[proust]

Blob lol.

[Non-Compliant_Deplorable]

oops...insufficient morning coffee...source is Investment Watch *Blog* not “Blob” ;-)

[mreerm]

Youtube censoring PragerUniversity videos too

[Biggirl]

Cannot wait for Mr. Trump to become President.

[The_Republic_Of_Maine]

They think that by labeling PizzaGate false news they can protect the clinton’s, the obamas and their child raping baby murdering infant sacrificing ilk, it will only cause more investigations.

[Buckeye McFrog]

President Trump + Anti-Trust Hammer.

Problem solved.

[eyeamok]

Hey tech guys, just remember the Feds put the CEO and Board of Directors of ALCOA IN PRISON for Antitrust.

[Leep]

‘We now return control of your television set to you’

[cicero2k]

Most internet sites are and will be privately held.

As such, content is controlled by the owners.

I may not like how Zuckerberg censors stories on FB. I use FB less and less, come here or Breitbart or Reddit or Twitter.

That’s all we can do. The concept of ‘fake’ and ‘bias’ is subjective.

There will always be an internet site that wants your clicks.

[Ohioan]

The Trump victory has already flushed out some emotion driven crack-pots to be sure. I have no doubt that some of those flushed out, at one time had functional intelligence, or they would never have gotten where they are. Neither do I have any doubt, but that those being discussed have lost the practical ability to apply that once functional intelligence, to political & social issues. (That involves a very different aptitude from that employed by them earlier.)

The incredible moral lapses of those engaged in Mrs. Clinton's behalf are too well known to leave any doubt of my point. The self-anointed internet thought Police, had no problem in supporting the nearest thing to pure evil, yet seen in an American Presidential campaign.

[Steve_Seattle]

Every once in a while I'll have trouble connecting to FR, and the thought occurs to me: "If the government (or some left-wing Internet provider) wanted to shut down FR and other conservative sites, they could do it."

Those sites would just be gone. Only those Freepers who personally know each other would be able to communicate with each other. And do you think any MSM media would protest? I doubt it - in private, they'd say, "Ha, ha. Good riddance," and in public they'd say, if they acknowledged it at all, that "This is a victory for honest journalism and the American people. There is no constitutional right to spread false or hateful information."

[HiTech RedNeck]

If Google’s platforms won’t host certain things, there probably are better ways to address it than being covetous. Let them be known as the fields of censorship (and sometimes filth). There’s another site called GodTube, as an example of an alternative.

[Steve_Seattle]

I also comment on Newsbusters (or used to), but about six weeks ago when I tried to log-in, I got a message that I needed to verify my email address before I could comment. But the email address given in the message is not my email address, and - as far as I can tell - does not in fact exist. (I have never been able to find it or log in to it.)

I tried to change the incorrect email address in my Disqus account, to no avail. I got involved in this circular procedure that never solved the problem. On Disqus's help page, others reported the same problem, and their inability to fix it.

Maybe this was just one of those weird glitches that happens on the Internet, but my paranoid side tells me that someone hacked my account so I couldn't comment anymore. (Some of my comments had been elevated to the status of "featured comment.")

[RayChuang88]

I’m not sure if that is a good idea. An individual company doing it is one thing, but a whole group of companies doing it together could have potential First Amendment implications.

[PIF]

Fake news?
Get your youtube David Seaman right here:

https://www.youtube.com/user/davidseamanonline

[tophat9000]

This is going to be antitrust.... businesses can not collude together to fix prices so business can not collude together to deny services( ie service at no price)

[Axenolith]

When are people going to get it through their thick skulls that a private entity censoring or removing your commentary from their forum isn’t infringement of first amendment rights?!?!

[Jack Hammer]

It really chaps their as*es that conservatives can share their views on the Internet.