Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Feinstein, Your Point Is?
Townhall.com ^ | August 20, 2015 | D.W. Wilber

Posted on 08/20/2015 8:14:57 AM PDT by Kaslin

Recently California Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein, in an apparent attempt to defend Hillary Clinton over the ongoing scandal involving her private e-mail and her mishandling of highly classified information, has suggested that the former secretary of state “did not send” any of the classified e-mails that were found on her private server. I presume that the California senator is trying to make some kind of point that if Hillary Clinton only ‘received’ classified e-mails, then she’s guilt-free.

While I can appreciate the Democratic senator’s loyalty, and trying her best to put a good face on Hillary’s troubles, I have but two questions to ask Sen. Feinstein. When did Hillary report these serious security violations, and to whom did she report them? After all, according to government regulations, “failure to report a security violation is in and of itself a security violation”.

Obviously Sen. Feinstein is aware of the legal requirement to report violations, one would think anyway, considering her experience as a senior member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, for far too many years I would add.

According to the Department of State’s own regulations, “A security violation is a security incident that, in the judgment of the Department of State Office of Security, results in actual or possible compromise of the information. For example, if an employee transmits a classified document over an unclassified facsimile machine, the incident would be adjudicated as a violation, as the possibility for electronic interception and transcription of the classified document is real”. I think an un-secured, un-encrypted private e-mail server would fall into this category.

The State Department’s regulations also state that “All security incidents will be reported to the Department of State Office of Security. Employees must inform the appropriate security officer, orally or in writing, of any improper security practice that comes to the employee’s attention in order that remedial action may be taken.

Upon discovery of improperly secured classified information or of other security incidents, the responsible security officer must complete Form OF-117, Notice of Security Incident. This form is unclassified and must be prepared as comprehensively and accurately as possible”.

OF-117s must abound in the State Department with Hillary Clinton’s name all over them Since most assuredly she recognized the egregious violations that were taking place by other government employees sending her highly classified information over her un-secure, un-encrypted server.

You see, every government employee entrusted with a security clearance which provides them access to highly classified information has a legal obligation to report security violations committed by other individuals that they may become aware of during the course of their duties. Even only receiving classified information over an unsecured, un-encrypted e-mail system is a security violation committed by somebody!

It was also incumbent upon her to report each instance as it occurred – over three hundred so far and counting – so that the violation could be properly investigated and the person responsible disciplined, or possibly prosecuted if appropriate. At the very least those responsible should have their security clearances revoked due to their failure to follow government security regulations, negligence, and mishandling of classified information.

The former secretary of state or the State Department need to merely produce all of the records of her reporting these serious security violations, and Hillary is home free. Certainly an easy task, one would think.

By the way, for those who have never worked in government service nor handled classified information on a daily basis, information that is Top Secret just isn’t transmitted and received over an un-secured, un-encrypted e-mail system.

You simply can’t do it without taking extraordinary steps to do so. And there’s a reason for that, which is to prevent the accidental transmittal of highly classified materials over an un-secured, un-encrypted system. Government employees take protecting our national secrets very seriously. Or at least some of our government employees do.

There’s also a government agency that spends millions, if not billions of dollars a year to protect our military and diplomatic communications from being read by others. And they go to great lengths to insure that government employees follow the proper procedures to protect classified information, and our communications systems remain secure and safe from foreign interception.

But perhaps the California senator was simply more interested in trying to protect a fellow Democrat, than in protecting the secrets of this nation. Perhaps Sen. Feinstein needs to review her own obligations as the holder of a national security clearance, which also requires the fine senator to report any security violations she becomes aware of.

So while I appreciate your loyalty to party, Sen. Feinstein, I would appreciate your loyalty to the United States of America much more. Perhaps it’s time you review the same government security regulations that guided former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, since based on your comments it would seem you’re not quite up to speed on what the regulations governing classified information are.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; US: Arkansas; US: California; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 114th; 2016election; arkansas; california; dianefeinstein; diannefeinstein; election2016; emailscandal; hillaryclinton; hitlery; newyork; wipewater
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 08/20/2015 8:14:57 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
It cannot be loyalty that compels DiFi.

After all, there is no honor among thieves and crooks.

Perhaps Hillary still has her file.

2 posted on 08/20/2015 8:18:06 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Sen. Feinstein is overdue for a public hanging.


3 posted on 08/20/2015 8:18:10 AM PDT by Noumenon (Resistance. Restoration. Retribution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon

Past time or this one to crawl back wherever she came from.


4 posted on 08/20/2015 8:28:06 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Convicts will tell you they aren’t homosexual even though they engaged in homosexual acts because they were on the receiving end. I never quite understood that logic.


5 posted on 08/20/2015 8:30:09 AM PDT by KirbDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

By the way, for those who have never worked in government service nor handled classified information on a daily basis, information that is Top Secret just isn’t transmitted and received over an un-secured, un-encrypted e-mail system.

You simply can’t do it without taking extraordinary steps to do so. ===

You have to physically copy files to a portable device, then copy them onto your ‘personal’ server.

Like Bradley Manning. Or Caytlin Manning, or whatever.

Hillary Clinton. Maybe in the Pen she can get a Govt funded Trans operation. Change her name to ???


6 posted on 08/20/2015 8:32:08 AM PDT by Scrambler Bob (Using 4th keyboard due to wearing out the "/" and "s" on the previous 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I presume that the California senator is trying to make some kind of point that if Hillary Clinton only ‘received’ classified e-mails, then she’s guilt-free.

The Meaning Of "Is"...

7 posted on 08/20/2015 8:33:47 AM PDT by Old Sarge (I prep because DHS and FEMA told me it was a good idea...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Feinstein and her husband are both crooks.

Feinstein is likely a supporter of the deadly, treasonous Deal with Iran, despite the fact that she’s Jewish.


8 posted on 08/20/2015 8:35:20 AM PDT by onyx (PLEASE Support FR - GO MONTHLY - Join CLUB 300 - God bless FR's Donors!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
5. Using unsecure email accounts to send and receive sensitive corporate information.

Large corporations invest huge amounts of money to ensure that their computer networks and email remain secure. Despite their efforts, careless employees using personal email accounts to conduct company business and pass along sensitive data can undermine the security measures in place. So make sure that you don't risk your company's security, and your job, by transmitting sensitive company data via your own personal computer or email address.

From an article on the 25 most common mistakes using email.

9 posted on 08/20/2015 8:39:55 AM PDT by immadashell (The inmates are running the asylum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If Sen. Feinstein is indicating that SoS Clinton only received classified docs, the Sen. Feinstein had knowledge of such at the time. Implicating herself in a breach of security.

This would make her complicit with HRC.

Hang them both.


10 posted on 08/20/2015 8:42:18 AM PDT by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; All
Dear Sen. Feinstein:

 photo IQtest.jpg

Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help To Keep FR In The Battle !!


Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


11 posted on 08/20/2015 8:43:18 AM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Folks , remember already in testimony is the fact that Pratt wrote software to circumvent the system so SENATORS could access Clinton

Loyalty my butt, she will be found to be complicit


12 posted on 08/20/2015 8:46:22 AM PDT by advertising guy (Mitch Mc Connell is a liar just as sure as Jenny McCarthy is a whore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Terrorism Suspect: “I detonated that nuclear weapon in downtown Los Angeles. I meant to do it because I wanted to kill millions. I am an Islamic Jihadist and I hate America.”

Diane Feinstein (upon learning that the Terrorism Suspect is a Democrat: “This person didn’t commit an act of terror. All they did was plant the bomb and set it off. They clearly are not responsible. We need to ban guns, is what we need to do. In no way was Islam involved, besides, it was an accident. If the NRA would just dry up and go away, we could ban assault weapons, which have killed many more 2 year old infants than death itself. This was not an act of terror. This person clearly states they love America. Ban guns.”


13 posted on 08/20/2015 8:49:41 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Dear Jeb Bush..... Trump upped his game. Up yours!.... Love, Laz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Feinstein tells us that Clinton only received
classified Emails on that server. OK, Diane,
then please tell us how Clinton transmitted
classified Emails.


14 posted on 08/20/2015 8:50:27 AM PDT by Sivad (NorCal red turf ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: advertising guy

Loyalty my butt, she will be found to be complicit


Yup


15 posted on 08/20/2015 8:52:57 AM PDT by samtheman (2014: Voters elect Repubs to congress... 2015: Repubs defund NOTHING... 2016: Trump/Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
What does she think she's doing, running for president?

16 posted on 08/20/2015 9:22:03 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
May she soon join “president” Carter. She has done inestimable damage to both California and the country, and has helped her third husband get filthy rich off of the rest of us. Dan White shot the wrong person.
17 posted on 08/20/2015 10:14:45 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Literally stepped over Harvey Milk and Don Moscone’s bodies to win the job. Not sure how she lives with herself.


18 posted on 08/20/2015 10:17:02 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Was wondering if the Senator is troubled that the Secretary of State did not use a State Department e-mail account.


19 posted on 08/20/2015 10:28:02 AM PDT by Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Was wondering if the Senator is troubled that the Secretary of State did not use a State Department e-mail account.


20 posted on 08/20/2015 10:28:36 AM PDT by Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson