Posted on 11/10/2016 2:52:09 PM PST by SubMareener
I like your theory better. I hope you’re right! Thanks!
*
Tears of gratitude to God for my awesome President Trump who will be in my White House Jan 20..
:)
Totally Agree 100000$.
>>> 3. Libs losing their minds
Just because these ‘people’ (the term is used loosely) didn’t get the outcome they desired, they thought by throwing a temper tantrum they can get their way.
The more Soros-paid-for “Not My President” protests displayed by special snowflakes around the country,
the more normal people realize how childish these people are.
Wow. Obama sees the light.
Let’s see here. Lemme check...
Nope. Not tired of winning yet!
Probably not as sad as Michael Medved, and unlike Medved, still mostly employed.
We have to be careful in the future as to who we permit to call themselves a conservative voice in the media.
Whatever he was, Medved is definitely NOT a conservative. He's a Republican Establishment Butt boy.
We have to reform these libertarians. I’m so sick of their stuff.
I’m a REPUBLICAN damnit
Totally agree 1000%
Totally agree 1000%
Why? Is Levin for TPP? Surely not!
Totally agree 1000%
Knocking down our fears and worries one at a time.
I get up happier every morning so far.
Next whack the EPA and Corps of Engineers for their over reach on wetlands and somehow making plowed furrows into “mini mountain ranges” and other insane things. With that done I’ll feel safe to get my dozer out of the barn again.
“So I’m a little worried about what might have been traded away.”
By Trump? Probably nothing. It was a house of cards deal that was easily blown away, as are many other Obama “commitments.”
What Kenny said!
Not to tell the press that Michelle was afraid to have her picture taken standing next to Melania.
Not to pave over Michelle's garden on the first day.
Not to mention how bad the stench is in the Executive Residence of the White House.
how about the WALL! How high and when do the construction teams get there?
“Why? Is Levin for TPP? Surely not!”
No he is against it.
Levin said that even people “who are required to comply with it are not going to comprehend” the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement, which is 6,000 pages long, 2 million words, long, and 30 chapters.
“No conservative—none—in the Senate or the House should vote for this based on the nature of this phony deal,” he said. “It’s too long. It’s too massive. It empowers the government. It empowers the bureaucracy… It empowers other governments and bureaucracies too.”
Levin blasted the agreement, saying “this is not a trade deal. This is a destroy-the-Constitution deal.”
Thanks. That is kind of what I thought but I hadn’t listened to Levin in so long that I thought I missed something. I couldn’t figure why this would be Levin’s Trump rant ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.