[SkyDancer]

Why does ice keep my fridge cold?

[blueunicorn6]

The glaciers “created negative feedback”?

Well, let’s just put them in the box until they get their minds right.

[j. earl carter]

There really is no such thing as “too far” for these people. Now, ice ages cause global warming.

[pax_et_bonum]

“runaway glaciation”

Hmmm.

[Thibodeaux]

that might be true if you disregard thermodynamics

factually, glaciers are a heat sink. glaciers absorb heat

[digger48]

All right....which one of you republicans made the glaciers melt?

[Rebelbase]

The climate change cult members are grasping at the most ridiculous straws to justify their position.

I sense they know the gravy train is pulling into the station only it’s not the destination they were hoping for.

[TigersEye]

The Greenhouse Theory Itself Is Bogus In Every Way

Global Warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide - Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts? By Timothy Ball

No Smoking Hot Spot (The Australian)

The missing hotspot (JoNova)

Those two articles take Greenhouse Theory at face value and by the criterion set up in the theory itself finds no evidence of warming on the basis of greenhouse effect.

Sky-high hole blown in AGW theory?

"Forbes reports on a peer-reviewed study that uses NASA data to show that the effects of carbon-based warming have been significantly exaggerated. In fact, much of the heat goes out into space rather than stay trapped in the atmosphere, an outcome that started long before AGW alarmists predicted:"

That article explains why no Hot Spot has been found.

The Hidden Flaw in Greenhouse Theory

Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics

Harvard astrophysicist dismisses AGW theory, challenges peers to 'take back climate science'

It Is Impossible For A 100 ppm Increase In Atmospheric CO2 Concentration To Cause Global Warming

Simple Chemistry and the Real Greenhouse Effect.

Those five articles each show that Greenhouse Theory itself has no basis in reality due to a direct conflict with the known laws of physics. No wonder the smoking gun "hotspot" can't be found.

Claim That Sea Level Is Rising Is a Total Fraud

That article kills any thought of planetary warming from any cause. Think about it. If there is absolutely no sign of an acceleration of sea level rise how could the planet be warming? The rise in sea level in the last 100 years is far less than the average over the last 18,000 years caused by the inter-glacial period we are in.

[richardtavor]

I thought it was Gore’s constant bloviating...

[beethovenfan]

So, if glaciers are warming the erf, must mean that the retreating glaciers is good nooz (?)

[Kenny500c]

The ice will reflect the heat from the sun back into space.

[Garth Tater]

The exposure of fresh, unweathered rock due to the movement of glaciers does increase the amount of CO2 released into the atmosphere as the newly uncovered rocks are oxidized - but that's only one out of countless factors releasing and absorbing CO2 into and out of the environment. And it totally ignores the miniscule effect CO2 has on warming compared to water vapor. And even that is pretty much irrelevant to the discussion of global warming as long as they refuse to acknowledge the effect the sun has on the planet. You can make good money talking about it though if you have the right paperwork and say the right things.