Skip to comments.
Oh, The Orlando Killer Didn't Use An AR-15 Rifle...
Townhall.com ^
| June 14, 2016
| Matt Vespa
Posted on 06/14/2016 11:55:16 AM PDT by Kaslin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
1
posted on
06/14/2016 11:55:16 AM PDT
by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
The weapon that the orlando killer used was islam.
2
posted on
06/14/2016 11:56:52 AM PDT
by
chris37
(heartless)
To: Kaslin
3
posted on
06/14/2016 11:59:46 AM PDT
by
longfellow
(Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
To: Kaslin
I’m not going to quibble over the model/variant because gun banners won’t stop at a single model. The last time, they set the terms when they defined “assault weapon” and listed features.
They want your guns. All of them. I’ll stick to the larger argument and avoid ceding ANY ground.
4
posted on
06/14/2016 12:01:15 PM PDT
by
SJSAMPLE
To: Kaslin
many videos have been released to news media. There is very rapid gun fire heard.
I am no gun expert, but I do recall that sportsman models have limiters to full auto fire.
If that is so, then what we are hearing is 1)an illegally modified rifle and/or 2)SWAT firing back.
Your thoughts??
5
posted on
06/14/2016 12:02:29 PM PDT
by
llevrok
(Lies are born the moment someone thinks the truth is dangerous.)
To: Kaslin
Owens noted that the rifle Mateen bought “has no major parts that interface with AR-15s in any way, shape, or form”: What?
It's my understanding that the MCX lower receiver is completely interchangeable with almost any (or maybe any) AR-15 upper receivers.
6
posted on
06/14/2016 12:03:36 PM PDT
by
Perseverando
(For Progressives, Islamonazis & other Totalitarians: It's all about PEOPLE CONTROL!)
To: Kaslin
Looks like and AK74 to me (using the MSM’s criteria) - and since when have they ever had a weapons expert? Self proclaimed yeah, but a real one?
7
posted on
06/14/2016 12:06:30 PM PDT
by
SkyDancer
("They Say That Nobody's Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
To: Kaslin
Oh, did we mention the BITTER LITTLE WEENIE in the White House?
8
posted on
06/14/2016 12:06:55 PM PDT
by
Dick Bachert
(This entire "administration" has been a series of Reischstag Fires. We know how that turned out!)
To: Kaslin
You’re too KIND to the Urinalists.
9
posted on
06/14/2016 12:07:46 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: longfellow
10
posted on
06/14/2016 12:07:53 PM PDT
by
Perseverando
(For Progressives, Islamonazis & other Totalitarians: It's all about PEOPLE CONTROL!)
To: Perseverando
It's my understanding that the MCX lower receiver is completely interchangeable with almost any (or maybe any) AR-15 upper receivers. I just looked, you can put the MCX upper on any AR-15 Mil-Spec lower. Not sure if the reverse is true. The site doesn't mention that.
11
posted on
06/14/2016 12:09:57 PM PDT
by
IYAS9YAS
(Veni accipe eam.)
To: Perseverando
Wow... I’m actually sporting a woody...
To: SJSAMPLE
“Assault weapon” has a kickback associated with it after the Dems can waxed over the worthless ban. Demonizing the AR-15 gets camel’s nose into the tent so to speak.
13
posted on
06/14/2016 12:10:46 PM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If you really want to irritate someone, point out something obvious they are trying hard to ignore.)
To: Kaslin
Damn communists MSM and the communists Democrats will do anything to destroy our right to own this beautiful gun, the AR-15.
Trump for President.
To: ObozoMustGo2012
“Wow... I’m actually sporting a woody..”
Remember, the police use these assault weapons more than anyone. When the government comes to kill citizens for whatever reason, it brings heavy firepower.
15
posted on
06/14/2016 12:12:37 PM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If you really want to irritate someone, point out something obvious they are trying hard to ignore.)
To: IYAS9YAS
It needs an adapter to put the mcx upper on the AR lower.
16
posted on
06/14/2016 12:13:32 PM PDT
by
glock rocks
(I'll be glad when the election is over, so FReepers can get back to discussing politics ...)
To: IYAS9YAS
I just looked, you can put the MCX upper on any AR-15 Mil-Spec lower. Not sure if the reverse is true. The site doesn't mention that. I may be having a senior moment, so I will have to recheck my info. However I believe you are spot on about the Sig upper working with AR lowers.
17
posted on
06/14/2016 12:13:38 PM PDT
by
Perseverando
(For Progressives, Islamonazis & other Totalitarians: It's all about PEOPLE CONTROL!)
To: IYAS9YAS; Perseverando
Not sure if the reverse is true. The site doesn't mention that.After looking at more pics, nope, you can't put an AR upper on the Sig MCX lower, no buffer tube accommodation, and the lower appears to have a mount for a swing-away stock where the hole for the buffer tube mount would be on the AR lower.
18
posted on
06/14/2016 12:13:56 PM PDT
by
IYAS9YAS
(Veni accipe eam.)
To: glock rocks
It needs an adapter to put the mcx upper on the AR lower.Thanks! I saw that it said it was "backward compatible" with any Mil-Spec AR lower, but wasn't sure what was necessary to backwardly compat it. ;-)
19
posted on
06/14/2016 12:15:20 PM PDT
by
IYAS9YAS
(Veni accipe eam.)
To: Kaslin
All Islamists are equipped with fully automatic AK-47s. Even the kids have them.
20
posted on
06/14/2016 12:16:28 PM PDT
by
Old Yeller
(Hillary is Satan's spiritual advisor.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
