Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Trump: Taking The Donald Seriously
Townhall.com ^ | January 11, 2016 | Kurt Schlichter

Posted on 01/11/2016 4:57:16 AM PST by Kaslin

 There is a real chance that our next president will be Donald Trump.

            I am not happy about that I've found a media niche as a hardcore conservative who outlets call to get the right wing view of why he's terrible (Well, at least media outlets without Don Lemon).  Yet it's foolish not to face the potential reality we are sort of just hoping he goes away thanks to flaws that never seem to actually hurt him.  We are not taking seriously the Donald Trump we actually face, as opposed to the one we wish we were facing.  Exactly 25 years ago this week, as a first lieutenant, I was at the VII Corps Main base cluster awaiting the start of Desert Storm.  We were preparing to fight the greatest military force in history, one made up of pros who were lavishly equipped, courageously led, and trained to clockwork perfection in their execution of Soviet-style combat operations.  But the real enemy up north was (with notable exceptions) something else a rag-tag collection of conscripts using intermittently operational, near obsolete gear, officered by cowards, and incapable of sustained, high intensity combat operations.  The point is you don't prepare to engage the enemy you want to engage; you prepare to engage the most dangerous possible enemy and count yourself lucky when you find you overestimated him.

            People keep underestimating Donald Trump.  Now, do I think he will win the nomination, much less the election?  No.  My analysis of his campaign's ability to execute on the electoral fundamentals like raising money (I don't see him dropping a billion to self-fund a run) and getting voters off their couches and into booths checking boxes tells me he probably won't win.  But then, I'm not a Trump guy, and I want him to lose the nomination, and when your analysis syncs up with your preferences you need to check yourself and ensure that your mode of thinking is critical, not wishful.  In the Army, those are the moments where your command sergeant major tells the briefing room to clear out and take ten, then, with the door closed, explains why the good colonel needs to pull his head out.

            Donald Trump has a path to the nomination and the presidency, like it or not.

            Trump's nomination challenge is three-fold:

  1. His antics appall many Republicans
  2. The hardcore conservatives detest him as a fake con
  3. Many Republicans hold it as an article of faith he will eventually stumble

            These may all be true, but these obstacles can also be overcome.  First, let's assume the worst case scenario in which his people actually show up and vote without a massive get out the vote drive - in other words, they self-motivate.  Then let's write off the fussy Republicans who won't support him because he's tacky; it's clear there is not going to be some gaffe that finally makes everyone else say, "Oh wait, this time I finally think he's terrible!"  And disregard the hardcore cons like me who will be going for people like Cruz or Rubio.  That means he really needs to focus on winning over whatever portion of the GOP electorate that doubts he can win and won't vote for him on that basis because beating Hillary is Mission Number One.  

            Say that's just 15% of the electorate.  Add that to his existing base in the polls of somewhere between 25%-35% and you are near 50%.  Now, if he exceeds expectations or even wins Iowa, then does the same in New Hampshire - which is very possible - he then heads into South Carolina and Nevada with momentum.  And momentum is exactly what he needs to convince the voters concerned with electability to go his way.  Everyone wants to be on the winning team, and the GOPe/Mainstream Media dual freak-out at a runaway Trump train would likely only supercharge him.

            Trump can totally win the nomination.  But then he has to beat Hillary and he can't possibly do that…can he?

            Yes, he can.

            Trump's general election challenges are similar to his nomination challenges:

  1. His antics will appall many general election voters
  2. Some Republicans will refuse to support him
  3. He lacks Hillary's campaign apparatus and funds
  4. Many voters don't think he could win

            Again, we can write off the people who detest him for being boorish and tacky.  He's never going to win them, but he's not trying.  Nor will he miss the Republicans who refuse to support him.  Some are conservatives for reasons of (I believe) misguided principle, since Hillary is manifestly worse for America than Trump.  I respect them.  Others are petulant, entitled jerks like the contemptible Jeb Bush, sore losers who are infuriated that mere voters are presuming to deprive them of the mastery of the universe to which they believe themselves entitled.  For every one voter snobs like Jeb convince to help Hillary by sitting out the election, a dozen more disgusted with Jeb's lack of integrity in breaking his implied promise to honor the will of the Republican voters will flock to Trump.  

            But, of course, Trump's strategy is not a Rovian play to motivate the base to squeak out a 50% + 1 win, but to broaden the coalition by bringing in new voters to add to those of us who will pull the tab for any Republican - hell, any terrier, if it came to that – over the monstrous Clintonbot.  Look for Trump to not only bring out working class whites left in the dust by coastal elites who look upon them and their concerns with contempt, but to make plays for blacks and Hispanics.  Who says he can't?  Trump has something Hillary doesn't ' love him or hate him, he's interesting.  She's human Ambien.

            So Trump can possibly bypass and neutralize Hillary's organizational apparatus and her piles of money.  Hillary's GOTV and ads will all be focused on motivating people she thinks are already for her because, by now, no one doesn't already have an opinion of her.  Granny Clinton, who has infested our politics for a quarter century, won't change minds; Trump can because he's perceived as new and fresh.  Moreover, he has a knack for saying things voters are actually thinking, as opposed to the scolding nanny who seems perpetually on the verge of demanding we use our inside voices.  And this is not an inside voice election year.

            Hillary has two great vulnerabilities of her own.  First, she's tied to an incompetent incumbent whose feckless failures are bound to manifest in more foreign policy disasters - what if Baghdad or Kabul falls while our depleted military watches helplessly?  That could happen.  Or what happens when yet another ISIS murder squad forgets how it is supposed to be contained and riddles some gun free zone with bullets, to be followed with President Fail sobbing away at the tragedy of Americans being able to defend themselves thanks to the Second Amendment?  If this becomes a security election and it comes down to Let God Sort 'Em Out Trump or the Pantsuited Appeaser, we're going to have one super-hot First Lady in 2017.

            Trump's second advantage is that Hillary is bitter, arrogant, and stupid - she's Flunk-the D.C.-Bar-Exam dumb, and that's really dumb.  Together, these characteristics will make it easy for Trump to get inside her head and throw her off.  Moreover, the past manifestations of these qualities might likewise doom her.  The recent revelation of new emails in which she blatantly committed what, to a colonel/lawyer who didn't fail the bar exam, are multiple, indisputable felonies regarding classified information could well lead to a reboot of the Watergate Saturday Night Massacre.  Imagine when the corrupt Department of Justice refuses to follow the FBI's recommendation to indict this future felon.  Imagine, then, that the FBI director resigns in protest, launching a crisis.  Now, Americans are a lot of things, but fans of double standard justice for friends of the powerful is not one of them.  And Trump will beat her over the head with it.

            Trump can win the nomination.  I don't like that, because I don't think he's a conservative.  He can also win the general, and I do like that because this country can survive a Donald Trump administration intact, assuming he learns what the nuclear triad is.  But a Hillary Clinton presidency?  A presidency for a woman who has not mere contempt but active hatred for the half of the population that she labels as her greatest enemy, and who aspires to restrict every amendment in the Bill of Rights that doesn't keep her from having to testify to her own crimes?  A slave to her unique homebrew of hatred, undue self-regard, and foolishness, her lawless reign will rip this country apart.  If it's Donald Trump versus Hillary Clinton, Trump all the way - and, thankfully, he absolutely could win.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas; US: New York; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2016election; arkansas; cruz4attorneygeneral; donaldtrump; election2016; hillary; hillaryclinton; hitlery; kurtschlichter; newyork; tedcruz; texas; townhall; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 01/11/2016 4:57:16 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Kurt Schlichter can tell it to Phyllis Schaffly, who was defining conservatism while his ass was in diapers.

GO TRUMP GO!!!!!


2 posted on 01/11/2016 5:00:06 AM PST by mkjessup (What will stink more as it burns in Hell? Hillary Clinton, or that pantsuit of hers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Not a single vote has yet been cast. We’ll see.


3 posted on 01/11/2016 5:01:05 AM PST by Daveinyork ("Trusting government with money and power is like trusting teenaged boys with whiskey and car keys",)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Oh noes!!!!!

4 posted on 01/11/2016 5:01:20 AM PST by McGruff (Trump/Cruz 2016 - could happen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Why do these ‘journalists’ insist on overthinking the perfectly obvious?

Someone has to SAY IT... and Trump SAYS IT.

Like that or not, it’s certainly a change from 8 years of lame, irresolute and duplicitous conduct from our “President”.

America is ready to understand and BE understood!


5 posted on 01/11/2016 5:04:14 AM PST by SMARTY ("What is freedom? To have the will to be responsible for one's self. "M. Stirner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Why do these ‘journalists’ insist on overthinking the perfectly obvious?

Someone has to SAY IT... and Trump SAYS IT.

Like that or not, it’s certainly a change from 8 years of lame, irresolute and duplicitous conduct from our “President”.

America is ready to understand and BE understood!


6 posted on 01/11/2016 5:04:14 AM PST by SMARTY ("What is freedom? To have the will to be responsible for one's self. "M. Stirner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Heading toward acceptance stage.


7 posted on 01/11/2016 5:07:55 AM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
"(I don't see him dropping a billion to self-fund a run)"


I can't begin to tell you how many times I've witnessed for Jesus and offered His salvation (which is free for the accepting) to people that nod their assent and agreement but balk at actually getting saved because, "They just don't see it THAT way" .. (or similar objections)


We are indeed in a spiritual battle for people to refuse to see the phenomenal upset ... right before their very lying eyes !! American politics is experiencing


WHEN ... have you ever seen an election that did not have an opposing party ?


The spiritual battle is the idea ... the spirit of America.

8 posted on 01/11/2016 5:08:53 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true .... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The hardcore conservatives detest him as a fake con

The "Hardcore" conservatives mentioned don't care that Cruz is a confirmed lying liar. That's not something they would let pass or contort themselves into pretzels over if the real problem here is their "hardcore" politics.

9 posted on 01/11/2016 5:09:13 AM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Clinton vs. Trump: It's a tie
10 posted on 01/11/2016 5:11:15 AM PST by 11th_VA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

the writer assumes a static condition. once nominated, candidates begin to court those voters the article doesn’t believe are there.

Then when compared to Hillary or Bernie, the choice becomes easier. Of course there is a fringe that can never be satisfied but there are far more that can and will be convinced.

A charismatic leader is what will win. An ideologue will lose this time around


11 posted on 01/11/2016 5:13:07 AM PST by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....carson is the kinder gentler trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

We need to seriously shake up both the political elites and the establishment.

There is no-one that can do this as well as Trump.....

We need to take the Republican party back from the progressives that now populate the upper echelons at all levels....Trump can do this.....


12 posted on 01/11/2016 5:16:56 AM PST by nevergore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

After the first paragragh.....even less......this guys visceral opinion of Trump was unreadable.


13 posted on 01/11/2016 5:18:04 AM PST by Guenevere (If.the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf

Absolutely!


14 posted on 01/11/2016 5:20:13 AM PST by Guenevere (If.the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans
WTF is a lying liar? Are you for real? According to you he's lying about lying about lying. You make no sense whatsoever.

Go back to your universe whereever that is you bot

15 posted on 01/11/2016 5:27:59 AM PST by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Looks like that link made you butt hurt. My job is done.


16 posted on 01/11/2016 5:32:47 AM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Daveinyork
That is correct, and whether the first vote is for him or not, there is still a long way to go until the nomination and the general election.

The most important part is that Hillary or Bernie Sanders will not be the next president.

17 posted on 01/11/2016 5:35:37 AM PST by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: knarf; DoughtyOne; Vision Thing; stephenjohnbanker
Potent and poignant points FRiend.

This IS a spiritual battle and while I like both Cruz and Trump, I find it a bit off-putting when Cruz rallies seem to either begin or end up in some sort of 'come-to-Jesus' moment with calls to "put on the full armor of God", and just this past week Cruz said "I believe the key to winning in 2016 is very simple: we have to bring back the millions of evangelical voters who stayed home. We have to awaken and energise the body of Christ." (emphasis mine, mkj).

Now no one is more in favor of energizing the body of Christ than I am, but whether we like it or not, the kind of talk Cruz is engaging in is not smart politics. It may win him Iowa and perhaps it could even wrest the nomination away from Trump and carry him into the general election, however the evangelistic fervor he is generating (and presumably would continue to generate) will end up polarizing the electorate and you can bet the rent that the 'RATs will portray Cruz as the second coming of Jimmy Swaggert, or Jim Bakker along with all of the negative aspects of those flawed preachers.

Can Cruz (or ANY candidate) win the general election by casting themselves in this fashion? To those spiritually born again (such as you and I), such talk from the campaign trail is music to our ears but to the larger numbers of voters who do NOT see the issues in stark good vs evil or light vs darkness, that talk will send them running, not walking to the exit and into the welcoming secular arms of the 'RATs.

Now Donald Trump is certainly no religious fire and brimstone type however he has repeatedly proclaimed his own belief in God, lifelong Presbyterian, has stated many times that he would "be the strongest advocate for Christians" as President, he believes in the Judeo-Christian principles that our Nation was founded on and made America great. But Trump also knows that in order to win the Presidency, he needs MORE than the votes of conservative Christians and that is why his ability to attract crossover votes from the latter day manifestation of the old 'Reagan Democrats' positions him in a stronger position for the general election than I believe Cruz would hold.

Make no mistake, I admire and support much of what Ted Cruz advocates and has done thus far, however it remains unproven if his political approach will "win the battle (nomination) and win the war (general election)" or just "win the battle".

Trump has demonstrated many times that he thinks many moves ahead of his adversaries and that is why he continues to be the man to beat, Cruz is impressive in his skills, no question of it. But the real critical question is whether Cruz can pivot from the nomination battle to the general election final confrontation with the 'RATs and win the day. Trump can do that. Cruz?

It remains to be seen.
18 posted on 01/11/2016 5:37:44 AM PST by mkjessup (What will stink more as it burns in Hell? Hillary Clinton, or that pantsuit of hers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
None of the Repubs, other then Trump, will get anything of significance accomplished, as POTUS. They will all bee limited by an insane media, hyper shrill lefties, and possibly a dem congress.

Any new Repub Potus, Cruz included, will acquiesce to the status quo, and settle for incremental window dressing change.

Not Trump. He will build a wall, stop Islamo Nazis here and there, challenge unfair trade, and fix Big Gov.

All monumental tasks in themselves, requiring a monumental prsonality and will.

19 posted on 01/11/2016 5:41:54 AM PST by Awgie (truth is always stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

Heading toward acceptance stage.


Yup


20 posted on 01/11/2016 5:42:18 AM PST by samtheman (Elect Trump, Build Wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson