Posted on 05/06/2016 4:19:43 AM PDT by Yashcheritsiy
Ben Sasse and the rest of the GOP elite claim Trump is a menace who must be stopped “on principle.” Sasse and others have criticized Trump for not disavowing racists quickly enough (even though Trump disavowed racists repeatedly).
Sasse has a bigger problem – he supported a pedophile. Some suspect he used his position of authority to enable abuse.
Ben Sasse was in charge of supervising underage boys, who were later abused by members of Congress.
Ben Sasse was a tutor in the Congressional page program from 1996 to 1998. The Congressional page program brings underage boys to Congress to run errands for Congressmen. These young boys would run errands for Congressmen, and often sexual relationships would develop between the underage boys and members of Congress.
Read: Pedophilia enabling follows around GOP candidate for the U.S. Senate Ben Sasse, NE The Congressional page program was shut down in 2011 after numerous sex scandals occurred, including the Mark Foley sex scandal.
Pedophiles like Dennis Hastert fought earlier efforts to close down the page program:
On October 2, 2006, Representative Ray LaHood (R-IL) called for the page program to be temporarily suspended. He stated that “this is a flawed program. The fact that a member of Congress is sending e-mails to a page and that he can get away with it [shows that] obviously there are problems.” Two more Representatives, Jon Porter (R-NV) and Kay Granger (R-TX) also supported LaHood’s recommendation to suspend the page program until an outside team could evaluate its security protocol. Dennis Hastert announced on October 5, 2006 that he was launching an investigation to evaluate and make improvements to the page program...
(Excerpt) Read more at dangerandplay.com ...
I haven’t seen any denial from the Cruz camp about Raphael and free Cuba
There IS something creepy about the #NeverTrump people...
I envision Trump giving a knowing glance to somebody and *poof* out comes this story.
It seems his hand reaches deep into Hidden Congressional lore.
Sasse has an advanced degree in Liberal Studies from Yale, not many conservatives can say that.
As time goes on, I have become more convinced that the ONLY way of rising in the uni-party is to have some type of terrible secret in the closet. This is how they keep such a tight grip on the party.
Recall that Beck likes Sasse and recently mentioned him on air. Within days Sasse is posting his anti Trump stuff. The “boys” problem runs deep and wide. Headline today says Paterno knew of Sandusky situation many YEARS ago.
According to Trump, the guy he picked to help select his VP is a pedophile.
ah ha!
I’m not a fan of Sasse. Let me be clear on that.
I’ve just read about every article on this issue though, and the crime he committed was, he was to insure these page’s were safe. Mark Foley and Jim Kolbe sexually abused these kids. Not Ben Sasse. He is guilty in the sense that his program failed and he failed to recognize that these two pedophiles were in congress.
This article insinuates that Sasse was in on the action yet nothing points to that direction. They pulled the information from Democratic Underground.com. If FR is now looking at that site as being a good source of information, then we have some very big issues. It’s smear campaign, propaganda.
Let’s say you had a picnic where your friends invited their friends, kids or grandkids and there was some sicko there that no-one recognized as a pedophile. Let’s say he was the caterer. He molest a kid. You should be labeled as a pedophile as well, right? Because it happened at your picnic. It happened on your watch. You should be on the news, in the papers, lose your job, get listed on the pedophile website?
I highly doubt you truly feel that way.
“According to Trump, the guy he picked to help select his VP is a pedophile.”
Ha!!! Took me a second to understand what you were stating. Perfect.
He's doing a good job exposing social justice hoaxes like that Breitbart bimbo who tried to get Trump's campaign manager fired.
But I agree this Sasse thing is pretty thin.
“...at this point I will help destroy anyone who threatens Trump...”
Even to the point of lying? Trying to ruin someone’s life for their political decisions?
I may not agree with his direction but painting him as a pedophile is a liberal move. As I mentioned earlier, this whole article is based on an article written on DemocraticUnderground.com back in 2014. It was a liberal attack on a conservative. Now, since he is not a fan of Trump, we should suddenly become liberals and use their tactics to ruin one of our few conservatives? Wow.
I hope no-one every points a finger at you and make accusations that are not true. Just to ruin your life. It would literally be a shame.
So Trumpian. If you come out against me I will get my friends in the tabloid media to attack you with spurious and unfounded smears. You will all learn that you don’t mess with me or I’ll will ruin you. How left wing Media Matters of you Mr. Trump.
I’ve talked with friends in NYC and they say this is the Trump way. Smears, threats, attacks and lawsuits, what a guy.
Sounds about right, unfortunately.
It is with some irony that 3 days ago, he was spouting off that Cruz’s Dad was friends with Lee Harvey Oswald. After Cruz bowed out, trump admitted he does not believe that at all....
It is smear campaigning at its finest and at a whole new level. Until it suits you to do otherwise.
I agree with your modern day Rome. Look at the 3 dead down lo types who were in Rev Wright’s church with Obama. Look at the Education Czar who we figured wanted to teach little boys to be gay. Then they push transgender bathrooms in schools. This is against everything our founding fathers came to America for. Most came here for religious freedom and a new life- not for welfare and abominations.
I think it is ironic how all of these “facts” come to light during elections? Maybe terms should be shorter so more and more hidden “facts” will come to light. (sarc)
I agree and if the hypothetical church members knew about it but did nothing, they have much more than “a measure”: of culpability. They would have civil liability, and possible criminal liability as well/
However, there is no evidence nor proof Sasse ever knew about it. By the way, the standard of proof here is about 98% percent, far from “a guy told a guy who told a guy” that one often sees in these accusations.
No, not a fan of SPLC. But I’m no longer a fan or believer in HBD stuff or the IQ fetishists. Most of them come from from the soft or social sciences and have done little else besides regurgitate analysis of middling social science minds. The rabidly anti-Trump Murray is a perfect example of how far an average intellect can get with a schoolmarm mother and determined hard work. But it still doesn’t get you through a graduate-level linear algebra class (which Murray failed because, as he admitted in a C-SPAN interview, he lacked the aptitude).
Again, not a fan of SPLC, but not a fan of a man who says he will vote for Hillary Clinton in the November.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.