That's what I call a "target-rich environment".
Posted on 07/27/2015 1:51:16 AM PDT by Kaslin
Republicans fear a repeat of 1992, with a squishy Bush at the head of the ticket watching helplessly as some populist businessman/novelty act hands the election to a Clinton. But Democrats should fear the far more likely repeat of 1968.
Ah, the 1968 convention … just thinking of it brings a smile to the face of every normal American. Let’s start with hordes of Chicago cops kicking the psychedelia out of dirty hippies. Footage of all-American flatfoots clocking VC-flag waving pinkos with nightsticks is more erotic than a hundred “Fifty Shades” books. Just thinking about it makes me want to light up a Marlboro and cuddle.
Then there was the fun and games inside the convention hall – nothing like blue stater on blue stater fratricide to quicken the pulse and put a spring in your step. That glorious intramural warfare led to a Republican president. It may well again in 2016.
Back in 1968, the Democrat Party was divided between liberals who loved America and liberals who hated everything about it. The situation is a little different now, with today’s Democrat Party divided between liberals who hate everything about America and liberals who really, really hate everything about it.
The delightful scene at Netroots where Martin O’Malley was forced to do penance before a jeering crowd of washed-out undergrads for the sin of saying “All lives matter” was a harbinger of the future. The Democrats are on the verge of being sucked into their own vortex of progressive insanity that will bar them from any chance to reach out of their psychotic echo chamber to normal Americans. It serves them right.
Hillary doesn’t need this. Her poll numbers are plummeting – gee, who would have thought that a corrupt, condescending, commie shrew might be unpopular? Hillary is America’s First Wife, a sour, sexless, disapproving presence eager to spend the next eight years telling us all how we are failing to measure up to her exacting standards.
She’s also what passes for diversity among the Democratic candidates, and then only because she is one of those woman women, the kind of woman that has woman DNA and not just a whim to be a chick today.
Of course, while she started out thinking the whole XX chromosome thing was going to win it all for her, the freak show that is her base decided to go off-script and force the Democrat candidates to pretend that the activists aren’t all stark raving mad. That’s why Hillary is simultaneously trying to suck-up to the activist community you’d think a Democrat would have nailed down while also keeping the hell away so no one can jump on stage with her and ask her terrifying questions like, “So, do white lives matter?”
That’s why she hides where she knows she will be safe from unwelcome questions and unplanned queries – behind the mainstream media, where she’s among friends and allies. She’ll just try to make sure they photograph her carrying a copy of that new Ta-Nehisi Coates book all liberals have to buy and pretend to read.
For the last few years, the progressives have tried to behave themselves and not totally embarrass Barack Obama – much like the filthy hippies did when they tried to go “Clean for Gene” McCarthy in 1968. Of course, Obama largely ignored them and their demands until the last mid-term was over and it didn’t matter much anyway. Now these jilted jerks are determined not to make the same mistake with Hillary. Poor Hillary – she wanted to talk about glass ceilings and spend her Goldman Sachs cash right up until she moved back into the White house and suddenly she’s faced with a much more boring, 2016 version of the Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test.
Yes, if she wants to keep ahold of her base and any chance of winning, Her Highness is going to have to try to decipher the ever-changing cryptography of leftist priorities. Do black lives matter more than brown ones? How about if someone has a limp … is that worth a couple extra points on the oppression scale? And what about LGBTQ lives – how much do they matter with respect to Pacific-Islanders lives? And is the acronym “LGBTQ” even enough, or is she unforgivably forgetting several more letters representing other oppressed classes of esoteric gender identity contortionists and exotic sexual practitioners?
But turning on Team Social Justice Fascism means turning off the normals. Hillary wanted to be reaching out to regular Americans and now she has to kiss up to millennial twerps with 500,000 Twitter followers who babble about “privilege.” Regular Americans are going to be super excited to hear how they are morally deficient solely because their great-great-great grandfather hailed from Stuttgart.
And that whole War on Women thing is going to fall a little flat now that Hillary’s allies got caught on tape swilling cabernet and giggling about their war crimes. Despite what those in her little circle of abortionophilics think, normal people are disgusted and appalled at the thought of a tax parasite organization supplementing its government subsidies by dismembering babies and auctioning off the chunks.
Nineteen sixty-eight was the year normal Americans saw the Democrats for what they were, and that’s the danger for them in 2016 too – that normal Americans will be reminded about what a circus of welfare-chiseling, race-obsessed, work-averse, baby-shredding freaks the Democrat party is.
So keep fighting for purity, Democrats – your painful cramming to pass your dozens of litmus tests is going to provide us with endless amusement. And don’t worry about us Republicans – it’s actually pretty easy to pass ours. You’re disqualified if you have ever given money or a medal to Hillary Clinton. After that, we can talk.
Sad thing is, our politicians have ALL moved to the left. Now, it’s the republicans who have the Love Americans vs. Hate Americans fight.
This is the United States of America. We have the God-given right to express our opinions-—to agree or disagree -——as WE see fit.
Republican candidates honor our freedoms-—and our system of govt-—by having open disputes.
OTOH-—Democrats are a bunch of lock-stepping liberals——falling in line for all the liberal atrocities including illegal onslaughts and abortion barbarism.....the stench is reminiscent of 1940s-era Europe.
With Hillary and Bill in the WH, one can imagine compulsory heel-clicking and saluting.
That's what I call a "target-rich environment".
So his entire rant was an attack on Trump. Boy the mediots will do anything to keep that border open.
Pray America is waking
True. I copied this from another site, so, I’m not the author - however, I find it amusing.
Avatar
Yale U concerndcitizen • 18 hours ago
The all-star geriatric Liberal Lineup:
1. “Dead Broke” server-erasing murderer Hillary Clinton, age 68
2. 0.0005% Indian Chief: Elizabeth “Lieawatha” Warren, age 66
3. wife-groping, “kRAzY Uncle” Joe Biden who may or may not be smarter than a box of rocks, age 74
4. Bernie Sanders: Run the country? He doesn’t even know how to run a comb through his hair! age 73
Actually a very good rant. Not really an attack on any GOP at all.
You gotta believe they truly represent their constituents.
I think I would have said that Joe Biden isn’t smarter than a 5th grader.
That’s what’s called the “two-party system”....the system of checks and balances.....goes back to the Doges in Venice.
I pine for an America defined by people who quietly and faithfully go about their days, caring for their families, serving their employers and leaving a legacy an American Dream fulfilled.
We now seem to be defined by pretty faces and clever minds who flood us with endless oceans of words, promising something lasting, only to evaporate into meaninglessness.
The America that found meaning and victory in the struggles of the 20th century is no longer and will never be again.
A perverse ugly Franken Nation is emerging from it's corpse.
“A perverse ugly Franken Nation is emerging from it’s corpse.”
Symbolized by the “election” of Al Franken.
a) Been too stupid to realize what's been going on.
b) Knows what's going on and agrees with it because they are globalist/NWO sympathizers.
c) Knows what's going on but can't do anything because of PAC/lobbyist promises.
d) Knows what's going on, doesn't like it, but has no idea what to do.
e) Knows what's going on, but is preoccupied with trying to get re-elected.
f) Doesn't care.
Beautiful!!
Your post brings tears of true joy for me.
In spite of all of this, look how close the Popular Vote was in the 1968 Election. Note also: With a Third Party Candidate running well, the GOP Candidate still won.
Richard Nixon Spiro Agnew Republican 31,783,783 43.42%
Hubert Humphrey Edmund Muskie Democratic 31,271,839 42.72%
George Wallace Curtis LeMay American Ind. 9,901,118 13.53%
Hillary Clinton uses Iwo Jima imagery in her new global warming video [video]
Posted at 8:27 pm on July 26, 2015 by Twitchy Staff | View Comments
I guarantee the U.S. Marine Corps begs to differ. 
Now, that is funny.
We are all California now.
I predicted it long ago.
for later
Hey, kids, it's time for our weekly remedial lesson in basic political math.
In 2012, Romney lost the popular vote by 4%, in spite of winning 59% of the white vote.
The “Conservatives Stayed Home In 2012” claim is completely false.
What actually happened was that 4.5 million “white” voters stayed home. Who were they? From a statistical point of view, Obama lost 5.5 million white votes in 2012. Romney got 1 million more white votes than McCain got. Bottom line: 4.5 million white Obama voters stayed home.
Between 2012 and 2016.....
3 million more immigrants will become citizens. 80% of them will vote for the Democrat nominee (although their turn out will be quite low).
About 10 million people will die. A solid majority of them will be white Republicans, who turned out to vote in very high numbers.
About 17 million youngsters will turn 18 years of age. About half that group will be non-white minorities. They will vote just like their parents, about 75% for the Democrat. Young white voters (18-22) voted 50% for Romney in 2012.
Bottom Line - if the Democrats can turn out their core voting groups in 2016, they have enough LEGAL voters to easily win the Electoral College, and they can probably move the U.S. Senate back to about 50-50.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.