Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arizona May Criminalize Recording Cops in Public
USA News ^ | Jan. 11, 2016 | Steven Nelson

Posted on 01/11/2016 5:04:58 PM PST by Boomer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: sagar

Too often your "good guys" shoot your dog and get away with it even when it's on video.

21 posted on 01/11/2016 5:39:40 PM PST by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

Bad bill. If citizens interfere with cops while recording video of their activities, it should surely show up on the recording or on the officers recording as cops should be running a camera while on duty. Prosecution of the ones interfering should be a straight forward affair. Leave it at that.


22 posted on 01/11/2016 5:39:41 PM PST by Blue Collar Christian (Ready for Teddy, Cruz that is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sagar
Good. This is a common sense approach. There are good guys and there are bad guys. LEOs are the good guys. Harassing them is counter productive.

True.

Then we wouldn't have this awkward situation in South Carolina where the police officer got filmed backshooting the guy who was running away.

The police could have prosecuted the filmer for "harassment". Maybe make it a felony, with the potential to lard on a lot of other charges, to make the mark squirm.

23 posted on 01/11/2016 5:46:16 PM PST by kiryandil ("When Muslims in the White House are outlawed, only Barack Obama will be an outlaw")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

I am all for it as long as it includes any Public Servant that makes a deliberate false statement during the course of their duties to be GUILTY of a FELONY!!


24 posted on 01/11/2016 5:48:39 PM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

If you have nothing to hide, you should not be afraid of being filmed.


25 posted on 01/11/2016 5:54:35 PM PST by Redcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

Ain’t this some s***.

I’m about at FU with this police state America.


26 posted on 01/11/2016 5:55:44 PM PST by Lazamataz (If the Oregon occupiers are occupying a National Wildlife REFUGE, are they not now REFUGEES?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sagar

Yeah, holding cops accountable is AWFUL.


27 posted on 01/11/2016 5:56:07 PM PST by Lazamataz (If the Oregon occupiers are occupying a National Wildlife REFUGE, are they not now REFUGEES?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Boomer
The legislation would require people to be at least 20 feet away while recording law enforcement activity or farther if officers decide that's needed. Recording inside private buildings such as homes would be allowed from an adjacent room or area' unless an officer objects.

Ok, upon reading this proposal, here's my take: The bolded part is fine. Everything else is suppression of civilian monitoring of police.

And these days, they need some monitoring.

28 posted on 01/11/2016 6:00:18 PM PST by Lazamataz (If the Oregon occupiers are occupying a National Wildlife REFUGE, are they not now REFUGEES?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sagar

Good. This is a common sense approach. There are good guys and there are bad guys. LEOs are the good guys. Harassing them is counter productive.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

So we citizens are the bad guys? Right here, pig, eat the loaf.


29 posted on 01/11/2016 6:07:41 PM PST by loungitude (The truth hurts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

Cops need to be reminded that they are the servants and not the masters.


30 posted on 01/11/2016 6:11:25 PM PST by ez (Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is... - Milton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

“Yeah, holding cops accountable is AWFUL.”

Earth to you: shoving cameras into cops’ faces is not “holding cops accountable”. It is potential suicide-by-cop. The law clearly says within 20 feet.


31 posted on 01/11/2016 6:23:55 PM PST by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: sagar

Perhaps your ability to read suddenly dissapated. It not only says 20 feet - something I think is reasonable — but then levied a series of additional and unnecessary restrictions, including ones allowing a cop to simply arbitrarily veto the ability to record.

You simply do not want cops held accountable. That’s okay, in any fascist or police-heavy state, there will be cheerleaders.


32 posted on 01/11/2016 6:27:43 PM PST by Lazamataz (If the Oregon occupiers are occupying a National Wildlife REFUGE, are they not now REFUGEES?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Boomer
Unconstitutional.

Period.

Screw him.

33 posted on 01/11/2016 6:28:13 PM PST by OldSmaj (Nearly 8 years of obamafail. How much more must we endure? It is not too late for impeachment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ez

“Cops need to be reminded that they are the servants and not the masters.”

Cops are there to protect and serve, neither be “servants” nor “masters”. One of the tools they need to properly protect and serve is the public giving them space to do their work and certainly not an interfer with brandishing cameras and shoving them in their faces. Sure, film them from 20+ feet, but do not interfere within 20 feet. The proposed bill is clear.


34 posted on 01/11/2016 6:28:57 PM PST by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: sagar
Unbelievable.

Your naivete is astounding.

35 posted on 01/11/2016 6:31:09 PM PST by OldSmaj (Nearly 8 years of obamafail. How much more must we endure? It is not too late for impeachment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sagar

SCOTUS has already ruled on this. And it wasn’t for the cops.

L


36 posted on 01/11/2016 6:31:13 PM PST by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

This is bad juju


37 posted on 01/11/2016 6:31:55 PM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: sagar
Sure, film them from 20+ feet, but do not interfere within 20 feet. The proposed bill is clear.

Amazing, for such a clear bill, that you cannot digest the entireity of it.

The legislation would require people to be at least 20 feet away while recording law enforcement activity or farther if officers decide that's needed. Recording inside private buildings such as homes would be allowed from an adjacent room or area' unless an officer objects.

38 posted on 01/11/2016 6:32:47 PM PST by Lazamataz (If the Oregon occupiers are occupying a National Wildlife REFUGE, are they not now REFUGEES?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

“Perhaps your ability to read suddenly dissapated. It not only says 20 feet - something I think is reasonable — but then levied a series of additional and unnecessary restrictions, including ones allowing a cop to simply arbitrarily veto the ability to record.”

I am sure the proposed law also have 50 other things. I was clearly debating the proximity issue, as everyone here. And you seem to agree that 20 feet is reasonable, which is not shared by cop-haters in this thread.


39 posted on 01/11/2016 6:33:03 PM PST by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
It's here and you cannot stop it.

And trying to suppress it indicates a mentality that should be kept away from law-making.

40 posted on 01/11/2016 6:33:06 PM PST by Oatka (Beware of an old man in a profession where men usually die young.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson