Posted on 07/30/2016 7:02:34 AM PDT by Kaslin
Programmed as they are in feminist myth-making, journalists, young and old, often ask incredulously, “Why would Western girls travel to join ISIS fighters?” “ISIS men don’t believe in equality between the sexes.”
At heart, neither do women. Not when hormones rage.
Islamic State projects strength. Strength is an aphrodisiac. Women are biologically programmed to be attracted to powerful men. That’s one reason some girls willingly put on black nose bags and flock to become ISIS brides.
Brainwashed to think biology is incidental, and that men and women are essentially interchangeable; younger readers will likely find it harder to grasp something as primordial and important as the male-female biological category.
Sheikh Muhammad Ayed has no such problem. Speaking in a deep, sonorous voice; in what sounds like classical Arabic, this imam can be observed on YouTube delivering a sermon from East Jerusalem’s Al-Aqsa Mosque. The object of Sheikh Ayed’s coruscating derision is the emasculated West. It is primed for a muscular, Muslim takeover, he argues.
Said Ayed (as translated by The Middle East Media Research Institute):
“But they have lost their fertility, so they look for fertility in their midst. We will give them fertility! We will breed children with them, because we shall conquer their countries—whether you like it or not, oh Germans, oh Americans, oh French, oh Italians, and all those like you. Take the refugees! We shall soon collect them in the name of the coming Caliphate. We will say to you: These are our sons. Send them, or we will send our armies to you.”
On its side, Islam has ascetic evangelists such as Ayed, who bow to no one.
On our side we have Father Michael Pfleger! He’s the too-hideous-to-behold, standard issue, Western preacher-cum-Obama idolater.
Pray tell: Who looks and sounds more impressive to the young and the impressionable? The impassioned, unapologetic, manly imam in flowing, Lawrence-of-Arabia robes, who channels the Word of his Prophet? Or, Father Pfleger, the soft face of the West’s ultra-liberal faith; a tool of liberal public administration; a man more eager to prostrate himself to Caesar than to serve a higher authority?
Pfleger’s ilk—the West’s priesthood—are in the four corners of the earth preaching hate for their own kind. Thus, in a week in which fifteen blacks wielding Kalashnikovs killed two white farmers in KwaZulu-Natal; another excuse-for-a-man—man-of-the-cloth Michael Vorster—was at a South-African pulpit puling about “the controlling ways of whiteness.”
More so than girls do boys need strong men in their lives—men who affirm their masculinity. When a vulnerable Anglo-American boy hears preachers, parents, pedagogues and politicians pounding on about our country’s Founding Fathers as the archetypical pale, patriarchal oppressors—he quickly learns to reject his country’s heritage and look elsewhere for masculine inspiration, maybe even at Muhammad. After all, American boys, K through Twelve, are mired in an estrogen-infused, cloistered world, where strong men in authority are an endangered minority.
Religious or irreligious, the generic Western guy is instructed to ooze psychological correctness, but sublimate manliness. He never takes charge; he consults and cooperates. He's not necessarily effeminate, but he's safely androgynous (and he’s most certainly not guy-like in the Trumpian sense). As personalities go, this Generic Guy and his wife (oops, “life partner”) are indistinguishable.
The feminization and regulation of Western society over decades has meant that life-saving manliness is confined, increasingly, to corners upon which women are less likely to encroach: the cockpit or combat.
Perhaps this blurring of biological boundaries accounts for why, in Europe, there are no men left to defend the women folk. From Cologne to Hamburg to Stuttgart, the mass molestation of German women by Muslim refugees elicits very little outrage from their natural protectors: the remaining 50 percent of the population.
Why, a decadent dilatant named Ralf Jaeger (interior minister for North Rhine-Westphalia), even ventured that “right-wing poisoning of the climate of our society” is “at least as awful as the acts of those assaulting the women.” Father Pfleger and the head of the Roman Catholic Church, Pope Francis, would concur. The last scurried to wash the feet of his Christ-like victims: the refugees, not the raped.
Although none was in attendance at the 2016 Democratic National Convention, America still has magnificent men who’re unwilling to relinquish their natural, individual right to proceed against evil.
Men like Mark Vaughan.
In September of 2014, a woman at a Vaughan Foods factory, in Moore, Oklahoma, was beheaded by one Alton Nolen, a young, hateful black man, convert to Islam, who was terrorizing co-workers into doing the same.
Another woman, poor Traci Johnson, was also doing an honest day’s work, when Nolen approached her and began sawing at her throat. Suddenly something marvelously American happened. The boss and CEO, Mr. Vaughan, stopped Nolen in his tracks with a bullet. (What a shame Vaughan didn’t stop the butcher dead in his tracks.)
Survival—of the species of the culture of the faith—has a biological dimension. What would have befallen our Hominid ancestors had they implemented gender parity in their hunter-gatherer societies—sometimes the women hunt while the men forage and mind the kids, and vice versa?
In the service of statist sameness, the male-vs.-female biological imperatives are rapidly, if reflexively, being dissolved. Dissolving “The Constitution of Man” is dangerous to civilization, for a subservient, effete civilization will not survive the onslaught of Islam.
Oh, I see, the atom bombers.
Who were obeying a civilly placed president.
But at any rate, we had none of this “Get the bibles out of the barracks” (or the schools or the presidential desks) P.C. problem at the time.
The Donald is doing what any smart don would do — offering protection, and choosing a side. And have you noticed his self-deprecating comments about “not deserving” support from Evangelicals. I think Pence is working on him.
Re: Jews — just saying it’s a HUGE part of the alt-right Zeitgeist out there, and I expect it will bubble up in time. I’m a half-Jew myself, and when I see Jewish name after Jewish name attached to political treachery, I get a sense of what it’s like to be a law-abiding, conservative black man. Interesting times.
Trump is awakening the long-dormant masculinity in men...I hope.
It seems the movement has been underway for some time in the younger set. Funny, seems to have started as a scientific study of how to get laid. Go figure. But it’s a big deal.
So when Trump came along, all these younger people recognized in Trump all the things they have learned about being an Alpha Male. He didn’t create them. They recognized him.
This movement has come to include frank, unapologetic views on all things, including RACE, which will really upset the apple cart when it hits the mainstream.
Does that mean we get to drag the girls by their hair back to the caves again? Oh happy days are ahead!
Bringing Christians under the umbrella of his plan will result in his being blessed, though. Even if he never planned it to be that way.
Trump jested in WWE. But he is quite serious here.
Did this chap envision the infiltration of Muslims? In 20/20 hindsight, I do not know how this force could have been missed. Maybe we took for granted how a much stronger Judeo-Christian ethos of that day tended to repel them from the US territories and never envisioned how they would want to do anything other than avoid us.
At any rate we have a rude spiritual wake up call amongst us now. We can’t deal with this mindset as “A religion of peace” because although individual Muslims may elide the bellicose parts for a season or even all their own personal lives, these parts are always there to receive them later at a suitable demonic spiritual nudge.
PC, and it's attendant anti-Christianity, are killing the west every bit as much as is islam.
Why don’t they just vote for Donald Trump?
And my father was Jewish and I was raised nominally that way, but I later came into Christianity due to a credible encounter with the Savior.
Decades and much bible learning later (in both testaments), I believe I have a larger, better picture. It’s really about God after all, and only peripherally about people. While God is desiring to invest Himself in people, He is also never forcing anyone to do it, or asking them to do so for the sake of mere self-interest. He seeks to be accepted for the sake of His merit, which means that refusal is an option that He permits.
The bible shows both Jews and Christians doing some incredibly stupid things. If this was a story to flatter Jews and Christians it would not read this way. But this is an honest story about the glory of God.
She needs to persuade other women.
And, on the topic covered by her column, let me just add this:
The sad fact is Vaughn left the man alive. When islam becomes more dominant, if time remains, they’ll free that guy and hold him up as a hero.
My story as well.
but I later came into Christianity due to a credible encounter with the Savior.
Haven't been so fortunate, but I pray to Jesus and try to believe.
Congrats on using a word i've never seen anywhere else but C.S. Lewis's That Hideous Strength.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
