Posted on 04/03/2015 12:35:09 PM PDT by doug from upland
VIDEO AT THE LINK
Gay conservative Tammy Bruce has just been awesome about criticizing those on the left who are attacking Christians for practicing their faith. Here’s her interview from the Hannity Show last night:
Read more: http://therightscoop.com/gay-bullies-attacking-christians-goes-against-what-every-civil-rights-movement-was-about-tammy-bruce/#ixzz3WHDRhFX1
Also the Italian designers Domenico Dolce and Stefano Gabbana have comported themselves somewhat honorably in the homosexual culture war.
Tammy is one of the good people
Homo’s thought they had the upper hand.They are so wrong.
The silent majority will not remain such on this issue!
The homosexuals may reach the point where they jump the shark.
I think a silent majority in America sees that homosexuals are not discriminated against, and their complaints are bogus.
There has never been a better time to be openly homosexual in America than right now. There has never been more sexual freedom, to be open about those issues, than there is today.
Yet against that backdrop, radical homosexuals are inventing things to bitch about. This really rubs a lot of us the wrong way.
There is a silent majority which may be afraid to speak out too much, due to political correctness.
But I think that majority is silently simmering about seeing businesses shut down, just to appease a homosexual. Not due to anyone being denied any rights, but, just because homosexuals are pissed off.
Well, let’s pray for her. Tammy is (perhaps) not far from the Kingdom of God.
Apparently, all that legally-mandated "acceptance" hasn't made them feel any better about themselves.
Good graphic at #3 (which I just stole).
I think a silent majority is simmering about that, and a lot of other things. I can’t wait till the simmering pot boils over. Let’s get it over with.
Steal away.
Loved that song.
It has not and it never will.
They are meanaholics.
“There is a silent majority which may be afraid to speak out too much, due to political correctness.”
Silenced by the PC movement, which goes to the root of the narrative problems.
That is the difference between gay and homosexual in my book. A gay person will not try to force their views on others while a homosexual will demand you cater to their every demand.
The black establishment sure is awful quiet...
The political problem the homosexuals have in this issue is that they don’t realize that their cause is not THE cause. They don’t realize they are simply being used by the left as a tool to criminalize Christians.
Home viewing bookmark
With all due respect to Tammy Bruce, beware of civil rights movements!
Civil rights movements must be based on constitutionally enumerated rights imo. All too often corrupt federal politicians have successfully won votes from low-information voters by promising such voters federal protections on issues that the states have actually never delegated to Congress, expressly via the Constitution, particularly the 14th Amendment (14A), the specific power to address.
As a side note to unconstitutional federal civil rights laws, please consider this. Unconstitutional, vote-winning federal civil rights laws probably wouldn’t be a problem if the state lawmakers hadn’t ratified the ill-conceived 17th Amendment, foolishly giving up the voices of state lawmakers by doing so.
Getting back to civil rights, consider the following. If a civil rights movement is reasonably justified but not supported by constitutinally enumerated rights, then it’s probably time to amend the Constitution to enumerate new rights.
As previously mentioned, what we don’t want is for the corrupt, popularly elected Senate to work in cahoots with the corrupt House to establish vote-winning civil rights outside the framework of the Constitution.
For example, note that the only race-based issue that the states have constitutionally authorized the feds to protect is voting rights as evidenced by the 15th Amendment.
On the other hand, religious expression is a constitutionally enumerated right which the states are constitutionally obligated to respect. This is evidenced by Section 1 of 14A.
14th Amendment, Section 1:All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States [emphasis added]; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Note that the “privileges or immunities” term which John Bingham, the main author of Section 1, used in that section is just another way to refer to constitutionally enumerated rights, most of these well-known rights, including 1st Amendment-protected freedom of religious expression, listed in the Bill of Rights.
Also note that Section 5 of 14A authorizes Congress to make laws like the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
Next, consider that post FDR-era activist justices have wrongly expanded Congress’s power to deal with civil rights outside the framework of the Constitution. Justices did so as a consequence of the twisted interpretation of Congress’s Commerce Clause powers in Wickard v. Filburn, FDR’s thug justices wrongly deciding that case in corrupt Congress’s favor imo.
Such judicial branch corruption is evidenced by Constitution-respecting justices who had previously clarified that states have never delegated to Congress, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate intrastate Commerce.
”State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphases added].” —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
The 17th Amendment needs to disappear.
Two questions:
1) In this picture, who is the Pizza place and who is the gay lobby?
2) If I asked the same question at Democrat Underground, what would they say?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.