Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun Control Does Not Mean Total Confiscation
The Modesto Bee ^ | 1/29/2003 | Don Shaw

Posted on 01/31/2003 4:04:41 PM PST by GunRunner

Edited on 04/13/2004 1:55:46 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

The documentary film "Bowling for Columbine" arrived in town at an opportune time since the whole gun control issue seems to be heating up again, making The Bee's Opinion pages once more a battleground of angry accusations and clamorous misconceptions.


(Excerpt) Read more at modbee.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; barfalert; guns; moore; violence
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
A reasonable liberal vision, like Michael Moore's, involves not confiscation but sensible controls and restrictions, together with an understanding that much more is involved in the problem of violence in America than the mere proliferation of guns.

Wow, what a moron. I heard Moore say on Crossfire that he supported banning all handguns. Since there are 60 million of them in the U.S., that would involve some kind of confiscation of course.

1 posted on 01/31/2003 4:04:41 PM PST by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
If rapid-fire military style rifles are still being sold anywhere in the country (and they are), we need to demand their total elimination from our society.

Let's see...demand their total elimination...well, now I can see that gun control does not mean total confiscation! I feel much better!

2 posted on 01/31/2003 4:08:26 PM PST by Sender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
---Michael Moore as "a voice of reason"--?--no need to read farther---
3 posted on 01/31/2003 4:10:26 PM PST by rellimpank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: GunRunner
Moore wrote a column calling for the ban on handguns. It was after the school shooting in Flint.

This writer is an idiot who doesn't know his facts. BTW - Gun control is hitting your target.

5 posted on 01/31/2003 4:11:41 PM PST by Dan from Michigan (I feel the need...for speed!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
Gun Control Does Not Mean Total Confiscation

Not this week, he means.

6 posted on 01/31/2003 4:14:02 PM PST by Oberon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
A reasonable liberal vision, like Michael Moore's, involves not confiscation but sensible controls and restrictions, together with an understanding -- brought out so effectively in the film -- that much more is involved in the problem of violence in America than the mere proliferation of guns.

So it is reasonable to expect criminals to obey these new "sensible controls and restrictions"? You are living in a dream world young lady. All you will accomplish is making criminals of law abiding citizens, and spend tax dollars for beaurocratic paper shuffling.

7 posted on 01/31/2003 4:14:12 PM PST by alaskanfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alaskanfan
Sorry, for some reason I thought this article was written by a woman.
8 posted on 01/31/2003 4:15:17 PM PST by alaskanfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
Mr. Shaw hasn't done his homework. Every country that has tried to stop the black market in guns has failed dismally. It's hard to believe, but Shaw seems to be unacquainted with the situation in Britain. Gun smuggling and crime has skyrocketed since they banned all guns. The same outcome can be seen in Australia.

As for his claim that the left never advocates complete confiscation, he is wrong again. There are some on the left who do this. And those leftists who realize incrementalism is the best strategy (most of them), are not about to admit that confiscation is their ultimate goal.

9 posted on 01/31/2003 4:16:36 PM PST by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
Stating the obivious i know, but, where is the barf alert?
10 posted on 01/31/2003 4:16:47 PM PST by subterfuge (I DO have to get snippy about it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner; bang_list
The Michael Moore column on Flint would be interesting to see...
11 posted on 01/31/2003 4:20:44 PM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
Gun Control Does Not Mean Total Confiscation

Yeah right! That's what the gun grabbers always say in order to get their feet in the door. Later on,after registering firearms, they start calling for confiscating guns.

12 posted on 01/31/2003 4:20:45 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
"If guns are still too easily obtained (and they are, despite existing laws), we need to get tougher -- for example, cracking down on the black market for firearms with the same fervor demanded of narcotics agents."

The crackdown on illegal narcotics is not exactly a great success. If you make a gun illegal, the demand and price increases for that illegal gun. liberals apparently never heard of the Law of Supply and Demand. Where there is a demand for cocaine, there will be a supply. The same applies to guns. Prohibition of alcohol did not reduce the demand for it. If anything, the opposite happened. Liberals are naive and childish. They should stick to poetry readings and art exhibits, and stop trying to deal with real world issues.

13 posted on 01/31/2003 4:24:19 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY (((Live Free or Die!)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
A reasonable liberal vision,

When I hear the words "reasonable" and "liberal" in the same sentence, I reach for my pistol....

14 posted on 01/31/2003 4:25:46 PM PST by 45Auto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
Of course the left doesn't want total gun confiscation. They just want guns confiscated from everyone else!
15 posted on 01/31/2003 4:28:36 PM PST by Redcloak (Join the Coalition to Prevent Unnecessarily Verbose and Nonsensical Tag Lines, eh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
Since law-abiding citizens vastly outnumber criminals, almost all gun-control acts will, by nature, disarm more law-abiding citizens than criminals. Consequently, they will result in an increase in the number of criminal uses of firearms versus self-defense uses. This increase will then be used to push for more gun control.
16 posted on 01/31/2003 4:28:54 PM PST by supercat (TAG--you're it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
...I have found none who advocate anything like a sweeping confiscation of legally owned weapons...


Of course not. That would mean the death of thousands of leftist trash and their pets. They will continue to chip away bit by bit while we do nothing.
17 posted on 01/31/2003 4:29:49 PM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
Gun Control Does Not Mean Total Confiscation

Not any more than a federal income tax means 100% taxation.

18 posted on 01/31/2003 4:31:38 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (Fighting for Freedom and Having Fun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
These screeds make me ill. So many lies.

No they don't want total confiscation of guns (despite the Brady's, Ed Randel, et al saying just that), they just want a total ban on BULLETS!

And just because registration of all guns led to confiscation in Australia, England, etc. is no reason to believe it would here. BLEEEEECHHHH

Don must certainly be an expert on all of this, after all, he's a TEACHER!
19 posted on 01/31/2003 4:34:35 PM PST by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveH
OK, it appears he is for banning only handguns, not all guns. Of course... From

http://squawk.ca/lbo-talk/0003/0098.html


 Date: 01-Mar-00 19:12:19 MsgID: MC2-9B6F-210E ToID: 72763,2240
From: "Michael Moore's newsletter" >INTERNET:MICHAELMOORE@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Subj: Flint, Again -- A message from Michael Moore
Chrg: $0.00 Imp: Norm Sens: Std Receipt: No Parts: 1

03.01.00

Dear friends,

I tried to write this letter to you last night, but the level of
sadness in me would not allow me to sit at this keyboard
and compose these words.

How much more can my hometown take? How much more
do the people we love have to suffer? How much? How
much?? HOW MUCH!

Isn't it enough that tens of thousands of lives in Flint have
been wrecked, destroyed by the greed of General Motors?
Isn't it enough that my wife and I and tens of thousands of
others who love our home -- love it more than any of you
will ever know -- have had to leave Flint in the past 20 years
to find work far from family and friends? Isn't it enough
that Flint suffers the highest or near-highest per capita rates
of murder, rape and theft in the nation?

What else do the people of Flint have to go through while
the rest of country mouths the propaganda of the evening
news claiming "the economy is the best ever!"? The top 10
percent just get richer and richer and the next 30 percent of
you keep the CNBC stock ticker on your screens all day
and toss out all sections of the daily paper but the pages
that tell you how well your portfolio did yesterday.

I thought there was nothing else left for Flint to go through.
Like Job, it seemed that every imaginable sorrow had been
visited upon its people. I guess I was wrong.

I look up at the TV and a helicopter is hovering over a
school while the words "Buell Elementary" flash on the
screen.

Buell? Buell! At the end of "The Big One," when I twisted
Nike chairman Phil Knight's arm to match my $10,000
contribution to the kids of Flint -- that $20,000 went to
Buell Elementary.

Yesterday, a 6-year old boy brought a semi-automatic gun
to that very school in Flint and killed a 6-year old girl in
their first grade classroom.

Six years old.

A little girl whose name was Kayla Rolland.

That's about the only thing the national media got right
about the story. Twenty satellite trucks now ring the school,
but with all that technology, they cannot find the way to
bring you the truth. Of course, they have been spun and
snookered by the local officials in Flint who try to hide
from the responsibility they share in Flint's destruction any
time a tragedy like this happens.

You have probably heard that this school shooting took
place out in the "suburbs," in a place called "Mount Morris
Township"... "somewhere near Flint."

There is no such place.

Buell Elementary, where the shooting took place, is in the
Flint Beecher school district, the poorest school district in
Genesee County, Michigan, and perhaps the poorest in the
entire state. Eighty-two percent of its children, according to
the federal government, live below the "official" poverty
level (meaning the number of kids in total poverty is even
higher).

Beecher is Flint's dump. It is where you go when you have
nothing left to your name. 60 percent black, 40 percent
white. No municipality in Genesee County wants to govern
Beecher, so it exists as a No Man's Land on the northern
city limits of Flint. It covers a small portion of two different
townships (one of which is where my wife Kathleen is
from). But folks, when you hear the word "township" used
in the case of Beecher, those of us from Flint mean it in the
way the word was used in South Africa. Buell Elementary
in the Flint Beecher school district has a Flint address and a
Flint phone number, but the black officials from Flint on
the news yesterday tried to point out that "this school really
isn't in Flint!" It is amazing how deep oppression takes its
roots when even black leaders find themselves in bed with
General Motors and, like Peter in the Garden of
Gethsemane, repeatedly deny that people of their own race
have anything to do with them.

Poor, poor Flint. The media blowhards babble on about
how "this is the youngest child to kill another child in a
school shooting" and the few anchors who started to look
at their own helicopter shots showing the school sitting in
the middle of a bombed-out neighborhood commented that
"this is actually the first of all these school shootings we've
had lately that has taken place in an 'urban' school." Wow.
Two records for Flint in one day.

When I was a senior in high school, the assistant principal
of Beecher High -- the first black man in the area to hold
such a position -- became despondent over his inability to
quell the racial disturbances in the school, so one night he
went home, wrote a heartfelt letter to the kids in the district,
then put a gun in his mouth and blew his brains out. As my
friend, Jeff Gibbs, who went to Beecher, told me last night,
it's sad that the only two times that Beecher receives the
attention of the nation is because of a gun. (Jeff's letter to
me can be read in full by going to
http://www.michaelmoore.com/jgibbs.html).

I heard from relatives last night that the family of the little
boy who killed the girl had been evicted from their home
just last week. Evicted, I wonder, by Deputy Fred, who 10
years after "Roger & Me," still spends his day at the behest
of Flint's landlords.

Homeless and fatherless (his dad is in jail as 30 percent of
all black men in America will be at some point in their
lives), the boy was staying at his uncle's. In the house were
guns, as there are in virtually every home in this devastated
and desperate area. The gun, that the boy found and took to
school, was not some "junk gun," the kind that Al Gore
promises to get rid of. It was a gun with a brand name
bought initially at a sporting goods store (I wonder, were
the bullets bought at K-Mart, as they were at Columbine?).

How do Mr. McCain and Mr. Bush feel this morning? Just
seven days prior, John McCain's "Straight Talk Express"
bus rolled past Beecher on I-75, but it didn't stop. It rolled
on down near Ann Arbor where McCain blasted those who
seek gun control, saying that he opposes ANY ban on ANY
assault weapon, and opposes ANY waiting period for a
background check when one purchases a gun. Mr. Bush
never stopped in Flint either.

I guess we all feel sorta proud that they both avoid us like
the plague. There is not -- and has not for nearly thirty
years -- been a single Republican state or federal
representative elected from Flint. Another reason, I
suppose, for our neglect and punishment. But we're proud
of how we've made it almost a crime to support a
Republican in Flint, proud of the fact we elected the
country's first black mayor in the '60s, proud that we voted
for Jesse Jackson 9 to 1 over Michael Dukakis in 1988
(and 4 to 1 for Jesse in Flint's all-white suburbs). So I
guess the gun crazy presidential candidates made the right
decision to take their hate-filled campaigns elsewhere. And,
in the end, I was proud to see that the people of Michigan,
like the people in Minnesota, have kept their sense of
humor intact as a way to express their sense of outrage. 51
percent of those who showed up to vote in the Republican
primary were Democrats and Independents! They took the
time to go the polls to plunk down for McCain just to, in
good ol' working class fashion, stick it to the Bush with the
silver spoon in his mouth.

I'll end by repeating what I have said many times before --
the handguns have to go. 16,000 gun murders last year in
the US and 15,500 were killed by someone they knew
(husband, boyfriend, neighbor) or by someone at work.
Approximately 500 were killed by a stranger who broke
into their home and 300 of those were killed by their OWN
gun. Those are the facts. Easy access to guns by a species
that often responds irrationally and with intense emotions is
a lethal combination. Great Britain, a nation of 60 million
people with a violent history of conquering the world at the
barrel of a gun and now full of drunks and hotheads who
eat up violent American movies and TV shows -- last year
they killed a grand total of 12 -- that's TWELVE! -- of their
own citizens with handguns. That's because handguns are
TOTALLY banned. Let the hunters keep their rifles after a
serious background check, but the handguns, whose only
purpose is to take a human life, must go. The Brits have
done it, the Australians have done it, the Canadians have
done it. Even New York City mostly did it -- and the
number of murders there has dropped from 2,200 a year to
600.

We look like a bunch of idiots. Let's do something about it
and about the poverty in which so many kids still dwell.
We have never been in a better place to make it happen than
right now.

What are we waiting for? Another Kayla Rolland? God
help you if you ever have to live in a township that no town
will claim and is forgotten by everyone else as soon as the
next gun nut enters a McDonald's and a Burger king on the
same day. Fried or flame-broiled, it's all our own unique
American Hell.

On behalf of the six of us from Flint who work on The
Awful Truth,
Michael Moore

MMFlint@aol.com
http://www.michaelmoore.com/

P.S. -- If you would like to contribute to the Kayla Rolland
Memorial Fund please send donations to:
Kayla Rolland Memorial Fund,
c/o Calvary Assembley of God
2518 Delaware Avenue
Flint, MI 48506

and from

http://www.michaelmoore.com/articles/index.php



[...]

DONAHUE: You're a member of the NRA and you went to Kmart and you actually moved them to stop selling the ammunition, as we see on your film.

MOORE: Yes.

DONAHUE: And that holds today?

MOORE: Yes, for handguns and for assault weapons. Hunting stuff, I don't care. They're still selling that. There's nothing against hunters here. I'm all for hunting.

DONAHUE: You're talking about long guns.

MOORE: Yes, I'm talking about stopping the selling of ammunition for weapons that are specifically designed to kill human beings.

DONAHUE: And you see that as pistols, handguns.

MOORE: Handguns or weapons where you can fire multiple rounds at a time. You don't need to essentially spray the woods to get your deer. If you do, you should be, you know, doing needle point or some other sport.

DONAHUE: OK, so let's understand. You'd like a ban on the sale of handguns.

MOORE: Yes. I believe that we don't need handguns.

DONAHUE: And a ban on the sale of brrr! That kind of gun.

MOORE: Anything that fires multiple rounds like that, absolutely.

DONAHUE: Which a significant number of cities and various areas of our nation actually do now.

MOORE: That's right. When I moved to New York City a decade ago, there were 2,100 murders that year. New York then enacted very strong gun laws. You cannot really -- you can't buy a gun in New York City. Last year there were 600 and some murders, down from 2,100. This will reduce a lot of it. But it's not the full solution.

And that's why I agree with the NRA in part, when they say guns don't kill people, people kill people. Because it really is the people. But I'd like to define people the as -- you know, I'd like to say guns don't kill people, Americans kill people. Because I think that's what's really at the core of this.

And we need ask ourselves, why do we, as Americans, do this? And the French don't do it, the Germans don't do it, the Canadians don't do it. They're not any better than us. They're not any less violent as a people. They're humans, they have the same responses as we have. Why don't they go for the gun and kill at the rate that we do?

[...]

20 posted on 01/31/2003 4:35:23 PM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson