The original statement didn’t say male, which is why I asked for some sort of source for the statement. It was a bold statement on unread’s part, yet lacked critical detail.
“In nearly every case of sexual abuse on children it’s almost always the queers who are the offenders”...
Had it said “male children” I’d have made the “male offender/boy victim = homosexual offender who is completely subhuman” connection. And I already knew the “male offender/girl victim = straight offender but completely subhuman” connection.
I’m still not fist bumpin’ with Obama, though.