Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

As an AZ resident I find this too much like a Maryland type infringement on our basic rights to hold all LEO's accountable. I believe most LEO's are good, decent, and are trying to do the best they can so why would any single one not want to be filmed doing their job if they are doing it right?

I'm starting to think all LEO must were a camera at all times while on duty and not be able to turn it on or off; even in the bathroom. I say this because if they don't want to be filmed while doing their job; what other things do they have to hide besides normal body noises.

1 posted on 01/11/2016 5:04:58 PM PST by Boomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Boomer

I bet he’s running as a pubbie too, right?


2 posted on 01/11/2016 5:06:32 PM PST by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

to criminalize close-up filming of police in public.
- - -

Does this show their pores???


4 posted on 01/11/2016 5:09:26 PM PST by Scrambler Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

Good. This is a common sense approach. There are good guys and there are bad guys. LEOs are the good guys. Harassing them is counter productive.


5 posted on 01/11/2016 5:10:31 PM PST by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

I really should have spell checked this before posting.. Sheesh!


6 posted on 01/11/2016 5:11:54 PM PST by Boomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

“...Times Square and other New York-area transit areas...”

I stopped right there.


7 posted on 01/11/2016 5:12:42 PM PST by chulaivn66 (Oh stranger, tell the Lacedaemonians that we lie here, trusting their words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

Nope. Higher courts already have ruled as long as you do not interfere, you have a right to record cops in public.


11 posted on 01/11/2016 5:15:20 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

Camera tech is getting so cheap and so small that the 10 dollar 1080p camera pin that you can stick on your shirt is surely coming soon.

And flash density is going up as prices go down.... that 10$ pin on cam will record for many hours... perhaps even days.

Everyone will be wearing the things to record their daily events.

You will have to make them illegal to keep cops from being recorded.

They could have blue tooth transfer to your smartphone so that instant upload to the net could be done... can’t destroy the video even by confiscating the cameras.


12 posted on 01/11/2016 5:15:53 PM PST by Bobalu (Even if I could take off, I could never get past the tractor beam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

Twenty feet seems reasonable.


18 posted on 01/11/2016 5:29:19 PM PST by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

IF LEO’s cannot be filmed in public then justice demands that the public cannot be filmed in public, including all those traffic cams and street cams. Surveillance for me but not for thee?


19 posted on 01/11/2016 5:34:38 PM PST by DaveyB (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

Bad bill. If citizens interfere with cops while recording video of their activities, it should surely show up on the recording or on the officers recording as cops should be running a camera while on duty. Prosecution of the ones interfering should be a straight forward affair. Leave it at that.


22 posted on 01/11/2016 5:39:41 PM PST by Blue Collar Christian (Ready for Teddy, Cruz that is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

I am all for it as long as it includes any Public Servant that makes a deliberate false statement during the course of their duties to be GUILTY of a FELONY!!


24 posted on 01/11/2016 5:48:39 PM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

If you have nothing to hide, you should not be afraid of being filmed.


25 posted on 01/11/2016 5:54:35 PM PST by Redcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

Ain’t this some s***.

I’m about at FU with this police state America.


26 posted on 01/11/2016 5:55:44 PM PST by Lazamataz (If the Oregon occupiers are occupying a National Wildlife REFUGE, are they not now REFUGEES?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer
The legislation would require people to be at least 20 feet away while recording law enforcement activity or farther if officers decide that's needed. Recording inside private buildings such as homes would be allowed from an adjacent room or area' unless an officer objects.

Ok, upon reading this proposal, here's my take: The bolded part is fine. Everything else is suppression of civilian monitoring of police.

And these days, they need some monitoring.

28 posted on 01/11/2016 6:00:18 PM PST by Lazamataz (If the Oregon occupiers are occupying a National Wildlife REFUGE, are they not now REFUGEES?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

Cops need to be reminded that they are the servants and not the masters.


30 posted on 01/11/2016 6:11:25 PM PST by ez (Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is... - Milton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer
Unconstitutional.

Period.

Screw him.

33 posted on 01/11/2016 6:28:13 PM PST by OldSmaj (Nearly 8 years of obamafail. How much more must we endure? It is not too late for impeachment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

I don’t think the video is the problem it’s the selective editing that sucks.


44 posted on 01/11/2016 6:44:23 PM PST by Lurkina.n.Learnin (It's a shame enobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

The legislation would require people to be at least 20 feet away while recording “law enforcement activity” or farther if officers decide that’s needed. Recording inside private buildings such as homes would be allowed from “an adjacent room or area” unless an officer objects.


doesn’t say they can’t record, just 20 feet away. looks like a good law to me.


45 posted on 01/11/2016 6:44:23 PM PST by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer
Does no one here remember that law enforcement officers used to be peace officers?

Which is better, to "keep the peace" or "enforce the law"?

Now admittedly, there are times when enforcing the law keeps the peace. But, those seem to be fewer and farther between as police forces have become militarized.

I see nothing wrong with filming a public employee, in public, or in your own home. If the employee doesn't want to be filmed I would suspect one of two things. Either they do not know how to do their job or they want to do something they want to hide from the public.

We aren't talking about getting a camera 2 feet from the action. Anyone that does that during a crime is insane anyway and will probably be up for a crack at the Darwin Award.

55 posted on 01/11/2016 7:11:41 PM PST by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson