRZGoqA

    Obama plainly stated that he will allow a company to build a coal plant, but that he intends to cause them such absurd costs to keep it environmentally friendly that it will intentionally bankrupt the company trying to build it:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hdi4onAQBWQ

    Audio of Obama declaring he wants to redistribute the wealth JUST LIKE COMMUNISTS do:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck

    The Democrats SOCIALISTS had a dinner where Obama was lead speaker:
    http://groups.google.com/group/chi.politics/browse_thread/thread/d5d92296fba9a75f/17699d1e87cff10e?lnk=st&q=obama

    Internet Archives confirmed Obama was a member of the openly Socialist NEW PARTY of Illinois in 1996:
    http://politicallydrunk.blogspot.com/2008/10/web-archives-confirm-barack-obama-was.html

    Obama’s economic team says they want to create jobs that intentionally exclude White males:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opxuUj6vFa4

    Democrat Barney Frank has openly called for a cap on all wages of all Americans, regardless of them being an employee or owner of a company, yet did not suggest a cap on Senators or Congressmen:
    http://www.financialweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090203/REG/902039977/1003/TOC

    Obama lied to the Illinois Court system when he was asked if he ever went by any other name. His real name was Barry Soetoro in Indonesia:
    http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/08/13/breaking-photo-documents-barry-soetoro-indonesian/
    ....
    How Many Names Does Obama Have?
    Jerome R. Corsi asks, how many different name is Obama legally authorized to use?

    Is his legal name Barack Hussein Obama II, Barack Hussein Obama (without the designation “II” indicating Barack Obama Jr.), Barry Soetoro or Barack Hussein Obama Soebarkah?

    All of these names appear in various documents produced since 2008 regarding Obama’s life story and his passport records.

    The White House has refused to release Obama’s long-form birth certificate, filed at his birth, that lists the hospital where he was born and the name of the physician who attended the birth. Also, the White House has refused to disclose to the public his passport and travel records as maintained by the U.S. State Department.

    The White House released this week a video displaying Obama’s passport, but the name displayed does not match the name on the Certification of Live Birth, or COLB, prominently displayed on websites favorable to Obama during the 2008 presidential campaign.

    In a thread that drew over 1,000 comments to a Politico.com article yesterday by former President George W. Bush speechwriter Josh Gerstein, titled “Don’t look, birthers: Obama’s passport,” was the following comment:

    If you go back to the Birth Registration (not Birth Certificate) that was released by the Daily Kos, Obie’s was Obama II (named after his father). If the “II” is part of his actual name (as per Hawaiian birth registration records), how is it that this is missing from the current passport? Something doesn’t compute here. Can any of the leftist apologists explain what’s going on here, and why their hero’s actual name isn’t shown?

    Another contributor stated:

    Anyone believes anything this guy or ANY prez says just because he says it is a foolish sheep. Question everything. Don’t trust. VERIFY. Why is it so impossible to verify something as simple as his birthplace? When did he change his name back to Obama from Soetoro? How can he be adopted by an Indonesian citizen and not be Indonesian? Where the hell are the real journalists?

    Remarkably, nearly two years after the election, and Obama’s legal name remains a mystery.
    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=192917

    While campaigning in New Hampshire, Obama cancelled the singing of the national Anthem to make room for more ‘speakers’:
    http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=Obama%3a+%27You+can%20not+let+up%27&articleId=1a7835c3-2468-4e6c-8d56-7253c033232a

    Obama clearly said he wants a Civilian Security force as well funded as the Military.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zx2PP4pYGno

    That is what every secret police force ever started like in all dictatorships, such as: Nicaragua: Ortega’s “Councils of Citizen Power”; Cuba: Fidel’s “Committees For Defense of the Revolution”; Panama: Noriega’s “Dignity Battalions”; Venezuela Chavez’s “Popular Defense Units”; Haiti Papa Doc’s National Security Volunteers, commonly called the Tonton Macoutes; China Mao’s Red Guards; Iran: Ayatollah’s Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution; USSR: Soviet Komsomol or “Communist Union of Youth”:
    http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/11/obama_fear_and_the_security_fo.html

    Recent documents and proclamations of his own President-Elect status show his agenda is similar to Soviet/Nazi history in their control and organization of the youth and the population. The following is a Communist Youth program information found here:
    http://www.geocities.com/youth4sa/abern.html

    ”Of all other tasks, some of the outstanding ones are outlined. The widest degree of activity of the youth in the class struggles of the day is imperative, it goes without saying. Nevertheless, it would be a decidedly short-sighted and opportunistic approach if the communist youth movement allowed itself to be involved, under pressure or pretexts of all sorts, in all kinds of routine activity, and to be made into a wagging or running tail of other bodies, political, trade union, etc. in order to achieve a name for ”activities”. There are some, perhaps, who believe that this very routine work, doing some of the distasteful work for the adult comrades, is the task of the youth. But it is in the communist youth organization that the youth (young worker or student) must make their major opportunity to learn thoroughly the fundamental principles and theory of the communist movement, its history, etc. in order really to be prepared for intelligent participation and leadership, at a later period, in the adult organization, the Party. It has to be said plainly that in the adult organization, the opportunities are often too limited for serious and necessary study by the ranks. Lack of time and the need to carry through numberless concrete tasks after working hours are the main reasons therefore.

    The adult members have to place a great reliance, perhaps too much, on experience and the theoretical back-ground can or should to a large degree be obtained by the youth in the years they are apart of the communist youth organization. This knowledge, coupled with their activities otherwise, will serve as a strong safeguard against opportunism and adventurism. In the above sense, the slogan of Clarity and Action sums up the attitude of the communist youth. While stressing education and class struggle activity, a youth movement, communist or otherwise, cannot live by these alone, especially so if the communist youth organization is to attract the wider strata of the youth to its own banner or around its bona-fide sympathetic auxiliary bodies. Social, sport, and cultural activities need to be systematically developed. The youth movement needs to build its dramatic and musical groups and like mediums which attract the youth. It can be done; who says otherwise needlessly narrows the possibilities for rallying youth elements to the communist cause through diverse methods. Particularly must the communist youth foster a broad workers’ sport movement of which it must be a guiding participant. The insidious and malevolent influence of the bourgeois sport movements, both professional and amateur is immense, and systematic efforts are required to counter-act this influence on the mass of American youth. A general social and cultural life, in addition to the basic tasks outlined before, ill tend to attract young workers and students around us. If the new forces are approached sympathetically, made to realize our genuineness, they will either join the communist youth organization, or at least remain sympathetic, even if not ready to accept the entire outlook of Communism. Numerous other tasks for the youth can be posed, but space forbids.”

    Obama has openly called for a national police force stronger than the American Military:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zx2PP4pYGno

    Obama’s campaign clearly tried to silence dissent of any criticism of Obama while claiming his higher moral authority, going so far as to claiming Obama is THE MESSIAH, and to even threaten to arrest and serve lawsuits against persons who argue against policies proposed by candidate Obama:
    http://www.spectator.co.uk/print/melaniephillips/2293196/pinch-yourself.thtml

    http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/09/missouris_obama_truth_squads_2.html

    When visiting troops overseas, Obama refused to meet with wounded troops in Germany and also Afghanistan, something NO responsible politician would ever do, even if he was just pandering for votes, they would have visited the wounded troops:
    http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,567821,00.html

    http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D924E4KO0&show_article=1

    http://www.blackfive.net/main/2008/07/from-gi-in-afgh.html

    Obama openly praises a racist pastor whose church he attended for over 20 years:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fh7xMhsLnac

    Obama openly makes racist jokes that his white half will be confused as whom to vote for:
    http://gawker.com/5070800/bloggy-obama-tells-absurdist-jokes

    http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/10/on-the-daily-sh.html

    Obama’s prayer leaders at his inauguration included someone associated with Islamic terror group HAMAS:
    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0109/17562.html

    Obama has been publicly supported by known terrorist states and their leaders:
    Ali Larijani, the hard-line speaker of the Iranian parliament, Ahmed Yousef from HAMAS, Muammar Gaddafi
    http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1225199589258&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

    Percy Sutton (Malcolm X’s Lawyer) Says Barack Obama Knows And Was Financed By The Racist Radical Muslim And Saudi Advisor Dr. Khalid Al-Mansour:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIVO8MZYXo8

    There were a number of known, public, and extremely violent terrorist organizations that openly endorsed Obama. Would they have endorsed a Republican Conservative?
    http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1225199589258&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2F

    Mohammed Al-Churbaji, Dad of Obama Fundraiser, worked for Azzam, Bin Laden.
    www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/06/exclusive_who_i_1.html

    Public supporter of Obama Jodie Evans, co-founder of CODE PINK and a top financier of the Obama for President campaign, openly donated hundreds of thousands of dollars and publicly stated their support for Al Qaeda and insurgent forces in Afghanistan and Iraq:
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2102867/posts

    Obama traveled to Africa and openly campaigned with his cousin, Raila Odinga who lost the election, and whose followers murdered hundreds when he lost and burned down over 100 churches and zero Mosques:
    http://africanpress.wordpress.com/2008/08/10/senator-barack-obama-in-kenya-obama-and-odinga-the-true-story/

    We are dealing with someone who wants to take over our present system of economics and openly said we need to redistribute the wealth of private citizens:
    http://www.topix.com/forum/source/carlsbad-current-argus/TUICEM8ULPQG63BDA

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTCNK7v3J6w

    http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=205883

    Obama supports destroying our present system of civil rights, and even change our Constitution as he plainly said when he said it was a flawed document.
    http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_constitution/2008/10/27/144675.html

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11OhmY1obS4

    http://bbs.freetalklive.com/index.php?topic=30514.0

    In conclusion, we are dealing with a man whose associations include but are not limited to the following:

    1.) Kenyan opposition candidates whose followers murdered hundreds when he lost and burned down over 100 churches and zero Mosques.
    http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2008-01-01-kenya-elections_N.htm

    2.) Domestic terrorists who murdered up to 6 Americans in bombings, robberies, shootings and other murders to include Police Officers and the bombing of civilian houses own and occupied by a Lawyer and family who thankfully escaped death that night.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7b-l-alJNw

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbQCpUhONtk

    http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2169

    3.) Proven 20 years of association with a racist theologian and the associations that go along with that man and theologian; the standard blame white America first sentiment, regardless of how true it was 150 years ago, the changes made in our own lifetime are disregarded and only demand more.
    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/warner-todd-huston/2008/03/16/contrary-claims-obama-very-close-racist-preacher-wright

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hAYe7MT5BxM

    http://sweetness-light.com/archive/barack-obamas-church-ultra-left-and-afrocentric

    4.) His own family’s statements of what his supposed moral foundation is and how his own statements declare that he will side with a religion that is historically known to kill their opponents first and refuse to negotiate until their opponents are subdued and begging for mercy.
    http://www.americanconservativedaily.com/2008/03/muslim-obama-says-in-his-book-he%E2%80%99s-on-the-side-of-muslims/

    http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12918.htm

    http://a.media.abcnews.com/podcasts/080618_israelie_army_audio.mp3

    5.) His campaign received millions of dollars that are untraceable to the original donors, and of the millions that are traceable that came from overseas, a FEDERAL CRIME, and how his campaign removed the Credit Card checking of names and account numbers to verify the credit cards were valid.
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/28/AR2008102803413.html

    https://donate.barackobama.com/

    http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-obama-campaigns-credit-card-crack-up/

    6.) His association with known supporters of Islamic Terrorism, of groups known as Hamas and Hizbullah.
    http://bidenobama.blogspot.com/2009/02/iran-hamas-connection-and-president.html

    http://sderotmedia.org.il/bin/content.cgi?ID=350&q=3

    http://www.jihadwatch.org/2008/08/obama-muslim-advisor-linked-to-hamas-cair.html

    http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/01/more_fallout_from_hamas_connec.html

    7.) Of his party’s refusal to demand he release his personal records for examination by the American people so as to know the candidate better, while they themselves have a history to demand documents from 40 years ago that pertained to President Bush. His party’s refusal to demand the Military records of John Kerry and the College records of Barak Obama are a part of his political party’s hypocrisy.
    http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/10/obama-records-obama-campaign-still-refuses-to-release-medical-other-records/

    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1107/6821.html

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=100613

    8.) The re-introduction of THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE, a form of censorship written by the Democrats to silence the effects of Talk Radio. NOT ONCE has the Democrat Party ever referred to the massive ideological outnumbering of Liberals to Conservatives in the mainstream media, and only refer to ‘fairness’ when considering Talk Radio and the Internet. Obama staffers have also made statements that they desired a censoring of the Internet.
    http://www.heritage.org/research/regulation/em368.cfm

    http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-anderson3-2009mar03,0,3448325.story

    http://www.infowars.com/obama-ag-choice-advocated-censoring-internet/

    http://en.wordpress.com/tag/internet-censorship-obama/

    As anyone knows, who has been paying attention, this can only mean Conservative Talk Radio and open Internet communication. Knowing that Obama associate Bill Ayers freely referred to Saul Alinsky, and Knowing that the writings off Saul Alinsky openly promote Communism and radical overthrow, who dedicated his book RULES FOR RADICALS to SATAN only confirms what I call the criminality of this administration.
    http://zombietime.com/prairie_fire/

    http://sweetness-light.com/archive/communist-party-interview-with-bill-ayers

    http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2169

    We all took a vow to protect and defend the Constitution of The United States of America, Against ALL Enemies, Foreign and Domestic...Will Obama be a Patriot after all or an enemy of the Constitution is a sad question that the informed can only be saddened to think of the answer.
    http://usmilitary.about.com/od/joiningthemilitary/a/oathofenlist.htm

    So, just what is treason then? Overthrowing our entire economic system to one that is proven to have failed worldwide is treason or is it Americanism? Submitting to and apologizing to Islamic terrorists who have repeatedly threatened to KILL US, ME AND YOU if we don’t become Muslim? Is that Treason? or Americanism? Taking ALL YOUR MONEY in the bank to be kept by the government to use as the government sees fit, is that treason or Americanism?

    Jim Bancroft
    Feb 3, 2009; UPDATED December 25, 2009
    USMC 1977-1981

    If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory
    is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and
    only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of
    victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves. WINSTON CHURCHILL


    A MOSAIC: OBAMA, ISLAM, COMMUNISM
    By Marshall Frank on February 7, 2012 in Politics & Government, Radical Islam

    I’ve made it no secret. I believe Barack Obama is a colossal fraud and that his true mission leading up to, and during his reign as president, is far more sinister than most people are willing to believe.

    Arguing about the legitimacy of Barack Obama always gets mired in minutia— single issues – because people don’t stand back and look at the big picture. We argue Reverend Wright, or Bill Ayres, or socialism or the suspicious birth certificate, and so on. The left accuses the right of dirty politics. The right accuses the left of protecting a non-patriot.

    To understand the real person behind that endearing facade is to know every segment of his life and look at him as a mosaic. Mosaic art is made of many tiles fitted together. Each tile has shapes and colors but no form. It’s those formless tiles that we waste time arguing about because none of them show the big picture. But in order to know the truth we must see all the tiles in place, for then they are no longer just shapes and colors, they show the entire mural of who and what Barack Obama really is.

    So let’s start with one tile after another and put them together like a jigsaw puzzle.

    1) Obama’s mother had an affair with and married an African-Kenyan, a Muslim.

    2) There is also plethora of literature to suggest that Obama’s father was a committed communist at the time he and Obama’s mother were involved in their relationship.

    3) Obama’s mother divorced his father, and then remarried to another man who was also a Muslim and citizen of Indonesia .

    4) Barack Obama lived mostly in environments dominated by Islam until he was ten years old.

    5) Obama’s religion was listed in his Indonesian school as “Islam.” With an Islamic father and stepfather, and registered as an Islamic, it is reasonable to assume he was subjected to Islamic indoctrination and teachings.

    6) He went by the name Barry Soetoro during the years he was adopted by his stepfather.

    7) After age ten, his mother left the stepfather and Barry Soetoro returned to Hawaii where he was cared for by his maternal grandparents.

    8)Obama’s grandparents were known to have strong political/socialist leanings

    9) Obama’s close mentor during his high school years was Frank Marshall Davis, an ardent member of the CPUSA (Communist Party)

    10) Obama’s roommates during his first two years at Occidental College , California, were Muslims from Pakistan .

    11) In 1981, Obama traveled with his Muslim friends to Pakistan on vacation, when Pakistan was in political turmoil and most American visas were not accepted. (This was in addition to a leg of his journey to see his mother in Indonesia ) This leaves open the yet unanswered question of what passport he traveled with. (Unlikely it was American)

    12) I have found no evidence that Barack Obama ever legally changed his name back from Barry Soetoro

    13) There is no evidence that Barry Soetoro, AKA Barack Obama, changed his citizenship back from Indonesia to the United States or that he traveled and/or entered college with an American passport and/or I.D.

    14) Following Occidental College , he enrolled in Columbia University and later Harvard. To this day, Obama does not explain why he — this “transparent” president — refuses to release any college/university records regarding his registration, finances, passports, birth records, school papers, writings, grades — nothing.

    15) Despite many Columbia U. enrollees interviewed from that period, same major (political science), including George Stephanopolous, no one remembers Obama on campus or in class.

    16) The former president of Manhattan Borough, Percy Sutton, a prominent attorney, (now deceased) revealed in 2008 that in the 1980’s, Obama was being supported and promoted by notorious radical Muslim cleric Dr. Khalid Al-Mansour who acted as an in-between for a wealthy Saudi named Al Waleed Bin Talal. The Saudi was interested in helping Obama get into Harvard. Sutton wrote a letter at the Al-Mansour’s request to help the Saudi, Bin Talal, get Obama into Harvard.

    17) Raised by atheists and Muslims, never a Christian, Obama strangely becomes a Christian and joins the Trinity Christian Church headed by anti- American, Marxist, racist, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, in 1988. Obama not only attended this church for 20 years, he was deeply involved in its activities.
    Note: Being labeled as a “Christian” strongly helps achieving political power, certainly more than atheist or Muslim.

    18) 1992, Wright presided over the marriage of Barack and Michelle Obama. However, there is no record that can be found of a prior relationship Obama had with any other women, until Michelle. No past girl friends.

    19) Obama becomes deeply involved in Chicago politics, primarily mustering blacks to register to vote.

    20) In 1991, Obama graduated law school and began writing his biography, “Dreams Of My Father”, an autobiography which is published in 1995. But why? Curiously, he’s a young man who has yet to accomplish much of anything significant, but he writes and publishes an autobiography?

    21) Obama was instrumental in assisting the Jew-hating leader of the Nation of Islam, Louis Farrahkan, in formulating the Million-Man March on Washington in 1995.

    22) With very little, or no experience as a practicing attorney, Obama decides to run for state senate. He is hand-picked by then state senator, Alice Palmer, D – Ill., to succeed her as she runs for the U.S. congress. Palmer wrote for the Communist Party newspaper, “People’s Daily World” and had appeared in the Soviet Union to attend the 27th congress of the Communist Party in 1986.

    23) 1995, Obama’s political career for the Illinois State Senate was launched by communist advocate Alice Palmer at the home of William Ayres and Bernadine Dorn, known anti-American Marxists/Activists, and past terrorists.
    Obama also shares a table and worked closely with terrorist Ayres on the board of directors of the Woods Foundation

    24) During his seven-year tenure as a state senator, Obama voted “Present” 129 times, thereby avoiding a left/right stand on selected issues.

    25) Obama developed a close relationship with radical Islamic professor, Palestinian, Rashid Khalidi, who he associated with at the U. Of Chicago . In 2000, Khalidi held a fund raiser for Obama during his failed bid for the U.S. Congress.

    26) Obama runs for and wins U.S. Senate seat in 2004. Almost immediately, he hits the ground running for president.

    27) During the campaign, Obama is endorsed by many radical organizations, including the American Communist Party, while Palestinians in the Middle- East form phone banks to raise money for his election. Gaddafi refers to Obama as a Muslim.

    28) Obama’s half brother Obongo “Roy” Obama is a Luo activist, militant Muslim and Marxist.

    29) Obama’s Kenyan cousin, Odinga, whom Obama later supported in his quest for political power, is an avowed Marxist and militant Islamist dedicated toward establishing Sharia (Islamist) courts in Kenya .

    30) After his election, Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit says that Obama privately told him in confidence, “I am a Muslim.” (As reported in Israel Today, May 2010)

    31) During his first trip as president to the Middle East, Obama speaks passionately to the Egyptian assembly, lauding his early life in a Muslim land….claiming that Islam has always been a great part of the American experience. (?)

    32) During an interview on TV, Obama misspeaks: “John McCain has not made an issue of my Muslim faith.” To which George Stephanopolous corrects him, “You mean, your Christian faith.” (How many of us have made such a slip?)

    33) Obama has hired at least one devoted communist to be a part of his Czar team, Van Jones, who has since resigned. Many others are questionable. His 38 czars are not vetted by congress and supersede many of the functions normally within the purview of cabinet posts.

    34) Obama has employed devout Muslims with connections to the Muslim Brotherhood in his White House staff and within the Department of Homeland Security. These people have access to the inner workings of our government and the highest of classified information. The top aide to Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, is a devout Islamic woman with family connections to the Muslim Brotherhood and Sisterhood.

    35) Obama ( and Eric Holder) do not permit the mentioning of Islam in any references to terrorism. Mentioning Islam in terrorist training for federal officers, is banned. The military’s Fort Hood massacre report — where 41 people were shot — does not mention Islam, or terror, or the Muslim shooter, Nidal Hassan, anywhere in the report, despite the obvious motivations. Eric Holder, when questioned in congress, will not acknowledge the existence of Islamic terrorism. Janet Napolitano is under orders to avoid the use of terms like “war on terror” or “Islamic terrorism” and instead, call it “Man-Caused Disasters”

    36) Every act/decision of Barack Obama before and during the so-called Arab Spring has been to the advantage and support of the notorious Muslim Brotherhood, including the removal of Mubarak of Egypt, Gadaffi of Libya, the leader of Tunisia and now the effort toward removing Assad of Syria. In all these places, the Muslim Brotherhood is now rising to power. Interestingly enough, Obama did not call for regime change in Iran when their citizens took to the streets to demonstrate in 2009 and 2011. The Muslim Brotherhood’s formative documents, and their many secret manifestos recovered by law enforcement agencies since, show — unambiguously — that their goals are to spread Islamic caliphates, and Sharia law, across the western world, to conquer from within, using deception and infiltration. This is a known fact to those who endeavor to pay attention.

    Get the picture?
    These are but the highlights, to keep it short. A more detailed list of horrors regarding Barack Obama could be found in any number of books, including:
    1. The Manchurian President, by Aaron Klein
    2. Radical-in-Chief, by Stanley Kurtz
    3. Muslim Mafia, by P. David Gaubatz
    4. Culture Of Corruption, by Michelle Malkin

    These books are crammed with researched and documented facts, not offhand right-wing opinions as some might claim. See for yourself.

    In this article, I chose to omit any references to Obama’s legitimacy for holding the office of president in order to avoid distractions from the focus of this mosaic. There remains cause for many doubts in that area as well, not limited to just the birth certificate.

    The focus of this mosaic is simple: Obama’s highest of priorities are tied to a surreptitious socialist/communist revolution and his strong leanings toward Islamist causes, and perhaps, he is a non-acknowledging Muslim himself.

    To those who are inclined to vote for this person in November, I ask: Do you want to destroy America?


    A slip up that should have been noticeable to any, not just a trained eye such as mine. Weeks ago Barack stated he met his wife in a class while at Harvard University
    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/24625.html

    Strange... Michelle graduated the year before Barry arrived. Hmmmm. A error concerning the person you refer to as “the love of my life”. That misspeak is unsettling to say the least, because it means Barack is lying about one or the other, or may be BOTH. One NEVER forgets the meeting of the “love’ of their life. Period.. end of story there. If it happened in a class at Harvard, Michelle is NOT the one. Meaning he neither met Michelle at Harvard, nor is in love with her. elementary deduction. Now, lest we deduce that Barry is the is the only duplicitous one of the pair, there is an interview http://watchingamerica.com/News/17081/in-1996-michelle-and-ba

    ... of the couple in 1996. In it Michelle says “ I managed a program called “Public Allies,” which is a group of managerial development that I created here in Chicago,” The truth is Barack founded the company, then installed Michelle at the head of it. As as Investor Business Daley investigated and found
    http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=4586

    ... it is not a ‘managerial development” company at all, but a community activist, read radical, development program. So it appears both have been lying for a period of time, WITH the others knowledge and consent. It appears they’ve planned these LIEs together. From their meeting, to everything that supposedly followed: “He sounded too good to be true,” she told David Mendell, author of “Obama: From Promise to Power. “I had dated a lot of brothers who had this kind of reputation coming in, so I figured he was one of these smooth brothers who could talk straight and impress people. So we had lunch, and he had this bad sport jacket and a cigarette dangling from his mouth, and I thought: ‘Oh, here you go. Here’s this good-looking, smooth-talking guy. I’ve been down this road before.” http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2008/10/03

    ... Really, how many times... Michelle? At the Law firm. You weren’t even liked at that company.

    I must admit, though their “romance” was totally overblown all over the media, and there were at least 50 feature magazine articles on how Barry met Michelle along with Millions of anecdotes. None of it connected to an arranged marriage until i heard Mikki doing the Anti Obesity interview with Robin Roberts. When she starts describing Barry as if she was his PR person. Insisting that her husband entered the office with the country on the “brink of a depression” That a series of smart decisions and quick decision prevented that. Huh? has she looked around this country? We are in THAT depression. Lies lies and more lies. Then she drops her guard. In the 4:00 minute mark of the interview she says “One of the things that Barack Obama said and continues to say is.. change ain’t easy” With a scoff at the end Bam... there it is. If you didn’t catch it the first time listen to it again. That’s not a wife (yes.. I do have experience to know this). That’s a partner in a law firm edifying their top consul. That, in Obama lingo, ‘ain’t’ a person in love. That’s an accomplice.

    These two mysterious people shoved in our faces with hoopla and fanfare are just a pair of con artists partnered together as a package. Dangerously unknown, but totally prepared to assault America’s conscience with guilt and her identity with confusion. Amidst the mysteries surrounding Barry Soetoro, it appears Michelle was hand picked to assist him in the crippling of this country, and the subjugating of its citizens. It is time to rise up in protests and demonstrations. Sit in and shutdowns. To use their own radical tactics against them. These two, with George Soro’s behind them, not only want your blood, but your children’s childrens blood. They will NOT stop. Get ready, get organized and get prepared.


    “”Dr. Quentin Young, Longtime Obama Confidante and Physician to MLK [Martin Luther King]

    FROM “THE OBAMA FILE”...
    RE: QUENTIN YOUNG

    The primary figure who delivered Obama to the single-payer camp was Quentin Young, an 86-year-old retired physician who was a longtime friend and neighbor of Obama in Chicago. Young joined the Young Communist League as a teenager in the late 1930s. From the mid-1940s through the mid-1970s, he was closely associated with the Communist Party. In October 1968 he was called to testify before the House Un-American Activities Committee, which was probing the extent of his knowledge about the riots that had erupted at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago two months earlier. The Committee accused Young of belonging to the Bethune Club, an organization for communist doctors; the group was named after Norman Bethune, a communist physician who devoted his services to the totalitarian regime of Mao Zedong

    Dr. Young was active in the radical movements of the Sixties and Seventies and led a small delegation to Communist North Vietnam in 1972. In the late 1970s, Young became associated with a Marxist organization known as the New American Movement, which was initially convened by Michael Lerner, an America-hating radical who counseled young people to explore the use of LSD and other hallucinogenic drugs as portals to a greater comprehension of socialist principles.

    In 1980 Young founded the Health and Medicine Policy Research Group, a single-payer lobby group whose Board of Directors he chairs to this day. In 1982 Young helped establish the Democratic Socialists of America, which, as the principal U.S. affiliate of the Socialist International, asserts that “many structures of our government and economy must be radically transformed.” In 1987 Young co-founded Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP), a single-payer advocacy organization where he currently serves as national coordinator. In PNHP’s view, government-run healthcare “should be financed by truly progressive taxation.”

    In 1995 Young attended the now-famous meeting at the Hyde Park home of former Weather Underground terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, where Barack Obama was first introduced to influential locals as the hand-picked successor to Alice Palmer, a pro-Soviet radical who planned to vacate her Illinois State Senate seat in pursuit of a higher elected office. Young quickly became a friend and political ally of Obama, teaching the latter about the merits of single-payer healthcare.

    In a 2009 interview with Amy Goodman of Democracy Now!, Young reminisced about the germination of his ideological kinship with the young Obama:

    “Barack Obama, in those early days [as a state senator] — influenced, I hope, by me and others — categorically said single payer was the best way, and he would inaugurate it if he could get the support, meaning [Democratic] majorities in both houses, which he’s got, and the presidency, which he’s got. And he said that on more than one occasion….”

    Another noteworthy influence on Obama’s views vis à vis healthcare has been Dr. Peter Orris, who co-founded Physicians for a National Health Program with Quentin Young. The son of a Communist Party member, Orris in the 1960s was a leader of Harvard University’s campus chapter of Students for a Democratic Society, the New Leftist organization that aspired to overthrow America’s democratic institutions and remake the nation’s government in a Marxist image. He later joined the Communist Party (CP) for more than two decades, before ultimately shifting his allegiance to the CP splinter group, Committees of Correspondence, where he remains a prominent figure to this day.

    http://www.theobamafile.com/_associates/QuentinYoung.htm
    _________________________________________________________

    From David Horowitz’s
    FrontPageMag.com/DiscoverTheNetworks.org
    PROFILE: Quentin Young

    An admirer of Fidel Castro, Young is proud that two of his children traveled to Cuba as members of the Venceremos Brigades to cut sugar cane and pick oranges. (The Venceremos Brigades were organized by Castro’s Cuban intelligence agency, which trained “brigadistas” in guerrilla warfare techniques, including the use of arms and explosives.)

    * Longtime supporter of communist causes
    * Was active in the anti-war and civil rights movements of the 1960s
    * Helped establish the Democratic Socialists of America
    * Co-founded Physicians for a National Health Program, an advocacy organization that lobbies on behalf of a single-payer, government-run healthcare system
    * Friend and supporter of Barack Obama
    * Longtime friend of Bernardine Dohrn and Bill Ayers

    Lots more at the link:
    http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2439


  • Iranian Leaders: Obama Admin Secretly Recognized Our Right to Nuclear Program Back in 2011

  • Iranian Leaders: Obama Admin Secretly Recognized Our Right to Nuclear Program Back in 2011

  • Iranian Leaders: Obama Admin Secretly Recognized Our Right to Nuclear Program Back in 2011

    08/10/2015 5:15:23 PM PDT · 13 of 17
    RaceBannon to AFreeBird; Nachum

    remember when Obama’s people went to Iran in 2008?

  • Iranian Hostage Crisis: West Germany’s Secret Role in Ending the Drama

    08/10/2015 9:09:21 AM PDT · 2 of 4
    RaceBannon to Olog-hai
  • Clinton campaign Abedin's history at State Department poses liability for Clinton White House bid

    08/08/2015 4:49:17 PM PDT · 14 of 24
    RaceBannon to Liz

    Andrew McCarthy on the Muslim Brotherhood and huma Abadin and hillary
    1:30 minutes
    http://youtu.be/AjY9xKd0EGU

  • Clinton campaign Abedin's history at State Department poses liability for Clinton White House bid

    08/08/2015 4:48:38 PM PDT · 13 of 24
    RaceBannon to McGruff

    Andrew McCarthy on the Muslim Brotherhood and huma Abadin and hillary
    1:30 minutes
    http://youtu.be/AjY9xKd0EGU

  • FLASHBACK=> MEGYN KELLY Discusses Her Breasts, Her Husband’s Penis and Sex Life with Howard Stern

    08/08/2015 1:28:47 PM PDT · 58 of 80
    RaceBannon to NKP_Vet
    the who?

  • State Department request for HumaAbedin´s records waylaid for 2 months

    08/07/2015 6:16:17 PM PDT · 11 of 17
    RaceBannon to Nachum

    Andrew McCarthy on the Muslim Brotherhood and huma Abadin and hillary
    1:30 minutes
    http://youtu.be/AjY9xKd0EGU

  • Iran Just Made This Deal with China… And It Means They’re Ready For War

    08/07/2015 2:12:34 PM PDT · 3 of 14
    RaceBannon to Nachum

    24 would only be good for kamakazi attacks, or as missile launch platforms before they do the full Islamikazi

  • Active shooter reported at Antioch theater (Nashville, TN area) (update: shooter is dead)

  • FBI: Middle Eastern Men Intimidating U.S. Military Families In Colorado & Wyoming

    08/05/2015 2:50:11 AM PDT · 25 of 82
    RaceBannon to sheikdetailfeather

    this is a docudrama or something
    FAKE BUT ACCURATE to quote Dan Rather
    https://www.facebook.com/muspeaks/videos/725708700867347/