Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arizona May Criminalize Recording Cops in Public
USA News ^ | Jan. 11, 2016 | Steven Nelson

Posted on 01/11/2016 5:04:58 PM PST by Boomer

efore retiring to dry heat and a second career in politics, Arizona state Sen. John Kavanagh arrested criminals in Times Square and other New York-area transit areas -- and one heroin bust 40 years ago, he says, inspired his new, instantly controversial bill to criminalize close-up filming of police in public.

The legislation would require people to be at least 20 feet away while recording “law enforcement activity” or farther if officers decide that’s needed. Recording inside private buildings such as homes would be allowed from “an adjacent room or area” unless an officer objects.

Violations would be petty offenses or, if a warning is given, misdemeanors carrying up to 30 days in jail.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: corruption; donutwatch; waco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
As an AZ resident I find this too much like a Maryland type infringement on our basic rights to hold all LEO's accountable. I believe most LEO's are good, decent, and are trying to do the best they can so why would any single one not want to be filmed doing their job if they are doing it right?

I'm starting to think all LEO must were a camera at all times while on duty and not be able to turn it on or off; even in the bathroom. I say this because if they don't want to be filmed while doing their job; what other things do they have to hide besides normal body noises.

1 posted on 01/11/2016 5:04:58 PM PST by Boomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Boomer

I bet he’s running as a pubbie too, right?


2 posted on 01/11/2016 5:06:32 PM PST by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

I do not think this is going anywhere, but time will tell.


3 posted on 01/11/2016 5:09:23 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

to criminalize close-up filming of police in public.
- - -

Does this show their pores???


4 posted on 01/11/2016 5:09:26 PM PST by Scrambler Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

Good. This is a common sense approach. There are good guys and there are bad guys. LEOs are the good guys. Harassing them is counter productive.


5 posted on 01/11/2016 5:10:31 PM PST by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

I really should have spell checked this before posting.. Sheesh!


6 posted on 01/11/2016 5:11:54 PM PST by Boomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

“...Times Square and other New York-area transit areas...”

I stopped right there.


7 posted on 01/11/2016 5:12:42 PM PST by chulaivn66 (Oh stranger, tell the Lacedaemonians that we lie here, trusting their words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scrambler Bob

Like those old spaghetti westerns where all you saw was an eyeball part of a nose and thousands and thousands of sweaty pores.


8 posted on 01/11/2016 5:13:59 PM PST by SkyDancer ("Nobody Said I Was Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sagar

” LEOs are the good guys.”


Oh my,wait until the FR cop haters read that,

Should be fun.

.


9 posted on 01/11/2016 5:14:23 PM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: chulaivn66

Good point mate!


10 posted on 01/11/2016 5:14:45 PM PST by Boomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

Nope. Higher courts already have ruled as long as you do not interfere, you have a right to record cops in public.


11 posted on 01/11/2016 5:15:20 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

Camera tech is getting so cheap and so small that the 10 dollar 1080p camera pin that you can stick on your shirt is surely coming soon.

And flash density is going up as prices go down.... that 10$ pin on cam will record for many hours... perhaps even days.

Everyone will be wearing the things to record their daily events.

You will have to make them illegal to keep cops from being recorded.

They could have blue tooth transfer to your smartphone so that instant upload to the net could be done... can’t destroy the video even by confiscating the cameras.


12 posted on 01/11/2016 5:15:53 PM PST by Bobalu (Even if I could take off, I could never get past the tractor beam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mears
Oh my,wait until the FR cop haters read that, Should be fun.

I'm not a cop hater at all. I do have a problem with one small town in Texas by the name of Waco though. The DA and entire legal system there is apparently corrupt.

It's LEO communities like them that give all LEO's a bad rap. I personally wish the LEO community would "police" their own and take care of that brown spot on their blue uniforms.

13 posted on 01/11/2016 5:19:38 PM PST by Boomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sagar

so...

If I get pulled over and I have a dash cam recording, I have to turn it off, in your opinion? It is less than 20 feet from the officer.

I am for recording *everything* for both my, AND the officer’s protection.

Good cops *want* to be recorded.

How about the woman who accused the cop of raping her and he was found innocent because of a camera? Want to take away *his* protections?

Get it all on camera and let the judge sort it out.


14 posted on 01/11/2016 5:21:44 PM PST by Marie (Hey GOP... The vulgarians are at the gate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sagar
Cameras continue to get smaller, cheaper, better and easier to conceal. Doesn't matter whether govt workers like being recorded or not.

It's here and you cannot stop it.

15 posted on 01/11/2016 5:22:18 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sagar

Uh First Amendment.
If they are good guys no harm from recording their actions.


16 posted on 01/11/2016 5:26:51 PM PST by Kozak (ALLAH AKBAR = HEIL HITLER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sagar
There are good guys and there are bad guys. LEOs are the good guys.

There are no bad cops?

Consider me skeptical.

17 posted on 01/11/2016 5:28:42 PM PST by Wissa (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

Twenty feet seems reasonable.


18 posted on 01/11/2016 5:29:19 PM PST by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

IF LEO’s cannot be filmed in public then justice demands that the public cannot be filmed in public, including all those traffic cams and street cams. Surveillance for me but not for thee?


19 posted on 01/11/2016 5:34:38 PM PST by DaveyB (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sagar

This would mean you could not film when you are stopped in traffic. Further, the cop can object and prevent all filming.

Seems to me there are already rules against interfering.

The answer should be an emphatic NO!!!


20 posted on 01/11/2016 5:38:40 PM PST by MortMan (I am offended by those who believe they have a right not to be offended.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson