Posted on 10/26/2016 11:19:50 AM PDT by jazusamo
Three women who accused former Bill Clinton of sexual assault and harassment are blasting Fox News host Megyn Kelly for her contentious interview with Donald Trump adviser Newt Gingrich.
Mr. Gingrich on Tuesday accused Mrs. Kelly of being “fascinated with sex” after the she questioned him about the allegations of sexual misconduct against Mr. Trump since the release of a 2005 tape in which the business mogul bragged about groping women.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
I warned people on here about Megyn several years ago before she got her show on Fox at night. She went totally bsc off on some guy who had RESEARCH on stay at home moms suggesting that he was telling her she wasn’t a good mom for working. She was shouting him down, not letting him respond, etc. All the while missing the point entirely. This was when she was on around noon.
I’ve rarely watched her except when she had the Benghazi guys on.
That a woman who has been politically active, her entire adult life, among a people with the most successful history of economic achievement over their first century and a quarter, of any people on earth, under a Constitutional Government designed to protect that people from a bureaucratic pestilence, which has been the bane of most nations; that such a woman has so missed the essential point of the American achievement, is staggering in its implications.
Mrs. Clinton claimed that a Clinton Government would rebuild the "Middle Class." Was she totally unaware that the American Middle Class clearly built itself? That the American Middle Class resulted from naturally energized individuals, aspiring to achieve the good life, who risked everything to first clear a wilderness, work hard, generation to generation, to save & accumulate the attributes of the good life; with the result that by 1913--the year that a graduated income tax first became Constitutional, this Settler built Federation of newly settled States, had already surpassed every one of the great powers of Europe in industrial strength.
To "rebuild" the "Middle Class," Mrs. Clinton vowed to make the most successful Americans--those who had achieved the most--pay increased taxes; she called it "paying their 'fair' share." But it was clearly to be a tax on success--a tax to fund a raft of new programs (a cancer or pestilence of an expanded bureaucracy). She was obviously indifferent to the fact that the biggest impediment to any poor person with ambition, actually launching a small business to improve his status, is an almost incomprehensible explosion in bureaucratic regulations, most of which premised on the same flawed understanding of how people actually advance, which Mrs. Clinton displayed, on the 19th.
Americans used to learn by experience. What were the experience based lessons of what transpired from the drafting of our written Constitution in 1787, until the passage of the income tax amendment in 1913? Are they instructive or not, for what actually works for human advancement?
The Constitution prior to 1913, absolutely interdicted a tax driven war on the accumulation of individual wealth. Article I, Section 9, which Mrs. Clinton should have remembered from Law School, provided that no direct tax on individual Americans could be applied in any way but pro-capita. (That is Warren Buffet would pay the same tax--not the same percentage tax--but the same tax as Joe the Plumber. The Founders had no desire to limit individual success. They sought only to encourage it.
Under there experience based philosophy, there were almost certainly not even 1% of the bureaucratic regulations, with which Americans seeking to improve their lot, must face today. In place of today's pursuit of grievances, real or imagined, there was universal admiration for the high achievers! And the growth rate of a people freed to achieve, was the economic phenomenon of human history.
We do not pretend to know whether it was in her indoctrination by Marxist Pied Pipers in her late teens, or pure confusion in whatever she is struggling with today. But Mrs. Clinton is utterly clueless on how a dynamic economy works; as she is utterly unaware of the dynamic, interactive factors, that drive or stagnate any human aspiration or achievement. What is absolutely clear, even if one ignores her lack of a moral compass in her political dealings; the woman is absolutely unqualified to be President of the United States.
This is one more reason why we must win this election for Donald Trump.
William Flax
[This may be reproduced, if in full context, with or without attribution.]
I sent this little message to FOXnews on their website (subject line was “You should fire Megyn Kelly”):
Megyn Kelly may as well go work for MSNBC. Other than her feigning outrage a week or 2 ago about the WikiLeaks info showing that the DNC wants to brainwash Catholics into a different ideology, she has done more to help get Hillary elected than anyone on FOXnews. I am completely disgusted that she is allowed to continue, and her rudeness and antagonism last night of both Mike Pence and Newt Gingrich were prime examples. I am going to disable the FOXnews channel on our television sets and write to the advertisers to please pull ads that make Megyn Kelly’s show available on the air. Thank you
OAN, if you don’t get it, demand it.
-
MEgyn has some demons, other than the attention-demanding.
Notice, she’s always the Victim. X didn’t do enough for her. Y didn’t defend her.
The problem may actually be how MEgyn views women.
-
Hillary is The Bully Master of the Clinton Bullies.
Too much talent for the position. A cabinet position like Sec of State would be more appropriate for Newt.
If anyone noticed, Kelly balanced her insane anti-Trump bias and bile against Newt by having Tim Tebow on later as her guest. THEN, tactically tossing Tebow a VERY well-timed "AMEN!"
Nope. Kelly, it didn't work. America and FNC's viewers witnesses your ugliness subterfuge right down to the bone. Good luck on your next gig at MSNBC or CNN.
Me-Gyn supports a woman who damaged the lives of women victimized by her husband.
She realizes she's already despised by the majority of FNC's audience. Kelly's antagonizing and badgering should be considered nothing but whoring and an audition for her new audience and bosses at MSNBC or CNN.
Kelly is also selling a book. The more controversy she creates, the more she hopes she'll generate book sales.
Rush was a joke because Newt is so much smarter are quicker than Rush
I prefer John Bolton for SOS.
We need someone like Newt to put the Press in their place on a daily basis.
I'm sure the position would also allow him plenty of contact and influence with President Trump.
Megyn Kelly may as well go work for MSNBC. Other than her feigning outrage a week or 2 ago about the WikiLeaks info showing that the DNC wants to brainwash Catholics into a different ideology, she has done more to help get Hillary elected than anyone on FOXnews. I am completely disgusted that she is allowed to continue, and her rudeness and antagonism last night of both Mike Pence and Newt Gingrich were prime examples. I am going to disable the FOXnews channel on our television sets and write to the advertisers to please pull ads that make Megyn Kelly’s show available on the air. Thank you
Before I stopped watching Fox News, I wrote them on what a fraud Megyn Kelly was but nothing happened. Maybe with more emails complaining about her and her ratings tanking, it will finally take its toll. I hope so, she is a nasty woman.
Newt was so spot on when he chided her with her fascination about the alleged women (even though much of that has been proven false) and Trump. Especially when she devotes little time to all the corruption that Wikileaks is exposing about hilLIARy and the DNC as Newt pointed out.
He nailed her pretty good and like a typical libtard as Megyn is, she attacked the messenger by saying he has anger issues instead of seeing the truth that Gingrich was trying to expose. She is a terrible, nasty person like most libtards these days and should be at PMSNBC.
CGato
Hannity's gloves are off; He'd touch anything at this point if it means helping Trump.
Apparently it is real, and taken a few years ago. Perhaps after her divorce?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.