Skip to comments.
Corporate Giants From Silicon Valley Come Together To Silence Free Speech On The Internet
Investment Watch Blog ^
| 12/8/2016
| Pamela Williams
Posted on 12/08/2016 7:39:08 AM PST by Non-Compliant_Deplorable
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
To: Non-Compliant_Deplorable
2
posted on
12/08/2016 7:40:23 AM PST
by
proust
(Trump / Pence 2016!)
To: Non-Compliant_Deplorable
oops...insufficient morning coffee...source is Investment Watch *Blog* not “Blob” ;-)
To: proust
Yep. Kinda’ tells me what the *rest* of my day is gonna’ be like :-/
To: Non-Compliant_Deplorable
Youtube censoring PragerUniversity videos too
5
posted on
12/08/2016 7:42:05 AM PST
by
mreerm
To: Non-Compliant_Deplorable
Cannot wait for Mr. Trump to become President.
6
posted on
12/08/2016 7:42:08 AM PST
by
Biggirl
("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
To: Non-Compliant_Deplorable
They think that by labeling PizzaGate false news they can protect the clinton’s, the obamas and their child raping baby murdering infant sacrificing ilk, it will only cause more investigations.
To: mreerm
I didn’t know about Prager being hit also. They do good stuff. Very, very concerning.
To: Non-Compliant_Deplorable
President Trump + Anti-Trust Hammer.
Problem solved.
To: Non-Compliant_Deplorable
Hey tech guys, just remember the Feds put the CEO and Board of Directors of ALCOA IN PRISON for Antitrust.
10
posted on
12/08/2016 7:46:30 AM PST
by
eyeamok
(destruction of government records.)
To: eyeamok
Hmmm..... when did that happen?
11
posted on
12/08/2016 7:47:12 AM PST
by
bert
(K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... Macroagression melts snowflakes)
To: Non-Compliant_Deplorable
‘We now return control of your television set to you’
12
posted on
12/08/2016 7:47:57 AM PST
by
Leep
(Stronger without her!)
To: Non-Compliant_Deplorable
Most internet sites are and will be privately held.
As such, content is controlled by the owners.
I may not like how Zuckerberg censors stories on FB. I use FB less and less, come here or Breitbart or Reddit or Twitter.
That’s all we can do. The concept of ‘fake’ and ‘bias’ is subjective.
There will always be an internet site that wants your clicks.
13
posted on
12/08/2016 7:52:20 AM PST
by
cicero2k
To: Non-Compliant_Deplorable
I just checked YouTube. Prager U is alive and well. Could this be fake news?
14
posted on
12/08/2016 7:58:27 AM PST
by
JusPasenThru
(SJW is the weaponization of compassion.)
To: cicero2k
Facebook won’t necessarily be king of the hill forever.
For details of how this occurs, look at my AOL and MySpace pages.
15
posted on
12/08/2016 7:59:29 AM PST
by
glorgau
To: JusPasenThru
To: JusPasenThru
YouTube spiked a particular Praeger U video.
Dennis has talked about it.
To: Non-Compliant_Deplorable
The Trump victory has already flushed out some emotion driven crack-pots to be sure. I have no doubt that some of those flushed out, at one time had functional intelligence, or they would never have gotten where they are. Neither do I have any doubt, but that those being discussed have lost the practical ability to apply that once functional intelligence, to political & social issues. (That involves a very different aptitude from that employed by them earlier.)
The incredible moral lapses of those engaged in Mrs. Clinton's behalf are too well known to leave any doubt of my point. The self-anointed internet thought Police, had no problem in supporting the nearest thing to pure evil, yet seen in an American Presidential campaign.
18
posted on
12/08/2016 8:11:50 AM PST
by
Ohioan
To: Non-Compliant_Deplorable
Every once in a while I'll have trouble connecting to FR, and the thought occurs to me: "If the government (or some left-wing Internet provider) wanted to shut down FR and other conservative sites, they could do it."
Those sites would just be gone. Only those Freepers who personally know each other would be able to communicate with each other. And do you think any MSM media would protest? I doubt it - in private, they'd say, "Ha, ha. Good riddance," and in public they'd say, if they acknowledged it at all, that "This is a victory for honest journalism and the American people. There is no constitutional right to spread false or hateful information."
To: Non-Compliant_Deplorable
If Google’s platforms won’t host certain things, there probably are better ways to address it than being covetous. Let them be known as the fields of censorship (and sometimes filth). There’s another site called GodTube, as an example of an alternative.
20
posted on
12/08/2016 8:26:12 AM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson