Posted on 04/01/2014 11:54:00 AM PDT by NYer
I was just using the line from Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade.
Is it dishwasher safe...
And I thought I was going to come in here and be all clever and make an Indiana Jones/Last Crusade comment. But you all beat me to it. Well played, freepers, well played. You chose wisely.
Thanks...now I can’t get “Red Solo Cup...” out of my head.
“That is not the cup of a carpenter!”
Exactly. I pictured a red Solo.
Or the Ark of the Covenant.
That pic is from Raiders of the Lost Ark. The cup of Christ had to do w the 3rd movie:
It could be. The medieval gold trimming and the jewels were added afterward. Underneath, you can see that it’s just a plain ceramic chalice, of the kind used at the time of Jesus.
All note:
The story circulating is that through authentication methods, it is expected that the treasured cup was adorned long after Jesus used it at “The Last Supper.”
Pros and Cons of the claim:
It is plausible that someone would have recognized the significance of saving things Jesus used, especially so close to his death and resurrection. He was at the peak of his celebrity status with the common Jews of the time. This is why the “Shroud of Turin” still garners so much attention (whether real or not). Also, Jesus made his place with the average folks of the time and it can be expected that there would be little more fanfare or luxuries for a Passover Meal that Jesus partook in than others. It is likely that “the best china” was used (so to speak). But a chalice laced in gold and jewels would likely not have been owned by the host of the event.
On the flip side, because of the war and destruction over the years, many expected artifacts that should have been saved from Jesus’ time here. As I said, he was famous and infamous (depending on your perspective) but certainly very well known. The story suggests that Muslim’s dating back to some conquest acquired the cup and adorned it because of the importance to Christians in order to offer it up as a gift. My problem here is that there was little preserved of the time during the turmoil in the region. Who is to say that a warrior would have the idea to save an ordinary chalice because the victor of a warring religion once drank from it. Like the temple, I would expect it would be lost in history.
I don’t know one way or another. But there are no soul saving qualities in an old cup. Fun to consider, however.
Red Solo cup.
It’s what I use at my Passover.
Try "Arc of the Covenant"! That was a Moses possession. Get your Indiana Jones references straight! Geez. LOL
When he came to be sacrificed his glory was veiled.
The cup would indeed have been the cup of a Carpenter.
Scam artists for thousands of years have overlooked the implications of scripture.
Interesting. I’ve never heard of this before. However, my faith will neither be strenghtened nor weakened by this story and item.
Oh, yeah, something in use in first century Judea is going to say “GRAIL” on it’s base.
That tiny mark on the bottom that says Made In China makes it more authentic
There are many — now, and down through the centuries — who consider objects important to their worship and devotion to Jesus Christ. I am not one of them. The whole purpose of Christ, and His Gospel, is to restore to us boldness, access and confidence in how we relate to God Himself, not to objects.
No ... no one is reading the article. They are stuck on the bling that surrounds the cup.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
