Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Joins Kasich as the Anti–Anti–Gay-Marriage Candidate
National Review ^ | 08/21/2015 | Maggie Gallagher

Posted on 08/21/2015 9:44:37 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Even as the Phillips family is struggling for financial existence against punishing government fines for refusing to bake a gay-wedding cake, Donald Trump is doubling down (along with Kasich) on his position as an anti–anti–gay-marriage Republican.

As Paul Dupont points out, Trump, when asked whether gay marriage was a dead issue, did not respond even by saying he would fight for religious liberty, or the right to make a living. He simply said a constitutional amendment is not going to pass, the Supreme Court has ruled, and it’s time to move on.

This is from an interview with The Hollywood Reporter:

THR: You say you would have liked the states, rather than the Supreme Court, to decide on gay marriage. Have you been to a gay wedding?

Trump: Yes, I have. [Broadway theater owner] Jordan Roth. You know Jordan, right? Great guy.

THR: So is this a dead issue for the GOP at this point?

Trump: Some people have hopes of passing amendments, but it’s not going to happen. Congress can’t pass simple things, let alone that. So anybody that’s making that an issue is doing it for political reasons. The Supreme Court ruled on it.

He’s a fighter, allegedly, but not against the biggest powers that be.

So now we have a weird scenario when the princess candidate of the current establishment (John Kasich) and the alleged insurgent are both unwilling to fight against the redefinition of Christianity as bigotry.

I respect Trump enough to take him seriously as a candidate. He could win Iowa. Are there enough people willing to stand up against the real powers that be to either change the candidates’ mind, or oppose him?

This is a central untold drama of the election.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: 2016election; election2016; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; johnkasich; newyork; ohio; pauldupont; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last
To: Kenny
You obviously hate

A weak response. A typically liberal one.

81 posted on 08/21/2015 11:43:32 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

Here’s the bottom line:

Trump’s default position assures the continuation of abortion on demand and the abomination of sodomite pretend “marriage.”

You don’t care about that.

I do.


82 posted on 08/21/2015 11:44:58 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Gay marriage is the fault of the GOP elite.

Let us remember that President Romney instituted gay marriage while Governor of Massachusetts.


83 posted on 08/21/2015 11:45:09 AM PDT by o2bfree (It would save $Trillions if the GOP Establishment would just drop dead. :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skippyjonjones

Still seems like a lot of celebration of faggotry everywhere I turn.

Anyway, as long as “fag marriage” is legally recognized in this country, I’ll never lift a finger for it again. It’s no longer a country I can defend, respect, or declare allegiance to.


84 posted on 08/21/2015 11:47:04 AM PDT by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
"The Constitution does not, and cannot, confer authority to overturn the laws of nature and nature's God. "

Bump.

85 posted on 08/21/2015 11:49:34 AM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; All

Although Trump’s intentions for the country are good, he is basically a low-information presidential candidate like many (most?) other candidates are imo. And he will remain that way until his Constitution-savvy supporters get him up to speed with the Founding States’ division of federal and state government powers as enumerated in the Constitution.

Regarding 10th Amendment-protected state power to prohibit constitutionally unprotected gay “marriage,” his supporters will also need to get him up to speed on the state powers and associated state revenues that the corrupt feds have stealing from the states for the last 60+ years.


86 posted on 08/21/2015 11:51:56 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
A weak response. A typically liberal one.

Name calling, a typical liberal response.

87 posted on 08/21/2015 11:52:19 AM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

Trump also let a “tranny” into his beauty pageant (for women) a couple years ago.

Let’s not forget he cheated on his first wife Ivana for reportedly 5 years with second wife Marla Maples.

He’s not the “family values” candidate by a longshot.


88 posted on 08/21/2015 11:52:30 AM PDT by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

You know, I’m getting tired of you judging me or anyone who doesn’t share your extreme positions. If you hate Trump, that’s fine but stand up for your own opinions, don’t try to blame everyone else for them.

In fact, I wouldn’t hold it against you if you loved Bush. I’d just assume you had your reasons and you’re entitled.


89 posted on 08/21/2015 11:54:46 AM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: skippyjonjones

Because they got what they want so they don’t have to propagandize anymore. Meanwhile all the unwilling businesses and government workers who are forced to comply will have their concerns ignored by the media. Radio silence on those SOSes. Because all the media has to do is ignore them and they will lose. But if one of the religious objectors actually won a court case, the media would start yapping about it endlessly.

But if you want to let the liberal media harass you into compliance...


90 posted on 08/21/2015 11:55:50 AM PDT by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: o2bfree

Conservatives want to defeat the GOP elites because they’re wrong on the principles and policies that will determine whether the republic survives or not.

Trump wants to defeat the GOP elites too. But he doesn’t differ from them substantially on principles and policy.

He simply wants to take their place and put their power into his own hands.


91 posted on 08/21/2015 11:57:07 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I don’t like it, but Trump is right. This is a dead issue. Only an idiot doesn’t know it. Google Yuri Besmenov. This was the KGB’s long term goal for 40 years. And it will only get worse. No one man can change it. It takes a conservative purge of academia, media, Hollywood and civil service to achieve it — the same way the Soviets engineered the leftist takeover of those cultural pillars in the first place. Trump needs to focus on sealing the border and crushing illegal immigration.


92 posted on 08/21/2015 11:57:50 AM PDT by montag813 (Bring Back Tar and Feathers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

RE: I don’t like it, but Trump is right. This is a dead issue.

We cannot make this a dead issue as long as the rights of Christian businessmen are being trampled upon and their businesses are being fined to the point of closure when they are FORCED by law to service a ceremony they object to.

You make this a dead issue, then religious freedom is dead in this country.

I need a President who will fight for the rights of Christians to freely practice their religion even in everyday life, not give up on it.


93 posted on 08/21/2015 12:04:51 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (qu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Kenny
anyone who doesn’t share your extreme positions

My positions are completely within the boundaries of the stated purposes of this website on the homepage. How about yours?

If you hate Trump, that’s fine

I don't hate Trump. But his positions on this are ignorant, stupid and destructive of the basis of the American claim to liberty and constitutional self-government.

that’s fine but stand up for your own opinions,

I've never had any problem standing up for my opinions. You must be confusing me with someone else.

don’t try to blame everyone else for them.

You're making that up.

94 posted on 08/21/2015 12:10:20 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: montag813
This is a dead issue.

That's only true if conservatives continue to ignore the principles the republic was premised upon, and keep ignorantly supporting politicians who keep surrendering for us.

95 posted on 08/21/2015 12:14:34 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: grania

Who says the courts won’t overturn victories on *any* issue? Federal courts have made voting an exercise in futility. I still vote, but I’ve learned to expect no significant worthwhile results from it. Why do I still vote? Because it still seems to be the right thing to do. And because people won’t take me seriously in political discussions if I don’t.


96 posted on 08/21/2015 12:44:31 PM PDT by liberalism is suicide (Communism,fascism-no matter how you slice socialism, its still baloney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: liberalism is suicide
President Trump who is not part of the paid-to-play government (including the judiciary) is more likely to give us better appointments and lead to the judiciary making constitutional decisions. Besides that, if Republicans smarten up we can invest our campaign donations to get uncompromised candidates elected in primaries who will think like Trump.

I really believe this is our last chance. The others will have to wait four years, and we'll see who is the most reliable conservative at that time.

97 posted on 08/21/2015 1:04:28 PM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

-— Trump has a problem with me if he isn’t taking a stand on moral and family issues -—

This is the problem with a non-ideological pragmatist. Their position on any issue is unstable.


98 posted on 08/21/2015 1:33:56 PM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

THR: You say you would have liked the states, rather than the Supreme Court, to decide on gay marriage. Have you been to a gay wedding?

Trump: Yes, I have. [Broadway theater owner] Jordan Roth. You know Jordan, right? Great guy.

THR: So is this a dead issue for the GOP at this point?

Trump: Some people have hopes of passing amendments, but it’s not going to happen. Congress can’t pass simple things, let alone that. So anybody that’s making that an issue is doing it for political reasons. The Supreme Court ruled on it.

Trump topics, past day or so:
99 posted on 08/21/2015 5:44:56 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The Federal Employees in black robes must be impeached. Their presumptive power OVER the federal Constitution to rewrite and over turn basic law as clearly written, understood, and practiced for 150+ years is a form of lawlessness that can NEVER be tolerated in a Constitutional republic.

The so called ‘court’ must fall or our republic will.

No we can not afford to move on, this and every other evil shoved down our throats by that group of lawless Federal employees must be nullified. The lawless employees should be made impudent to change the Constitution as written.

A Constitutional republic can permit only one way to change the law, vote of the people or their legislator.


100 posted on 08/21/2015 9:45:36 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson