Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The year of the hated: Clinton and Trump, two intensely disliked candidates, begin their face-off
Washington Post ^ | May 8, 2016 | David Weigel

Posted on 05/08/2016 10:31:05 PM PDT by Innovative

In the end, it was the voters of Indiana last week who effectively gave the country the outcome that had loomed for months. The 2016 election is likely to pit Hillary Clinton, who is disliked by a majority of voters, against Donald Trump, disliked by a greater majority of voters.

If the rise of Trump has no obvious precedent, neither does an election like this. Clinton, whose buoyant favorable ratings in the State Department convinced some Democrats that she could win easily, is now viewed as unfavorably as George W. Bush was in his close 2004 reelection bid. Trump is even less liked, with negative ratings among nonwhite voters not seen since the 1964 campaign of Barry Goldwater.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Russia; US: Arkansas; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2016election; clinton; election2016; elections; hillary; newyork; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: savagesusie
> Media just repeats lies over and over until they become the truth. Don’t think it will work with Trump.

Because he was part of their world he knows how they think which must be driving them (the MSM) crazy about now. He knows they're heavily funded liars who are paid by their handlers very well to confuse the masses and make them believe the illusion they are portraying.

The MSM - Star Trek version


21 posted on 05/08/2016 11:49:28 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt

Leftist Journ-o-listers take care of their own.


22 posted on 05/08/2016 11:52:04 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

23 posted on 05/08/2016 11:52:28 PM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie (It's them or us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer
What else from Washington but compost

Properly aired, compost is life, but a dump of garbage never turned nor cared for is a stinky, smelly pile of rotted matter

Washington always thinks the way it does things is the best ... hah !

24 posted on 05/08/2016 11:56:51 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true .... I have no proof .... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Clinton is widely hated by D voters. Trump is not widely hated by anyone other than the mass media elites ( who nevertheless make $ because of him).


25 posted on 05/09/2016 12:01:23 AM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicians are not born, they're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 -- 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
If Trump has 40 million supporters, that’s still over 260 million who don’t support him.

If Trump currently has 40 million supporters, he is already carrying between 34% and 50% of the voting base. A win is very do-able.

according to a wiki article, 131,407,000 voters voted in 2008

according to statisticbrain.com, 146,311,000 voters were registered to vote in the 2012 election. Of that number, 126,144,000 voted that year.

according to electproject.com, 81,687,059 voters voted in the 2014 election.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turnout_in_the_United_States_presidential_elections

http://www.statisticbrain.com/voting-statistics/

http://www.electproject.org/2014g

26 posted on 05/09/2016 12:09:11 AM PDT by blueplum (March 11, 2016 - the day the First Amendment died?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

The wash post is owned by the fascist uniparty machine. They want Clinton of course and will try to cram her down the D party voters’ throats -— the post is afraid of trump because he’s the one R candidate that can get a lot of D votes (because he’s quite leftist in some ways and because he’s charismatic ). The Post will keep making up Krap about him


27 posted on 05/09/2016 12:15:56 AM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicians are not born, they're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 -- 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

WAPO is very high on my do-not-patronize list.


28 posted on 05/09/2016 12:33:53 AM PDT by ganeemead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salamander; chris37; mkjessup
Support the TRA
(Trans-R'lyeh Partnership)


29 posted on 05/09/2016 12:41:17 AM PDT by shibumi (Vampire Outlaw of the Milky Way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

It’s an old liberal trick to do the equal pox thing to take the shine off someone new. Hillary is hated. They can’t deny it, so Trump has to be seen as hated. Their reporting will try to bring that about.

Everything the Wapo reports is a lie. They’ve been covering for liberals for decades after running Nixon and trying to run Reagan.


30 posted on 05/09/2016 1:04:45 AM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris37

As he does for every election, he has Trump and Hillary battling onstage while he sings “Elected”.

They end up kissing and Trump swats her on the arse and carries her offstage, caveman style.

Pretty funny.


31 posted on 05/09/2016 1:27:26 AM PDT by Salamander (We're pain, we're steel, a plot of knives...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: toddausauras

Trump grows on most people. hillary becomes ever more intolerable, every day.


32 posted on 05/09/2016 2:03:41 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

He (Trump) apparently has higher negative ratings and primary votes than McCain or Romney.

Anyone can make up the fake polling data and make the word ‘disliked’ into some fraudulent phrase. It is a humorous article and has little to do with reality.

Go and talk to a hundred regular democrats (actually working guys, not students, journalists or idiots living under bridges). In private conversations...more than a quarter will admit that they can find a way in their heart to vote for Trump. It is the same formula that Reagan had in the first campaign where blue-dog democrats came out in the south and assured the victory. It’s a repeat of the success from that one single year.

My suspicion is that the news media and lobbyists are screwed because they can’t manipulate the message or force into corners. If he does create a million-plus jobs in his first four years....there’s nothing much they can do to go negative on him. That’s really the bulk of this story....if he can just achieve what he says.


33 posted on 05/09/2016 2:29:34 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

This election is no different/worse than any previous elections. Two candidates are selected, neither of which is the greatest available, and then thrown in front of the people to select which of the two is the lest worst.


34 posted on 05/09/2016 2:40:57 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

Been listening to a few regular people debating Trump vs Hillary vs Obama in one of the bluest of blue states. Some like Obama but don’t like Hillary. Some like Trump and really don’t like Hillary. The few that like Hillary are generally clueless. I ask politely to have them talk about her accomplishments. Invariably they say Secretary of State. Sometimes they mention Senator. They can’t name an actual accomplishment. Trump will try to open their eyes, but that’s an uphill battle. Fortunately those people appear to be a minority.


35 posted on 05/09/2016 2:43:47 AM PDT by palmer (Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet over to foreign enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

As I’ve said all along, the media selected your candidates and the American people went right along with them. Whoever had their faces plastered on the screen the most got the votes. The media had control over the message, the time allotted on screen and who created the most revenue for them. Both Trump and Hillary got the most “hits”. A goldmine for the media agency’s.


36 posted on 05/09/2016 3:01:46 AM PDT by lucky american (Progressives are attacking our rights and y'all will sit there and take it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

McCarthy: Donald Trump Could Help GOP Win Seats

37 posted on 05/09/2016 3:35:21 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Innovative

LOL Trump just had 28,000 attending his West Virginia rally!


38 posted on 05/09/2016 3:44:46 AM PDT by stilloftyhenight (Trump speaks TO us, not AT us. Big difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

Alice Cooper is actually a very nice man.


39 posted on 05/09/2016 3:46:22 AM PDT by stilloftyhenight (Trump speaks TO us, not AT us. Big difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: stilloftyhenight

I know.

:)


40 posted on 05/09/2016 4:00:48 AM PDT by Salamander (We're pain, we're steel, a plot of knives...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson