Posted on 12/15/2016 4:30:41 PM PST by Fractal Trader
A years-long forensics investigation into the computer image of the long-form Hawaiian birth certificate image that Barack Obama released during a White House news conference during his first term and presented to the American people as an official government document reveals it is “fake.”
It also confirms those who were subjected to the derogatory “birther” label from many media outlets and Democrats for badgering Obama with lawsuits, petitions to the Supreme Court, and more, were right – at least in the dispute that the document was manufactured and the questions about Obama’s birth and legitimacy to be president under the Constitution’s requirements still are unanswered.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Everything wrong with Chicago was on display when Chicago Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson said, while in possession of the video showing four blacks saying, “F___ whites,” while sadistically torturing a mentally challenged white, that there was no concrete evidence of a hate crime. (He called it mere “stupidity.”) What he meant was, there was no evidence of a black person being tortured—THAT would be a hate crime.
Fix the attitude/culture underlying the Superintendent’s assessment, and the crime issue will be resolved.
Oh, and thank Obama for the racist attitude/culture being the problem. That is his pathetic legacy.
That’s true but largely thanks to the manstream media always having his back, the American people by and large love them some Barry Soetoro.
Friday, January 06, 2017
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows that 58% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Obama’s job performance. Forty-one percent (41%) disapprove.
The latest figures include 38% of who Strongly Approve of the way Obama is performing as president and 31% who Strongly Disapprove. This gives him a Presidential Approval Index rating of +7.
President Obama: Gallup Daily Tracking
Gallup Poll. Rolling average. N=approx. 1,500 adults nationwide. Margin of error ± 3.
“Do you approve or disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling his job as president?”
Approve: 56%
Disapprove: 42%
And according to the polls Hillary is the POTUS. Oh, and Obama’s popularity resulted in Dems picking up seats in DC and the various statehouses.
I keep trying to tell you that Leftists are the only ones who still give a flying monkey t__d about polls.
And you keep proving my point.
The RCP final average for the race was Hillary +5. Her ENTIRE popular vote advantage came from CA, where illegals can vote with impunity.
Unless you get very creative, you’ll soon run out of ways to broadcast to the entire site that you’re a full-on liberal Dem.
‘Wrong again’
Again?
I made a mistake. I looked at the Reuters poll, and copied that number.
But at least I can count past one. As in, one mistake. When you’re done acting like a 2-yo about it, do explain about the other time I was wrong.
Interesting thread on the subject of drones, and Obama being very good at killing people:
https://m.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5mgl1t/til_obama_has_killed_more_children_with_drones/
What bothers you is not the one time I was wrong, but the fact that on the issue that really matters—Obama’s place of birth—I’m right. I’m sure you saw the thread demonstrating this a couple of days ago:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3511021/posts
[Beginning at post 29]
It must have galled you that the ‘Obama was born in HI’ side lost the argument so quickly and resoundingly.
Yet you never showed up to lend them a hand. You know it’s a lost cause—and that’s what really irks you.
Some interesting comments re the popular vote.
Enjoy:
https://m.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5mkcum/next_time_a_lib_mentions_the_popular_vote_give/
The national public opinion polls are based on estimating the popular vote not the Electoral College vote. The final popular vote tally was Clinton 48.2%/Trump 46.1%.
National polls usually have a +/-3% Statistical Margin of Error so any poll that was within the margin of error was an accurate poll.
Realclearpoltics.com’s average of 11 different national polls predicted an average Clinton popular vote win of 3.3 points, she actually led in the popular vote by 2.1 points so they over-estimated her total by 1.2 points which is well within the statistical margin of error.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton_vs_johnson_vs_stein-5952.html
I mentioned rasmussenreports.com and Gallup because they do Presidential job approval polling on a daily basis.
I really don’t care. I once cared about polls but now I’d be more interested in the price of eggs in China, if you get my drift.
Maybe you’ve noticed the spate of articles lately on the subject of Obama’s legacy. Conservatives see it like this: 1, Donald Trump (without Obama’s disastrous tenure, DT would never have won), 2, racial division and hatred the likes of which we haven’t been seen in many, many decades (Obama actively stoked this fire from Day One; read Rules for Radicals—what you see, race-wise, is exactly what community organizers do), and 3, a decimated, discombobulated Dem party.
Obama accomplished those three things, along with demoralizing and undercutting the military, while presiding over a holocaust of enlisted men and women suicides, the likes of which we have NEVER seen, and the doubling of the debt with zip to show for it, etc.
You say the MSM has propped him up. True, but despite Obama’s best efforts, Hillary flamed out in ignominious defeat.
Now you say Obama is up in the polls. I say tell me something that harmonizes with the demoralizing losses the Dems suffered this last go round, as opposed to something that clashes with the practical election outcomes on every level.
This is what liberals put in charge of America, and is directly the reason for the savagery of the hate-whites/white lives don’t matter culture plaguing the US today:
“An organizer must stir up dissatisfaction and discontent... He must create a mechanism that can drain off the underlying guilt for having accepted the previous situation for so long a time. Out of this mechanism, a new community organization arises....
“The job then is getting the people to move, to act, to participate; in short, to develop and harness the necessary power to effectively conflict with the prevailing patterns and change them. When those prominent in the status quo turn and label you an ‘agitator’ they are completely correct, for that is, in one word, your function—to agitate to the point of conflict.”
snip
“’The organizer’s first job is to create the issues or problems,’ and ‘organizations must be based on many issues.’ The organizer ‘must first rub raw the resentments of the people of the community; fan the latent hostilities of many of the people to the point of overt expression. He must search out controversy and issues, rather than avoid them, for unless there is controversy people are not concerned enough to act. . . . An organizer must stir up dissatisfaction and discontent.’”
http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communism/alinsky.htm
There were 46 Democrat Senators in the 114th (2015-2017) Congress.
There are 48 Democrat Senators in the 115th (2017-2019) Congress.
There were 187 Democrat Representatives in the 114th Congress.
There are 194 Democrat Representatives in the 115th Congress.
‘The American people won’t just be selecting a president in November 2016. Along with House races, ballot initiatives and countless local offices, 34 United States Senate contests will appear on ballots around the country, with high stakes for both parties.
Republicans have built a majority in the upper chamber, but they face the daunting task this cycle of defending 24 GOP-held Senate seats, while Democrats are only playing defense on 10. Democrats need a net gain of either four or five seats to regain control of the upper chamber, depending on whether or not they also win the White House.’
http://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/democrats-eye-senate-takeover-2016-n455306
‘In 2007, I could have sworn President Barack Obama was supposed to be the savior of the Democrat Party. The smooth talking, suave Illinois senator had everything to bring the party together and end any GOP dominance.
Well, it turns out, the Democrats have lost 1,030 seats across the board since Obama took office in January 2008. This includes seats in state’s houses and senates, governorships, and Congress.’
‘Despite a record loss of offices for the Democratic Party during his eight-year presidency, Barack Obama believes that the problem is not the party’s values or policy prescriptions but the inability to “make the argument.”
That’s what his top spokesman told Newsmax Friday in response to our question about the numerous news stories pointing out that Democrats lost 1,030 offices — U.S. Senate and House seats, governorships, and state legislative offices — during the Obama presidency.
Noting that several reports conclude that this is the largest loss of offices for a party while it held the White House in modern history, we asked how the President felt about it.’
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3512075/posts
But in Washington D.C., there will be 2 more Democrat Senators and 7 more Democrats in the House.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.