Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evidence Now Is Conclusive That Obama And Hillary Should Be Indicted And Put On Trial For TREASON
Freedom Outpost ^ | 5/19/2015 | Walid Shoebat

Posted on 05/22/2015 4:39:10 AM PDT by HomerBohn

Judicial Watch announced today that it "obtained more than 100 pages of previously classified "Secret" documents from the Department of Defense (DOD)and the Department of State, revealing that DOD almost immediately reported that the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi was committed by the al Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood-linked "Brigades of the Captive Omar Abdul Rahman" (BCOAR), and had been planned at least 10 days in advance."

Judicial Watch added what has been proven and obvious for years—that "Benghazi attack" was "not about a response to an anti-Muhammad video" or was it "the protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo" and that A Defense Department document dated September 12, 2012, the day after the Benghazi attack, details that the attack on "the compound had been carefully planned by the BOCAR terrorist group" "to kill as many Americans as possible."

While Judicial Watch did a fantastic job in proving that this document was sent to "then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Obama White House National Security Council," but what the Defense Department revealed was nothing new.

The heavily redacted Defense Department "information report" says that the attack on the Benghazi facility "was planned and executed by The Brigades of the Captive Omar Abdul Rahman (BCOAR)."

The evidence for all this was already released, by Shoebat.com (while doubted by idiots) in 2012, which was researched with assistance from Libyan intelligence sources from which Shoebat.com not only obtained this confirmation but also sent findings to the National Center For Intelligence and Counter-Terrorism, a 'huff-and-puff' agency Shoebat.com dealt with, and to be frank, were unfit of being street sweepers.

This agency threw the valuable intelligence sources from Libya under the bus, an intelligence that not only helped resolve details about Benghazi, but would pin-point terrorist weapons cache with latitude and longitude accuracy. This was a team of x-Qaddafi intelligence who desired nothing more than to reverse U.S. policy in Libya and exposed the very assassins of Americans during the Benghazi affair. These were the true heroes and not these 'street-sweepers.'

The Department of Defense agency's information was lacking that the Muslim Brotherhood's involvement stems from the top. Mohammad Morsi's involvement in his defense for the blind Sheikh and his Egyptian Ansar Al-Sharia's branch involvement with Ansar Al-Sharia in Libya, the very element that attacked the U.S. in Bebghazi which later became ISIS itself.

The countless documents and evidence Shoebat.com provided on this issue was immense and took years to compile. There should be no doubt now regarding the year's worth: 450 reports on Benghazi affair alone.

And just for one little example out of thousands, Shoebat.com reported in detailed evidence on how the Salafists and the Muslim Brotherhood under Morsi planned the attack on U.S. embassies prior to 9/11/2012.

This is an agency (the Defense Department) who did not reveal everything and does not know how to spell such names as Al-Libi, whom we reported on (which they spell Alaliby), Sufian Gammu (which they spell GUMMA), or Abdul Baset Azzouz (which they spell AZUZ). All this hush-hush in both media and government, which we exposed long ago with detailed evidence, and it takes a court order to confirm this joke:

What can be obtained from newspapers on the streets of the Middle East was not as "classified," information we provided with immense detail including better classified documents from Middle Eastern sources.

The American reader would read: "A violent radical," the DIA report says, is "the leader of BCOAR is Abdul Baset ((AZUZ)), AZUZ was sent by ((ZAWARI)) to set up Al Qaeda (AQ) bases in Libya."

Really?

Did we just now need a confirmation that "member of the Muslim brotherhood movement…where they have large caches of weapons …" and was involved in Benghazi?

Shoebat.com working with x-intelligence officers had reported on Abdul Baset Azzouz (AZUZ) back in 2012: "Known for his vicious and cunning abilities, he was the first adviser to Ayman Al-Zawahiri and became the leader of Al-Qaeda in Darnah, Libya. He can be seen in this video, giving his testimony from Libya (wearing yellow). Azzouz can even be seen recruiting entire communities in Libya to join the jihadists."

In our Libyan Leaks: More Secret Documents Reveal Obama's Failure In Libya, "Sufyan Gammu of Ansar Al-Sharia in Darnah (white cap and long beard) is one of the most wanted men from Al-Qaeda. He used to be the special driver for Usama Bin Laden and is now roaming free in Libya, protected by the government."

Shoebat.com detailed research in 2013, investigated Benghazi and determined that the Muslim Brotherhood and Ansar Al-Sharia with branches in Libya and in Egypt were the main hand in the attack.

From as far back as July 27, 2012, even before the Benghazi attack itself, other Americans warned about the threats of the Blind Sheikh's son that appeared in the Egypt Independent:

The son of Omar Abdel Rahman, a Jama'a al-Islamiya leader known as the "Blind Sheikh" who was convicted of terrorism charges in the US in 1995, threatened to organize a protest at the US Embassy in Cairo and detain the employees inside.

Abdallah Abdel Rahman's threat came during a press conference organized by the sheikh's family near the highly fortified American embassy compound on Thursday evening.

Abdel Rahman demanded that President Mohamed Morsy intervene for the release of his father as he did in the case of Egyptian journalist Shaimaa Adel who was detained for nearly two weeks for covering protests in Sudan then flown back to Egypt on a plane with Morsy.

In fact, the Blind Sheikh's son was threatening to kidnap Americans from the U.S. embassy in Cairo to exchange for his father and was calling on Morsi to get involved. Shoebat.com provided EXHIBIT A and EXHIBIT B with video, shot in real time during the attack in which gunmen can be heard shouting, that they were sent by Morsi, the very terrorist whom now the State Department is in bed with is also the very terrorists, it now defends. Some even attempted to refute our findings but failed, not knowing how to spell a word of Arabic.

The other is a document that implicates Ansar al-Sharia Egypt, which clearly had representatives outside the U.S. Embassy in Cairo on 9/11/12. Another Egypt Independent article, dated April 10, 2012, is being submitted as EXHIBIT Z2.

So now, and thanks to Judicial Watch, we all know that:

"The first official documentation that the Obama administration knew that weapons were being shipped from the Port of Benghazi to rebel troops in Syria. An October 2012 report confirms: Weapons from the former Libya military stockpiles were shipped from the port of Benghazi, Libya to the Port of Banias and the Port of Borj Islam, Syria. The weapons shipped during late-August 2012 were Sniper rifles, RPG's, and 125 mm and 155mm howitzers missiles."

Another DIA report, written in August 2012, said that the opposition in Syria was driven by al Qaeda and other extremist Muslim groups: "the Salafist, the Muslim Brotherhood, and AQI [Al-Qaeda in Iraq] are the major forces driving the insurgency in Syria."

Judicial Watch concluded: The growing sectarian direction of the war was predicted to have dire consequences for Iraq, which included the "grave danger" of the rise of ISIS.

Some of the "dire consequences" are blacked out but the DIA presciently warned one such consequence would be the "renewing facilitation of terrorist elements from all over the Arab world entering into Iraqi Arena."

Judicial Watch concludes:

"…why would the Obama administration continue to support the Muslim Brotherhood even after it knew it was tied to the Benghazi terrorist attack and to al Qaeda? These documents also point to connection between the collapse in Libya and the ISIS war – and confirm that the U.S. knew remarkable details about the transfer of arms from Benghazi to Syrian jihadists," stated Tom Fitton, Judicial Watch president. "These documents show that the Benghazi cover-up has continued for years and is only unraveling through our independent lawsuits. The Benghazi scandal just got a whole lot worse for Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton."

We as a nation, claim that we are fighting terrorists. How so? Especially when the terrorists are in the White House and in the State Department as well.

God is watching.


TOPICS: Canada; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia; US: South Carolina; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2016election; benghazi; canada; clintoncash; clintonfoundation; election2016; evilobamaregime; hillaryandbarack; hillaryclinton; hillarymb; hillarytreason; hitlery; impeachnow; iran; irs; jw; liars; libya; loislerner; mbinfiltration; muslimbrotherhood; obamamb; obamatreason; pages; peterschweizer; russia; southcarolina; traitors; treygowdy; uranium; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: Starboard

We (FR) are the choir no need to preach. But look at what are portrayed as extremely conservative areas. South Carolina for instance. They vote GOP. They voted for an Air Force officer for Senate. That senator being mega RINO ‘Linda’ Graham. Go figure the mind set....I can’t.


21 posted on 05/22/2015 6:16:50 AM PDT by Vaquero ( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Amazing how the info in this document fits right in with the cover up as originally planned.

The attack wasn’t supposed to involve killing everyone but taking hostages.

Hillary and the Obama adm was then supposed to claim it was a “spontaneous” response to a video protest in Egypt.

No one above the level of idiot was supposed to believe the “spontaneous” lie.

The left wing social media would then be set on fire with claims of right wing extremist collaborating with the terrorist to make Obama look like Peanuts Carter.

Republicans would then hold congressional hearing and come to the conclusion the terrorist had simply picked from the news the dems honoring Peanuts Carter at their convention and planned the attack in a short period of time.

Democrats would get a cover up for their collaborating with muslim terrorist and republicans would get a cover up for helping to supply weapons to muslim terrorist.

When the dems first announced their intention of honoring Peanuts Carter at their convention several months before the attack is the time when the planned attack was put into motion, not the 10-20 days as claimed.


22 posted on 05/22/2015 6:26:06 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Hear, hear!


23 posted on 05/22/2015 6:42:20 AM PDT by mcshot (I pray someone comes forth with the strength, fortitude and burning desire to save our Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

REGARDLESS of the outcome.... obama should be impeached.
Let senators refuse to in the face of hard evidence... they will not give up crony kickbacks and stealing for obama ... he is finished... clintoon belongs in prison for their aiding and abetting al queda / the muslim brotherhood and isis.. THEY MUST PAYT HE PRICE... OTHERS DID WITH THEIR LIVES SENT ON PHONY MISSIONS IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH WHAT THE WHITE HOUSE WAS REALLY DOING BEHIND OUR BACKS..
OABAMA AND CLINTON = BENEDICT ARNOLD


24 posted on 05/22/2015 6:43:39 AM PDT by zzwhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Nonsense.


25 posted on 05/22/2015 6:45:10 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (Of those born of women there is not risen one greater than John The Baptist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Please remember socialism is it’s own worst enemy. It has failed everywhere it has been tried. While the foolish (now estimated to be around 47%) are temporarily satisfied to vote ‘D’, expecting something more for nothing. They will ultimately be left dissatisfied with their ill-gotten prosperity and left holding an empty bag. The law of diminishing returns is a proven reality in this universe as is the concept of equilibrium. Those that fail to understand that are doomed.


26 posted on 05/22/2015 6:55:49 AM PDT by Texicanus (Texas, it's like a whole 'nother country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texicanus

Oops, wrong post...nevermind.


27 posted on 05/22/2015 6:58:23 AM PDT by Texicanus (Texas, it's like a whole 'nother country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Not one democrat Catholic will change their voting because of the criminal enterprise being exposed. Democrat Catholics have no fear of God and throw their support for the evil in with some of the most depraved beings in America. Without millions of democrat Catholics supporting and approving the degenerate democrat politicians, the Democrap party would be a footnote in History.


28 posted on 05/22/2015 7:03:18 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texicanus

For many of us time is running out. We don’t have time for decades to pass and cities to crumble.

We need drastic change now in order to have hope.


29 posted on 05/22/2015 7:09:14 AM PDT by HomerBohn (When did it change from "We the people" to "screw the people" ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

I think this election cycle will tell us all we need to know about America’s future.


30 posted on 05/22/2015 7:18:02 AM PDT by Texicanus (Texas, it's like a whole 'nother country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero; HomerBohn

NO, NO that’s to lenient and will go NOWHERE. He need to physical be removed by Marshals and transfer to GITMO in waiting and......THEN !

Ten days of knowing proves that Admiral Lyons is right!!

They were arranging a kidnapping stunt of Amb. Stevens in exchange for the blind Sheik to solidify the re-election (”selection”). But Patriots Navy Seals were not calculated into the stunt!!!


31 posted on 05/22/2015 7:50:15 AM PDT by danamco (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie; HomerBohn

I’m total baffled every morning waking up to another nightmare!!!

In the country’s 200+ years history has there ever been such greed of CORRUPTIONS and treasons???


32 posted on 05/22/2015 7:53:39 AM PDT by danamco (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: iontheball; HomerBohn

During that time of secretary Jezebel (who was eaten by dogs) WHY were the tree+ dozens CIA in Benghazi and what were they doing there. Any further questions???


33 posted on 05/22/2015 7:57:29 AM PDT by danamco (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350; HomerBohn

What Admiral Lyons has been saying fits this narrative!!!


34 posted on 05/22/2015 8:01:14 AM PDT by danamco (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: zzwhale; HomerBohn

NO, NO........ REMOVED!!!


35 posted on 05/22/2015 8:02:30 AM PDT by danamco (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Come on Homer,
It ain’t illegal for the gub mint to lie to you,
It is illegal for you to lie to the gub mint.
Hill and obammy lie to us All the damn time now.


36 posted on 05/22/2015 8:07:59 AM PDT by Joe Boucher ( Obammy is a lie, a mooselimb and pond scum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: danamco

I haven’t heard what he was saying, but it’s good to know.

Four weeks ago when the MSM started targeting the Clintons with their money laundering operation all at the same time as if on cue it should have been a clue to everyone something was in the works.

By targeting the Clintons the MSM was trying to discredit a document that explains where the spontaneous lie came from.

The doc comes directly from Osama bin Laden and he tells you exactly were to look for the preparations for the terrorist attacks but not the preparations being made by the terrorist overseas but the preparations being made by people in this country.

The doc says the media, meaning the news, is 90% of the preparation for the battle(attack), in other words our news media at the direction of Hillary Clinton has been orchestrating news stories as preparation for the attacks.

By targeting the Clintons with their money laundering operation the news media is trying to create the impression the Clintons don’t control the content of the news so the Osama bin Laden doc couldn’t mean the news is being orchestrated for the terrorist attacks. The terrorist would have to be picking up on news stories and planning the attacks around what is in the news.

Problem is the airline plot several months before the Benghazi attack, the news media orchestrated a news story which resulted in protest which were orchestrated by the Obama WH and the terrorist then gave the govt agent the bomb for the attack and told him to time the bombing when he wanted it to take place.

There was no spontaneous protest followed by a spontaneous terrorist attack.

Obama controlled both the protest and the timing of when to announce the terrorist bomb plot.


37 posted on 05/22/2015 9:36:57 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn; hoosiermama; EnigmaticAnomaly; Califreak; kalee; TWhiteBear; freeangel; Godzilla; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Evidence Now Is Conclusive That Obama And Hillary Should Be Indicted And Put On Trial For TREASON

Check out article, - and # 6.

Thanks, hoosiermama.

38 posted on 05/22/2015 12:15:29 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Since day one when the issue of Benghazi popped up, I was saying any attack with pincer movement and heavy weapons is not a spontaneous event. It had to be preplanned. The You Tube Video explanation was so total BS only an uninformed voter would eat it up. Then I thought what was the motive? Not trying to be a conspiracy nut, I remembered Morsi of Egypt asking Obama to release the “Blind Sheik. So now we find out that “the Brigades of the Captive Omar Rahman” were behind it. Well DUHHHH!!!. You knew there were Egyptians involved, and you should have also known that Egyptian President wanted Rahman’s release. Kinda easy to put the pieces together. Since it would not be popular for our POTUS to just release him, what could they do to arrange it? Maybe arrange to kidnap, the Ambassador and trade him for the Blind Sheik? Why couldn’t they do it?? Because Doughty and Woods weren’t in the loop. Any wonder why they weren’t too warm to the parents when the coffins came back with the bodies, and why they won’t discuss it with their families? OMG if that ever got out, disaster! Conspiracy? Not to me, it stunk then, and eventually the air will clear. We’ll see where it goes, it ain’t over until its over and the Fat Lady becomes President. I just wonder what Sisi of Egypt has in his folder? I hope he keeps it locked up until Oct 16’.


39 posted on 05/22/2015 1:45:53 PM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (2016 The RNC better come up with a Winner this time. Run some one like Cruz and Go for Broke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ethan Clive Osgoode

We live 9 miles from Canada, so needless to say we’ve been there zillions of times. Our most recent trip was into their deep north where basically Indian towns exist. Very friendly people, easy to get along with. No apparent Gestapo.

Their east and west coasts are just like ours, lib filled and their socialism is deeper than ours. Their gun rights appear to be more limited. Their government is not banana republic corrupt like ours.

But their northern outposts are the place to be. Even if the SHTF, it would be better than our Idaho or Montana wilderness.

Of note, the Soviets seemingly gave their Siberian natives much more slack than the heavy populated or agricultural areas. I’m inclined to believe the heavy duty commies here would do the same. Their hands would be full trying to keep order in the big metro areas and down south.

So yes, Canada would be it, but the central northern most provinces, such as Manitoba or Saskatchewan.


40 posted on 05/22/2015 8:42:28 PM PDT by redfreedom (All it takes for evil to win is for good people to do nothing - that's how the left took over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson