Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Debra Katz : We Accept A Request to Testify, Maybe, But Only If We Can First Discuss More Specifics
Townhall ^ | September 22..,2018. 3;05pm | Timothy Meads

Posted on 09/22/2018 12:36:14 PM PDT by Hojczyk

Attorney Debra S. Katz and her client, Professor Christine Blasey Ford, have "accepted" the Committee's request to testify next week before the Senate next week regarding Professor Ford's allegation that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexual assaulted her three decades ago, but have asked Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) for another meeting this afternoon to discuss specifics regarding the process in which the testimony will occur. Based on Debra Katz's request for more time to discuss specifics, it does not appear that they will actually testify under the proposed plan by the Senate Judiciary Committee.

"Dr. Ford accepts the Committee's request to provide her first-hand knowledge of Brett Kavanaugh's sexual misconduct next week," Katz's email read. But, she said the proposed order of business is "fundamentally inconsistent with the Committee's promise of a fair, impartial investigation into her allegations."

Katz also said that her legal team and client were "disappointed" with the "leaks and bullying" which have "tainted" this process. Katz's team now asks for even more time to discuss the testimony, after 5 extended deadlines have been given already.

Based on this letter from Katz, it appears no agreement has been met. The 2:30 PM deadline was not an invitation to discuss more details, but to accept the Senate Judiciary Committee's offer. Katz and Ford did not accept their offer and instead made a counteroffer to discuss more details, thus delaying the process even further.

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-147 next last

1 posted on 09/22/2018 12:36:14 PM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

That is not accepting. If they show its accepting.


2 posted on 09/22/2018 12:37:37 PM PDT by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Why is this “news”? This is literally the same crap we’ve been hearing for a week.


3 posted on 09/22/2018 12:37:46 PM PDT by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

THis sluts attorney is milking this for all its worth, so she too can have her 15 minutes of “fame”.
They BOTH need to be told to STFU and go away.


4 posted on 09/22/2018 12:38:15 PM PDT by MagUSNRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Of course, this behavior will continue all weekend and continuing into Monday. She will never appear under oath, so the Republicans will need to hold a vote.


5 posted on 09/22/2018 12:39:36 PM PDT by centurion316 (Back from exile from 4/2016 until 4/2018.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

A slut admits to being a slut .... so what


6 posted on 09/22/2018 12:39:49 PM PDT by no-to-illegals (..There is no difference between liberals/rinos/moslems/illegals/lamestream media ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

“This is literally the same crap we’ve been hearing for a week.”

That’s mostly what modern “news” is...the same old crap for days ..weeks..even months.


7 posted on 09/22/2018 12:40:03 PM PDT by Leep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: poinq

Good grief I wish they’d stop this crap. Vote and be done


8 posted on 09/22/2018 12:40:20 PM PDT by vmpolesov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

LOL LOL LOL OMG OMG COME ON END THIS SH*T ALREADY who else is already so sick and tired of this nonsense


9 posted on 09/22/2018 12:40:44 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Piss up a rope.

See ya on 60 Minutes tomorrow night.


10 posted on 09/22/2018 12:40:59 PM PDT by onyx (JOIN 300 CLUB BY DONATING $34 MONTHLY! TRUMP'S WAY IS THE WINNING WAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leep

Yet stupid Commie media keeps on saying “She has agreed to testify” UH NO SHE HASNT..its the same nonsense from last week, same BS new day


11 posted on 09/22/2018 12:41:17 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

"Debra you're doing great! Keep up the good work! What's that? Oh, no problem! Glad to give you the negotiating advice!"


12 posted on 09/22/2018 12:41:56 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (Marxism: Trendy theory, wrong species)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Andrew McCarthy sums the the cowardly incompetent republican handling of this perfectly:

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/09/kavanaugh-hearings-chuck-grassley-senate-judiciary-committee-chairman/

Unreal how bad the RINOs are.


13 posted on 09/22/2018 12:42:18 PM PDT by Nicojones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Grassley should tweet: “Ms. Katz and Ford, be here Monday morning, we’ll have your green M&Ms, requested water, and Judge Kavanaugh will wear a black hood and shackles.”


14 posted on 09/22/2018 12:42:24 PM PDT by Reno89519 (No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

They need to tell this homely lesbo to stuff it.


15 posted on 09/22/2018 12:42:38 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (#NotARussianBot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Why does a witness have lawyers?


16 posted on 09/22/2018 12:43:16 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Just heard on Fox that in Maryland there is no statute of limitations on sexual assault and that this accuser could go today and file a report against the Judge. At that point the Judge would be under investigation. In the end, she’ll probably go that route.


17 posted on 09/22/2018 12:43:21 PM PDT by tsowellfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no-to-illegals

Have some sensitivity ...someone grabbed the slut over 30 years agos..it was so traumatizing it “derailed her”.
Now she’s “afraid to fly on a plane” on Mondays!
If only we could clone Ginsburg...problem solved.


18 posted on 09/22/2018 12:44:50 PM PDT by Leep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

I have a question for the Freeper Maryland legal scholars. In 1982, was there a Maryland statute of limitations on attempted sexual assault, and if how long was it? When was the time limitation for bringing an action removed for such crimes? If there was a statute of limitations in 1982, had it expired when the law was changed to remove it? It seems to me that an unlimited SOL can’t be applied in a case where the old SOL had already run by the time the law was changed. Any thoughts?


19 posted on 09/22/2018 12:45:10 PM PDT by myerson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

Grassley. needs to put out a statement immediately so stating. He should have expected this as it comes as no surprise. The longer he delays response, the less impactful it will become. Repubz, get your damn act together!!!


20 posted on 09/22/2018 12:45:26 PM PDT by downtownconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson