Anyone care to debate the points raised in the article? Or are the comments going to be more along the lines of “La-La-La I can’t hear you?”
Yeah, here’s an argument: 7 and 1/2 years of Obama. The WORLD is going to NEVER get over the s#it done by him! And dip#hits who sat by enabling the carnage are worried about Trump? Give me a F@cking break!
By way of argument all you have to do is read Trump's books. The one trait that it doesn't highlight is narcissism. He surrounds himself with good, well informed advisors, listens to what they have to say and then makes the decisions and whats even more rare, takes the responsibility along with the credit for the results.
If you posted this Left-wing Brit slop on the DUmp, maybe you'd get a debate over who hates Trump more...
There is nothing to debate, just name calling and baseless comparisons to royalty made by an unnamed source. It’s not “La-La-La I can’t hear you” -more like “La-La-La this is stupid”
Anyone care to debate the points raised in the article? Or are the comments going to be more along the lines of “La-La-La I can’t hear you?”
Judging by most of the responses, it appears to be the latter.
Despite all that, the general public is noticing, also as reflect by every poll
I’ve read The Guardian so many times that a pattern is very clear. THEY ARE HARD CORE LEFT which means logic and reasoning is bizarre or missing.
But just for you I will paraphrase their nonsense which you erroneously refer to as “the points”:
* Louis XIV of France: imperious, bouffanted Sun King. NO POINT; IRRELEVANT; USAGE OF ADJECTIVE ‘BOUFFANT’ IS MISCAST; REVEALS GUARDIANS HOMOSEXUAL LEFTIST TENDENCY TO DENIGRATE ANY CAPITALIST PERSONA WHO POSSESSES POWER AND INFLUENCE, I.E. INSERT NAME OF ANY STRONG CAPITALIST, IN ADDITION TO TRUMP, AND THEIR INVECTIVE IS THE SAME.
* ***total*** narcissist, a source ***intimately*** familiar with Trump...declined to be identified, destruction of the United States. TOTAL? WHAT WOULD A 50% NARCISSIST BE LIKE? INTIMATELY? AS IN HIS WIFE OR HIS EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT?
* band of loyalists ... uncouth, combative and ignorant about the mechanics of American politics ... BAND OF LOYALISTS? WHAT WOULD THE GUARDIAN PREFER? A BAND OF TRAITORS? UNCOUTH? AND WHAT IS BILL CLINTON? COMBATIVE? AS OPPOSED TO WAVING A WHITE FLAG? IGNORANT ABOUT THE ‘MECHANICS’? THE GUARDIAN IS COMPILED IN THE UK AND THEY KNOW BETTER THAN PEOPLE THAT HAVE DEALT WITH THE US CONGRESS UP CLOSE? ARE COREY LEWANDOWSKI, BARRY BENNETT, PAUL MANAFORT, RICK WILEY NEW TO AMERICAN POLITICS? THE GUARDIAN HERE IS NOT MAKING ‘POINTS’, THEY ARE THROWING A FIT, A TYPICAL LEFTIST FIT.
* Trump inches closer ... hands on the levers controlling the world’s richest economy and a military of unparalleled might. THE REAL POINT HERE IS THE HOMOSEXUALS AT THE GUARDIAN ARE SHITTING THEIR PANTS. OH! HOW UNCOUTH!
* MICHAEL COHEN, COREY LEWANDOWSKI, HOPE HICKS, MICHAEL GLASSNER, BARRY BENNETT, PAUL MANAFORT .... WHY NO MENTION OF RICK WILEY? THE GUARDIAN PUBLISHED THIS TRASH YESTERDAY. IT’S NOT EVEN UP TO DATE. AND THE ADJECTIVES ‘UNCOUTH’, ‘IGNORANT’ ARE SO OFF THAT ‘TRASH’ IS AN IMMEDIATE ADJECTIVE DESCRIBING THE RUMP RANGERS AT THE GUARDIAN.
The rest of this nonsense is diatribe invective, rumor, innuendo and unfounded attacks. It’s tabloid trash.
Note that opening The Guardian includes a splattering of pro-Hillary ads such as “Proud to Stand With Hillary”. That is the first sign the reader is in enemy territory.
Now if you have more than a 2-digit IQ which is doubtful, perhaps you realize The Guardian is worse than trash, it is a bowel movement. Therefore, if you even understand the notion of refinement, you won’t be posting turds like this again.
...a source intimately familiar with Trump’s way of working, who declined to be identified......
That is the point.
There isn't one.
Just a bunch of vague and ominous warnings from people who, (if they actually exist) are not exactly standing behind their words.
Voters chose Obama because of the color- BLACK!
They came to his rallies by the thousands, over and over and over they came.
Voters are choosing Trump because of the colors- RED, WHITE, and BLUE!
They too are coming to his rallies by the thousands, over and over and over.
Do - You - See - The - Similarities?
Me neither. bawahaha
What points? I saw a disjointed screed written by European Socialists that have no clue how to be the Greatest Nation in the World, let alone how to make it Great Again after Socialism has gradually attempted to destroy it for the past one hundred years of salami slicing.
Did you notice a specific point you want to debate?
Several points struck me but this is more relative to the narcissism which the article really doesn’t get into and also correlates with his disdain for the 1st Amendment:
I did find an article that explains part of his motivation for running...as a republican this time. If he isn’t nominated he will run 3rd party, or quit. Probably 3rd party. He couldn’t become a member of the Constitution party.
“Judging by his petulance on the 2016 campaign trail, the easiest explanation is that Trump broke with the Democrats because he was peeved at the titular head of the Democratic Party. His pattern of donations changed markedly during Barack Obama’s second term as president. This change actually began a year earlier and it coincides with the 2011 White House Correspondents’ Association dinner. Trump was a guest, and listened as the president made fun of Trump’s hair, his supposedly garish architectural taste, and his fixation with Obama’s birth certificate.
“The Donald kept up a tight smile as this roasting went on, but his expression froze in pique when the entertainer who followed Obama kept piling on. “Donald Trump often talks about running as a Republican, which is surprising,” said comedian Seth Meyers. “I just assumed he was running as a joke.””
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8TwRmX6zs4
1. Michael Cohen...pit bullshiite lawyer...Imagine DT with the FBI, NSA, and DOinJ under his power...
” Trump has threatened to have federal employees sign a similar contract [NON-DISCLOSURE=NO 1ST AMENDMENT?] once he is in the Oval Office. Stone maintained that he and Trump were still “very good friends” and will no doubt be hoping to heal the rift in the months ahead.”
Remember that his volunteers also had to sign a non-disclosure.
2. STONE=Lobbyist
“The future of Trump’s relationship with Stone, who is perhaps the ally who most closely shares the candidate’s sense of opportunism, remains unclear. The pair go back decades, Stone claiming to have first met Trump and his father, Fred, on Ronald Reagan’s presidential campaign in 1979. [protesting?] The Trump Organization was one of Stone’s first clients in DC, where he worked as a lobbyist throughout the early 80s.”
In bed with the politicians?
3. Self-Funding:
The relatively few television advertisements that Trump has deemed it necessary to broadcast – cable news channels having provided him with an estimated $1.9bn in free advertising through blanket coverage – have been entrusted to Rick Reed, a veteran conservative ad-man hailed as “the smartest political consultant I know” by Tucker Carlson, the rightwing broadcaster and publisher.
While I’m at it I did a little research into DT’s investments...
Title:Study: Trump investments underperformed in 2015
“Trump also argued that several of his individual stock picks, like Apple and Goldman Sachs, have done very well for him.
“I hit the market exactly perfectly,” he said.”
http://thehill.com/policy/finance/274178-trump-investments-underperformed-in-2015
Title:Know Who Else Has Received Loans from Citibank and Goldman Sachs? Donald Trump.
“He’s made the nonsensical claim repeatedly that Ted Cruz can’t “protect people” from Citibank or Goldman Sachs or whoever, because he has taken out loans from them or personally guaranteed loans to his campaign from them.”
“As for Goldman Sachs, Trump is himself a shareholder in Goldman Sachs, which means he has a direct financial interest in its success. One would think that would make Trump even less enthusiastic about protecting me from Goldman Sachs (whatever that means) than Cruz would.”
[DT is super owned by the banks. In fact I think his fear of losing everything is the biggest motivations for running, the other is another psychotic reason]
4. Carson tweet gold foil hat spinning...carson was promised a deal. If it was verbal it means nothing.