Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity: Can the president ignore the court and continue with his valid executive order?
February 9, 2017 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 02/09/2017 4:01:56 PM PST by Jim Robinson

Vanity Discussion Question: Can the president ignore the court order and continue with his valid executive order?

It appears the president is acting in accordance to his constitutional powers and specifically in accordance to laws regarding immigration and has been challenged and overridden by an unconstitutionally political activist (liberal) court.

If so, can he can he continue with his valid orders controlling the actions of the executive branch? No doubt this would set up a "constitutional crisis" but this is going to happen soon anyway as it's the only way we will ever restore constitutional government, ie, the liberal activist courts will have to be toppled eventually. Why not now while we have a strong president and Republican majorities in both housees of congress?

Just askin'.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: aliens; coequalbranches; commanderinchief; conflictofpowers; consitutionalcrisis; constitution; courts; immigration; judicialactivism; judicialtyranny; nationalsecurity; publicsafety; ruleoflaw; separationofpowers; travelban; trump; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-369 next last
To: Jim Robinson

I should think he can be the Commander in Chief.

We lose in a 4/4 Supreme Court anyway.


61 posted on 02/09/2017 4:18:41 PM PST by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Public Education/Academia are the farm team for more Marxists coming... infinitum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I'd be willing to bet that the VERY best Constitutional lawyers in the country are people that hardly anyone has ever heard of.

Here's hoping that Pres.Trump has placed several of them on retainer.

62 posted on 02/09/2017 4:18:47 PM PST by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator

Quote:

“Not without provoking a constitutional crisis.”

Let’s provoke it. The Declaration of Independence demands it.


63 posted on 02/09/2017 4:19:06 PM PST by TTFlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

“I would recommend that Donald Trump just withdraw the order and then issue a new one.”

Yep. He should issue multiple EO’s.

Let the moonbats try to strike down each one.


64 posted on 02/09/2017 4:19:11 PM PST by Helicondelta (Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Yes, Trump can and should—although there are huge political considerations. But there is also a separate remedy: Congress decides which cases and controversies the federal courts decide (aside from a few specified in the Constitution), and it could withdraw immigration law from them altogether. It is long past time that Congress exercised this prerogative, and this is an excellent place to start—not that any of them has the guts.


65 posted on 02/09/2017 4:19:12 PM PST by Hebrews 11:6 (Do you REALLY believe that (1) God IS, and (2) God IS GOOD?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

The Constitution gives judges the authority to decide controversies between U.S. citizens and non citizens, but if no U.S. citizens are involved there is no rule what they can do.


66 posted on 02/09/2017 4:19:49 PM PST by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
Not without provoking a constitutional crisis.

The 9th Ciruit has provoked a constitutional crisis. Or more accurately, it has usurped unconstitutional powers.

67 posted on 02/09/2017 4:20:10 PM PST by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Blue Collar Christian

Yes, he is a democrat, a buddy of Fatty Murray although he was appointed by GWB.


68 posted on 02/09/2017 4:20:15 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: jjotto
I’d bet the permanent bureaucracy

Here's hoping that the "permanent" becomes "temporary" or "former" soon. Just another part of Drain The Swamp.

69 posted on 02/09/2017 4:20:24 PM PST by Bernard (The Road To Hell Is Not Paved With Good Results)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Hebrews 11:6

Very interesting.


70 posted on 02/09/2017 4:21:14 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: IDontLikeToPayTaxes

I agree.


71 posted on 02/09/2017 4:21:49 PM PST by myerson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I think he probably could, but that would be an open invitation to an impeachment and he knows it. Trump is a lot more intelligent than his detractors give him credit for.

I think he made the right call by going along with it, and by the time the supreme court sees it his appointee will be in place, and it will be thrown out.

In the meantime it will be tricky, but he can go ahead with improving the vetting process, which I’m sure is already underway. This is a setback, but not a major roadblock.

As someone already noted, what he did is completely within his authority, someone even posted the appropriate clause. It says he can shut down ALL immigration as he sees fit according to national security concerns.

The only drawback to this is I’m sure a number of people who do not have our best interest in mind are on their way here right now. Anyone who does not believe this only has to look at Germany, Belgium and France.

Personally, I think he should have shut down ALL immigration until they have a handle on how to find out who is coming here, where they really come from and why they want to be here.


72 posted on 02/09/2017 4:21:53 PM PST by Paleo Pete (When the sun comes up, nitrogen turns into daytrogen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Issue a new EO more sweeping.

Ignore the judges/courts that don't have jurisdiction.
And notify them of this.

Let them fight to prove they do.
73 posted on 02/09/2017 4:22:43 PM PST by novemberslady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: EternalHope
It seems highly unlikely we will have a 9 person court in time to rule on this

Not so, except for the general urgency of the situation. The losing party (the Admin so far) has to be the one to appeal (except in cases where both parties lost some portions of the rulin), so they're in control of the timing, or at least they can hold it up. All the Admin has to do is not appeal until Gorsuch is confirmed and seated.

74 posted on 02/09/2017 4:22:58 PM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Hebrews 11:6

If the Congress, and the People, do not rise to fight this lawlessness they’ll not fight for anything.


75 posted on 02/09/2017 4:23:06 PM PST by TTFlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

No, not according to Fox’s Judge Napolitano, but the President could consolidate the 47 suits that have been filed against his ban from Leftists everywhere and give that combined case to the judge in the Boston court who ruled in favor of him. and let her decide it. At least the proceedings would be removed from the Communist west coast. The Ninth Circuit Court should be split into four courts. It is ridiculous to have 27 judges in this huge court, so they can never get together to vote en bans because of the logistics that would require. The Ninth also has been reversed 86% of the time, so it is a rogue court. It deserves dismantling.


76 posted on 02/09/2017 4:23:08 PM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
"Jim if anyone from the White House monitors this site, I would recommend that Donald Trump just withdraw the order and then issue a new one. That would kill the current case and force the Snowflakes to seek a new restraining order elsewhere. Then if it is challenged he can withdraw it and issue a new one."

Not to speak for her, but Laura Ingraham and many of her guest have opined and said tweaking this E.O. to allow green-card holders from these 7 countries to come in ( if my readback is correct ) would do it.

77 posted on 02/09/2017 4:23:11 PM PST by taildragger (Do you hear the people singing? The Song of Angry Men!....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Congress should impeach every judge that ruled against the law they passed and has been in use for over 60 years.


78 posted on 02/09/2017 4:23:15 PM PST by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lopeover

I think it takes more than a simple majority to impeach a federal judge. There is no way he would get an impeachment through the Senate.

There may be a way for Congress to re-organize the Circuit Courts that would only require a simple majority. Might move the 9th Circuit to Idaho or Orange County CA so it isn’t wallowing in liberal SanFran. Wouldn’t get rid of the current judges, though.


79 posted on 02/09/2017 4:23:27 PM PST by Kellis91789 (We hope for a bloodless revolution, but revolution is still the goal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity
Will ever happen. Unless the pubbies get a super majority AND the spine to use it, the dims in the senate will protect their judges implementing the destruction of America. Congress can dissolve any court except the SCOTUS with a simple majority vote. They can establish any court they want whenever they want by majority vote. Congress can cut SCOTUS back to one judge or expand it to 99 judges by majority vote. If the congressional critters won't do their job and defend the nation against judicial tyranny then it looks like the burden will fall upon the citizens.
80 posted on 02/09/2017 4:24:23 PM PST by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-369 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson